Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Iraq Dinar/News is a popular topic among many topics this board offers.

See the footer of the board for our Facebook and My business pages.

Be sure and join our Dinar Only Newsletter Email list. It is located on the right. Your User Account Email when joining the board is for with in Neno's Place use of board information which you can control in your profile settings.

Neno

NOTES:
For "Advertising" with in my board to our Membership and Visitors see our "Sponsor Ad Info" in the Navbar. Neno's Place receives a low of 50,000 views a week to over 100,000 plus many times thru out the year.

I can be reached by phone or text 7am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Longest Dinar holding Community. Reach Admin by Private Message. Copyright © 2006-2017


‘Why Wasn’t It Disqualifying?’: Matt Lauer Intensely Questions Clinton on Email Scandal

Share

Lobo
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 17916
Thanked : 881
Join date : 2013-01-12

‘Why Wasn’t It Disqualifying?’: Matt Lauer Intensely Questions Clinton on Email Scandal

Post by Lobo on Thu 08 Sep 2016, 1:56 pm

‘Why Wasn’t It Disqualifying?’: Matt Lauer Intensely Questions Clinton on Email Scandal
Sep. 7, 2016 10:52pm Tré Goins-Phillips

NBC host Matt Lauer fired questions toward Hillary Clinton relentlessly Wednesday night about the Democratic presidential nominee’s use of a private email server while at the State Department.
“The word judgment has been used a lot around you, Secretary Clinton, over the last year and a half,” Lauer said, “and in particular concerning your use of your personal email and server to communicate while you were secretary of state.”

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
He asked, “Why wasn’t it more than a mistake, why wasn’t it disqualifying, if you want to be commander in chief?”
Clinton immediately reminded the NBC host of her frequent admission that the decision to use a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state was a “mistake.”
“As I have said repeatedly, it was a mistake to have a personal account. I would certainly not do it again,” she said. “I make no excuses for it. It was something that should not have been done.”
Clinton then turned to her claim that she never handled any information on her private email account that was marked classified — an assertion FBI Director James Comey has said is untrue. Employing a new defense, Clinton said none of the emails she sent or received had a classified “header.”
“The real question here is the handling of classified material, which I think is what the implication of your question was,” Clinton said. “[I] have a lot of experience dealing with classified material, starting when I was on the Senate Armed Services Committee, going into the four years as secretary of state.”
“Classified material has a header, which says, ‘Top Secret,’ ‘Secret,’ ‘Confidential,’” she continued. “Nothing, and I will repeat this and this is verified in the report by the Department of Justice — none of the emails sent or received by me had such a header.”
But Lauer pressed further, asking Clinton if some of the emails pertained to the U.S.’s “covert drone program,” which she said was, in fact, the case.
However, the Democratic candidate said there were “no discussions of any of the covert actions in process being determined about whether or not to go forward.”
When the NBC anchor asked Clinton if she thought her discussion of the drone program on her private server was “routine,” Clinton noted that the FBI’s notes on its email investigation “discussed drone matters in the unclassified section of the report.”
“But Director Comey also said this, after reviewing all the information, ‘There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation,’” Lauer said.
Clinton told him there are “hundreds” of foreign policy experts who communicated on an unclassified system.
Watch the exchange below: USE LINK FOR VIDEO -
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/09/07/why-wasnt-it-disqualifying-matt-lauer-intensely-questions-clinton-on-email-scandal/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Firewire%20Morning%20Edition%20Recurring%20v2%202016-09-08&utm_term=Firewire_Morning_Test

    Current date/time is Tue 06 Dec 2016, 3:49 pm