Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    The Federal Court responds to the request of the President of the Republic, Barham Salih, regarding

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 277783
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    The Federal Court responds to the request of the President of the Republic, Barham Salih, regarding Empty The Federal Court responds to the request of the President of the Republic, Barham Salih, regarding

    Post by Rocky Sun 22 Dec 2019, 3:55 am

    The Federal Court responds to the request of the President of the Republic, Barham Salih, regarding the "largest parliamentary bloc"

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    Baghdad / ... The Federal Supreme Court, today, Sunday, responded to the request of the President of the Republic, Barham Salih, regarding the "largest parliamentary bloc".

    The following is the text of what the court said:

    Mr. President of the Republic asked the Supreme Federal Court to determine the largest bloc mentioned in Article (76) of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2005.

    The court received the request on Thursday, 19/12/2019, and accordingly the court held a session to consider the application, on Sunday morning, 22/12/2019, with all its members and issued the following decision:

     

    ((The listed application formulated above was subject to scrutiny and deliberation by the Federal Supreme Court at its session held on December 22, 2019 and reached after deliberation and scrutiny and after referring to the priorities for its interpretation of the provision of Article (76) of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2005, according to its decision issued on 25 / 3/2010 in the number (25 / federal / 2010), which I confirmed by its decision dated 11/8/2014 in the number (45 / TC / 2014) and their contents, that the term (the largest number of parliamentary blocs) mentioned in Article (76) of the constitution It means either the bloc that was formed after the elections through one electoral list, or the bloc that was formed after the elections from two lists One or more electoral lists and entered the House of Representatives and became seats after entering the Council and its members took the oath in the first session, the largest number of the rest of the blocs, then the President of the Republic assigns its candidate to form a cabinet in accordance with the provisions of Article (76) of the Constitution and within the period specified therein.

     This is what the Supreme Federal Court decided upon according to its aforementioned decisions in the interpretation of Article (76) of the constitution and by clarifying the concept of the largest number of parliamentary blocs.

    Whereas, the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court are final and binding on all legislative, executive, and judicial authorities stipulated in Article (47) of the Constitution, and that the Federal Supreme Court is one of its components according to the provisions of Article (89) of the Constitution, it is bound by the rulings and decisions it issues, and accordingly the Supreme Federal Court decides its commitment With its aforementioned decisions, which are attached to this decision to interpret the provision of Article (76) of the Constitution in accordance with what was stated in them and this decision was issued in full and binding agreement in accordance with the provisions of Article (94) of the Constitution and Article (5) of the Federal Supreme Court Law and edited at the sitting (Dated 22/12/2019)). Finished 2 




    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Fri 20 Sep 2024, 3:25 am