Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Legal: Parliament's vote is binding to remove the Americans and Article 30 of the Strategic Agreemen

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 272546
    Join date : 2012-12-21

    Legal: Parliament's vote is binding to remove the Americans and Article 30 of the Strategic Agreemen Empty Legal: Parliament's vote is binding to remove the Americans and Article 30 of the Strategic Agreemen

    Post by Rocky Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:34 pm


    Legal: Parliament's vote is binding to remove the Americans and Article 30 of the Strategic Agreement does not hinder the resolution

    16:58 - 30/01/2019



    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    Information / Special ...
    The legal expert Ali al-Tamimi said on Wednesday that the terms of the strategic agreement concluded between Baghdad and Washington have nothing to do with ending the US presence in Iraq, between the parliament's vote on the draft resolution of the removal of foreign forces will be binding on America to withdraw its combat troops permanently and in violation of that will apply Chapter VII Of United Nations law and deal with it as an occupier of the country.
    "There is a difference between the strategic agreement signed between Iraq and America in 2008 and the removal of US forces that entered the resolution of the UN Security Council to fight the terrorist," Al-Tamimi said in a statement to Al-Maaloumah. "Article 30 of the strategic agreement, The right of any party to terminate the agreement unilaterally after a year of notification has nothing to do with ending the US presence in Iraq, and the decision of the parliament will be bound to withdraw US forces after a series of actions.
    He added that "the strategic agreement related to the economic and security aspects of the training and arming of Iraqi forces and cultural development and America is not entitled to use for the survival of combat forces in Iraq," noting that "the Iraqi Foreign Ministry will resort after the parliament vote on a draft resolution to remove foreign forces to notify the US embassy to withdraw its troops from the country If it fails to comply, the government will go to file a UN complaint against Washington. "
    "The American side will apply Chapter VII of the United Nations law in the event that the withdrawal of combat troops from Iraq after the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, The Iraqi parliament's vote on him and will explain survival on the basis of occupation and the threat to international peace and security. "
    The Committee on Security and Defense parliamentary, said earlier, it will adopt a new draft for the removal of foreign troops (US and Turkish) of the country within the House of Representatives in the coming days.
    The Committee on Security and Defense parliamentary, on Tuesday, the horror of the US side of the decision to draft the removal of foreign forces from the country and the cancellation of the strategic agreement between Baghdad and Washington behind the US troops in combat in the capital cities and a number of other provinces.

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

      Current date/time is Tue Jun 25, 2024 6:08 pm