Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Iraq Dinar/News is a popular topic among many topics this board offers. You must log in to see and participate in our Dinar sections.

Hello friends -

Have you wanted to grow your nest egg faster to fulfill your family's dreams? Maybe you own an IRA, a 401K, maybe even a few stocks and mutual funds. Or maybe you're just starting...

Take a few moments to explore a simple program which can accelerate and even turbocharge your wealth growth to reach your dreams!

http://Styles.CTSoft.io

Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 7am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2019


Federalism ruled unconstitutional paragraph of the budget was hampering investment projects

Share
avatar
rocky
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 136420
Thanked : 7790
Join date : 2012-12-21

Federalism ruled unconstitutional paragraph of the budget was hampering investment projects

Post by rocky on Wed 11 Jul 2018, 3:36 pm


Federalism ruled unconstitutional paragraph of the budget was hampering investment projects

11:25 - 11/07/2018
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]



[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Information / Baghdad ..
On Wednesday, the Federal Supreme Court ruled unconstitutionality in one of the paragraphs of the Budget Law of 2018, which would impede the implementation of investment projects.
"The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat Al-Mahmoud, and the presence of all the members of the judges, and considered the appeal contained in Article (2 / II / 19) of the General Budget Law," said Ayas al-Samuk, a spokesman for the court. Which states: (All sovereign guarantees for investment projects with the approval of the Council of Ministers and the ratification of the House of Representatives).
He added Samok, "The Federal Supreme Court found that the House of Representatives added the last paragraph, which is the need to ratify the House of Representatives on the sovereign guarantees, to the draft law subject to appeal without reference to the Council of Ministers," noting that "the Court explained that this text would restrict the movement The executive authority in the contracts relating to the investment projects, and this interference in the affairs of the executive authority and contrary to the principle of separation between the powers provided for in Article (47) of the Constitution, and contrary to Article (61 / I) of the Constitution.
He explained that "the Federal Supreme Court stated that it is not the competence of the Council of Representatives to ratify the sovereign guarantees of investment projects, but it exercise its powers to control the performance of the executive authority in this area, and resort to constitutional means if there is a defect in performance, The executive authority to require the ratification of the sovereign guarantees for investment projects, and accordingly the court decided to rule unconstitutional the last part of the said article including the ratification of the House of Representatives on the sovereign guarantees. Ending / 25

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    Current date/time is Fri 21 Sep 2018, 5:19 am