EXCLUSIVE
From Tel Aviv to Turtle Bay
The White House hoped a new Israeli prime minister would resume peace talks with the Palestinians. With Netanyahu holding on, the administration is weighing a turn to the U.N. to help force a deal.

After years of blocking U.N. efforts to pressure Israelis and Palestinians into accepting a lasting two-state solution, the United States is edging closer toward supporting a U.N.
Security Council resolution that would call for the resumption of political talks to conclude a final peace settlement, according to Western diplomats.
The move follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decisive re-election Tuesday after the incumbent publicly abandoned his commitment to negotiate a Palestinian state — the basis of more than 20 years of U.S. diplomatic efforts — and promised to continue the construction of settlements on occupied territory. The development also reflects deepening pessimism over the prospect of U.S.-brokered negotiations delivering peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Shortly before this week’s election, the United States informed its diplomatic partners that it would hold off any moves in the U.N. Security Council designed to put Israel on the spot at the United Nations in the event that Netanyahu’s challenger, Isaac Herzog, won the election. But U.S. officials signaled a willingness to consider a U.N. resolution in the event that Netanyahu was re-elected and formed a coalition government opposed to peace talks. The United States has not yet circulated a draft, but diplomats say Washington has set some red lines and is unwilling to agree to set a fixed deadline for political talks to conclude.
“The more the new government veers to the right the more likely you will see something in New York,” said a Western diplomat.
Netanyahu’s government will likely be made up of right-wing and Orthodox parties adamantly opposed to making concessions to Palestinians. According to a statement from Netanyahu’s office, the Israeli leader has already consulted with party leaders he plans to add to his coalition, including Naftali Bennett of the pro-settlement Jewish Home party, Avigdor Lieberman of the far-right nationalist Yisrael Beitenu party, and leaders of the ultra-Orthodox Shas and United Torah Judaism parties.
On Wednesday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki did not rule out the possibility of the United States supporting a U.N. resolution on Israel-Palestine.
“We’re currently evaluating our approach. We’re not going to prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action,” she told reporters.
For decades, Democratic and Republican administrations have resisted a role for the U.N. Security Council in dealing with the Middle East crisis. They have argued consistently that an enduring peace can only be achieved through direct negotiations between the parties. Israeli leaders have also strongly opposed giving the world body a greater role in bringing about a deal.
However, the prospect of direct negotiations appeared to evaporate with Netanyahu’s pre-election declaration that he would never allow the creation of a Palestinian state. The comment completely reversed the Israeli leader’s previous support for an independent Palestine as part of a permanent peace deal between the two sides.
The deliberations over the future of the U.S. diplomatic efforts are playing out just weeks before the Palestinians are scheduled to join the International Criminal Court, a move that is certain to heighten diplomatic tensions between Israel and the Palestinians. On Wednesday, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s top diplomat in the United States told Foreign Policy the Palestinians would move forward with plans to use the ICC to try to hold Israel accountable for alleged war crimes during last summer’s war in Gaza. (Israel says it worked hard to avoid civilian casualties, of which there were many, and blames Hamas militants for taking shelter in populated areas.)
“The fact that we have a government in Israel publicly opposing a two-state solution just reinforces our position that this conflict must be handled by the international community,” Maen Rashid Areikat said.
Ilan Goldenberg, a former member of the Obama administration’s Mideast peace team, told FP that Washington might be inclined to support a Security Council resolution backing a two-state solution as an alternative to the Palestinian effort to hold Israel accountable at the ICC.
“If it was done, it could protect Israel from a worse outcome,” he said.
Under this scenario, the United States would seek guarantees from the international community to hold off on ICC activity in exchange for a Security Council resolution outlining international standards for a final peace agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians.
“The Israelis will probably resist and say this is a bad idea, but they could also be convinced that this is better than the alternative,” said Goldenberg.
The window for this type of U.N. initiative is small. U.S. officials are unlikely to act during the contentious Iran negotiations, which are set to end in late June, Goldenberg said. But the administration will not want to wait until the 2016 presidential race kicks into high gear, as any Democratic nominee would likely advise the White House against upsetting the party’s influential pro-Israel supporters.
“Don’t expect anything to move until the summer,” said Goldenberg.
European and Arab governments, including France and the Palestinians, will likely want to move more quickly at the United Nations.
The Palestinians had been pressing the U.N. Security Council for months last year to adopt a resolution demanding that Israel end its occupation of Palestinian lands within three years. But the United States vetoed the Palestinian initiative.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power called it “unbalanced” because it failed to take into consideration Israel’s security concerns.
But France, which is seeking a broader diplomatic role in the Middle East, had also been pushing for a separate resolution, which calls for the resumption of political talks between Israelis and Palestinians in order to conclude a comprehensive peace settlement. In December, U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry warned Paris and other European governments that the United States would block the resolution if it were put to a vote before the Israeli election.
But one European diplomat said that there was “a broad understanding” at the time “that this was something that could be revisited post-election.” So far, U.S. talks with European allies have taken place in Washington and other capitals. There have been no substantive talks in New York among Security Council members.
France, however, recently renewed its appeal to the United States to consider taking up the issue before the council, according to diplomats familiar with the matter.
The United States, according to the diplomats, gave no firm commitment. But the administration indicated that it was willing to consider action in the council once a coalition government is put into place.
“I think they probably just want to see how it pans out,” said one U.N.-based diplomat. “But certainly the message we got back in December was that they might be able to show more flexibility after the election.”
Security Council diplomats say there remain significant differences between the U.S. approach and that of France. “There are discrepancies between the U.S. and European positions but I think they will bridge them soon,” said an Arab diplomat. “The key elements are the same: a framework for a peaceful solution that leads to the establishment of a Palestinian state … plus guarantees for Israel’s long-term security.” The United States is unlikely to hit Israel or the Palestinians with punitive measures if they fail to comply.
During a recent meeting of U.S. and European officials in Washington, a senior State Department official said the United States was considering a draft resolution at the Security Council but that no decision had been made.
Of course, two other options lie before the Obama administration with regard to the Israel-Palestine issue: continuing to reflexively back Israel at the United Nations, and simply enduring the widespread criticism of the international community, or raising the pressure on Jerusalem by abstaining from a U.N. resolution condemning Israeli settlements.
In 2011, the United States vetoed a resolution demanding that Israel’s settlement activity cease immediately — even though it was in line with U.S. policy. The measure was sponsored by nearly two-thirds of the U.N.’s membership and received a 14-1 vote on the Security Council.
“If there was a settlement resolution, would the U.S. abstain? I could see that as a possibility,” said Goldenberg.
In the wake of Israel’s election, U.N. and Israeli officials exchanged sharp words after U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq called on the new Israeli government to halt “illegal settlement-building in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
In response to the statement, Ron Prosor, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., snapped back: “If the U.N. is so concerned about the future of the Palestinian people, it should be asking … why Hamas uses the Palestinian people as human shields.”
http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/18/from-tel-aviv-to-turtle-bay-israel-palestinians-un-resolution/
From Tel Aviv to Turtle Bay
The White House hoped a new Israeli prime minister would resume peace talks with the Palestinians. With Netanyahu holding on, the administration is weighing a turn to the U.N. to help force a deal.
- MARCH 18, 2015

After years of blocking U.N. efforts to pressure Israelis and Palestinians into accepting a lasting two-state solution, the United States is edging closer toward supporting a U.N.
Security Council resolution that would call for the resumption of political talks to conclude a final peace settlement, according to Western diplomats.
The move follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decisive re-election Tuesday after the incumbent publicly abandoned his commitment to negotiate a Palestinian state — the basis of more than 20 years of U.S. diplomatic efforts — and promised to continue the construction of settlements on occupied territory. The development also reflects deepening pessimism over the prospect of U.S.-brokered negotiations delivering peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Shortly before this week’s election, the United States informed its diplomatic partners that it would hold off any moves in the U.N. Security Council designed to put Israel on the spot at the United Nations in the event that Netanyahu’s challenger, Isaac Herzog, won the election. But U.S. officials signaled a willingness to consider a U.N. resolution in the event that Netanyahu was re-elected and formed a coalition government opposed to peace talks. The United States has not yet circulated a draft, but diplomats say Washington has set some red lines and is unwilling to agree to set a fixed deadline for political talks to conclude.
“The more the new government veers to the right the more likely you will see something in New York,” said a Western diplomat.
Netanyahu’s government will likely be made up of right-wing and Orthodox parties adamantly opposed to making concessions to Palestinians. According to a statement from Netanyahu’s office, the Israeli leader has already consulted with party leaders he plans to add to his coalition, including Naftali Bennett of the pro-settlement Jewish Home party, Avigdor Lieberman of the far-right nationalist Yisrael Beitenu party, and leaders of the ultra-Orthodox Shas and United Torah Judaism parties.
On Wednesday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki did not rule out the possibility of the United States supporting a U.N. resolution on Israel-Palestine.
“We’re currently evaluating our approach. We’re not going to prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action,” she told reporters.
For decades, Democratic and Republican administrations have resisted a role for the U.N. Security Council in dealing with the Middle East crisis. They have argued consistently that an enduring peace can only be achieved through direct negotiations between the parties. Israeli leaders have also strongly opposed giving the world body a greater role in bringing about a deal.
However, the prospect of direct negotiations appeared to evaporate with Netanyahu’s pre-election declaration that he would never allow the creation of a Palestinian state. The comment completely reversed the Israeli leader’s previous support for an independent Palestine as part of a permanent peace deal between the two sides.
The deliberations over the future of the U.S. diplomatic efforts are playing out just weeks before the Palestinians are scheduled to join the International Criminal Court, a move that is certain to heighten diplomatic tensions between Israel and the Palestinians. On Wednesday, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s top diplomat in the United States told Foreign Policy the Palestinians would move forward with plans to use the ICC to try to hold Israel accountable for alleged war crimes during last summer’s war in Gaza. (Israel says it worked hard to avoid civilian casualties, of which there were many, and blames Hamas militants for taking shelter in populated areas.)
“The fact that we have a government in Israel publicly opposing a two-state solution just reinforces our position that this conflict must be handled by the international community,” Maen Rashid Areikat said.
Ilan Goldenberg, a former member of the Obama administration’s Mideast peace team, told FP that Washington might be inclined to support a Security Council resolution backing a two-state solution as an alternative to the Palestinian effort to hold Israel accountable at the ICC.
“If it was done, it could protect Israel from a worse outcome,” he said.
Under this scenario, the United States would seek guarantees from the international community to hold off on ICC activity in exchange for a Security Council resolution outlining international standards for a final peace agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians.
“The Israelis will probably resist and say this is a bad idea, but they could also be convinced that this is better than the alternative,” said Goldenberg.
The window for this type of U.N. initiative is small. U.S. officials are unlikely to act during the contentious Iran negotiations, which are set to end in late June, Goldenberg said. But the administration will not want to wait until the 2016 presidential race kicks into high gear, as any Democratic nominee would likely advise the White House against upsetting the party’s influential pro-Israel supporters.
“Don’t expect anything to move until the summer,” said Goldenberg.
European and Arab governments, including France and the Palestinians, will likely want to move more quickly at the United Nations.
The Palestinians had been pressing the U.N. Security Council for months last year to adopt a resolution demanding that Israel end its occupation of Palestinian lands within three years. But the United States vetoed the Palestinian initiative.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power called it “unbalanced” because it failed to take into consideration Israel’s security concerns.
But France, which is seeking a broader diplomatic role in the Middle East, had also been pushing for a separate resolution, which calls for the resumption of political talks between Israelis and Palestinians in order to conclude a comprehensive peace settlement. In December, U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry warned Paris and other European governments that the United States would block the resolution if it were put to a vote before the Israeli election.
But one European diplomat said that there was “a broad understanding” at the time “that this was something that could be revisited post-election.” So far, U.S. talks with European allies have taken place in Washington and other capitals. There have been no substantive talks in New York among Security Council members.
France, however, recently renewed its appeal to the United States to consider taking up the issue before the council, according to diplomats familiar with the matter.
The United States, according to the diplomats, gave no firm commitment. But the administration indicated that it was willing to consider action in the council once a coalition government is put into place.
“I think they probably just want to see how it pans out,” said one U.N.-based diplomat. “But certainly the message we got back in December was that they might be able to show more flexibility after the election.”
Security Council diplomats say there remain significant differences between the U.S. approach and that of France. “There are discrepancies between the U.S. and European positions but I think they will bridge them soon,” said an Arab diplomat. “The key elements are the same: a framework for a peaceful solution that leads to the establishment of a Palestinian state … plus guarantees for Israel’s long-term security.” The United States is unlikely to hit Israel or the Palestinians with punitive measures if they fail to comply.
During a recent meeting of U.S. and European officials in Washington, a senior State Department official said the United States was considering a draft resolution at the Security Council but that no decision had been made.
Of course, two other options lie before the Obama administration with regard to the Israel-Palestine issue: continuing to reflexively back Israel at the United Nations, and simply enduring the widespread criticism of the international community, or raising the pressure on Jerusalem by abstaining from a U.N. resolution condemning Israeli settlements.
In 2011, the United States vetoed a resolution demanding that Israel’s settlement activity cease immediately — even though it was in line with U.S. policy. The measure was sponsored by nearly two-thirds of the U.N.’s membership and received a 14-1 vote on the Security Council.
“If there was a settlement resolution, would the U.S. abstain? I could see that as a possibility,” said Goldenberg.
In the wake of Israel’s election, U.N. and Israeli officials exchanged sharp words after U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq called on the new Israeli government to halt “illegal settlement-building in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
In response to the statement, Ron Prosor, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., snapped back: “If the U.N. is so concerned about the future of the Palestinian people, it should be asking … why Hamas uses the Palestinian people as human shields.”
http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/18/from-tel-aviv-to-turtle-bay-israel-palestinians-un-resolution/
» Parliamentary Services Determine The Only Solution To End The Housing Crisis In Iraq
» Finance spent 2 trillion dinars for Erbil in the first 3 months of 2022
» Increasing the capital of the central bank enhances its balanced monetary policy
» Parliament intends to legislate a national security law
» The Presidency of the Region denies its request from the UN Security Council to mediate between Erbi
» Baghdad reveals the "restructuring" of oil contracts in Kurdistan and threatens violators with legal
» Parliamentary Al-Fateh: We objected to the Food Security Law in order not to legitimize the current
» The President of the Region: We have reached a ground to solve the political blockage and there are
» Gold prices are rising in the Iraqi markets
» About a billion dollars in bank sales in a week
» Al-Rasheed Bank decides to raise the credit card ceiling to 5 times the salary
» The River Street Stock Exchange in Baghdad records a slight decrease in gold prices
» Decline in Iraq's oil exports to America
» Iyad Allawi sends a message to the political forces
» Parliamentary Energy: Ending the electricity crisis file depends on three factors
» Electricity announces the start of the initial stages of construction of solar power plants
» Ministry of Electricity: We will pay Iranian gas dues at the end of May
» Finance Committee: The Food Security Law will include the addition of 500 billion dinars to serve Ba
» Khazali reveals that al-Sadr accepted deputies from al-Maliki's coalition to form a government and u
» Erbil wants to develop trade relations with Washington: 138 American companies are operating in the
» Al-Muthanna expects a suffocating water crisis and awaits 3 difficult months
» Federalism is not equal between citizens..Kurdish political prisoners threaten to sue the regional g
» The President of the Kurdistan Government leaves for Davos to attend the forum
» Two discussion tables to develop attitudes to legal legislation
» 3 differences between the government project and the parliamentary proposal for a food security law
» More than 320 cases before international courts to recover the looted antiquities of Iraq
» The Ports Company confirms control of the territorial waters and sea crossings
» Breaking consociationalism is more important than the prime minister’s position at Al-Sadr and antic
» Planning: food security will be a priority in the poverty strategy
» Al-Rasheed decides to raise the credit card ceiling to five times the salary
» Dollar exchange rates in local markets
» The Triple Alliance recalls its strength and "refutes" allegations of political blockage
» Al-Halbousi: “The ban on normalization” is a true reflection of the people’s will
» The PUK demands Baghdad to protect Iraqi lands, including Kurdistan
» Nechirvan Barzani meets with Bafel Talabani in Sulaymaniyah
» Iyad Allawi invites political forces
» Barzani clarifies the possibility of "resolving" differences between Kurdish forces
» Representative of the State of Law: The expected scenarios in the next stage herald a solution to th
» A deputy expects the Federal Court to respond in the event of a new challenge to the Food Security L
» Minister of Electricity: Iranian gas dues will be paid at the end of this month
» An Iraqi speech to the Security Council - Hana Adwar
» Federal: The caretaker government is achieving the withdrawal of confidence from the Prime Minister
» Kurdistan Region establishes 3 advanced industrial cities with international assistance
» The President of the Kurdistan Regional Government participates in the Davos World Economic Forum
» I am confident of its success.. The coordination framework: the political blockage will be resolved
» 7 Chaired Parliamentary Committees.. Women's Disputes Obstacles to Choosing the Chairperson of "Wome
» Gold prices are rising in the Iraqi markets
» It was recently inaugurated by the government.. (700) million dinars donated by citizens at the shri
» Next Wednesday .. Who will prevail in the food security law, for the devotees or for those who refus
» Iraq achieves $ 20 billion in surplus oil sales and avoids borrowing
» Parliamentary committee reveals the reason for the deterioration of electric power: Iran is conducti
» Good Deed distributes the food basket in Baghdad to orphans and the needy on the anniversary of the
» Alia Nassif: Parliament can instruct the Ministry of Finance to take alternative mechanisms to the F
» Al-Maliki: The judiciary is the last pillar of the stability of the political process, and its decis
» Close to him: Al-Amri is in good health, and there is no health to take him to the hospital
» His office: Al-Kazemi will participate in receiving the body of the Iraqi poet Muzaffar Al-Nawab
» Al-Halbousi participates in an “extraordinary emergency” conference in Cairo
» In an effort to resolve the crisis, a negotiating team presents the initiative of the independents t
» The Minister of Finance excludes resorting to borrowing and reveals the size of the surplus from sel
» The World Bank announces its readiness to support Iraq by expanding the use of clean energy
» With 967 thousand barrels per day.. Iraq is the third largest oil exporter to China in the month of
» The stability of the dollar exchange rates on the Iraqi local stock exchange
» Parliamentary Energy explains the reasons for the deterioration of the electricity supply to citizen
» Independent representatives form a negotiating team to present their initiative
» Oil prices rise, Brent approaches $113 a barrel
» Dollar exchange rates in local markets
» An upcoming meeting with the Sadrists.. The independents form a committee to present their initiativ
» The political winds in Kurdistan are moving.. Setting a date for the visit of a delegation from the
» A segment of retirees and employees addresses Parliamentary Finance about the predecessor of Al-Rafi
» Service Council Chairman: We are ready to launch any electronic form as soon as job grades are avail
» MilitiaMan " The World is Watching" Thursday Night 5-19-2022
» KTFA Members "News and Views" Thursday Afternoon 5-19-2022
» Documents: The legal cordon "tightens" the Ministry of Oil regarding the region's oil, and the Feder
» Dozens of parliamentarians sign to settle defense mobilization salaries
» The supply of electric power in an Iraqi governorate has fallen to a third
» Reservations and controversy in Parliament’s reading of “Food Security”
» The Prime Minister directs to change {Green} and return its original names
» Iraq asks America to answer 14 files of convicts residing on its soil
» Opening it may topple big heads.. Parliamentary Integrity: “Corruption files” are closed with a “pol
» Washington imposes sanctions on Hezbollah financial companies in Iraq
» Transportation announces the reception of three commercial ships in the northern port of Umm Qasr
» Iraq and Jordan sign a memorandum of understanding on the exploitation of natural resources
» The Central Bank and Kurdistan Integrity sign a cooperation agreement to reduce money laundering
» The Supreme Judicial Council calls on political forces not to include him in their disputes
» Ministry of Commerce: There will be no famine in Iraq
» Dollar exchange rates in local markets
» Alsumaria publishes a picture of the bank account of the Minister of Transport
» State of Law: UNAMI is out of context
» Count him as an escape.. A legal expert comments on the dismissed governor of Salah al-Din sending h
» In the document .. Initiating a criminal case against the Minister of Oil for his failure to impleme
» Irada movement calls for respect for what is issued by the judiciary and directs a request to the po
» Can the proposed food security law be challenged? Legal expert explains
» Political blockage.. Is external mediation the solution?
» Document .. Federal Oil announces that it will "take over" the management of the export of crude fro
» KTFA Members "News and Views" Wednesday PM 5-18-2022
» Noon Agency publishes the text of the proposed food security bill in Parliament
» Al-Maliki..we are surprised by the insistence on legislating the food security law and standing agai
» Ur State Company signs a contract worth more than 13 billion dinars to supply electricity to the cen