Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Upper: Security will collapse and the United States would not intervene again

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 267081
    Join date : 2012-12-21

    Upper: Security will collapse and the United States would not intervene again  Empty Upper: Security will collapse and the United States would not intervene again

    Post by Rocky Wed 07 Aug 2013, 4:00 am

    Upper: Security will collapse and the United States would not intervene again




    Tuesday, 06 August / August 2013 12:56




    BAGHDAD / Duraid Salman

    Ruled out independent MP Hassan Alawi, the possibility of entering the United States militarily in Iraq again, while the expected deterioration of the security situation more. The upper said talk of a U.S. offer to the Iraqi government includes fighter to send U.S. troops to help maintain security in Iraq has not officially confirmed news and hypothetical, adding that "the United States has not and will not get involved again in any military action in the region."

    He added: that America can provide backing for the Iraqi government, as well as the logistics aid is excluded, the fact that "the United States feel that things in Iraq escaped," but it would not intervene directly. He explained: that American support for Iraq is linked primarily American responsibility on the grounds it was the state of the Iraqi security guarantor according of security Stratjah concluded between the two countries. And: that the United States bears responsibility in Iraq, such as France, which bears responsibility for Lebanon after the withdrawal from Lebanon and conclude an agreement similar to those signed between Iraq and the United States, and therefore not so long ago to send American equipment or military experts and equipment is offensive as organs eavesdropping and surveillance, to support Iraq security and however require the U.S. strategic interest.

    Upper politically favored the survival of Maliki first in the political scene, and said: that al-Maliki will remain is the first winner in the next stage because the front of his opponents dispersed. He continued: that al-Maliki strengthen his position after the agreement was recently between the Territory and the center, where collapsed a large part of the coalition counter to the owners, and remained the Sadrists and the group in the remnants of Iraq's fragmented are the other of which went to al-Maliki earlier and others later, some of them waiting his turn.

    He said: that al-Maliki is the winner did not offer concessions and remained in line with the same, unlike the others, pointing out that that leaves the environment electoral and belongs to the other means that does not belong to himself, especially after the leaves alliance strategic, and behold what did not happen to the owners through the other blocs.

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

      Current date/time is Thu 28 Mar 2024, 7:20 pm