Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Talk continues about controversial laws... Will they be moved to the next legislative session?

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 282968
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Talk continues about controversial laws... Will they be moved to the next legislative session? Empty Talk continues about controversial laws... Will they be moved to the next legislative session?

    Post by Rocky Thu 12 Dec 2024, 4:19 am

    [size=35][size=35]Talk continues about controversial laws... Will they be moved to the next legislative session?[/size]
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    [/size]

    policy

    [size][size]
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.][/size]
    2024-12-12 | 03:39
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    [/size]

    Source:
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    404 views

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]News - Politics

    MPs from different blocs expect to postpone voting on controversial laws until the next legislative session, calling for consensus on them before including them on the agendas[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].


    The most controversial laws are: general amnesty, personal status, and the return of real estate.

    He said:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Hussein Mounes: “The vote on these laws was not completed due to the lack of consensus among the representatives, as there was…[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]There was a disagreement among the political blocs over passing it in one basket, while there was parliamentary rejection of such a project, as it[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Important and fateful.



    He added, "There are comments on the three laws, and they must be revised, and not written by agreements between the political blocs, as they have...[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Certain opinions and convictions were the driving force behind not completing the vote on these laws.” He described the outcome of the laws’ rejection to pass them in one basket as a “healthy situation,” because if they were passed by consensus, this would diminish the value of legislation that is not considered in the public interest. Therefore, returning them and not completing the vote on them is a positive situation that is credited to the representatives.

    Mouanes expressed his regret over “putting these laws on the agenda without any change in the subject of the agreements or the content, which forced[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]To maintain their previous position,” expecting a vote on it at the beginning of the next legislative session, provided that it is amended and the opinions and proposals of the representatives are taken into account.”

    For his part, he said[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Zuhair Shahid Al-Fatlawi said, "There is a parliamentary rejection of what is happening in the council when voting on laws, which require that they be in one basket."

    He added, "The differences are still over the Personal Status Law, as everyone agreed that it regulates the conditions of Iraqis from all categories."

    Al-Fatlawi explained that "the dispute prevailed over the general amnesty law after adding categories of prisoners and inmates who were not previously included, which wasted the right[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]"Those who demanded the enactment of this important law," stressing that "the law to return properties to their original owners in Kirkuk Governorate was completely contrary to the version sent by the government."

    He continued, "The Legal Committee committed a legal violation by refusing to read the version sent by the government, regarding this law, as it was supposed to read the version of the law for the first time, then add amendments to it, if any, by the members of the committee and the rest of the members of the council."

    Al-Fatlawi explained that "these laws will be voted on at the beginning of the next legislative session."

    In turn, she described[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Nahal Al Shammari The three laws are “dialectical” and require extensive discussions with[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]And the committees. Al-Shammari confirmed her refusal to be included in one basket, because each law requires a lot of study and discussion.

    Al-Shammari expected that "if these laws are not voted on in the next legislative session, they could be postponed to the next session."

    As for[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Ali Al-Mashkoor expressed his regret that everyone relied on the principle of passing the three laws in one basket, and that they were not presented in a correct manner that was open to discussion, deliberation and transparency, indicating that their discussion was postponed until after the legislative holiday.

    Al-Mashkoor added that "the principle of relying on the opinion of the heads of the blocs ended at the beginning of presenting these laws for voting, because most[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]They have many reservations about the laws that the bloc leaders neglected in their meetings, which led to the failure to pass these laws,” he said.
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Wed 15 Jan 2025, 5:44 am