Iran between the law of blocking and penalties
Author: Mohamed Sherif Abu Maysam
30/5/2018 12:00 AM
[rtl]After the US Treasury Department warned of sanctions it could impose on European companies if it continued its trade ties with Iran after US President Donald Trump announced the unilateral cancellation of the nuclear deal with Iran.
EU leaders rushed to take a decision to enforce a law banning European companies from complying with US sanctions on Iran and not recognizing any judicial provisions that would put those sanctions into
Under the resolution, it appears that the US-US alliance is looming over the Iranian issue. Is the US really failing to persuade its allies to withdraw from the nuclear deal with Iran?
Or is there a scenario behind the European reaction, which came to the consensus of EU leaders to work on the so-called "blocking law" that prevents European companies from meeting US sanctions after the United States committed all its partners to a three to six-month deadline to end their belongings and withdraw from Iran.
What is most surprising about the European position is the decision to allow the EIB to facilitate the investments of European companies in Iran and to arrange credit lines in the Euro currency from the EU countries as if this behavior is a message to Iran reassuring about the seriousness of the decision. And transactions and financial exchanges with Iranian companies and government entities
Since the first days of immigration from Britain to the United States, after the discovery of Columbus for the so-called Paradise Earth, through the Marshall Plan after the Second World War, in which the United States spent about Eight billion dollars at the time to return the Western European countries to the bosom of global capitalism after the expansion of communist Eastern Europe, does not exempt us in the context of the objective analysis of the responsibility to consider the reality of common interests, which leads the monopoly of the economy of the Arafat 's first priorities to talk about the common destiny and common desire for global domination, as well as other priorities may be the most important indicators of US investments in EU countries amounting to about 80 percent of the total investments of
Here, NATO's military treaties should be recalled to the level of small wars in the Middle East that have shown indissoluble alliances between these states and the United States. Today, more and more of the confluence of economic interests that form the core of the United States And the European Union countries to the concept of protectionism towards the development of the concepts of globalization of production and globalization of markets, which cause other countries to intrude on the two strategic allies, and try to partner with them in the areas of scientific, economic and military superiority
This modest reading, coupled with a thorough understanding of the merits of the Greater Middle East project and its motives, is likely to be nothing more than an attempt to blackmail an amendment to the text of the nuclear agreement that would put an end to Iran's hostility to the Israeli entity to ensure a greater role for Iran in the Greater Middle East project. The 12 conditions of the United States to return to the negotiating table recently, and the seven conditions of Iran in this context, and what was hinted by "Donald Tusk," President of the European Council, who chaired the meeting of leaders in the Bulgarian capital Sofia, said: "As long as Iran respects the terms of the agreement, Will also respect