Tariq Harb: Parliament's decision to suspend the previous government's decisions is unconstitutional
The legal expert Tariq Harb, the decision of the parliament to stop the work of [url=https://www.thebaghdadpost.com/ar/Story/t/92452/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A9 %D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%82%D8%A9]the previous government's[/url] decisions unconstitutional.
Harb said: "If the parliament had to issue such a decision, considering that its authority is not limited by the constitution, it is unconstitutional and unconstitutional in many ways. The first is that article 138 of the constitution, which ended in 2010, The presidential council, which was in the first electoral cycle from 2006 to 2010.
He added: "The decision of the parliament mentioned the fifth paragraph of Article (138), which provides for (send .. decisions made by the Council of Representatives to the Presidency Council) and this Council ended and there is not since the elections in 2010 where the Presidency Council, which mentioned the decision of Parliament in paragraph V of The previous article and pain is not read this text and the collision with the Presidency Council ended. "
He explained that "it was necessary to issue a law and not a decision did not arrange the Constitution any legal effect on him except for the decisions set by the Constitution and arranged effects such as the resolution of the validity of membership and secret meetings and the election of presidencies and ministers and extension of its meeting and the submission of legislation and vote, "It was not necessary to have a law that has a legal effect, such as granting the president of the republic the authority to ratify the law, but he does not have the authority to ratify the decisions, such as the resolution passed by parliament yesterday."
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]