The Al-Maliki family controls the "coordination" of the stock exchange of candidates for the preside

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]The Al-Maliki family controls the "coordination" of the stock exchange of candidates for the presidency of the next government[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad / Tamim Al-Hassan[/size]
[size=45]A war of nerves that the "coordinating framework" is going through, with the supposed negotiations with the forces outside the circle of Shiite allies pushed into another week, and the increasing hints of the Sadrists to resort to the street.[/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, the situation within the "coordinating framework" is not in the best condition, as the leader of the State of Law coalition is still trying to control the coalition and his relatives.[/size]
[size=45]And if "Al-Maliki" is not able to be the next prime minister, he will be the one who sets the conditions and name of the candidate through one of his "in-laws" who have wide powers within the "Coordination Committee".[/size]
[size=45]Contrary to Coordination's calculations, the Kurdistan Democratic Party has decided to resume negotiations the week following the Eid holiday, which begins on July 9 to 14 of the same month.[/size]
[size=45]The "coordinating framework" had hoped that negotiations would begin to choose the president and the government with the remainder of the tripartite alliance during the current week (before Eid).[/size]
[size=45]Parliament is supposed to return to its sessions (after the Eid al-Adha holiday) after the end of the legislative recess that began last June, which puts the "Coordination Committee" in embarrassment for its delay in forming a government.[/size]
[size=45]According to (Al-Mada) sources close to the "coordination framework", "postponing the date for the start of negotiations increases pressure on the framework that is rushing to form a government for fear of uncalculated scenarios."[/size]
[size=45]A spokeswoman for the Democratic Party bloc in Parliament, Vian Dakhil, said in a statement on Saturday evening, that "the party is sticking to its candidate for the presidency of the republic," noting that "the round of negotiations with the rest of the parties will start after the end of the Eid al-Adha holiday."[/size]
[size=45]The leader of the party, Massoud Barzani, had met earlier on Saturday, his party's deputies in Parliament to discuss the political situation and the latest steps and changes in the political process in Iraq, according to another statement issued by the first office.[/size]
[size=45]According to the statement, Barzani said, "We are the owners of a just cause, regardless of the political variables and equations, and that solving problems must be through adherence to the constitution and the three principles of partnership, consensus and balance."[/size]
[size=45]The leader of the Democratic Party called for these principles to be reflected “on the work of the next government and on all political blocs,” stressing that “the KDP is not with the conflict and the deepening of the worsening crisis, but rather what is important for it is to protect constitutional rights and the dignity of citizens.”[/size]
[size=45]The "frameworkers" feel embarrassed over the accusation by the Sadrist movement's leader, Muqtada al-Sadr, of the first candidate for the presidency, Barham Salih, that he has "normalizing tendencies with Israel", following the latter's refusal to sign the law "criminalizing normalization" that was passed after the insistence of the leader of the movement.[/size]
[size=45]The "Coordination Committee" is pushing for the two main Kurdish "democratic" parties and the coordination framework ally "the National Union" to agree on one candidate to head the government, instead of the "frameworkers" having to vote for Barham Salih, and then they will be in direct confrontation with "Al-Sadr."[/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, what is known as the “minister of the leader,” which is an electronic account of one of those close to the leader of the Sadrist movement, continued to pressure the “coordinator” by commenting on the reasons for “Sadr’s withdrawal” from the political process and accusing his opponents.[/size]
[size=45]On Saturday evening, the "minister" revealed 10 new reasons in addition to 20 previous points he had published over the past three days, and described Sadr's withdrawal from forming the government as (the victor's withdrawal).[/size]
[size=45]He is close to al-Sadr, commenting on the withdrawal, hoping that "the withdrawal will be a lesson for others not to cling to money, power, fame, chairs and positions."[/size]
[size=45]The "minister of the leader" considered the leader's retirement as "a step to save the country... and it was necessary before God and the people... so is anyone preaching?"[/size]
[size=45]During the past two days, Sadr's supporters began to publish expressions of support for the leader of the movement, and signs of readiness to go out to the street, and a number of tribal sheikhs sympathized with those calls.[/size]
[size=45]Attitudes escalating with the term “the coming of the storm,” a description of the supposed demonstrations, until the movement’s leader, Ibrahim al-Jabri, announced, on Saturday evening, the postponement of “situations” that were scheduled to be held in a number of governorates until “further notice” without giving an explanation.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sadr's decision to form the government more than two weeks ago caused a "schism" among his opponents, and an opinion emerged to form an interim government (for one or two years) that would pave the way for early elections, instead of a government that would not last more than 6 months if the "Sadrists" decided to go out against it. .[/size]
[size=45]So far, there are conflicting opinions within the "coordinating framework" and disputes over the name of the prime minister's candidate, as Nuri al-Maliki, the former prime minister, is still aspiring to the position, despite the names being put on his side.[/size]
[size=45]Returning to the sources (range) within the coordination framework, "Al-Maliki wants to control the names of the candidates for prime minister in the event that he is excluded."[/size]
[size=45]Those sources confirm that "relatives and in-laws of al-Maliki are the ones who control this file and are responsible for choosing the name of the next prime minister, who is believed to be revealing his name after the Eid holiday."[/size]
[size=45]The most common name was the former member of the Dawa Party, MP Muhammad Shiaa Al-Sudani, while Hadi Al-Amiri, the leader of the Al-Fateh Alliance, had denied the latter's nomination for the position after his name was rumored.[/size]
[size=45]Terms of the opponents of the "coordination"[/size]
[size=45]According to some estimates, the mainly divided Coordination Committee will face requirements from the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Sovereignty Alliance, which may increase differences within the Shiite bloc, which, in turn, faces anger from the independents team at a time when (the framework) still needs the seats of that team.[/size]
[size=45]And the Alliance for the People, which includes the movements of extension and the new generation, announced that it would not participate in the next government.[/size]
[size=45]The coalition, which includes 18 deputies, said in a press statement that it rejects: "Inviting any party (to participate in the government) would repeat the previous failure experiences in the quota governments in all previous parliamentary sessions...".[/size]
[size=45]The coalition affirmed that it "establishes the real opposition in the House of Representatives and reserves its right to all tools that enable it to perform its opposition role in Parliament, and we will proceed with our opposition programme."[/size]
[size=45]In the event that the "coordinating framework" fails to obtain the votes of the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the "Sovereignty" alliance, which sets difficult conditions in its negotiations, it must persuade the independents, whose seats represent about 40 seats.[/size]
[size=45]And the independents recently began to give signals to withdraw from Parliament or to turn to the opposition (as the Alliance for the People said), due to the "Coordination Committee"'s repudiation of its previous promises to give the former the right to form a government.[/size]
[size=45]Pressure may increase on the "coordinating framework" due to expected requirements from the Sunni forces (the Alliance of Sovereignty) in return for participation in the government.[/size]
[size=45]Ziad al-Arar, a former candidate for the Sunni forces, told Al-Mada that "the coalition of sovereignty has conditions, the most important of which are general amnesty, the distribution of positions, especially security, and effective participation."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Arar speculates that there are “demands that will be shared between the sovereignty and the Democratic Party on the issue of decentralization in the administration,” noting that “the two parties (the democratic and the sovereign) support each other in negotiations and conditions.”[/size]
[size=45]Nor can the demands to withdraw some factions from the Sunni areas, according to informed sources, be excluded, as are the demands of the "Democratic" party to remove these groups from the vicinity of Kurdistan, according to what a senior official in the Kurdish Party revealed a week ago.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]