Al-Maliki carries out a coup within the coordination framework because of his ambition to head the g

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]Al-Maliki carries out a coup within the coordination framework because of his ambition to head the government[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad / Tamim Al-Hassan[/size]
[size=45]Nuri al-Maliki, the former prime minister, is close to "destroying the coordination framework" because of his insistence on heading the next government.[/size]
[size=45]Parties within the Shiite group expect that if the "coordination" contract breaks, forming a new government will become "almost impossible."[/size]
[size=45]Hadi al-Amiri, head of the Al-Fateh Alliance, because of his "subordinate" personality, as described by some of the "framers" of him, supports al-Maliki's efforts in exchange for an "opposition" team that grew up within the "coordination".[/size]
[size=45]The opposition party in the "coordinating framework" defends the idea of ​​choosing a "non-controversial" figure, in addition to observing Najaf's terms of reference and not "provoking al-Sadr" and the street.[/size]
[size=45]The "schism" within the "coordinating framework" began following the decision of the Sadrist movement's leader, Muqtada al-Sadr, to retire from the political process in mid-June.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Maliki's wing expected at the time that the formation of the government was "around the corner," but other parties such as Ammar al-Hakim, leader of the Wisdom Movement, considered that "the crisis has become complicated."[/size]
[size=45]A senior source within the coordination framework confirmed in an interview with (Al-Mada) that: "Nuri al-Maliki's insistence on heading the government will lead to the final disruption of the coordination framework."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Maliki's office had earlier denied discussing the name of the prime minister in the coordination framework meetings that followed the resignation of the Sadrist bloc from the House of Representatives.[/size]
[size=45]The words of the office of the head of the State of Law coalition came in response to leaks that spread at the time that the latter wanted to obtain the prime minister's office, although the office's statement did not deny or confirm al-Maliki's ambitions.[/size]
[size=45]The source, who asked not to be named, goes on to say that "the framework today has deep differences, and al-Maliki wants to be unique in the decision and does not see a danger to the next government."[/size]
[size=45]This position created what was described as "opposition within the framework", as the parties to this team believe that forming a government headed by al-Maliki in particular will face "many obstacles."[/size]
[size=45]The source adds that "there is a popular rejection by some political forces of al-Maliki's person as prime minister, and the current situation does not bear the choice of a controversial figure."[/size]
[size=45]The source, who is close to the opposition within the "framework", revealed that there are now 3 main problems within the Shiite group:[/size]
[size=45]The first: the form of the government, is it a long-term government (4 years) or a short government (one or two years) working for new early elections?[/size]
[size=45]The second: the identity of the prime minister, is he a hawk or a dove? From the first or second line of the coordination parties? Independent or partisan?[/size]
[size=45]The third problem: Who is entitled to nominate the prime minister within the coordination framework? Where everyone sees that there is a «coup represented by al-Maliki on the framework for the exclusivity of power».[/size]
[size=45]The opposition put forward within the "coordinating body" two proposals to solve the crisis of choosing the prime minister: the first is that a person from the second line of the parties is chosen, and if they do not agree on a person, they go to the "General Assembly" vote.[/size]
[size=45]The general body represents within the "coordinating framework" all the deputies of the latter in Parliament, in addition to all Shiite representatives, even those outside the "framework".[/size]
[size=45]According to the opposition, quoting the informed source: "The General Assembly will vote on a number of candidates to fill the position of prime minister to resolve the matter."[/size]
[size=45]So far, this proposal "is not satisfactory for the owners," and the knowledgeable source adds: "Al-Maliki caused embarrassment for us in front of the independents, as we had promised them that they would present a candidate from them for prime minister."[/size]
[size=45]The coordinating framework and even statements by the leader of the State of Law coalition before the "withdrawal of al-Sadr" had welcomed the initiative presented by independents.[/size]
[size=45]The initiative at the time stipulated the formation of an independent government, while al-Maliki stressed in statements at the time that he "supports the idea of ​​independents submitting a candidate to head the government."[/size]
[size=45]Long term or short term?[/size]
[size=45]If the identity of the prime minister is agreed upon, there will be another obstacle, which is the form of the government: long-term or short?[/size]
[size=45]The source confirms within the coordination framework that "the opposition fears a long-term government (4 years) because it will not succeed because of the stifled political and popular climate."[/size]
[size=45]The opposition prefers to form an interim government (a year or two) to prepare for a permanent government, and these positions were recently adopted by the leader of the Wisdom Movement Ammar al-Hakim and the leader of victory Haider al-Abadi, as well as Qais al-Khazali, the leader of Asa'ib.[/size]
[size=45]The source indicates that "Hadi al-Amiri, because of his close personality to al-Maliki, agrees with the latter's positions, just as the Alliance of Azm and the National Union Party want a long-term government."[/size]
[size=45]The source shows that «al-Maliki and defenders of his position believe that Iraq now needs a strong government, as it was in 2010».[/size]
[size=45]The source asserts that «there is still concern within the coordination framework of the possibility of moving the leader of the Sadrist movement the street against them at any moment».[/size]
[size=45]But so far there is ambiguity within the "current" about their positions after the "withdrawal of al-Sadr," as those close to al-Hanana deny the latter's residence: "Anyone knows what the leader of the Sadrist movement is planning."[/size]
[size=45]Those close to (Al-Mada) assure that "the current has a wide popular influence and can use it at any time, but so far there has been no decision in this regard."[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]