Al-Sudani does not act as a framer, and the latter fears that he will eat his fans in the elections

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]Al-Sudani does not act as a framer, and the latter fears that he will eat his fans in the elections[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad / Tamim Al-Hassan[/size]
[size=45]Muhammad al-Sudani, the prime minister, is eating away at the popularity of all political forces, even the Sadrist movement, if he remains silent until recently.[/size]
[size=45]And the prime minister, who alone won a seat in Parliament and then raised the number to 3 - following the resignation of the Sadrists last summer - made arrangements for him to run in the elections.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sudani's movement to "polish his image" is not absent from the coordination framework, within which some leaders view the former as a "general director."[/size]
[size=45]Some indirect corrections from the Shiite coalition, sometimes, against al-Sudani seem to be reminding the latter that he is just an "employee" of the coordination framework.[/size]
[size=45]Some party offices believe that the "framework" has fallen into a trap several times, and pushed al-Sudani out of nowhere to take the lead in decisions.[/size]
[size=45]The Shiite alliance follows the prime minister's movement at home and at the level of foreign policy, as the latter was seen as "internationally poor."[/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, the "framework" fears, on the other hand, that it lost the "St. Lego" war, by which it wanted to weaken the independents and give the first four comfortable years to rule.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sudani, on the one hand, and the independents, on the other hand, worry about the Shiite alliance, as the offices of the “framework” parties believe that the new election law may harden the promise of the independents in a broad alliance, and the most dangerous thing is that it is with Al-Sadr.[/size]
[size=45]This hypothesis contradicts recent calls by activists for independents to resign following what was known as the “whistle incident” in the last parliament session, in which the independents were expelled using the military.[/size]
[size=45]Concerned political circles within the framework reveal to (Al-Mada) "concerns about the movements of the Prime Minister, who seems to be approaching running in the local elections alone."[/size]
[size=45]These circles, which are parties and politicians, found in Al-Sudani's speeches that they "do not suggest that he is a representative of the coordination framework or part of it."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sudani had resigned in 2019 from the Dawa Party in the midst of the October protests, and at that time he was expected to be a replacement for Adel Abdul-Mahdi, the prime minister at the time.[/size]
[size=45]He considered his selection, last July, as a candidate for the "framework" to head the government, as a surprise to everyone, especially since he had run in the elections on a single list for the first time.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sudani was seen at first as a "shadow of Al-Maliki" the former prime minister, at least as stated in one of the tweets of Saleh Al-Iraqi, who is close to Muqtada Al-Sadr, the leader of the Sadrist movement, last summer.[/size]
[size=45]But after that, Al-Maliki complained more than once about the administration of the prime minister, especially in the issue of replacing the governors, and his silence about the interference of the League of the Righteous (Qais Khazali) in the Ministry of Oil, which belongs to the former.[/size]
[size=45]Against the background of these events, Al-Sudani was considered to be close to Khazali, after the latter directed against the prime minister. It was interpreted at the time as a reminder to Al-Sudani that he is implementing the “framework” policy and that he should not forget that.[/size]
[size=45]At the end of last year, the leader of Al-Asa’ib said in a television interview: “Al-Sudani is like the general manager of the framework.”[/size]
[size=45]And before that, while trying to persuade al-Sadr to join the government, Khazali said in another meeting that "the framework is ready to withdraw Sudani's candidacy."[/size]
[size=45]A Sunni politician whose party's alliance with the Coordinating Framework conveys talk about al-Sudani in one of the sessions that took place in Baghdad several months ago.[/size]
[size=45]The politician, who asked not to be identified, tells Al-Mada: “Al-Sudani does not appear to represent the Shiites or the framework.”[/size]
[size=45]He adds, "The prime minister told us in the party's office that he came at the top of quota (sectarian) arrangements, but he believes in the logic of the state."[/size]
[size=45]The party offices of the “framework” indicate that the prime minister invests in all his speeches to “polish his image” for the elections that are supposed to take place at the end of this year.[/size]
[size=45]And she adds, "The coordination framework made a mistake by hiding behind Al-Sudani in international issues, especially the relationship with America, which showed that the former is the champion of those policies."[/size]
[size=45]Parties in the "framework", according to those offices, considered al-Sudani's statements about "friendly America" ​​and the issue of the "Aqaba Pipeline" as seeming to be adopted by al-Sudani alone, although they are issues that are still being discussed within the Shiite coalition.[/size]
[size=45]The "framework" was in the phase of promoting the Sudanese after the Sadrists' resignation last June. They indicated that it was acceptable internally, but "it has no international acceptance."[/size]
[size=45]Peanut and chest[/size]
[size=45]The opinions of these offices about the future of Al-Sudani may go to extremes, by saying that "in addition to having eaten from the framework's popularity, he may withdraw Al-Sadr's popularity if he remains without interference."[/size]
[size=45]And the leader of the movement has been committed to political silence for more than 6 months, while everyone expects his intervention, especially in the "St. Lego" case.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sudani differs from Al-Sadr, in that the former has channels of communication, wide media platforms, and pledges for projects, some of which were launched for the first time since the issue of gas investment.[/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, the Sadrist movement, despite its overwhelming popularity, has no channel of communication with its fans except for Friday prayers.[/size]
[size=45]Observers expect that the new election law "St. Lego" may not have a significant impact on the Sadrists' share in the upcoming elections, but it will not achieve the hypothesis of the "political majority" adopted by al-Sadr.[/size]
[size=45]And the leader of the movement may be forced, if he decides to participate in the elections, to ally with other parties, and he is against what is proposed, at least by those close to Al-Sadr, to form local governments with a Sadrist majority.[/size]
[size=45]Returning to Al-Sudani's ambition, his unilateral entry into the elections under the "St.[/size]
[size=45]However, opinions say that Al-Sudani will count on his "high popularity", although there are doubts about his progress in the street, especially with the public's grumbling about the issue of dollar exchange and the high prices of basic materials.[/size]
[size=45]Ali Moanes, a member of the political body in the Euphrates Movement, which was established by Al-Sudani before the 2021 elections, told Al-Mada - before the approval of the latest election law - that: “His party is with the idea of ​​entering into large alliances if the electoral system is St. Lego 1.7. It has not been replaced by another system.[/size]
[size=45]required of freelancers[/size]
[size=45]Most of the views of the coordination framework parties go to the formation of single or medium alliances in the Shiite regions in the center and south, which is what the Maliki coalition (State of Law) and Hadi al-Amiri (Al-Fatah) think about, and the alliance may expand in the western cities.[/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, the independent deputies are haunted by the same idea, which may be the issue of passing the "St. Lego" in the last version an opportunity for this group to unite after failing to do so several times, or they may agree with al-Sadr in a new alliance.[/size]
[size=45]This hypothesis seems disturbing to the coordination framework, which observers believe insisted on "St. Lego" to have a comfortable next 4 years (in the upcoming legislative elections) without disturbing the independents.[/size]
[size=45]Ghaleb al-Daami, a professor of journalism at Ahl al-Bayt College, tells Al-Mada about the idea of ​​establishing an alliance of independents: “The greed of some independents for positions, and the vacillation of others’ positions may undermine this dream.”[/size]
[size=45]Al-Daami says that "Representative Hussein Arab, for example, who is one of the independents, has tried and worked to be prime minister and deviated from the goal of the independents in Parliament."[/size]
[size=45]The independents were recently expelled from the parliament hall, in an unprecedented measure by Parliament Speaker Muhammad al-Halbousi, who sought the help of the military against their objection to St. Lego.[/size]
[size=45]In that session, independents told Al-Mada that “Hussein Arab and Hassan Al-Khafaji,” two independent MPs, were with those who voted in favor of the election law, which was opposed by about 80 MPs.[/size]
[size=45]At that time, the deputies chanted against "Saint Lego", while the independent MP, Falah Al-Hilali, took out a whistle and started whistling inside the hall.[/size]
[size=45]After what happened in that session, parts of which were broadcast on social media and on the parliament's website, activists called in a campaign on Twitter for the resignation of the independents, "a victory for October."[/size]
[size=45]Supporters of this hashtag considered that if the independents could not break the will of the traditional forces in Parliament, then at least they would not be a factor in helping them achieve their goals.[/size]
[size=45]Ghaleb al-Dami says that "the independents did what they had to do in the issue of the election law, and the number of supporters of the law was more than those who rejected it. Parliament's rules are voting."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Dami added, "If the independents resign, their fate will be like al-Sadr's deputies. The big parties will take their seats."[/size]
[size=45]And the professor of journalism considered that the al-Sadr movement is "responsible in some way for passing the St. Lego law because it decided to resign from Parliament."[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]