Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Including the need to pass the provisions with the approval of three quarters of the experts of Shar

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 280608
    Join date : 2012-12-21

    Including the need to pass the provisions with the approval of three quarters of the experts of Shar Empty Including the need to pass the provisions with the approval of three quarters of the experts of Shar

    Post by Rocky Wed 26 Jun 2019, 3:48 am

    POSTED ON [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    [size=52]Including the need to pass the provisions with the approval of three quarters of the experts of Sharia[/size]

    [size=45]An expert reveals a dangerous point in the minutes of the House of Representatives to discuss the Federal Supreme Court Act
    [size=45]Revealed a legal expert on a dangerous paragraph contained in the minutes of the House of Representatives to discuss the draft law of the Federal Supreme Court, indicating that the paragraph gives preference to Islamic jurisprudents to the judges.[/size]
    [size=45]"The consideration of the minutes of the agenda of the session on Tuesday 24/6/2019, published on the website of the House of Representatives shows the extent of differences on the law of the Federal Supreme Court."[/size]
    [size=45]He added that Sharif, "that the session allocated part of them to discuss the controversial bill amid a wide divergence of views, which called the Chairman of the meeting to continue talks on it without completing the second reading."[/size]

    [size=45]He pointed out that "the most prominent of the record contained a paragraph that reinforced our previous concerns of the law, and quote it as follows (requiring that the special provisions and decisions obtain the approval of three quarters of Islamic jurisprudents in the court to ensure that the rules of Islam are not opposed).[/size]
    [size=45]Al-Sherif said that "this quote shows the extent of the Council's insistence on the inclusion of clerics in the Federal Supreme Court, not only as members contrary to the judicial nature stipulated in Article 92 (I) of the Constitution, they are preferred to the judges through the need to issue verdicts With the approval of three-quarters of jurists. "[/size]
    [size=45]He explained that "the decision, even if issued by a majority of the members of the Court, some of whom are not judges, must be approved by three quarters of jurists to pass."[/size]
    [size=45]"The use of this condition in the transformation of the regime in Iraq to an Islamic; the fact that the Federal Supreme Court is the only body authorized to interpret the constitutional text and veto what is issued by the authorities and does not subject to what is issued to challenge."[/size]
    [size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    [/size][/size]

      Current date/time is Sun 10 Nov 2024, 7:02 am