Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Iraq Dinar/News is a popular topic among many topics this board offers.

See the footer of the board for our Facebook and My business pages.

Be sure and join our Dinar Only Newsletter Email list. It is located on the right. Your User Account Email when joining the board is for with in Neno's Place use of board information which you can control in your profile settings.


For "Advertising" with in my board to our Membership and Visitors see our "Sponsor Ad Info" in the Navbar. Neno's Place receives a low of 50,000 views a week to over 100,000 plus many times thru out the year.

I can be reached by phone or text 7am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Longest Dinar holding Community. Reach Admin by Private Message. Copyright © 2006-2017

Ad Space M-1

Board Rules

October 2016


Calendar Calendar

Ad Space M-2

Revv Worldwide

IQD/Oil/Commodities Charts


Ad Space M-3

Top posting users this week

Top posting users this month

Ad Space M-4

Giuliani: Police ‘Don’t Ask if You Are Black or White, They Just Come to Save You!’



Posts : 16589
Thanked : 806
Join date : 2013-01-12

Giuliani: Police ‘Don’t Ask if You Are Black or White, They Just Come to Save You!’

Post by Lobo on Tue 19 Jul 2016, 3:22 pm

Giuliani: Police ‘Don’t Ask if You Are Black or White, They Just Come to Save You!’

Jul. 19, 2016 10:27am Carly Hoilman

Rudy Giuliani praised police officers during his impassioned speech Monday evening at the Republican National Convention, saying they work tirelessly to protect Americans “of every race, every color, every creed, every sexual orientation.”

Image source: Fox News
“When they come to save your life, they don’t ask if you are black or white, they just come to save you!” he shouted.
The former New York City Mayor recently criticized the Black Lives Matter movement, which he says makes police officers targets by blaming them for complex social problems. He also called the movement “inherently racist” and “anti-American.”
“What happened to, ‘There’s no black America, there’s no ‘white America,’ there is just America’?” he asked during his speech.
“It’s time to make America one again — one America!” Giuliani added.
He also said during his speech that presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump will do for the country “what I did for New York.”
Giuliani went on to describe Trump as a good friend, father and grandfather, noting that they’ve been friends for 30 years and that the candidate is “a man with a big heart, who loves people. All people.”

Dedicated Investor
Dedicated Investor

Posts : 164
Thanked : 41
Join date : 2012-12-21

Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

Post by ksp on Tue 19 Jul 2016, 9:24 pm

Continue reading the main story Share This Page
WASHINGTON, June 27 - The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.
The decision, with an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia and dissents from Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, overturned a ruling by a federal appeals court in Colorado. The appeals court had permitted a lawsuit to proceed against a Colorado town, Castle Rock, for the failure of the police to respond to a woman's pleas for help after her estranged husband violated a protective order by kidnapping their three young daughters, whom he eventually killed.
For hours on the night of June 22, 1999, Jessica Gonzales tried to get the Castle Rock police to find and arrest her estranged husband, Simon Gonzales, who was under a court order to stay 100 yards away from the house. He had taken the children, ages 7, 9 and 10, as they played outside, and he later called his wife to tell her that he had the girls at an amusement park in Denver.
Ms. Gonzales conveyed the information to the police, but they failed to act before Mr. Gonzales arrived at the police station hours later, firing a gun, with the bodies of the girls in the back of his truck. The police killed him at the scene.
The theory of the lawsuit Ms. Gonzales filed in federal district court in Denver was that Colorado law had given her an enforceable right to protection by instructing the police, on the court order, that "you shall arrest" or issue a warrant for the arrest of a violator. She argued that the order gave her a "property interest" within the meaning of the 14th Amendment's due process guarantee, which prohibits the deprivation of property without due process.
The district court and a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit dismissed the suit, but the full appeals court reinstated it and the town appealed. The Supreme Court's precedents made the appellate ruling a challenging one for Ms. Gonzales and her lawyers to sustain.
A 1989 decision, DeShaney v. Winnebago County, held that the failure by county social service workers to protect a young boy from a beating by his father did not breach any substantive constitutional duty. By framing her case as one of process rather than substance, Ms. Gonzales and her lawyers hoped to find a way around that precedent.
But the majority on Monday saw little difference between the earlier case and this one, Castle Rock v. Gonzales, No. 04-278. Ms. Gonzales did not have a "property interest" in enforcing the restraining order, Justice Scalia said, adding that "such a right would not, of course, resemble any traditional conception of property."
Although the protective order did mandate an arrest, or an arrest warrant, in so many words, Justice Scalia said, "a well-established tradition of police discretion has long coexisted with apparently mandatory arrest statutes."
But Justices Stevens and Ginsburg, in their dissenting opinion, said "it is clear that the elimination of police discretion was integral to Colorado and its fellow states' solution to the problem of underenforcement in domestic violence cases." Colorado was one of two dozen states that, in response to increased attention to the problem of domestic violence during the 1990's, made arrest mandatory for violating protective orders.
"The court fails to come to terms with the wave of domestic violence statutes that provides the crucial context for understanding Colorado's law," the dissenting justices said.
Organizations concerned with domestic violence had watched the case closely and expressed disappointment at the outcome. Fernando LaGuarda, counsel for the National Network to End Domestic Violence, said in a statement that Congress and the states should now act to give greater protection.
In another ruling on Monday, the court rebuked the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in Cincinnati, for having reopened a death penalty appeal, on the basis of newly discovered evidence, after the ruling had become final.
The 5-to-4 decision, Bell v. Thompson, No. 04-514, came in response to an appeal by the State of Tennessee after the Sixth Circuit removed a convicted murderer, Gregory Thompson, from the state's death row.
After his conviction and the failure of his appeals in state court, Mr. Thompson, with new lawyers, had gone to federal district court seeking a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that his initial lawyers had been constitutionally inadequate. The new lawyers obtained a consultation with a psychologist, who diagnosed Mr. Thompson as schizophrenic.
But the psychologist's report was not included in the file of the habeas corpus petition in district court, which denied the petition. It was not until the Sixth Circuit and then the Supreme Court had also denied his petition, making the case final, that the Sixth Circuit reopened the case, finding that the report was crucial evidence that should have been considered.
In overturning that ruling in an opinion by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, the majority said the appeals court had abused its discretion in an "extraordinary departure from standard appellate procedures." Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Sandra Day O'Connor joined the opinion.
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Stephen G. Breyer said the majority had relied on rules to the exclusion of justice. Judges need a "degree of discretion, thereby providing oil for the rule-based gears," he said. Justices Stevens, Ginsburg and David H. Souter joined the dissent.
Continue reading the main story


Posts : 9231
Thanked : 1777
Join date : 2012-12-17
Age : 52
Location : Lone Star State

Re: Giuliani: Police ‘Don’t Ask if You Are Black or White, They Just Come to Save You!’

Post by Neno on Wed 20 Jul 2016, 5:13 pm


First and Foremost; God Bless You!! Next Support TRUMP then, Read Below. ;)

We Gotta Play This New Mobile APP Together!
You can preregister at and use Styles as your FREE Promo CODE!
First up is NFL and MLS then, the NBA and International League Soccer.
The MLB,  NHL, NASCAR, Rugby, Cricket, and College Sports will follow.

Sponsored content

Re: Giuliani: Police ‘Don’t Ask if You Are Black or White, They Just Come to Save You!’

Post by Sponsored content Today at 10:39 am

    Current date/time is Tue 25 Oct 2016, 10:39 am