The opening of a[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], the first in over a decade, provides an opportunity to re-evaluate America’s options in Iraq by considering what the U.S. presence in that theater could realistically achieve if it remains as well as the possible results of a complete withdrawal if it does not. President Donald Trump described the war in Iraq as “a horrible mistake” and declared the “[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]” on Twitter. But like his predecessor, he is finding the more isolationist approach plays well with the American public though in practice it is extremely difficult to implement.
Withdrawing from the “[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]” and reducing the U.S. military footprint in the region is proving more complicated than Trump might have anticipated because of opposition to such steps on the professional levels of U.S. government, and it conflicts with some of the president’s other stated goals including preventing the re-emergence of the Islamic State and maintaining “maximum pressure” on Iran.
The impetus for ending the U.S. presence in Iraq (and drawing down from the Middle East more broadly) is the astronomical price of U.S. wars there in terms of blood and treasure, as tweeted by Trump “8 Trillion Dollars and many thousands of lives (and millions of lives when you count the other side)” from which the U.S. derived minimal returns. It is undeniable that the costly U.S. invasion of Iraq not only drained resources but also unleashed Iran in a way that provided Tehran with the opportunity to both expand its influence and bog down Washington in a messy counter-insurgency campaign.
But to order the United States to withdraw based on those reasons would be to argue against maintaining the U.S. presence in Iraq one decade ago—not today.
Frustration with the results of the U.S. occupation of Iraq under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama is an inadequate reason to ignore the fact that maintaining a presence there now is considerably less costly than during the 2003–2011 era.
The number of Americans killed in Iraq last year (8) was less than 1 percent of the number of troops killed in 2004-2007 (800+), while U.S. expenditures to maintain its current presence in Iraq is similarly only a small fraction of the annual expenses incurred during the aughts.
The key question, then, is what does the United States stand to gain from maintaining it?
If the White House’s aim is to force Iraq to choose between Washington and Teheran, then it will likely be disappointed by the results of such a maneuver. Baghdad is presumably aware of America’s declining interest in the Middle East and the fickle nature of U.S. foreign policy as of late which has led each successive U.S. president to undo many of the actions of his predecessor.
Iran, on the other hand, has an enduring interest in Iraq due to the countries’ geographical proximity to one another as well as religious affinities.
Iran has also enmeshed itself into the political, security, and economic fabric of Iraq to the extent that attempting to remove it could prove highly destabilizing for Iraq; because Iraq constitutes Iran’s strategic depth, as both a bridge and a buffer, Tehran would not forfeit its deeply entrenched positioning there without a fight.
The United States should not understand this to mean that Iraq has been lost outright to Iran, rather that it is an area of competition for influence and it will remain so, for better and for worse, as long as the United States does not withdraw.
By remaining engaged with Iraq, the United States provides politicians in Baghdad the opportunity to counter-balance Iran’s penetration and to avoid becoming entirely beholden to Tehran.
Washington should leverage its value as a partner to ensure several clearly defined aims.
Decisionmakers in Baghdad are likely aware that if the U.S. derives no benefit from its continued presence then it may be inclined to drawdown, which would create a security vacuum that Iran would rush in to exploit in order to:
1) use Iraq as a production, storage, and launch site for (plausibly deniable) precision missile strikes against U.S. forces and allies in the region including Israel and Saudi Arabia,
2) influence Iraq’s oil policy to exert greater control over the global energy market,
3) use Iraq as a venue for sanctions-busting, which will ultimately leave the Iraqi economically deeply isolated.
Assuming Iraqi leaders are willing to cooperate with Washington in order to avert Iranian designs for Iraq, the United States should seek to rein in Iran’s most dangerous behavior there with the understanding that there are limitations on what it can demand vis-à-vis the Iraqi government.
Ensuring the safety of U.S. forces and diplomatic personnel stationed in Iraq should be the first priority.
A second goal, with significant overlap to the first, would be cracking down on activities related to Iran’s precision-guided munitions program taking place on Iraqi territory.
Third, the United States might seek to promote greater Iraqi integration into the global economy in order to reduce its dependence on Iran.
Fourth, Baghdad and Washington ought to discuss how to prevent Iraq from becoming a battlefield on which the U.S.-Iran tensions play out.
In January 2020, we that the assassination of Iran’s Qassim Suleimani [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] which would dramatically alter the strategic environment in the Middle East—and that thesis still holds.
However, the Quds Force commander’s demise may provide latitude for somewhat closer U.S.-Iraqi cooperation because it appears unlikely that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] will develop a comparable level of familiarity with and control over the Iraqi political and security arena.
That window of opportunity has since been compounded by the appointment of Mustafa al-Kadhimi, who is viewed as close to the United States, to the post of the prime minister of Iraq.
American frustration with the situation in Iraq is understandable—but it will endure until the United States either sets more clearly defined and limited goals there or withdraws.
While the latter option may be more politically expedient, the “all or nothing approach” will have significant costs for U.S. interests, regional allies, and the people of Iraq. After all, it is not only initiating wars that can have unintended consequences, that also applies to how one chooses to manage or end them.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Withdrawing from the “[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]” and reducing the U.S. military footprint in the region is proving more complicated than Trump might have anticipated because of opposition to such steps on the professional levels of U.S. government, and it conflicts with some of the president’s other stated goals including preventing the re-emergence of the Islamic State and maintaining “maximum pressure” on Iran.
The impetus for ending the U.S. presence in Iraq (and drawing down from the Middle East more broadly) is the astronomical price of U.S. wars there in terms of blood and treasure, as tweeted by Trump “8 Trillion Dollars and many thousands of lives (and millions of lives when you count the other side)” from which the U.S. derived minimal returns. It is undeniable that the costly U.S. invasion of Iraq not only drained resources but also unleashed Iran in a way that provided Tehran with the opportunity to both expand its influence and bog down Washington in a messy counter-insurgency campaign.
But to order the United States to withdraw based on those reasons would be to argue against maintaining the U.S. presence in Iraq one decade ago—not today.
Frustration with the results of the U.S. occupation of Iraq under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama is an inadequate reason to ignore the fact that maintaining a presence there now is considerably less costly than during the 2003–2011 era.
The number of Americans killed in Iraq last year (8) was less than 1 percent of the number of troops killed in 2004-2007 (800+), while U.S. expenditures to maintain its current presence in Iraq is similarly only a small fraction of the annual expenses incurred during the aughts.
The key question, then, is what does the United States stand to gain from maintaining it?
If the White House’s aim is to force Iraq to choose between Washington and Teheran, then it will likely be disappointed by the results of such a maneuver. Baghdad is presumably aware of America’s declining interest in the Middle East and the fickle nature of U.S. foreign policy as of late which has led each successive U.S. president to undo many of the actions of his predecessor.
Iran, on the other hand, has an enduring interest in Iraq due to the countries’ geographical proximity to one another as well as religious affinities.
Iran has also enmeshed itself into the political, security, and economic fabric of Iraq to the extent that attempting to remove it could prove highly destabilizing for Iraq; because Iraq constitutes Iran’s strategic depth, as both a bridge and a buffer, Tehran would not forfeit its deeply entrenched positioning there without a fight.
The United States should not understand this to mean that Iraq has been lost outright to Iran, rather that it is an area of competition for influence and it will remain so, for better and for worse, as long as the United States does not withdraw.
By remaining engaged with Iraq, the United States provides politicians in Baghdad the opportunity to counter-balance Iran’s penetration and to avoid becoming entirely beholden to Tehran.
Washington should leverage its value as a partner to ensure several clearly defined aims.
Decisionmakers in Baghdad are likely aware that if the U.S. derives no benefit from its continued presence then it may be inclined to drawdown, which would create a security vacuum that Iran would rush in to exploit in order to:
1) use Iraq as a production, storage, and launch site for (plausibly deniable) precision missile strikes against U.S. forces and allies in the region including Israel and Saudi Arabia,
2) influence Iraq’s oil policy to exert greater control over the global energy market,
3) use Iraq as a venue for sanctions-busting, which will ultimately leave the Iraqi economically deeply isolated.
Assuming Iraqi leaders are willing to cooperate with Washington in order to avert Iranian designs for Iraq, the United States should seek to rein in Iran’s most dangerous behavior there with the understanding that there are limitations on what it can demand vis-à-vis the Iraqi government.
Ensuring the safety of U.S. forces and diplomatic personnel stationed in Iraq should be the first priority.
A second goal, with significant overlap to the first, would be cracking down on activities related to Iran’s precision-guided munitions program taking place on Iraqi territory.
Third, the United States might seek to promote greater Iraqi integration into the global economy in order to reduce its dependence on Iran.
Fourth, Baghdad and Washington ought to discuss how to prevent Iraq from becoming a battlefield on which the U.S.-Iran tensions play out.
In January 2020, we that the assassination of Iran’s Qassim Suleimani [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] which would dramatically alter the strategic environment in the Middle East—and that thesis still holds.
However, the Quds Force commander’s demise may provide latitude for somewhat closer U.S.-Iraqi cooperation because it appears unlikely that [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] will develop a comparable level of familiarity with and control over the Iraqi political and security arena.
That window of opportunity has since been compounded by the appointment of Mustafa al-Kadhimi, who is viewed as close to the United States, to the post of the prime minister of Iraq.
American frustration with the situation in Iraq is understandable—but it will endure until the United States either sets more clearly defined and limited goals there or withdraws.
While the latter option may be more politically expedient, the “all or nothing approach” will have significant costs for U.S. interests, regional allies, and the people of Iraq. After all, it is not only initiating wars that can have unintended consequences, that also applies to how one chooses to manage or end them.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Today at 7:23 am by Rocky
» Governor of Baghdad: 20 projects will be included during the current year in the city of Nahrawan
Today at 7:20 am by Rocky
» More than $242 million in central bank sales today
Today at 7:17 am by Rocky
» Advisor: Sudanese is determined to close the displacement file
Today at 7:14 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani: The implementation of the 2023 budget witnessed a success that must be invested in
Today at 7:13 am by Rocky
» The Baghdad Council will decide on the nomination of the committees in the coming days
Today at 7:10 am by Rocky
» Al-Samarrai: The Sunni community is not in favor of removing American forces
Today at 7:08 am by Rocky
» A warning from Al-Rasheed to those wishing to apply for advances and loans
Today at 7:06 am by Rocky
» Azerbaijan expresses its desire to participate in the implementation of joint projects in the oil an
Today at 7:05 am by Rocky
» Fuel cards arouse citizens' discontent
Today at 7:03 am by Rocky
» utube 3/18/24 MM&C Iraqi Dinar-- IQD-- Dinar Update -100% Electronic - Real Effective Exchange Rat
Today at 5:21 am by Rocky
» utube MM&C 3/16/24 0:05 / 18:16 Iraq Federal Court Brings - Strength to Financial - Politic
Today at 5:18 am by Rocky
» MM&C 3/18/24 Sudanese Advisor: Iraq will leave government monetary dealing in mid-2024
Today at 5:17 am by Rocky
» A delegation from the Kurdistan government visits Baghdad to discuss the issue of localization of sa
Today at 5:11 am by Rocky
» Director of the Central Oil Company: We are keen to provide the appropriate investment environment
Today at 5:10 am by Rocky
» The Energy Parliament calls for reporting generators violating government pricing
Today at 5:08 am by Rocky
» A representative reveals the fate of the laws of “previous sessions”
Today at 5:07 am by Rocky
» Politician: Coordination holds the keys to resolving the “Parliament Presidency” conflict
Today at 5:05 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani: Iraq wants to carry out its peaceful activity in the field of atomic energy
Today at 5:04 am by Rocky
» Including a minister and a parliamentarian... 38 arrest and recruitment orders were issued against t
Today at 5:02 am by Rocky
» Integrity: Citizens’ cooperation resulted in detecting inflation and returning state funds
Today at 5:01 am by Rocky
» Agriculture presents 97 projects to the Ministerial Council for the Economy
Today at 4:59 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani: We succeeded in implementing the 2023 budget, and we must continue to complete economic p
Today at 4:58 am by Rocky
» Labor adopts new mechanisms to reduce the phenomenon of begging
Today at 4:57 am by Rocky
» Electronically.. directing the collection of fees tomorrow in an Iraqi governorate
Today at 4:56 am by Rocky
» Held in Brussels.. Iraq receives an official invitation to attend the Nuclear Energy Summit
Today at 4:55 am by Rocky
» Kurdistan has been paralyzed. There has been no liquidity in hand for 50 days, and the truth has bee
Today at 4:53 am by Rocky
» The dollar continues to decline against the Iraqi dinar on the stock exchange and exchange offices
Today at 4:52 am by Rocky
» The Minister of Oil reveals the reasons for Shell’s withdrawal from Nebras: It will be divided into
Today at 4:51 am by Rocky
» The Housing Fund advises loan applicants and launches a link for inquiries
Today at 4:50 am by Rocky
» He stressed that the government’s vision is to make one class not exceed 25 students...Government me
Today at 4:48 am by Rocky
» Al-Hakim and Al-Halbousi stress the importance of choosing a speaker for Parliament in accordance wi
Today at 4:47 am by Rocky
» Iron and Steel Company: Iraq is on the verge of a major industrial revolution
Today at 4:46 am by Rocky
» Economists: Citizens still prefer cash transactions over electronic transactions
Today at 4:45 am by Rocky
» The compass of Iraq's foreign policy in a world of turbulent polarization
Today at 4:43 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Finance: The federal budget is in the corridors of the Council of Ministers, and there
Today at 4:42 am by Rocky
» Integrity calls on citizens to report the inflation of funds in the sector of the Ministry of Labor
Today at 4:40 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani directs the launch of initiatives for young businessmen and investors
Today at 4:38 am by Rocky
» Representative agriculture emphasizes taking supportive measures for the local product
Today at 4:37 am by Rocky
» An economist calls on the government to support and stimulate the private sector
Today at 4:36 am by Rocky
» Al-Ittihad: Employees and retirees in Kurdistan paid the price of political differences with Baghdad
Today at 4:34 am by Rocky
» Al-Samarrai and Al-Hakim discuss the importance of achieving political and constitutional entitlemen
Today at 4:32 am by Rocky
» Only 23 million dunums. Iraq exploits approximately 50% of its arable land
Today at 4:30 am by Rocky
» Türkiye considers it a political issue.. Where have the negotiations reached regarding Iraq’s water
Today at 4:29 am by Rocky
» Sudanese receives an invitation to attend the Nuclear Energy Summit in Brussels - Urgent
Today at 4:27 am by Rocky
» Central Bank sales exceed $240 million today
Yesterday at 6:52 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Finance calls on the government to expedite sending the 2024 budget to Parliament
Yesterday at 6:47 am by Rocky
» ‘We’re So Sick of It’: Northern Border Crisis Gets Worse
Yesterday at 6:35 am by Bama Diva
» A representative holds Kurdistan responsible for the faltering legislation of the oil and gas law
Yesterday at 5:27 am by Rocky
» Warnings of the danger of the increase in foreign labor in Iraq
Yesterday at 5:26 am by Rocky
» Iraq's oil exports to America decreased within a week
Yesterday at 5:25 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani chairs an “important” meeting to form the Kirkuk government
Yesterday at 5:23 am by Rocky
» Investment confirms the adoption of a new method in new residential cities and explains its details
Yesterday at 5:21 am by Rocky
» For the first time in 2024.. exchange rates fall to the threshold of 149 thousand in Baghdad
Yesterday at 5:19 am by Rocky
» Including gold.. An increase in exports of 3 Turkish products to Iraq during 2024
Yesterday at 5:18 am by Rocky
» A detailed integrity report regarding the Housing Fund... called for this matter
Yesterday at 5:17 am by Rocky
» Resources count the number of trespassers in Baghdad.. What about restaurants?
Yesterday at 5:16 am by Rocky
» At a cost of approximately two billion dinars... determining the completion rates achieved in the Ma
Yesterday at 5:15 am by Rocky
» Parliament awaits the “Cabinet of Ministers” law
Yesterday at 5:14 am by Rocky
» Provincial councils return after an absence with a heavy legacy
Yesterday at 5:13 am by Rocky
» Iraq is the axis and meeting point of East and West
Yesterday at 5:11 am by Rocky
» One million beneficiaries of health insurance early next May
Yesterday at 5:10 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Finance: Delaying the budget had a negative impact on the performance of the ministrie
Yesterday at 5:09 am by Rocky
» The chaos of urban expansion threatens the agricultural character of Diwaniyah
Yesterday at 5:08 am by Rocky
» A project to plant Japanese trees in Erbil
Yesterday at 5:07 am by Rocky
» A team to prepare the national strategy for national security in Kirkuk
Yesterday at 5:06 am by Rocky
» Next Tuesday...concluding a contract to expand the basic design of the city of Mosul
Yesterday at 5:04 am by Rocky
» A festival to reduce food prices in Mosul
Yesterday at 5:03 am by Rocky
» Technical committees between Baghdad and Erbil to resume oil exports through Türkiye
Yesterday at 5:02 am by Rocky
» A model of economic diversification
Yesterday at 5:01 am by Rocky
» Variation in the extent to which Iraq was affected by the decision to reduce the credit rating of {T
Yesterday at 5:00 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani: Iraq has made a commitment to receive the entire security file from the Ministry of Inter
Yesterday at 4:58 am by Rocky
» The President of the Republic stresses the important role of Mr. Abdul Aziz Al-Hakim in the first st
Yesterday at 4:56 am by Rocky
» The Iraqi Center for Combating Rumors warns against social media celebrities misleading their follow
Yesterday at 4:54 am by Rocky
» Integrity investigates the work of the Housing Fund and indicates debts worth 56 billion dinars
Yesterday at 4:53 am by Rocky
» Agricultural associations in Karbala welcome the provincial council’s decision to prevent the fragme
Yesterday at 4:52 am by Rocky
» Free education lecturers demand that they be given job opportunities and contracts in Kirkuk
Yesterday at 4:51 am by Rocky
» The Digital Media Center calls for not browsing links published on a government page
Yesterday at 4:50 am by Rocky
» The President of the Republic confirms the strength of relations between Iraq and Italy
Yesterday at 4:48 am by Rocky
» A decline in Iraq's oil exports to America during the past week
Yesterday at 4:47 am by Rocky
» Economic researcher for / NINA /: Iraqi youth are qualified for the labor market and relying on them
Yesterday at 4:46 am by Rocky
» The Minister of Planning is following up on the Statistics Authority’s preparations to conduct the g
Yesterday at 4:45 am by Rocky
» 5 days after sending the money and the Kurdistan government has not paid the salaries...a political
Yesterday at 4:44 am by Rocky
» A political reading about Sudanese political concern.. Amending the election law is one of the attem
Yesterday at 4:42 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani to the Baghdad government: Pay attention to the outskirts of the capital, and drainage mus
Yesterday at 4:41 am by Rocky
» The Iraqi dinar recovers against the dollar in local markets
Yesterday at 4:39 am by Rocky
» Investment provides a summary of Bismaya units... and the new cities have “fixed prices” for the fir
Yesterday at 4:38 am by Rocky
» “Hidden commissions” on electronic fuel cards, contrary to what is advertised.. To whom does 100 mil
Yesterday at 4:37 am by Rocky
» Al-Hasnawi: The government is continuing to accelerate the completion and opening of lagging health
Yesterday at 4:36 am by Rocky
» Oil: The gasoline import file will be closed early next year
Yesterday at 4:35 am by Rocky
» “My account or your account”... a new problem behind the delay in the salaries of the region’s emplo
Yesterday at 4:34 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani: Iraq is about to host important events and conferences
Yesterday at 4:33 am by Rocky
» In Erdogan's visit to Iraq...the path of development in exchange for water
Yesterday at 4:33 am by Rocky
» An American report on Washington’s seriousness in withdrawing from Iraq: Biden does not want to lose
Yesterday at 4:30 am by Rocky
» The organization is banned in Iraq.. Baghdad decides the fate of the Workers’ Party after 40 years o
Yesterday at 4:29 am by Rocky
» The rain exposes the poor quality of service projects and calls for the dismissal of officials and h
Yesterday at 4:28 am by Rocky
» Politician: Ankara needs Baghdad economically, and the path of development is Iraq’s trump card
Yesterday at 4:26 am by Rocky
» Economic calls to adopt a new philosophy for implementing strategic projects
Yesterday at 4:24 am by Rocky
» Al-Maliki: My alliance with Al-Sadr is possible, and the movement’s distance from it is an unhealthy
Yesterday at 4:23 am by Rocky