Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Middle Eastern system and policy Impossible

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 268390
    Join date : 2012-12-21

    system - Middle Eastern system and policy Impossible Empty Middle Eastern system and policy Impossible

    Post by Rocky Sat 11 Feb 2017, 3:35 am

    Middle Eastern system and policy Impossible





    2017/02/11 | 12:01




    (Encyclopedia of the Day News | Iraq News ) - are important in the Syrian revolution politicians does not appear, and the Arab revolutions in general. 

    Does this failed revolutions, or that this generated , failure? I tend to answer that the emergence of politicians associated Login year in politics, which looked to revolutions and failed in it. 

    This article seeks some of the roots of the failure of the revolutions and the scarcity of politicians in the «system Middle East».



    The first defense of the community is owning policy and production means working to change the system as a whole




    Condemned sovereignty in the Middle East since 1967 , the Americans and the Israeli partner. 

    Arab states retained sovereignty demilitarized policy Movernmaha, but somehow does not affect the system

    Political change in our region has become an international issue Internationalized and stopped any endogenous political changes since that time approx. 

    What I call the Middle Eastern system is based on the internationalization of the change, and what that means there is the rule of supreme control basic political processes in the region, a manner that respects the «stability» and thus ensure the survival of crews Alhakmh.alnzam the Middle East is through one big war at least every decade of years: 1948.1956, 1967.1973, 1982.1991, 2003 , as well as Israel 's repeated wars against the Palestinians. 

    But the system also form across the Lebanese civil war (1975-1990, Hafez al - Assad granted crush the insurgency license Gen. Michel Aoun as the price of joining the international coalition against Saddam Hussein at the time) system, the first stamens and the war in Syria (1979-1982), and the wars of Saddam Hussein ( the war Iraqi - Iranian 1980 -1988, and the war in Kuwait , 1990-1991) and the siege of Iraq until the occupation in 2003, and before that and after inflicting the Gulf of national security system Alomirka.obinma system days has not been without tensions and conflicts, decimal and rhythm of wars strong indicator, it took based on steadfast interrelated: the security of Israel 's absolute pillar, and its monopoly on war in the region, and absolute security for crews accepted rule and the monopoly of the war at home. 

    There was always Maatardon from under the system

    Their name these terrorists, and they deserve to crush Doma.filstinion Obahawwa political genocide since the establishment of Israel, the physical and genocide wherever they resisted and attacked. 

    Syrians Tlohm. 

    While the PLO forces surrounded and kicked out of Lebanon occupied by Israel in the early summer of 1982, she was barely passed four months on the massacre Hamah.ouma turned political change into an international affair, is specific to a particular new sovereignty, Israeli - American, taking a pattern legitimacy systems ruling changed a significant change in our region. 

    Before that, the government derives its legitimacy from the crews adhesion including supposedly goals and an independent national university communities recently. 

    After that, legitimacy has become something inherent in the ruling, and they became of giving legitimacy to what lies beneath them from the peoples and nations. 

    Hafez al - Assad of Syria is more important than immeasurably, which gives it legitimacy, state and country. 

    Saddam and like it. 

    And Gaddafi. 

    Egypt was firmer entity that entails governor, but political change is no longer an Egyptian affair since the seventies, and Mubarak was working on hereditary rule in his descendants, what would be a leap toward owning «Mother of the World» in keeping with a year dynasty stamens in Sorah.obinzerh General, since the defeat of the Arab nationalist movement in June 1967 did not produce our politicians, individuals and communities are free and independent people, or engaged in a struggle for freedom and independence. 

    We have produced tyrants raised themselves above the human place, and activists in a desperate situation. 

    And by the tyranny on the one hand and the war all the decimals on the other hand, what caused the societies of Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine, Egypt and to a lesser extent, from the devastation, impossible that the social and political choices stable, works for which groups of individuals and the accumulation of ideas and experience over the years formed. 

    Politicians did not appear because the building options and protection were two things Msthilin.almsolh simply that our societies devoid of politics at the hands of local agents, to the extent that our countries bereft of sovereignty and the practice of politics in the international arena. 

    This is a «common law.» 

    If all attempts to build a new political groupings or organizations fail in a manner we water frequently, Fbfl this year 's law , which leaves limited margins for the largest act of Alssayas.maholh Assembly to own policy through the demolition of the wall of the local agency represented in the Arab revolutions. 

    The largest, the Syrian Revolution, been comprehensively smashed by the local agency, but the active participation of the leading powers in the international system that Israel has given little say then. 

    And contributed to the Islamic configurations generated by the prolonged political stone, and it seems that politics defies them intractable inevitable, melt all the time in religion or in war, or in Mzejehma: Salafist Aljhadih.khalal the first two years of the Syrian Revolution, appeared political experiences and emerged a large number of activists and activists and forms of work a year, it would produce a new policy and politicians. 

    But the failure of the revolution, the largest collective effort defined by Syria to own policy in half a century, unleashed a wave smashing the opposite, partly from within these objects new self and experiences, albeit basic crashing came from the party «system», local thereof and the international Middle Oosti.la leaves Middle Eastern regime opportunities to own a policy is not the revolution, but the possession of sovereignty, including in particular the war, is the absolute nihilistic insurgency along the lines of the Salafist jihadist. 

    There is no point just in my opinion to condemn the Salafist jihadist from any location does not condemn the Middle East , local systems existing system

    Salafi Jihad failed to solve the problems of sovereign and political in the Middle East, from the face of it attached to the policy of sovereignty over the way stamens State itself, turned without politics and the public interest appears, without to have real sovereignty beyond waging the ongoing war on Movernmaha, and the face of it turned to an item of the counter system policy elements, and an excuse for the oppression of any strong popular potential. 

    But not from the historical point of view what is special or Asttnaia.az what system provides the options? The system itself, ie , infinite repetition, or «forever», as it is called in Syria, then «opposition» Small fail to evolve, and the only chance to evolve a political expressions are the system crash and convergence forever. 

    It remains the third option is nihilistic option , which is against all , and the foundation, which is the Salafi Jihad. 

    Our Middle East policy , which does not permit does not allow the emergence of these roles is Althelath.vi any direction system evolves in time to crush the Syrian revolution at the hands of the Iranian theocracy and the followers of the Iraqi, Lebanese and Afghan sectarian militias and others, and at the hands of the Russian Empire? There is nothing to suggest that the entry of Russia and Iran conflicts with system architecture, based on preventing countries from acquiring the war (against non Movernmaha), and to prevent convicts from owning policy. 

    Russian and Iranian Ctlalan apparently linked Baenkva US in the Middle East, but there is nothing to affect the Israeli centralism, on to the occupiers are working to save a local committed, took into account the length of time controls territorial sovereignty and it was tough to eradicate politics from the inside Alsora.bl Today , it seems that the system Middle East in the process after the Arab revolutions evolve in the direction of a more aggressive and crushed policy communities. 

    Iran and Russia Maaditan community in Syria, and not only for the independence of the policies in this society like Americans. 

    And both countries are compatible with the interests of ethnic cleansing and changing the demographic composition of Syrian society, that is, they do not Tktefian disarm the politics of the Syrians, but Ptbr Syrian meeting itself. 

    It seems that the phase of the new US policy, phase Turamba, compatible with him , too, under the banner of fighting terrorism Alasalama.mama does hostages system rejectionists role of the opposition , who crushed again and again, or adapt the system gives the site, opponents also exits nihilism and the Salafist jihadist ? This is the question of questions today. 

    It is the most difficult question in the Syrian context in which they are not allowed to operate the infrastructure at home by tyranny recovered the same condition, protected foreign bayonets, or by uprooting and physical impossibility. «Must defend society» against ethnic cleansing and changing the composition of the population, and against genocide. 

    But the first defense of the community in every case is to acquire the policy and production, which means working to change the system as a whole, «Middle East» as space dependency binds them what is local with what is a regional and international. 

    This seems very reluctant to the day after the failure of the Arab revolutions. 

    But the aspiration of the Arab revolutions remains at present day and in all the time. 

    « The people want to overthrow the regime» to politics and has become Ath.ki people.



    Source: newspaper "Life"

    https://hathalyoum.net/articles/1228782-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D8%B8%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%B7%D9%8A-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A9

      Current date/time is Fri 19 Apr 2024, 3:08 am