Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Call for the presidential system .. Parties "trade" to protest Iran and dictatorship of the majority

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 268431
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Call for the presidential system .. Parties "trade" to protest Iran and dictatorship of the majority Empty Call for the presidential system .. Parties "trade" to protest Iran and dictatorship of the majority

    Post by Rocky Fri 22 Nov 2019, 8:43 am

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    Call for the presidential system .. Parties "trade" to protest Iran and dictatorship of the majority!
    November 21, 2019


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    Transition to a presidential system will allow pro-Iranian Shiite parties to seize power

    Since the beginning of popular demonstrations in early October, which killed hundreds of victims and thousands of wounded, the voices calling for a change in the form of government in Iraq have risen from a parliamentary to a presidential by political parties, amid fears of dragging the country to establish a new dictatorship On the chests of Iraqis and breaks their hopes and future and fail their uprising, which has continued for more than 30 days.
    share
    It is the political blocs close to Iran that have been proactive in calling for a regime change from parliamentary to presidential

    Adding to these concerns among some activists and followers that it is the blocs close to Iran, which was the forerunner in this lawsuit demanding a change of government from parliamentary to presidential, where former Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] in [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] that "the presidential system is the most appropriate in Iraq, considering It is "the beginning of correcting the political process that begins with the constitution."
    Also read:  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    The leader of the conquest bloc Hadi al-Amiri [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] that "the parliamentary system proved its failure and no longer work, and therefore must be adjusted to another system suited to our situation."
     In a reference to the adoption of the presidential system, which was demanded by the bloc recently, and the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] far from this demand, which he repeated in previous years and demanded again a short time ago, as Khazali believes that "the best solution is to be Change the parliamentary system to a presidential system in Iraq. "
    Regardless of the difficulty of adopting a presidential system that requires a constitutional amendment to be agreed upon by all components, especially in the presence of a veto of three provinces that have the right to reject the amendment to the Constitution if it does not live up to it, it opens the controversial question, which is frequently repeated at every crisis in Iraq. The problem is in the form of government or in the political class that has ruled for 16 years? "
    Speaking to Ultra Iraq, UNESCO Professor in Iraq Dr. Hassan Nazim believes that "changing the system from a parliamentary to a presidential is impractical; because it requires a constitutional amendment and unavailable means." Judiciary to "sweep" this corrupt political class, "he put it.
    Asad Shabib, a professor of political thought at the University of Kufa, said in his interview with Ultra Iraq that the parliamentary system provides a relative representation of minorities who fear marginalization and exclusion. It is based on citizenship and represents the values ​​and aspirations of the people, as well as a modern legislative structure such as the law of parties, the rule of law and the separation of powers.
    share
    Some of the demonstrators have adopted the invitation to the presidential system.

    He added that "the political experience in Iraq, which produced utilitarian parties and oligarchy stole people's aspirations to build a state based on equal opportunities, and decent living as well as the long file of financial and administrative corruption because of the process of quotas resulting from the parliamentary and executive consensus, everyone worked in power, explaining." While it is one of the elements of parliamentary systems that there is one party governing and another in opposition. "
    He pointed out that "the goal of demanding the presidential system in light of the escalation of popular protests in Iraq is for the purpose that this system serves some of the partisan parties that want to rule Iraq through force."
    Also read:  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    Sheibib pointed out to "the need to consolidate and legalize the parliamentary system through the rule of law and get rid of the chaos of the party and all its components and its repercussions, including the failure to run the state."
    Regardless of the political ends of the parties calling for changing the parliamentary system into a presidential system, the distortion of this system by the political class that has dominated the political scene since 2003, has led some demonstrators to unload their anger by changing it and adopting the presidential system, according to the researcher interested in political affairs. Hisham al-Mawazni, who told Ultra Iraq that "this demand was adopted by political forces representing the majority and trying to centralize the political decision, I do not expect this transformation to succeed."
     "As for the demands of some of the demonstrators to adopt the presidential system, it is a kind of unconscious revenge on the people of the system, which extended to the system itself."
    For his part, the doctoral student in political science Alaa Radi in his interview with "Ultra Iraq" that "the demand at this time to change the system from parliamentary to presidential reveals two facts; the first ignorance of many of the demanders of what the presidential system, as they think it is free from parliament, the second Is compared to long-established presidential systems in democratic countries. "
     Radi called on political elites and researchers interested in political affairs to take their role in explaining these regimes to protesters to unite their demands, saying, "the elites should take their role and explain what the prevailing political systems adequately for the demonstrators and choose the most appropriate political system according to the nature of Iraqi society and the shape of the federal state and the plurality of nationalities and sects." .
    Sincere calls to resolve the crisis or are attempts to delude the people? 
    The political forces calling for changing the system of government from parliamentary to presidential trying to delude the people that the main problem in Iraq lies in the constitution or in the system of state administration and not in parties and personalities, as evidence that they did not explain what is different in the administration if the parties and blocs remain the same, According to the writer Qais Hassan.
    share
    The purpose of demanding the presidential system in light of the escalating protests in Iraq is for the purpose that this system serves some of the partisan parties that wish to rule Iraq by force

    "What is wrong with the parliamentary system?" Hassan told Ultra Iraq.
    He explained that "the parliamentary system is, in my opinion, the best system suited to the Iraqi situation. Absence of any effort that could remove it from power and used the state and its capabilities to strengthen its influence through illegal and immoral means and methods in achieving this influence, can we replace its behavior in the presidential system, for example?
    Also read:  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    Academic researcher Osama Ghali agrees with Hassan's vision. "Previewing protest is now necessary for the purpose of understanding power in the way of the New World, or the way of French thinker [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] , the composite power, not the official government, " he told Ultra Iraq. The country runs, and when it tries to protest; any revolutionary protest, the salvation of an authority; ".
    He continued, "This is what I understand about power, and this is what I understand about the revolution or the real protest .. So when these elements return to be part of the protest we are about the construction of a new power similar, perhaps more degenerate, and this pointless futility, and perhaps this preview expands to understand the dialectic Demand of the presidential or parliamentary system. "
    Boutros-Ghali explained that "the talk is not in the preference of either of them as much as talking about these elements that push to thwart any opportunity to save the country, regardless of the system of presidential or parliamentary." 
    The presidential system seems closer to the dictatorship or may establish a future and gives the president wide freedom to make decisions that may be misused against his opponents and thus create a political fragmentation that could have serious repercussions for the internal warfare and Iraq bitter experiences with presidential systems that have been tarnished by repeated coups since The Iraqi Republic was founded in 1958 through 2003, according to academic Bashar Hatem al-Zubaidi.
    Zubaidi pointed out that "the president may also arrest all the authorities or put men to do the task with his party control of the Legislative Council and enjoy a broad popular mandate and thus become the three executive, judicial and legislative powers in the hands of one leader or one party and may later become an autocratic system."
    share
    Academic: Becoming a Presidential System Will Allow Pro-Iranian Shia Parties to Capture Power Strongly, Uncensored or Obstructed Under the Motto of Shia Majority

    Al-Zubaidi pointed out that "the presidential system is mostly suitable and harmonious with small and socially harmonious countries. As for a country like Iraq known for its cultural, national and sectarian diversity, the presidential system is not suitable for it due to weak social integration and democratic maturity." To become a dictator who is committed to the chair of power and paves the way for the rule of one of his followers or his family. "
    Also read:  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    Zubaidi explained that "those who call for the presidential system, especially the friends of Iran, are sure that the re-centralization of power will enable them to re-establish a full grip on power and get rid of the plight of quotas requiring the involvement of Sunnis and Kurds in the system of government, which has become a demand that everyone is removed and this step will allow the Shiite parties Pro-Iran seized the reins of power in the country strongly and unchecked or impediments under the slogan that the Shiites constitute the majority in the Iraqi state.
    The presidential system allows the president to excel in everything, unlike the parliamentary system, which imposes many restrictions on the prime minister, Zubaidi said. "Perhaps because the Iranian experience was successful in tightening the grip of power without a parliamentary system since 1979 until today and has not been shaken by any popular movement, Iran and its allies in Iraq have made it possible to overthrow the regime into a president and choose a president to serve the interests of the parties and restrict his freedom of movement also through a range of organs. For example, the Iranian president is restricted according to the rule of velayat-e faqih. Iranian and effectively implemented. "
     [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Fri 19 Apr 2024, 6:27 am