Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Iraq Dinar/News is a popular topic among many topics this board offers.

See the footer of the board for our Facebook and My business pages.

Be sure and join our Dinar Only Newsletter Email list. It is located on the right. Your User Account Email when joining the board is for with in Neno's Place use of board information which you can control in your profile settings.


For "Advertising" with in my board to our Membership and Visitors see our "Sponsor Ad Info" in the Navbar. Neno's Place receives a low of 50,000 views a week to over 100,000 plus many times thru out the year.

I can be reached by phone or text 7am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Longest Dinar holding Community. Reach Admin by Private Message. Copyright © 2006-2017

Ad Space M-1

Board Rules

October 2016


Calendar Calendar

Ad Space M-2

Revv Worldwide

IQD/Oil/Commodities Charts


Ad Space M-3

Top posting users this week

Top posting users this month

Ad Space M-4

Libs Telling Us To Be More Considerate, “Terrorism” Is A Mean Word



Posts : 16542
Thanked : 805
Join date : 2013-01-12

Libs Telling Us To Be More Considerate, “Terrorism” Is A Mean Word

Post by Lobo on Tue 20 Sep 2016, 3:35 pm

Libs Telling Us To Be More Considerate, “Terrorism” Is A Mean Word
Posted by Martin Walsh | Sep 20, 2016 | Liberal Corruption, National Security

Democrats And Muslims Now Arguing The Term “Terrorist” Is Offensive
Democrats have officially argued the most neurologically deficient idea to ever be uttered publicly. Following the two bombings and knife stabbings by multiple Muslims this past weekend, Democrats are now arguing that that we should refrain from using the word “terrorism.”
This is not a joke. In fact, this topic has picked up a lot of steam since it was uttered by this incompetent liberal on Fox News.
In the discussion, linked below, the panel is arguing over whether the terrorist attacks were “homegrown” terrorism or Islamic terrorism. One liberal pundit argued that calling it terrorism, in general, was disrespectful to Muslims and it was offensive.
He was arguing about how we should define Muslims. he indicated that even though they carry out Jihad against nonbelievers by stabbing people, set off bombs, or run over nearly 100 people with a truck for Allah, we should wait awhile before we define it as a terrorist attack. Liberals continue to think we are going to win the War on Terror with narrative instead of action.
That logic is exactly why terrorism has reached historic levels since 2008 both internationally and domestically.

That lazy, incapacitated line of thinking is exactly why we are experiencing historic levels of terrorism today. Do you think President Reagan cared about what we called our enemies during the Cold War? Do you think President Roosevelt went into a “verbal war” with Japan after Pearl Harbor? My point exactly.
This idea, offered by liberal Richard Fowler, a radio host who went on Fox News Sunday, is very scary.
“The problem is, when you say the word ‘terror,’ because of word association it automatically assumes you are talking about people of the Muslim faith,” Fowler said.
Franklin argues that we should begin by using the phrase: “Intentional acts.”
“None of these organizations have taken credit for it,” Fowler said. “So before we go out and start to blame and shame a whole religion we ought to be very careful and get all the facts first.”
He has obviously missed the point, but everything you do is an intentional act. Throwing away trash is just as much of an intentional act as strapping a suicide belt around your waist to blow yourself up in a crowd of people.
Nearly 100% of intentional acts on this planet are not acts of terrorism. Why would you argue that eating, talking, or running is similar to stabbing someone while yelling “Allah Akbar?”

Since Then, Orlando, Boston, San Bernardino, And New York Have ALL Been Major Terrorist Attacks By Muslims For Islam
The word “terrorism” has not been unfairly appointed to anyone. Title 22 of the U.S. Code, Section 2656f(d) defines terrorism as “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience for social or religious motivations.”
This argument by Fowler is no different than the Obama administration refusing to say “radical Islamic terrorism” because they still think we can defeat these jihadists with “love and kindness.”
Using the term “terrorism” has become closely associated with Muslims because a major portion of their population carries out Jihad. When was the last time someone set off a bomb for Jesus Christ?
Replacing “terrorism” with “intentional acts” does not change the fact that Muslims practicing Islam carry out terrorist acts in the name of Allah. We have all seen how violent and cruel ISIS and their supporters have been.
So, if you’re arguing that we should be using kinder words, tell that to the people that have shrapnel in their shoulders from the New York City bombings; that was a Jihadi Muslim, by the way.

Wow, So There Is A Correlation Between Islam/Muslims And Terrorism
Liberals, Fowler, and the academic left are imposing politically correct newspeak, and that’s the most ridiculous part of this. Liberals, especially Obama and Hillary, are more worried about convincing everyone that ISIS is not Islamic than fighting Islamic terrorism.
If Leftists got as upset about Islamic terrorism as they do with memes and name calling, ISIS would be finished by now. Instead, they spend millions of dollars and hours of the day telling the American people that we should normalize bombings and pressure cooker attacks. This is the United States of America, not Syria. Bombs and terrorists attacks should never become normal.

    Current date/time is Mon 24 Oct 2016, 12:15 am