Search found 97 matches for 2

Nylander is Lamoriello’s next contractual challenge
September 2, 2017, 12:35 PM ET [127 Comments]
Mike Augello
Toronto Maple Leafs Blogger • RSS • Archive • CONTACT
For the latest Leafs updates or Follow @mikeinbuffalo on Twitter

Maple Leafs GM Lou Lamoriello successfully navigated through the summer of 2017, re-signing restricted free agents Zach Hyman and Connor Brown to team-friendly contract extensions, but as the opening of training camp approaches, the club’s management is likely eyeing the challenge of getting the “Big 3” of Auston Matthews, Mitch Marner and William Nylander locked up.

Matthews and Marner are entering their second pro season and will not be eligible to be extended until July 2018, but it is unknown whether the Leafs will be proactive with the pair and get them under control being entering the final year of their entry-level contract (as Edmonton did with Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl) or wait till their ELC expires before beginning to negotiate (which appears to be what Buffalo is doing with Jack Eichel).



Nylander became eligible to sign a new deal on July 1, but there have been no indications that the Leafs and the 21-year-old forward’s representatives have started contract talks.

The value for a team being proactive is getting a player signed with a year left on their ELC, so they have less on their resume to demand a higher salary.

Toronto may have helped their case with Nylander down the line by calling the 2014 first rounder at the end of the 2016 season for 22 games and burning the first year of his entry-level. Even if the Leafs wait until next summer to sign the speedy Swede to a new deal, Nylander will only have two full NHL seasons to use as a negotiating point.

There is a fear that Nylander could be in position to demand a deal close to Draisaitl’s eight-year, $68 Million extension ($8.5 Million AAV) if he puts up big numbers playing on Matthews’ line for a full season, but comparables like Alexander Wennberg’s new contract with Columbus are an indicator that the Leafs can get Nylander signed without breaking the bank.

Wennberg was selected 14th by the Blue Jackets in 2013 and scored 59 points (13 goals, 46 assists) in his third full campaign with Columbus last season (two points less than Nylander) and signed a six-year, $29.4 Million extension ($4.9 Million AAV) on Friday.

If Nylander matches his rookie totals, Toronto appears to be in a better position to get him signed to a deal closer to Wennberg than to Draisaitl. The only way that his price tag escalates is if he has a breakout year like 2014 Draft classmate and friend David Pastrnak did last season.




Lamoriello’s ability to negotiate a favorable deal is one factor that has to be taken into consideration, but there are other considerations that could keep Nylander’s price point more reasonable.

Leafs head coach Mike Babcock indicated at the end of last season that in spite of seeing Nylander as a center, he will not move from wing with Matthews, Nazem Kadri and Tyler Bozak occupying the top three spots up the middle.

One of the big contributing factors in Draisaitl’s new deal was being a legitimate #2 center to play behind McDavid. Nylander will have considerably less leverage as a free agent winger.

Another possible factor is whether Nylander stays on Matthews line next season. Babcock punished the winger by placing him on the fourth line a few times, but also flipped him and Connor Brown on the road to have him play with the more defensively responsible Kadri and Leo Komarov.

The addition of Patrick Marleau gives Babcock more options next season. The veteran winger is likely to play alongside Matthews and could force the versatile Hyman to move to the right side. If that happens, Nylander could see most of his ice time with Kadri and Komarov.

The Prospect Tease
August 11, 2017, 1:15 PM ET [35 Comments]
John Jaeckel
Chicago Blackhawks Blogger • RSS • Archive • CONTACT



Just 5 summers ago, the Blackhawks #2 ranked prospect—in what was at that time supposedly a top 10 NHL talent pipeline—was defenseman Adam Clendening. Another top 5 Hawk prospect at that time was LW Jeremy Morin.

Since then, Clendening has played in 81 NHL games with 4 teams, compiling 22 points. Morin has played in 70 NHL games since with 2 teams and compiled 19 points.

Ugh.

10 years ago, the Hawks’ top 10 prospects—which included the likes of Toews, Kane, and Byfuglien—also included Cam Barker, Evan Brophey, Danny Richmond, and Jack Skille.

Skille and Barker were top 10 NHL draft selections, as was 2008 pick Kyle Beach.

Many of these players put up huge junior numbers. Some, like Kane, became NHL successes. Some, like Beach, didn’t.

The truth is, huge production in junior or college hockey pretty much can’t be counted on as a clear or direct indicator of future NHL success.

An old friend of mine, who himself played in the OHL and later in the pro minors, later was the GM of an OHL club, and finally an agent for a handful of former Hawk prospects about 10-15 years ago. Of one of those prospects—who was highly touted—he said:

“He gets away with things in junior that he can’t in the NHL. So I don’t know how good he’s going to be at the next level. He doesn’t have the speed to do the same things he’s doing now. There’s such a big difference between junior and the NHL.”

As it turned out, the prospect in question ended up being a fairly productive NHL player for several seasons. But the point stands. Some make that leap, some don’t.

For every Kane, there’s a Rob Schremp. Or an Alexandre Daigle. Or a Beach. A Morin. Or an Akim Aliu.

I had another friend who was once invited to Red Wings pro camp. It didn’t last long.

“The guys at that level are so fast and it’s so physical. I was a great player at the lower levels. But I couldn’t handle it.”

Comparing top tier NCAA hockey to the pros, former Hawk Jim Cummins once said:

“Guys in college skate around like they’re ten feet tall with those full cages. You can’t do that up here.”

Yet, every year as summer inches toward fall, bloggers and fans get bored and itchy and start creating lists of prospect rankings—typically based on reputation and numbers at the lower levels of hockey alone.

I know, I used to do the same thing—even “professionally” as a writer for the now defunct hockeysfuture.com.

What I’ve learned—and why I now tend to pump the brakes on prospect rankings and projections—is this:

1) Speed is a big differentiator

Straight line speed is not the sole determinant of who succeeds in the NHL and who doesn’t. But the road to NHL success is littered with guys like Beach, Morin, and Barker who could dominate at the lower levels (in Morin’s lone OHL season, as a 19 year old, he racked up 83 points in 58 games) but lacked the speed necessary to translate their games to the NHL level.

And, if anything—due to rules changes, and resulting officiating and coaching trends in the NHL, speed is an even more important aspect of the game today than it was even just five years ago.

I had a reader “lecture” me on the “elite” nature of the OHL a couple of weeks ago. His point being that I shouldn’t discount “outstanding” production in that league. I had to explain to the reader that over 90% of the players in the OHL are 16-19 years old and never play pro hockey—because they lack either the speed, size, talent or combinations thereof to reach the next level. And logically, there are “high end” prospects who can compile big numbers against those players, because of some unique skill like stickhandling or shooting—but can’t duplicate it at the next level due to a deficit of speed, size, or willingness versus pro players.

That isn’t to say that a player with average skating can’t make it and succeed in today’s NHL. But that player better have some highly commendable skills in other areas—as well as a lot of humility and work ethic—to overcome a lack of speed.

2) Size is not critical, but willingness absolutely is

Hawk fans don’t have to go too far back to the glory days when Teuvo Teravainen was going to be the next Patrick Kane—or some facsimile thereof. The jury is still sort of out on TT as an NHL player. And in terms of sheer talent, the more extreme expectations on him were probably a bit overblown and unfair. He does, however, have skill, that much has never been in question.

The issue with Teravainen has been (and by some accounts still is) an aversion to the weight room and to contact on the ice—which has limited him as a player in the NHL.

But for every TT, there’s a Theo Fleury or a Marty St. Louis, or a Kane. Smaller guys who are fairly fearless—and have other NHL attributes (like hands, a shot and especially speed) in abundance.

3) It’s a marathon, not a sprint

Most NHL players are drafted at age 17. That is, those who are drafted.

The average age for an NHL debut is about 21. That’s four years where a lot can happen, good or bad.

Some guys come out of nowhere, like the undrafted Ed Belfour, or a sixth round pick like Steve Larmer, or Byfuglien who was taken in the 8th round.

Many guys taken higher, as pointed out ad nauseum, never really develop or fail to meet projections.

Sometimes, it merely takes some players longer than others to meet expectations. The Blackhawks’ own Richard Panik bounced through three NHL organizations before settling in and flourishing last year on Jonathan Toews’ right wing.

Important to note also, Panik’s junior numbers were never what you’d call “exceptional”—yet today he is a productive top 6 winger in the NHL, primarily because of an NHL-level size/speed combination—and willingness.


It’s with all this in mind that we can look forward to this year’s pro camp, and questions that are yet to be answered.

Is last year’s camp phenom, undrafted QMJHL winger Alex Fortin, the real thing or just a one-year flash in the pan? A couple of highly intriguing traits Fortin showed last year—above average speed (as compared to pro competition) and the ability to make and finish plays at top speed. Yet Fortin lacks the big junior pedigree, barely a point per game player. So another stellar camp—or one where he comes back to earth—will go a long way in determining whether Fortin is one of those “out of nowhere guys” or not.

The recently-concluded prospect camp was supposed to be “The Camp of (Alex) Debrincat.” It wasn’t. OHL scoring champ DeBrincat had some moments—especially in camp scrimmages versus other prospects, but he struggled in one on one drills (especially against bigger players) and at times looked slow or disinterested.

Or will another camp invitee step up, like Fortin did last year, and grab the spotlight?

The point is, all the hype and projections and rankings aside, we won’t really know until they lace the skates up and play. As pros. Or at least with and against pros. And even then, the story itself will likely deviate from the scripted expectations.

All I have for now,

Top-5 wingers in the Western Conference?
August 9, 2017, 11:36 AM ET [117 Comments]
HockeyBuzz Hotstove
RSS • Archive • CONTACT
Follow me on Twitter @ToddCordell

In this edition of the hotstove, we rank the top-5 wingers in the Western Conference.

Todd Cordell

1. Vladimir Tarasenko (STL)

Tarasenko has the power, speed, and skill combination teams dream about and is one of the most dynamic players in the league. As good as he is, I think he may still have another gear.

2. Blake Wheeler (WPG)

Wheeler is one of the NHL's most underrated stars. He consistently piles up points at a high-end rate, plays in all situations, drives possession, and gets little talk despite that. He may not be as flashy as a guy like Kane, but he's a far more well-rounded player.

3. Patrick Kane (CHI)

I don't think Kane is great without the puck, and he has benefited from sheltered zone starts, but it's pretty hard to argue with 195 points over the last two seasons.

4. Jamie Benn (DAL)

Benn is the total package. He's physical, he has a big shot, he scores goals in bunches, and he's a very effective playmaker. By his standards, 2016-17 was a down year but I have no doubt he'll bounce back.

5. Johnny Gaudreau (CGY)

He's extremely skilled and tough to contain because of his speed and elusiveness, which leads to a lot of magical plays. Like Benn, his counting totals weren't as good as expected in 16-17 but he is a good bet to bounce back.

Honorable mentions: Filip Forsbergand Patrik Laine. Forsberg is only 22 and has averaged 30 goals and 62 points over the last three seasons while posting remarkably good possession numbers. Laine's defensive game needs work but he is just 19 and already one of the best pure goal scorers in the NHL.

James Tanner

The best wingers in the Western Conference:

1. Blake Wheeler - Between 60-80 points for six straight years, never misses a game, guarantee between 20-30 goals, tons of 5v5 points.

2. Patrick Kane - Art Ross winner, consistent scoring, one of the best players in the league.

3. Patrik Laine - he probably doesn't deserve to be this high, but his potential is insane and I'd probably want him as the corner stone of my franchise over anyone on this list.

4. Nino Niederreiter - Elite defense and scores at a 5v5 clip worthy of any first line. Signed to arguably the best team-friendly contract in the NHL.

5. Vladimir Tarasenko - One of the most exciting players to watch. I would not argue against ranking him higher. All these guys are so awesome that you could probably rank them in whatever order you wanted, and you could even put in Jamie Benn or Johnny Gaudreau and I wouldn't much care.

Peter Tessier

Well, this is group seems far more interesting to me than the Eastern Conference because I know them better. That being said you will probably see a very obvious bias.

#1 Patrick Kane- There might be players people prefer more than Kane but he's been at the top for too long to ignore. Consistently consistent and such a pain to play against.

#2 Vladimir Tarasenko- Guy is an elite scorer who led the western wingers in goals.

#3 Blake Wheeler- what does Wheeler have to do to get some respect from across the league? He's missed 5 games in the last 6 years too not scoring less than 60 points.

#4 Nik Ehlers- coming off his sophomore season he was second for points for LW behind Benn- given his age that's impressive.

#5 Patrik Laine- sure it's full homer mode here but that rookie season on a team that has as many challenges as the Jets was incredible. Laine showed more talent than most gave him credit for and blew past all expectations as an 18-year-old.

Comey is as guilty as Hillary for treating government work product including top secret information as personal. Comey, just like Hillary, claimed the memos were all “personal” that he made talking to Trump because he did not trust him (contrary to his trust for Clintons). There is no such “personal” qualification and he leaked those memos to the New York Times which he admitted openly in Congress. But those memos contained classified information and that was a CRIME for him to leak them, no less pretend they were his “personal” property. Every FBI agent signed a confidentiality agreement as do traders working for a bank. The agreement signed by Comey states plainly: “all information acquired by me in connection with my official duties with the FBI and all official material to which I have access remain the property of the United States of America.” This means (1) he stole government documents obstructing any investigation of him, and (2) he then leaked classified information to the New York Times. Let’s see; they say Snowden should be indicted for the same thing. Curious!
This is why Comey never recorded Hillary’s “interview” before the FBI to ensure she could never be charged as Martha Stewart was for “lying to the FBI” in such an interview and sent to prison. Comey wrote private memos when talking to Trump, but not Hillary, and then leaked classified information to the New York Times releasing his memos. Legally, he should be prosecuted as they prosecuted Lewis “Scooter” Libby who was Dick Cheney’s chief of staff for leaking information.
In United States v. Libby, he was put on trial for interfering with special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s criminal investigation of the Plame affair by lying in an interview with the FBI for which he was indicted by a federal grand jury on five felony counts of making false statements to federal investigators. This is what Comey protected Hillary from by not recording the “interview” which is standard operational procedure. Libby served as assistant to the President under George W. Bush and Chief of Staff to Dick Cheney from 2001 to 2005. Bush denied giving Libby even a pardon.
Then Comey granted immunity to Hillary Clinton’s lawyer Cheryl Mills to protect her against prosecution. In fact, Comey strikingly gave wholesale immunity deals to virtually every person who had intimate knowledge of Hillary Clinton’s illegal private server and emails. This protected Hillary beacause nobody would testify against her under threat of imprisonment. Comey abused his discretion and made sure that Hillary could not be prosecuted nor any of her staff.
There is now more than enough information to hand to a Grand Jury for Comey to be indicted the same as Libby. Comey stole government work product (memos) and who knows what else and that is a crime in itself. Then they had classified information – count #2.  And he should be indicted to colluding with Hillary not to record her “interview” and then giving immunity to everyone around her obstructing justice. You give immunity to someone for testifying against someone – not on a wholesale agenda to cover everything up.
If Congress FAILS to prosecute Comey, then Trump should pardon Snowden!!!!!!!! What happened to “Equal Protection of Law” and where is “justice for all” we indoctrinate children to pledge in school? nIf Comey can walk on water, then so should Snowden.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/there-is-now-enough-evidence-to-indict-comey-or-snowden-should-be-pardoned/

Kovalchuk, Raanta, Girardi and Staal, Richter stopped Bure 23 yrs ago today
June 7, 2017, 3:45 PM ET [41 Comments]
Jan Levine
New York Rangers Blogger • RSS • Archive • CONTACT
Larry Brooks in his Sunday Slap Shots column brought up several topics that have a Rangers bent to them. Several of these have likely been discussed in one form or other - blog or comment - but wanted to add in my two cents as well. Would love to hear your views as well.

Slap Shots has learned the Blues (with assistant general manager Martin Brodeur), Maple Leafs (with general manager Lou Lamoriello) and Sharks (with coach Pete DeBoer and assistant Johan Hedberg) are among more than a half-dozen clubs who have expressed interest in Ilya Kovalchuk.

And yes, indeed, the Rangers are one of the those teams, though there are obstacles to work around in order to get the potential game-changer into a Blueshirt.

Let’s understand that Ray Shero has the upper hand at this moment, and the Devils general manager would need to get more back from the Rangers in a trade than, say, from the Blues or Sharks. Obviously the Devils would prefer to see Kovalchuk scoring goals out west than just across the Hudson. That is the reality as Shero deals with the perception of his fan base, if not his ownership.

But Shero can’t overplay his hand, either, because he essentially will only hold Kovalchuk’s NHL rights through July 1. If the Devils don’t deal Kovalchuk by then, he likely would return to Russia for a final season before becoming an unrestricted free agent next July 1, unencumbered at that point by his current status on the voluntary retired list.

So under this scenario, what could be considered fair value from the Rangers?

The young A- and B-listers — including Brady Skjei, Chris Kreider, J.T. Miller, Kevin Hayes, Jimmy Vesey and Pavel Buchnevich — are off the table. Derek Stepan is not going to be traded for a 34-year-old winger, and Rick Nash doesn’t make any sense from New Jersey’s perspective, though the Rangers almost certainly would need to move No. 61’s $7.8 million cap hit in order to accommodate what could be a $5 million-$5.5 million hit for Kovalchuk.

Then how about 25-year-old Oscar Lindberg, a legitimate candidate for a top-six role in New Jersey, if, of course, the Blueshirts’ putative fourth-line center is not selected by Las Vegas in the expansion draft?

Would the Rangers do it? It should be a no-brainer for general manager Jeff Gorton considering Kovalchuk’s game-breaking ability and forte as a power-play quarterback from the point. And if it would take tossing Nick Holden into mix, then by all means.

The Devils might be able to squeeze more from another team, but Kovalchuk could reject the trade and bide his time in Russia for one more year before signing with the Rangers as a free agent next year with New Jersey getting zero in return.


Let me state up front that I am a huge Kovy fan, have been since he entered the league. His skill set, at least years ago, would have tremendously helped the Rangers. Now that he is 34, he likely still has some of the foot speed he had years ago, but most likely has slowed to at least some extent.

In addition, if the rumors of the type of deal he wants are true - 2-3 years at $6 mil a season - then he all but prices himself out of the reasonable range for New York even if a deal could be reached. Now maybe NJ does a sign-and-trade, as has been suggested, and eats some of the salary to facilitate a trade but that would mean more would have to come back to the Devils. If that is the case, Shero will most probably look to break the bank.

If Kovy is smart, he stays in the KHL and comes back as a UFA. But let's say he really wants to play again in the NHL and his sights are set are on the Rangers, rather than the Isles or Blue Jackets or Panthers. What are you willing to pay? Lindberg isn't a game-breaker but he proved, especially in the playoffs, that he can be an effective center in this league. Maybe not a 1 or 2 but definitely a 3 with upside. if he somehow got past Las Vegas, would you deal him for Kovy? Would you make that deal if Holden could be part of it before the expansion draft, though that would necessitate losing someone else NY might want to protect.

Plus, and this may be the most important part, how are you creating cap room? Even if NJ ate some salary, who is going to free up at least $2.5-3 million, let alone $5-6 million? Do you want Kovy on the Rangers and what do you think he has left? Are we looking at an Alexander Radulov type season or one like the second half Jaromir Jagr had last season or somewhere in-between?

Slap Shots has learned several clubs have inquired about the availability of Rangers goalie Antti Raanta, who will be vulnerable to claim by Vegas.

But moving Raanta, who is one year away from free agency, would guarantee that the Rangers would lose someone else — likely Lindberg, Jesper Fast or Michael Grabner — in the expansion draft.

So Gorton would have to get value in return for the 28-year-old Finn that would compensate for the loss of the goaltender
and the player who would go to the Golden Knights.

If Raanta is not selected by Vegas, the dynamic changes.


With Henrik Lundqvist nursing an injury, but expected back well before training camp starts, Raanta's value has changed slightly. This wrinkle coupled with his play the last two years has made him an even more valuable part of the roster. But many of us believe he is firmly on Vegas' draft list. What it then comes down to is as Brooks asked, are you willing to preemptively move him to get an asset back to keep him from the expansion draft list knowing that it will cost you another player? Now also consider the possibility of giving an incentive for the Golden Knights to take Holden, does that change your view on moving Raanta? Another aspect to factor in is the presence of goaltending coach Benoit Allaire and the confidence he can turn another goalie into a solid #2 behind Hank, does that change your view?

Rangers have not told either Dan Girardi or Marc Staal to expect a buyout prior to the expansion draft, nor has management asked either veteran defenseman to waive his no-move clause, sources said. But that does not mean either possibility has been ruled out, because there essentially is no chance both will remain on the roster when training camp commences.


Just because it hasn't been done yet, doesn't mean it won't happen. To not ask seems shortsighted, but there is still 10 days or so to make that request. Because if neither one is asked, then players we all want to keep will have to be exposed in the draft. after the draft, there is 10 days or so before free agency starts. Buyouts could occur then, with a second buyout occurring if an RFA is to go to arbitration, even if a deal is signed before that hearing occurs. So this saga is far from solved.

As posted and commented in my prior blog, Richter stopped Bure penalty shot and changed the momentum of Game 4, 23 years ago today.

Thoughts on the defence and the Expansion Draft
May 4, 2017, 12:47 PM ET [9 Comments]
Paul Berthelot
Columbus Blue Jackets Blogger • RSS • Archive • CONTACT
The Jackets defence group was a hot topic all season long due to the success they were having and they continue to be a hot topic into the off-season. Looking forward to next season the defence projects as follows:

Zach Werenski – Seth Jones
Jack Johnson – David Savard
Markus Nutivaara – Ryan Murray
Scott Harrington

That was the six the Jackets used for the majority of last season. With Dalton Prout traded away and Kyle Quincey expected to test free agency, Harrington moves up into that seventh defencemen role. With the expansion draft looming it’s quite possible that one of these defencemen is picked. Using the expansion tool on Cap Friendly the most common player picked from Columbus has been Johnson. If the Jackets were to lose Johnson their defence entering next season could look something like this:

Werenski – Jones
Murray – Savard
Nutivaara – Gabriel Carlsson
Harrington

The Jackets brass is very high on Carlsson, including John Tortorella who had some high praise for the young defencemen.

“The most important thing I like about his game is just his demeanor,” Tortorella said of Carlsson, who logged an assist in his second game Sunday in Toronto. “He’s not afraid to step up. He’s not afraid to make a pass into the middle of the ice. He’s not a tentative player. I think he’s very confident, and that’s the most important thing.”


That quote from Tom Reed’s Dispatch article prior to Game 1, shows the confidence the organization has in Carlsson. To go from Sweden to North America, play five games on the smaller ice (three AHL, two NHL) and then be a regular in the playoffs is rare. Carlsson is going to enter camp with a good shot to make this team regardless of what happens during the expansion draft.

The other wrinkle here is Vladislav Gavrikov. The Jackets have made him an offer and are trying to convince him to come over to North America. Normally this wouldn’t be a big deal, teams bring players over all the time. The Jackets however have shown a willingness with Carlsson and Nutivaara to put these players right into the NHL. That plus this Aaron Portzline tweet and you can see why the speculation has started.




Gavrikov has been a regular in the KHL for the past two seasons. He's played 112 games in the KHL in his career, so he should be ready to make the jump to the NHL. The problem though is that he has not been very successful in those 112 games. He had back to back seven point seasons and has just 15 career points.

It doesn’t really make much sense to me that Gavrikov would make Murray expendable. If a deal happens in which Murray is traded that’s fine, but don’t look for a trade just because Gavrikov might come over.




Portzline has his ear to organization so this very well may be an opinion shared by the organization. If so this sheds some light on who the Jackets will protect in the expansion draft. It was assumed that the Jackets would be protecting Jones, Savard and Murray (Werenski is exempt), leaving Johnson exposed. If the team sees Murray as expendable however they may be more inclined to protect Johnson and leave Murray unprotected. If Murray is left unprotected I would imagine Vegas takes him. He's a 23 year old defencemen, former #2 overall pick, who has been a regular in the NHL. Yes he has had plenty of injury problems, but this is the type of talent you take a chance on if you’re Vegas.

There is still plenty of time before the expansion draft for things to shake out. As things currently stand Gavrikov has not decided if he will come over to North America or if he will stay in Russia and play in the KHL. He will be playing for Russia at the World Championships where everyone associated with the Blue Jackets will be keeping a close eye on him

QUESTION: Hi Martin:
I’d love to believe that the collapse of this dead-end ideology is imminent, but when one looks at just the media situation in the entire Western world, and sets aside the political landscape, it is hard to fathom. With O’Reilly’s departure from FOX, and Murdoch’s sons taking over (who are both reportedly very progressive liberals), it seems that Socialism is on the grow. Care to comment and enlighten us some more? It would be vastly appreciated, thanks.
DA
 
ANSWER: The economics of the situation is what rules. That is why Communism failed. But keep in mind that this is the civil unrest. Socialism will not simply die and move into the light. It will rage, kick, scream, and try to take down everyone in the process. You can see it in these anti-Trump demonstrations. They claim to be for peace and against Trump because he is some sort of racist etc. etc etc. etc…..
 

 
Yet these are historically ALWAYS the most violent people. This is the subject of the next 2017 Cycle of War Report. The system is collapsing and all the taxes and fines the dream up in their minds cannot save the system. It will go bust. That is the end of Socialism the same as it was the end for Communism. Both are against human nature.
 
They say it is wrong to discriminate for race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation. But it’s OK to discriminate against anyone who disagrees with those in power or if they have material wealth above average. This type of discrimination is perfectly fine because it suits their agenda. What happens when the productive class refuses to produce? When Atlas Shrugged, it all comes crashing down.
 
Do you know that when Ayn Rand published that book, she received the worst reviews ever. The press was socialistic agreeing with FDR. Despite having the press trying to prevent people from reading it fearing the book would be against their socialistic philosophy, Atlas Shrugged has been ranked as #2 in the most influential books just behind the Bible ever written.
Here is the survey’s list of the most influential books:
1. The Bible.
2. “Atlas Shrugged,” by Ayn Rand.
3. “The Road Less Traveled,” by M. Scott Peck.
4. “To Kill a Mockingbird,” by Harper Lee.
5. “The Lord of the Rings,” by J. R. R. Tolkien.


https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/end-of-socialism-will-be-a-tumultuous-hard-landing/

Post Battle ECQF Game #2 – Two games one story
April 15, 2017, 8:24 AM ET [30 Comments]
Paul Berthelot
Columbus Blue Jackets Blogger • RSS • Archive • CONTACT
Final Score: Penguins 4 – Blue Jackets 1

Game Summary

Well game two brought on much of the same as Game 1. The Jackets got plenty of shots, but again were unable to get enough scoring chances to put up more than one goal. They put up 40 shots which resulted in a few more chances than in the first game, but Marc-Andre Fleury was saving everything and denying all opportunities. The Jackets were able to get nine high danger chances at 5 on 5 and did a much better job at getting into the slot area.






The goaltending has been frustrating as the Jackets were expected to have an edge over Matt Murray and a sizeable advantage over Fleury. Sergei Bobrovsky has not played up to his Vezina level self, whereas Fleury is playing like its 2009 again. Bobrovksy needs to be better as the series moves to Columbus.

Before we dive too far into what went wrong, a couple positives from what was otherwise an extremely disappointing game. Brandon Saad the Jackets only goal, showing just how good a player he is.




He clearly responded well to the third period benching. He was one of the lone forwards that was able to get offensive chances.




The other was Oliver Bjorkstrand. He was everywhere again. When he's on the ice the Jackets are in complete control. He led the team with a 75% Corsi at 5 on 5, and was one of just three players, along with Saad and Scott Hartnell, to be on the ice for more high danger chances for than against. If Bjorkstrand could start finding the back of the net, he could singlehandedly win this team a game.

Switching gears, the third pair continues to be a disaster. Scott Harrington looks overmatched against any of the Pittsburgh lines. Every rush opportunity by the Penguins it felt like they were going to score. Harrington does not have the speed and it’s glaringly obvious. Next game needs to have one of Kyle Quincey or Markus Nutivaara (or both) on that bottom pair.

The Jackets had no answer for Sidney Crosby who showed everyone why he’s the best player in the world. Crosby had three points with a goal and two primary assists. Crosby played most of his 5 on 5 minutes against Seth Jones and Zach Werenski so this was the defensive pairing you want out there. As for the forward group, he saw his fair share of time against Brandon Dubinsky but also a good chunk of time against the third line of William Karlsson, Matt Calvert and Josh Anderson. This was a favourable matchup for the Penguins and they took advantage.

Speaking of Calvert, he very well may be missing some time after this nonsense.




I'm all for physical play, but this goes way too far and was completely unnecessary. The play will be reviewed by the NHL and a suspension is quite possible. Even if Calvert somehow manages to avoid a suspension it might be time for him to sit anyway. He did not have a strong game, that third line were the only three players to be below a 50% Corsi.

Game 3 goes Sunday night in Columbus. The Jackets need a win badly to get back into the series.

Stat of the Night




Stats courtesy of Natural Stat Trick and Hockey-Reference.

Good, Bad And In-Between
April 5, 2017, 8:43 AM ET [74 Comments]
John Jaeckel
Chicago Blackhawks Blogger • RSS • Archive • CONTACT



It was ironic that Hawk netminder Scott Darling was given the first star in last night’s 4-3 OT loss in Colorado. It’s not often an opposing player nets first star under any circumstance.

But maybe it was the 51 shots Darling faced, where it can be argued he kept a very sloppy Hawk club in the game and in position to win a point. And when your backup goalie exhibits not just the best of his game, but also the worst, and still wins first star, you know you have a pretty good backup goalie.

Darling flopped and sprawled and scuffled his way through the barrage of shots and quality chances from the Avs–he’s definitely played better positionally and the game winner from Erik Johnson was one he would love to have back. But, he also came up big numerous times as well.

And that’s kind of what I took from that game. The Hawk regulars did not play that well, with the exception of the Marcus Kruger line, but a couple of the backup/depth types gave you some encouragement in the event they’re needed in the playoffs.

Exhibit #2, the Three-Wheeled Jewel Shopping Cart, Michal Rozsival, who, although he can’t really get up and down the ice anymore, made an absolutely gorgeous stretch pass on Kruger’s goal.

We probably won’t see Rozsival in the playoffs, unless one of the regular top 6 goes down. But, in limited minutes, and with a certain degree of shelter, there may just be a fiber or two of tread left on Rozy’s tire if necessary.

Hey, I sort of enjoyed the first 30 minutes or so of last night’s game, before the Hawks went all Rockford Ice Hogs from the red line in to their net. And I would expect more of the same in the remaining two contests of the regular season in Anaheim and LA.

But, that’s the nature of things when playoff position is no longer at stake and you’re trying to just stay healthy.

All I have for now. I’ll have an Anaheim preview tomorrow.