Rentier economy and the state sponsors
[rtl]The concept of the state based on a rentier economy , or so - called rentier state is facing a lot of criticism, as a concept indicates the economy depends mostly on unearned income working relationship is what makes the individuals who ran this economy within the framework of the state pastoral relationship. Which leads to the absence of human potential and to make a distorted relationship between community formations and administrative system
of the state.
This is what ends him pan theories consistent with neo - liberal concepts that are often focused on the results of the pastoral relationship without focusing on the possibility of hiring rents in the development of economic and social life, as well as a charge of this type of economy unilateralism , even if it diversified sources of revenue.
The paradox here is that some people in line who preach Blabralah the market, that this economy usually leads to enshrine the concept of the consumer society is the product and contributes to the consolidation of the existence of authoritarian regimes by the lack of the state 's reliance on tax system to finance its revenue, which necessarily contributes to the accounting authority on financial results to meet what Tajabih of public funds, in essence based market liberalism to call for the freedom of capital and freeing the individual from the feeling of dependence on the state.
The most surprising in some propositions that promise Blabralah market to persist in criticizing the rentier economy to some extent make rent direct cause of the conflict between community formations, as it goes a lot of the advocates of liberalism far as to say disqualified entity rentier state to contain the democratic form multi - state spectra, the considering that the rent would be a matter of debate and conflict between nationalities and races, is laying the groundwork for political conflicts and infighting between community entities .. In this sense, the State Administration can only be the shift towards capitalist market economy through privatization rents resources for the benefit of capital , which can buy assets such rents, or return to the form of the authoritarian state!
What concerns us here is marketing the idea of rent "scourge" on society as bringing the conflicts and justification of tyranny, which is in line with what is being said on the street "Ahsalnh of oil is war ?!" On the back of the recruitment of rent by the former regime to devote his authority, as well as suspension of the problem of structural macroeconomic imbalances such rents, without giving historical and geopolitical importance of the data in this "scourge." This is what ends him theorizations Middle East project owners and Tjatra writings halves intellectuals these days which smells of incorporation to the order of
[rtl][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.][/rtl]