Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

I would like all Members and Guest to view CryptoTravel.biz as this is my company I promote.




Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2019


Federal Supreme: Article 69 of the Central Bank Law does not violate the Constitution

Share
avatar
rocky
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 141010
Thanked : 8594
Join date : 2012-12-21

Federal Supreme: Article 69 of the Central Bank Law does not violate the Constitution

Post by rocky on Tue 13 Feb 2018, 4:23 am

Federal Supreme: Article 69 of the Central Bank Law does not violate the Constitution

Tuesday, February 13,


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


The Federal Supreme Court, Tuesday, that Article 69 of the Central Bank Law No. 56 of 2004 does not violate the Constitution, noting that the addition of legislative text is not within its competence. 

"The Federal Supreme Court held its session and considered the appeal against the unconstitutionality of Article (69) of the Central Bank Law No. (56) of 2004, which states that" the injured party or The parties affected by a decision, order or procedure issued by the Central Bank of Iraq to submit a written request to the court and seek to review the decision .. The application must be submitted within thirty days from the date of the issuance of the resolution or order .. ").




"The plaintiff also asked in his lawsuit to enact a text that requires that the duration of the appeal begins after the decision is informed." 

He pointed out that "the Court found that the text of Article (69) of the Central Bank Law does not violate the Constitution as a legislative option similar to the Civil Procedure Law in relation to decisions issued in the area of ​​accelerated judiciary, and the request to add legislative text from the Federal Supreme Court outside its jurisdiction, And then decided to respond to the lawsuit for not based on the support of the Constitution. "




[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    Current date/time is Sun 18 Nov 2018, 8:20 am