Turkey and the Battle of Mosul
Just as the votes of regional and some international voices rose before the battle ofFallujah , the Iraqi government to the demands of the mildly it interference in the internal affairs of Iraq and try to play the sectarian hamstring, voices rose rhythm higher as it seeks to internationalize the battle of Mosul and impose preconditions on the editing process on customary condition of the right to participate and who is not entitled to it.
it is clear that Turkey does this advance planning and coordination of regional and participation of internal Iraqi forces, since the success of the Iraqis in freeing greater part of the lands occupied by the «Daesh», provincial neighbors realized that Iraq is in transforming the fragility of the state and the weakness of the social structure and political to the strengths will contribute to strengthening the political system and increase confidence in the security and military equipment and converting PDF crowd into a large structural strength plug loopholes which was the entrance to shift «Daesh» to theoccupying force falls cities and seize territory and control millions.
Iraq 's success in the liberation of Mosul alone and faculties regular and popular means that the Iraqi society overcome many obstacles in his way to consolidate the logic of thestate and increase national cohesion and healing the sectarian divide and obsessions divisive, and nutshell lead in parallel social and governmental movement to counter theaccumulation of a large constituent mistakes produced corruption and fragility and vulnerability of structural and institutional, to a gradual shift towards the restoration of thestate 's power
system . it
seems that the anticipated success in the liberation of Mosul is not desirable regional and seen that the success of the political axis in the region Hasher when Iraq squashed like sardines and that Baghdad was unwilling to classification, entitlements and costs, but the logic of axes imposed a de facto, the were not part of the axis that compete his leadership Arabia and Turkey thou among the other axis, and success means adding strengths is distasteful to this axis, so Ankara raised her voice , citing sometimes defend in Mosul together and sometimes year Turkmen and third to prevent the PKK from imposing his influence in the region and the fourth to prevent sprawl Kurdish Aljgerassayas from docking in practice to prevent the emergence of the State of South Kurdistan , even if an alliance professor Massoud Barzani progress with Ankara.
internally local Mosul forces appears to be divided between the national trend Unionist and the orientation of the investment opportunity and the Turkish regional intervention to impose agendas on Baghdad to prevent recent recording is a great victory reflects positively on the strength of the state and forces of the military and human , this Musli team and in coordination with the Kurdistan region does not want to Baghdad can enjoy the political and military power makes them capable of processing based on theaspirations of power on the national heritage or sectarian.
escalation of the Turkish intervention in Mosul , originating as well as the regional ambitions of rising to Ankara in the party that draws new political geography lines be on the ruins of defeat «Daesh» who raised the slogan «topple the Sykes - Picot borders and return to the state of the global caliphate.»
Turks know that the battle to liberate Mosul big chance to impose their perceptions inparallel with direct involvement in military actions inside Syria, but just as the Iraqis succeeded in the battle of Fallujah a resounding success prosecutors dropped the many excuses and regional interventions, the urgency has not fallen in resolving the battle ofMosul will waste all regional bets and will restore Iraq 's ability to draw a new destiny live faculties and not through the traditional political forces that Arthnt policies countries of the region.[/rtl]