Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


The file of ending the foreign presence from Iraq raises doubts as the deadline approaches

rocky
rocky
NNP TEAM
NNP TEAM


Posts : 205207
Join date : 2012-12-21

The file of ending the foreign presence from Iraq raises doubts as the deadline approaches Empty The file of ending the foreign presence from Iraq raises doubts as the deadline approaches

Post by rocky Thu 25 Nov 2021, 6:50 am

[size=52]The file of ending the foreign presence from Iraq raises doubts as the deadline approaches[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad / Hussein Hatem[/size]
[size=45]Security specialists rule out the withdrawal of foreign forces from Iraqi territory at the end of this year, as was agreed upon last July.[/size]
[size=45]Specialists believe that the international mandate grants the coalition forces to be present in any geographical area that they feel threatens world peace, while former MPs stressed the government’s lack of seriousness in its agreement to end the file of the foreign presence in Iraq, noting that the government did not provide any statistics on the number of forces present or the forces that will remain. bolster.”[/size]
[size=45]Security specialist Ahmed Al-Sharifi said in an interview with Al-Mada that "when we talk about the issue of the withdrawal of the foreign presence from Iraq, we must proceed from two basic premises, namely international law, according to which the presence of the international coalition forces is required as an international alliance to confront terrorism that threatens security." and international peace.”[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sharifi added, “The international mandate grants the coalition forces to be present in any geographical area,” adding that “the countries concerned with their presence, whether it is the international coalition or the United States, must provide support, support and requirements for managing the battle.”[/size]
[size=45]The specialist in the security affairs pointed out, “The one who evaluates and evaluates the situation is not the countries in which these forces are located, but rather a staff body present in the United Nations that classifies the countries that threaten international security and peace and that do not threaten it.”[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out, "The United Nations, the United States and most countries of the world believe that terrorism still exists and continues and has the ability to surprise and attack, even if it is limited."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sharifi continued, "As for local law, the United States, in terms of classification, is a strategic ally to Iraq constitutionally, and we have two agreements with it represented by the strategic framework and a security agreement."[/size]
[size=45]And the security specialist indicated that "under the security agreement, the United States undertakes to protect the political project in Iraq and the Iraqi state from any threat, whether internal or external."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sharifi said, “The recent political conflicts over the election results are classified as a threat to civil peace,” noting that “the United States cannot expel its forces from Iraq if it has not reached the stage of international reassurance and reached maturity at the level of its internal politics and parties (...).”[/size]
[size=45]He went on to say, "The United States will not withdraw, but rather is working on arranging its forces, for the first two reasons related to the decline in military operations, and the growth of the national capabilities of the army units in confrontation and engagement."[/size]
[size=45]And the security specialist stated that "Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi's agreement with US President Joe Biden regarding the withdrawal of foreign forces is nothing but marketing."[/size]
[size=45]On July 26, last July, Iraq agreed with the United States to withdraw all American combat forces from Iraq by the end of this year 2021. Armed factions had issued a statement last Friday, threatening to use force to expel American forces in the event that peaceful methods failed to withdraw forces According to the deadline.[/size]
[size=45]On Friday, the “Sayyid al-Shuhada Brigades” opened the door to volunteer for its ranks, in a move it said was a preparation for the “decisive” confrontation with the Americans, by the end of this year 2021. The Secretary-General of the Brigades, Abu Ala’ al-Wala’i, wrote in a blog post that Al-Mada followed, that he “With the approaching hour of decisiveness and the major confrontation, the Islamic Resistance, the Sayyid al-Shuhada Brigades, announces the opening of the door to belonging and volunteering to its ranks and calls on our resistance Iraqi people and the resistance factions to raise the level of readiness in preparation for the decisive and historic confrontation with the American occupation on 12/31/2021 after 12:00 pm.”[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sharifi commented, "This step comes as a clear political reaction," noting that "if the Al-Fateh coalition had won more than 70 seats in the elections, the Sayyid Al-Shuhada Brigades would not have taken such a step."[/size]
[size=45]And the security expert went on to say, “Opening the door for volunteering by a faction that is not affiliated with the government is against the democratic state and the law,” asking, “Who has authorized through the law a military mobilization in the country?” In turn, a member of the Security and Defense Committee in the former parliament, Kata' al-Rikabi, said in an interview with (Al-Mada), that "it was scheduled to witness the end of this year the withdrawal of all foreign forces, but there was an agreement approved by the government to transfer the forces from combative to supportive." He pointed out that "it is not possible to transform all these forces, with their equipment and bases, into supporting forces."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Rikabi, a member of the coordination framework, added: "So far, we have not heard from any American official confirming the exit of the American forces at the end of this year," noting that "all the statements of the Americans are contradictory." The former member of parliament pointed out, "The government has not given any official statistics on the number of foreign forces present on Iraqi soil, not even statistics on the number of forces that will remain supportive, and who will appoint them, is the Iraqi government or the American government?"[/size]
[size=45]Yesterday, Wednesday, the Joint Operations Command announced the departure of most foreign combat forces from the country before the specified date.[/size]
[size=45]The spokesman for the joint operations, Major General Tahsin al-Khafaji, said in an interview with the official agency, which was followed by (Al-Mada), that "the file of ending the foreign presence is proceeding according to the planned schedule, and there are no rules assigned to them except for their presence in a small way in Ain al-Assad."[/size]
[size=45]He added, "Most of the combat forces left Iraq, and only advisers and those working in the field of intelligence or reconnaissance, as well as training and advice, remained."[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out that "the rest of the foreign forces are a small part, and they will all leave within 15 days, except for those whose mission has turned to advise, provide information and support the Iraqi security forces," noting that "there is a schedule for delivering weapons and equipment to the combat forces."[/size]
[size=45]Earlier, the international coalition confirmed that its role in Iraq would not change in conjunction with the approaching withdrawal of combat forces at the end of December of this year.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    Current date/time is Fri 03 Dec 2021, 9:25 am