Home
EXCLUSIVE
From Tel Aviv to Turtle Bay
The White House hoped a new Israeli prime minister would resume peace talks with the Palestinians. With Netanyahu holding on, the administration is weighing a turn to the U.N. to help force a deal.
After years of blocking U.N. efforts to pressure Israelis and Palestinians into accepting a lasting two-state solution, the United States is edging closer toward supporting a U.N.
Security Council resolution that would call for the resumption of political talks to conclude a final peace settlement, according to Western diplomats.
The move follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decisive re-election Tuesday after the incumbent publicly abandoned his commitment to negotiate a Palestinian state — the basis of more than 20 years of U.S. diplomatic efforts — and promised to continue the construction of settlements on occupied territory. The development also reflects deepening pessimism over the prospect of U.S.-brokered negotiations delivering peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Shortly before this week’s election, the United States informed its diplomatic partners that it would hold off any moves in the U.N. Security Council designed to put Israel on the spot at the United Nations in the event that Netanyahu’s challenger, Isaac Herzog, won the election. But U.S. officials signaled a willingness to consider a U.N. resolution in the event that Netanyahu was re-elected and formed a coalition government opposed to peace talks. The United States has not yet circulated a draft, but diplomats say Washington has set some red lines and is unwilling to agree to set a fixed deadline for political talks to conclude.
“The more the new government veers to the right the more likely you will see something in New York,” said a Western diplomat.
Netanyahu’s government will likely be made up of right-wing and Orthodox parties adamantly opposed to making concessions to Palestinians. According to a statement from Netanyahu’s office, the Israeli leader has already consulted with party leaders he plans to add to his coalition, including Naftali Bennett of the pro-settlement Jewish Home party, Avigdor Lieberman of the far-right nationalist Yisrael Beitenu party, and leaders of the ultra-Orthodox Shas and United Torah Judaism parties.
On Wednesday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki did not rule out the possibility of the United States supporting a U.N. resolution on Israel-Palestine.
“We’re currently evaluating our approach. We’re not going to prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action,” she told reporters.
For decades, Democratic and Republican administrations have resisted a role for the U.N. Security Council in dealing with the Middle East crisis. They have argued consistently that an enduring peace can only be achieved through direct negotiations between the parties. Israeli leaders have also strongly opposed giving the world body a greater role in bringing about a deal.
However, the prospect of direct negotiations appeared to evaporate with Netanyahu’s pre-election declaration that he would never allow the creation of a Palestinian state. The comment completely reversed the Israeli leader’s previous support for an independent Palestine as part of a permanent peace deal between the two sides.
The deliberations over the future of the U.S. diplomatic efforts are playing out just weeks before the Palestinians are scheduled to join the International Criminal Court, a move that is certain to heighten diplomatic tensions between Israel and the Palestinians. On Wednesday, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s top diplomat in the United States told Foreign Policy the Palestinians would move forward with plans to use the ICC to try to hold Israel accountable for alleged war crimes during last summer’s war in Gaza. (Israel says it worked hard to avoid civilian casualties, of which there were many, and blames Hamas militants for taking shelter in populated areas.)
“The fact that we have a government in Israel publicly opposing a two-state solution just reinforces our position that this conflict must be handled by the international community,” Maen Rashid Areikat said.
Ilan Goldenberg, a former member of the Obama administration’s Mideast peace team, told FP that Washington might be inclined to support a Security Council resolution backing a two-state solution as an alternative to the Palestinian effort to hold Israel accountable at the ICC.
“If it was done, it could protect Israel from a worse outcome,” he said.
Under this scenario, the United States would seek guarantees from the international community to hold off on ICC activity in exchange for a Security Council resolution outlining international standards for a final peace agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians.
“The Israelis will probably resist and say this is a bad idea, but they could also be convinced that this is better than the alternative,” said Goldenberg.
The window for this type of U.N. initiative is small. U.S. officials are unlikely to act during the contentious Iran negotiations, which are set to end in late June, Goldenberg said. But the administration will not want to wait until the 2016 presidential race kicks into high gear, as any Democratic nominee would likely advise the White House against upsetting the party’s influential pro-Israel supporters.
“Don’t expect anything to move until the summer,” said Goldenberg.
European and Arab governments, including France and the Palestinians, will likely want to move more quickly at the United Nations.
The Palestinians had been pressing the U.N. Security Council for months last year to adopt a resolution demanding that Israel end its occupation of Palestinian lands within three years. But the United States vetoed the Palestinian initiative.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power called it “unbalanced” because it failed to take into consideration Israel’s security concerns.
But France, which is seeking a broader diplomatic role in the Middle East, had also been pushing for a separate resolution, which calls for the resumption of political talks between Israelis and Palestinians in order to conclude a comprehensive peace settlement. In December, U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry warned Paris and other European governments that the United States would block the resolution if it were put to a vote before the Israeli election.
But one European diplomat said that there was “a broad understanding” at the time “that this was something that could be revisited post-election.” So far, U.S. talks with European allies have taken place in Washington and other capitals. There have been no substantive talks in New York among Security Council members.
France, however, recently renewed its appeal to the United States to consider taking up the issue before the council, according to diplomats familiar with the matter.
The United States, according to the diplomats, gave no firm commitment. But the administration indicated that it was willing to consider action in the council once a coalition government is put into place.
“I think they probably just want to see how it pans out,” said one U.N.-based diplomat. “But certainly the message we got back in December was that they might be able to show more flexibility after the election.”
Security Council diplomats say there remain significant differences between the U.S. approach and that of France. “There are discrepancies between the U.S. and European positions but I think they will bridge them soon,” said an Arab diplomat. “The key elements are the same: a framework for a peaceful solution that leads to the establishment of a Palestinian state … plus guarantees for Israel’s long-term security.” The United States is unlikely to hit Israel or the Palestinians with punitive measures if they fail to comply.
During a recent meeting of U.S. and European officials in Washington, a senior State Department official said the United States was considering a draft resolution at the Security Council but that no decision had been made.
Of course, two other options lie before the Obama administration with regard to the Israel-Palestine issue: continuing to reflexively back Israel at the United Nations, and simply enduring the widespread criticism of the international community, or raising the pressure on Jerusalem by abstaining from a U.N. resolution condemning Israeli settlements.
In 2011, the United States vetoed a resolution demanding that Israel’s settlement activity cease immediately — even though it was in line with U.S. policy. The measure was sponsored by nearly two-thirds of the U.N.’s membership and received a 14-1 vote on the Security Council.
“If there was a settlement resolution, would the U.S. abstain? I could see that as a possibility,” said Goldenberg.
In the wake of Israel’s election, U.N. and Israeli officials exchanged sharp words after U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq called on the new Israeli government to halt “illegal settlement-building in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
In response to the statement, Ron Prosor, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., snapped back: “If the U.N. is so concerned about the future of the Palestinian people, it should be asking … why Hamas uses the Palestinian people as human shields.”
http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/18/from-tel-aviv-to-turtle-bay-israel-palestinians-un-resolution/
From Tel Aviv to Turtle Bay
The White House hoped a new Israeli prime minister would resume peace talks with the Palestinians. With Netanyahu holding on, the administration is weighing a turn to the U.N. to help force a deal.
- MARCH 18, 2015
After years of blocking U.N. efforts to pressure Israelis and Palestinians into accepting a lasting two-state solution, the United States is edging closer toward supporting a U.N.
Security Council resolution that would call for the resumption of political talks to conclude a final peace settlement, according to Western diplomats.
The move follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decisive re-election Tuesday after the incumbent publicly abandoned his commitment to negotiate a Palestinian state — the basis of more than 20 years of U.S. diplomatic efforts — and promised to continue the construction of settlements on occupied territory. The development also reflects deepening pessimism over the prospect of U.S.-brokered negotiations delivering peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Shortly before this week’s election, the United States informed its diplomatic partners that it would hold off any moves in the U.N. Security Council designed to put Israel on the spot at the United Nations in the event that Netanyahu’s challenger, Isaac Herzog, won the election. But U.S. officials signaled a willingness to consider a U.N. resolution in the event that Netanyahu was re-elected and formed a coalition government opposed to peace talks. The United States has not yet circulated a draft, but diplomats say Washington has set some red lines and is unwilling to agree to set a fixed deadline for political talks to conclude.
“The more the new government veers to the right the more likely you will see something in New York,” said a Western diplomat.
Netanyahu’s government will likely be made up of right-wing and Orthodox parties adamantly opposed to making concessions to Palestinians. According to a statement from Netanyahu’s office, the Israeli leader has already consulted with party leaders he plans to add to his coalition, including Naftali Bennett of the pro-settlement Jewish Home party, Avigdor Lieberman of the far-right nationalist Yisrael Beitenu party, and leaders of the ultra-Orthodox Shas and United Torah Judaism parties.
On Wednesday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki did not rule out the possibility of the United States supporting a U.N. resolution on Israel-Palestine.
“We’re currently evaluating our approach. We’re not going to prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action,” she told reporters.
For decades, Democratic and Republican administrations have resisted a role for the U.N. Security Council in dealing with the Middle East crisis. They have argued consistently that an enduring peace can only be achieved through direct negotiations between the parties. Israeli leaders have also strongly opposed giving the world body a greater role in bringing about a deal.
However, the prospect of direct negotiations appeared to evaporate with Netanyahu’s pre-election declaration that he would never allow the creation of a Palestinian state. The comment completely reversed the Israeli leader’s previous support for an independent Palestine as part of a permanent peace deal between the two sides.
The deliberations over the future of the U.S. diplomatic efforts are playing out just weeks before the Palestinians are scheduled to join the International Criminal Court, a move that is certain to heighten diplomatic tensions between Israel and the Palestinians. On Wednesday, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s top diplomat in the United States told Foreign Policy the Palestinians would move forward with plans to use the ICC to try to hold Israel accountable for alleged war crimes during last summer’s war in Gaza. (Israel says it worked hard to avoid civilian casualties, of which there were many, and blames Hamas militants for taking shelter in populated areas.)
“The fact that we have a government in Israel publicly opposing a two-state solution just reinforces our position that this conflict must be handled by the international community,” Maen Rashid Areikat said.
Ilan Goldenberg, a former member of the Obama administration’s Mideast peace team, told FP that Washington might be inclined to support a Security Council resolution backing a two-state solution as an alternative to the Palestinian effort to hold Israel accountable at the ICC.
“If it was done, it could protect Israel from a worse outcome,” he said.
Under this scenario, the United States would seek guarantees from the international community to hold off on ICC activity in exchange for a Security Council resolution outlining international standards for a final peace agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians.
“The Israelis will probably resist and say this is a bad idea, but they could also be convinced that this is better than the alternative,” said Goldenberg.
The window for this type of U.N. initiative is small. U.S. officials are unlikely to act during the contentious Iran negotiations, which are set to end in late June, Goldenberg said. But the administration will not want to wait until the 2016 presidential race kicks into high gear, as any Democratic nominee would likely advise the White House against upsetting the party’s influential pro-Israel supporters.
“Don’t expect anything to move until the summer,” said Goldenberg.
European and Arab governments, including France and the Palestinians, will likely want to move more quickly at the United Nations.
The Palestinians had been pressing the U.N. Security Council for months last year to adopt a resolution demanding that Israel end its occupation of Palestinian lands within three years. But the United States vetoed the Palestinian initiative.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power called it “unbalanced” because it failed to take into consideration Israel’s security concerns.
But France, which is seeking a broader diplomatic role in the Middle East, had also been pushing for a separate resolution, which calls for the resumption of political talks between Israelis and Palestinians in order to conclude a comprehensive peace settlement. In December, U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry warned Paris and other European governments that the United States would block the resolution if it were put to a vote before the Israeli election.
But one European diplomat said that there was “a broad understanding” at the time “that this was something that could be revisited post-election.” So far, U.S. talks with European allies have taken place in Washington and other capitals. There have been no substantive talks in New York among Security Council members.
France, however, recently renewed its appeal to the United States to consider taking up the issue before the council, according to diplomats familiar with the matter.
The United States, according to the diplomats, gave no firm commitment. But the administration indicated that it was willing to consider action in the council once a coalition government is put into place.
“I think they probably just want to see how it pans out,” said one U.N.-based diplomat. “But certainly the message we got back in December was that they might be able to show more flexibility after the election.”
Security Council diplomats say there remain significant differences between the U.S. approach and that of France. “There are discrepancies between the U.S. and European positions but I think they will bridge them soon,” said an Arab diplomat. “The key elements are the same: a framework for a peaceful solution that leads to the establishment of a Palestinian state … plus guarantees for Israel’s long-term security.” The United States is unlikely to hit Israel or the Palestinians with punitive measures if they fail to comply.
During a recent meeting of U.S. and European officials in Washington, a senior State Department official said the United States was considering a draft resolution at the Security Council but that no decision had been made.
Of course, two other options lie before the Obama administration with regard to the Israel-Palestine issue: continuing to reflexively back Israel at the United Nations, and simply enduring the widespread criticism of the international community, or raising the pressure on Jerusalem by abstaining from a U.N. resolution condemning Israeli settlements.
In 2011, the United States vetoed a resolution demanding that Israel’s settlement activity cease immediately — even though it was in line with U.S. policy. The measure was sponsored by nearly two-thirds of the U.N.’s membership and received a 14-1 vote on the Security Council.
“If there was a settlement resolution, would the U.S. abstain? I could see that as a possibility,” said Goldenberg.
In the wake of Israel’s election, U.N. and Israeli officials exchanged sharp words after U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq called on the new Israeli government to halt “illegal settlement-building in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
In response to the statement, Ron Prosor, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., snapped back: “If the U.N. is so concerned about the future of the Palestinian people, it should be asking … why Hamas uses the Palestinian people as human shields.”
http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/18/from-tel-aviv-to-turtle-bay-israel-palestinians-un-resolution/
» Parliamentary Finance sets the date for completing its discussion with the ministers and governors o
» Finance reveals the results of its meeting with the region’s delegation: We will not vote on such te
» Iraq and Kuwait are discussing the file of remaining debt payments and the possibility of postponing
» The International Development Bank announces its joining the "Bani" platform
» Oil Minister: Iraq is keen to develop its oil and gas fields
» Tuesday's session ... the insurance law and the retirement of private sector workers at the Parliame
» Source: The IMF knows very well that the Minister of Finance has lost the confidence of the people a
» International Monetary: Iraq requested emergency assistance
» After changing the exchange rate, the inflation rate rose by 3.3%
» Iraqi president approves more than 340 death sentences: official
» A storm of changes strikes the 2021 budget days before its approval: What happened to the dollar exc
» 104k members already joined & we are in pre-launch. Please have a look, No Hype here
» An economist predicts a new dollar exchange rate and identifies the reason
» After more than a month of the parliamentary movement .. Setting an official date for the questionin
» International report: The Iraqi economy experienced its worst downturn since 2003
» The constitutional case related to the export of oil and gas as a model
» Two Kurdish delegations to Baghdad to persuade the parliament and the blocs to pass the budget
» A major change in the budget, including the price of oil, and these points of contention
» In the aftermath of the Baghdad bombings, Al-Kazemi ousted five prominent security chiefs
» Majida Al-Tamimi: The discount is imminent … The budget is presented within days
» Oil Parliament reveals the completion of the legal drafting of the oil and gas law
» A decrease in sales .. The Central Bank of Iraq sells only 3 million and 225 thousand dollars
» A monthly salary for every Iraqi..within the promises of previous governments and the possibility of
» Al-Maliki launches his election campaign early: We are coming to restore the prestige of the state
» Finance announces the launch of employee payroll financing for the month of January
» Iraq tops the first place in the Arab world in terms of activity and trading
» Credit rating .. Iraq is among the countries with the highest risk
» The Central Bank cancels two previous decisions pertaining to the Sharia Committee in Islamic Banks
» Iraqi port revenue surges as anti-corruption move bears fruit
» Iran's Rouhani hails departure of 'tyrant' Trump
» House of Representatives set, on Wednesday, the date for the employees’ salaries to be disbursed for
» Rafidain Bank announces the launch of loans of all kinds
» Parliamentary Finance: The budget will be ready next week
» The Iraqi government announces the imminent launch of small income-generating projects
» Government is talking about the Baghdad Renaissance project: Basmaya loans without interest over 20
» The Council of Ministers votes on setting October 10 as the date for early elections
» The director of Al-Rafidain Bank announces good news about the loan interest
» International Monetary Fund: Great ambiguity surrounds the outlook for the global economy
» The decision to devalue the currency is on the table of experts
» Iraq has sufficient gas to fuel all electricity stations: MP
» Rumors of an airstrike in Iraq come amid Iran tensions. Claims that the US struck Iranian-backed mil
» Time for Iraq’s militias to lay down arms. Many Iraqis are heartily sick of the pro-Iran troublemak
» “Made in Iraq” activities kicked off at Baghdad International Fair … encouraging investment and sup
» AM Best Releases Country Risk Assessment Report on Iraq
» Banks Are Reluctant To Buy Dollars In Cash From The Central Bank
» Determine when to pass the budget law
» Zain Cash offers an exclusive offer for its permanent wallet customers
» Decision of the Parliamentary Finance Committee: The amendments will include most of the items in th
» Parliamentary warnings .. Delay in approving the budget will affect the payment of salaries of emplo
» Al-Rafidain Bank raises the interest for savings accounts to 5 percent and fixed deposits to 7
» “Made in Iraq” activities kicked off at Baghdad International Fair … encouraging investment and supp
» The head of the Iraqi Supreme Judicial Council discusses with the US ambassador extraditing Trump
» Iraq loses more than $61m monthly in uncollected electricity fees in Baghdad: MP
» IHEC proposes to delay early election until October 16
» Mid-January .. Iraq Applies The Electronic Payment System, Exporters And Importers
» US drawdown of troops in Iraq is complete, says Pentagon
» How Erbil and Baghdad could fuel Iraq’s recovery
» The Council of Ministers decides to adopt the biometric card as proof
» Parliament ends discussion of the 2021 draft budget
» Parliamentary Finance: To vote on the budget next week .. This is the fate of the salary deduction
» Postponing Iraqi elections seen as an opportunity for Kadhimi to boost political fortunes
» Iraqi protest leaders launch political bloc ahead of elections
» Iran test-fires ballistic missiles on targets at sea
» American diplomat James Jeffrey: Trump’s model will continue in Iraq and Syria
» Foreign Ministry talks about its measures to remove Iraq from the list of money laundering
» Washington and Baghdad agree on Iraqi independence in the energy field
» The presidencies of Iraq recommend dissolving parliament
» Iraq to Participate in Buna Payment Platform
» Finance Minister: We will take a package of measures to reduce the effects of devaluation
» US piles pressure on Iran-backed militia commanders in Iraq with new sanctions
» The Iraqi parliament moves to change the price of oil in the budget
» Parliament keeps the debate on the draft budget open and sets a date for its holding
» Al-Halbousi stresses to Allawi the importance of limiting the repercussions of the financial situati
» Finance resolves the controversy and reveals the fate of the dollar exchange rate in the budget
» Parliament ends the second reading of the draft law on Iraq’s accession to an international protocol
» Saleh officially ratifies Iraq’s accession to the Paris climate agreement
» Article 140 postpones the resolution of constitutional amendments
» More than three-quarters. "Big" decline in central bank sales
» Finance Minister: We will take a package of measures to mitigate the effects of the devaluation in t
» Gorran MP alleges $78bn removed from Iraq since 2016, including $12bn from Kurdistan Region
» “Strict” measures and “serious” international monitoring awaiting early elections
» Al-Kazemi government takes 5 new decisions
» The presidencies, the Commission and UNAMI stress on increasing the biometric registration rate and
» The Three Presidencies: Reaching Radical Solutions Between the Federal Government and the Kurdistan
» The Parliamentary Finance committee to convene at the Prime Ministry's headquarters
» Al-Halbousi discusses with the Kurdistan Democratic delegation the budget and early elections
» The House of Representatives keeps its session going until tomorrow to complete the budget
» The high price of the dollar in Baghdad and its st
» An Iraqi forum discusses the impact of changing the exchange rate on the poor, destitute and low-inc
» Council of Representatives should vote on early election date: MP
» There will be no salary issues in Region, if Erbil, Baghdad abide by draft 2021 Iraqi Budget Law: MP
» Al-Kazemi and Al-Halbousi are discussing the budget and amending the Federal Court law
» Finance determines the changes it will make in the 2021 budget: changing the price of a barrel of oi
» Iraq maintains its ranking globally in gold reserves
» Foreign Ministry Spokesman: US sanctions against Hashd al-Sha'bi chief ‘insult to Iraq’
» Parliament’s agenda for next Monday’s session
» In details … Cabinet decisions for Saturday
» The Iraqi Parliament ends the first reading of the 2021 budget