Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Priority between economic and political in the "Deal of the Century"

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 270719
    Join date : 2012-12-21

    Priority between economic and political in the "Deal of the Century" Empty Priority between economic and political in the "Deal of the Century"

    Post by Rocky Wed 10 Jul 2019, 3:14 am


    [size=32]Priority between economic and political in the "Deal of the Century"


    - 1 Minute Ago
    [/size]
    Priority between economic and political in the "Deal of the Century" %D8%B5%D9%81%D9%82%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%B1%D9%86-%D8%A7%D8%A7%D8%A7%D8%A7%D8%A7%D8%A7%D8%A7
    [size][size][url][/url][/size]
    [/size]
    Dr.. Salim Mohammed Zaanoun
    deal President Trump since his arrival in the White House , the logic of economic power, as a key to resolve all outstanding issues in the international arena, according to this perspective comes trade war with China, and economic sanctions on Iran and Russia, raising tariffs with Turkey, Mexico and the countries of the European Union.
    The Palestinian-Israeli conflict was not isolated from this vision. The American administration believes that the conflict can be resolved through the use of economic instruments. In March 2018, the Washington Conference for the Economic Support of the Gaza Strip was held, and on 25-26 June 2019, "Peace for Prosperity", during which it reviewed its economic vision of three main aspects: maximizing Palestinian economic potential; creating one million jobs; and reducing Palestinian poverty levels by 50%. The Manama conference will raise $ 50 billion for 10 years of infrastructure Infrastructure, and otherwise Hunted, creating job opportunities, regional trade, improve the economy to push the Palestinians to put pressure on their leadership to show greater flexibility in political issues, to pave the way for a political agreement aimed.
    Until now, the political aspect of the plan has been missed and the administration announced its postponement to a later stage. This seems to be related to the stability of the political system in Israel, which is related to holding elections in September. At this stage, the American elections are approaching, After the American elections in 2020. 
    Historical experiences to end major conflicts indicate the priority of the political file on economic issues, where the dimension of economy is secondary compared to national and political issues, and the agreements and economic development culminate in the agreement At a later stage, the 1988 Belfast Agreement was a political agreement between Britain and Ireland, ending the conflict in the final form and achieving peaceful coexistence between the Northern Ireland and Irish Republics. At a later stage, economic and commercial action was strengthened.
    The US economic power played a role in the achievement of political agreements. Washington provided guarantees and economic support for the success of political agreements. However, it was not the first incentive for countries to sign agreements. The first incentive was to achieve national and political issues. Then, economic projects between the two conflicting parties After the basic agreement. 
    In the Camp David model between Egypt and Israel, it was not the economic issue that led to a solution to the conflict, but the complete Israeli withdrawal from Egyptian territory, in the same context, the Wadi Araba agreement between Jordan and Israel. The agreement on political issues such as the disputed border was The US administration strengthened the two agreements by providing economic support to Egypt and Jordan, and at a later stage, several economic agreements were signed between the parties to the political agreement.
    The Oslo agreement between the PLO and Israel dealt mainly with political issues such as the Israeli withdrawal, self-rule, guarantees and economic aid from the United States, followed by the signing of the Paris Economic Agreement, and when the political process between the Palestinian and Israeli sides was disrupted, the economic agreement was unable to prevent the outbreak of violence. 
    The economic dimension plays a role in the solution, but it is not the same solution, and economic considerations are a catalyst for the continuation of the negotiations, but in the context of the historical experience of ending the conflicts, if the work in a purely economic framework was the signing of the political agreements, Belfast, Camp David, Oslo and Wadi Araba. Priorities come after political interests and national issues.
    In view of this, the American administration's attempt to reverse the priorities in resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict by presenting the economic to the political is not practical and will not lead to an end to the conflict, which requires a creative and creative political vision that achieves the political interests of the Israeli and Palestinian parties.



      Current date/time is Sat 25 May 2024, 12:08 am