The different versions of the budget ... a dangerous precedent that needs a serious pause to address

[size=52]The different versions of the budget ... a dangerous precedent that needs a serious pause to address it[/size]

[size=45]The issue of differences between the budget tables voted by the House of Representatives and the one published in the official newspaper met with mixed reactions among the political forces, while a member of the representative economy considered that situation as a dangerous precedent that needs to be followed up and addressed, a member of the Parliament underestimated the The importance of these tables, given that the basic articles governing the tunnel ceiling are fixed and unchanged, while a political researcher indicated that what happened in publishing tables related to the budget that differs from the one who voted on it leads to several indicators, and he needs to diagnose the defects in that case.[/size]
[size=45]Member of the Parliamentary Economic and Investment Committee, Nada Shaker Jawdat, confirmed that changes in some of the budget items voted on are a dangerous precedent that needs to be followed up and addressed, while she expressed her surprise at the government's desire to challenge some of the budget items.[/size]
[size=45]Jawdat said that "there is talk about a change in many budget numbers between the one that was voted on inside the parliament and the other that was published in the official newspaper, in addition to collecting parliamentary signatures to form a temporary parliamentary committee that monitors the implementation of the budget," indicating that "changes occurred in some budget items." The vote on it is a dangerous precedent that needs to be followed up and addressed.[/size]
[size=45]Jawdat added, "The Iraqi people were waiting for the political forces and the government to find mechanisms to provide services and projects, eliminate unemployment and address the state of poverty, and not create disagreements and controversies within the budget and important laws, as they will not be in the people's interest," pointing out that "the government's desire Appealing some budget provisions is a surprising thing, considering that during the entire period of completing the budget, there was communication between the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Planning and other government ministries and agencies on the one hand and between the House of Representatives and the Finance Committee on the other hand in order to reach a formula of transfers that is compatible with the requirements of the people and in a way that reduces the size The deficit in it and maximizes the revenues.[/size]
[size=45]Member of the Parliamentary Finance Committee, Muhammad al-Shabaki, indicated that the budget voted by the House of Representatives and approved by the President of the Republic and published in the Official Gazette is the same and the important and main chapters in it and the ceiling for imports and spending has not changed.[/size]
[size=45]"The budget in its entirety included the volume of spending which is 129.9 trillion dinars, and it was assumed, according to what came from the government, it was 164 trillion dinars, so the size of the final amount is what is important and not the tables considering that the first and second ruling articles are the basis for the sums." “.[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out that "the issue of the tables is not for the vote, but it is sub-tables, no more, but it is important to vote on the actual ceiling of funds, and it remains the issue of distribution to the provinces on projects according to the sub-tables."[/size]
[size=45]The political researcher, Yusuf Salman, indicated that what happened in publishing tables belonging to the budget that differs from the one who voted on it leads to several indicators, and he needs to diagnose the defects in that case.[/size]
[size=45]Salman said, "The conversation that appeared during the past two days regarding the existence of a difference between the versions related to the budget that was voted on and the one that was published in the Official Gazette," indicating that "this disagreement leads to several indicators, especially since everyone knows that the vote on the budget came after a difficult labor." “.[/size]
[size=45]Salman added, "The publication of tables belonging to the budget that differs from the one that was voted on raises many question marks, the first of which is about the party that bears responsibility for these mistakes, and the second about the position of the Presidency of the Republic and how it did not pay attention to the difference in the tables before approving it," pointing out that "the matter The other is the position of the Finance Committee, which justified that there are no practical errors between the published tables and what the parliament voted on, and what increased suspicion is the appearance of the Finance Ministry on the next day to acknowledge the existence of errors in those tables unintentionally and pledged to re-correct those tables.[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out that "what happened may lead us to a scenario where there is a maneuver that some parties may have carried out in one way or another for intended or unintended purposes to achieve this matter, and what proves that theory is the announcement by the Ministry of Labor about the creation of job grades for the appointment of researchers, despite that this article has already been made." And if it was dropped in the voting session, how was it re-activated and included in the transcript of the facts, ”stressing“ the importance of the House of Representatives seriously standing on this situation and diagnosing the defect and the one who caused it, and whether it happened only in the budget law or may it open the door to other errors in legislation Later, or perhaps the same situation occurred in previous legislations that were not shed light on.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]