Battle of Mosul in the field of politics
[rtl]Ibrahim al - Abadi
gaining the battle to liberate Mosul and ending direct military presence for »Daash» importance paramount strategy of the Iraqi state, to hand back the extension of Iraqi sovereignty over the entire national territory, and the unification of the country and save millions of people and to prevent division projects and acquisitions that finds its way to the verification, the ongoing preparations to win the battle looks good and there areinternational determination to support Iraq to get rid of a «Daash» military before the year end, but it is certain that there are significant obstacles to delay the military victory and may increase fears dissipated value of this victory, the first of the great concern of thedoubling of the problem of displaced persons and the number of no less hundreds ofthousands have been over one million, and the second is the political complications resulting from wrestled multiple wills each of which wants to lay hands on Mosul ,administratively, politically and directing the political destination that wants the public, thelatest fashions calling to find a political and administrative consensus between Nineveh components and entities that adopt those components will shed cast heavy on the scene and may delay the start of edits military Baltoukitat
when raised fears of post - liberation to be urgent and pressing issue leading up to thestart of military operations, it means that some people do not want (urgency) at the start of the battle of Mosul , but he wants conducting the course of consensus and negotiation, and we know that military successes would not have been realized if allowed political consensus and party interventions to have an impact compressor.
enter into a tunnel consensus will prolong the life of the preparations and delay the start of operations has been fabricate crises and problems slow down the progress of military operations. Battle of Fallujah is not far from us and remember how raged political and media atmosphere such as In the course of the start of operations and almost that corrupts the process without the sudden and rapid victory that resolving the battle and buried voices seeking to delay.
Mosul , along the lines of Fallujah, will be an arena to the views of multiple arguments over political and huge media, Vmkhaov conflict tribal and ethnic, religious, and attempts at revenge and retribution of those who caused the disaster and helped them, and theaspirations of the geographical expansion of this team or the other to confirm thedominance of historical, demographic and rights, as well as the desire of local political forces and leaders of tribal finding the equations of power and influence confronted Baghdad, is poignant and stressful factors and the need to deep accounts , and wisdom arrangements have before Tdhm sparked by Iraq and become a military victory dull and futile strategy, but pending the outcome of consensus and unite wills conflicting and fraught with entrenched accounts Btaiviha or nationalism, will have a serious impact on the achievement of political and military first goal of ending military presence for »Daash» , either ending a «Daash» security and political and intellectual Vmak who needs a non -military strategy strategy that focuses on grab the land and prevent «Daash» direct presence, those strategic win hearts and minds and invest setback lessons and Nakba Aaischha directly to the population under the rule of succession savagery, that battle should be parallel preparations to do with the battles for liberation , but before and after ,but not on the battlefield starting account even if some people called it the battle of theUS presidential election, there is a chance a large international support for Iraq militarily, economically and politically , and must be employed for the benefit of Iraq the necessary speed we are not in Ward waste