Home
EXCLUSIVE
From Tel Aviv to Turtle Bay
The White House hoped a new Israeli prime minister would resume peace talks with the Palestinians. With Netanyahu holding on, the administration is weighing a turn to the U.N. to help force a deal.
After years of blocking U.N. efforts to pressure Israelis and Palestinians into accepting a lasting two-state solution, the United States is edging closer toward supporting a U.N.
Security Council resolution that would call for the resumption of political talks to conclude a final peace settlement, according to Western diplomats.
The move follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decisive re-election Tuesday after the incumbent publicly abandoned his commitment to negotiate a Palestinian state — the basis of more than 20 years of U.S. diplomatic efforts — and promised to continue the construction of settlements on occupied territory. The development also reflects deepening pessimism over the prospect of U.S.-brokered negotiations delivering peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Shortly before this week’s election, the United States informed its diplomatic partners that it would hold off any moves in the U.N. Security Council designed to put Israel on the spot at the United Nations in the event that Netanyahu’s challenger, Isaac Herzog, won the election. But U.S. officials signaled a willingness to consider a U.N. resolution in the event that Netanyahu was re-elected and formed a coalition government opposed to peace talks. The United States has not yet circulated a draft, but diplomats say Washington has set some red lines and is unwilling to agree to set a fixed deadline for political talks to conclude.
“The more the new government veers to the right the more likely you will see something in New York,” said a Western diplomat.
Netanyahu’s government will likely be made up of right-wing and Orthodox parties adamantly opposed to making concessions to Palestinians. According to a statement from Netanyahu’s office, the Israeli leader has already consulted with party leaders he plans to add to his coalition, including Naftali Bennett of the pro-settlement Jewish Home party, Avigdor Lieberman of the far-right nationalist Yisrael Beitenu party, and leaders of the ultra-Orthodox Shas and United Torah Judaism parties.
On Wednesday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki did not rule out the possibility of the United States supporting a U.N. resolution on Israel-Palestine.
“We’re currently evaluating our approach. We’re not going to prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action,” she told reporters.
For decades, Democratic and Republican administrations have resisted a role for the U.N. Security Council in dealing with the Middle East crisis. They have argued consistently that an enduring peace can only be achieved through direct negotiations between the parties. Israeli leaders have also strongly opposed giving the world body a greater role in bringing about a deal.
However, the prospect of direct negotiations appeared to evaporate with Netanyahu’s pre-election declaration that he would never allow the creation of a Palestinian state. The comment completely reversed the Israeli leader’s previous support for an independent Palestine as part of a permanent peace deal between the two sides.
The deliberations over the future of the U.S. diplomatic efforts are playing out just weeks before the Palestinians are scheduled to join the International Criminal Court, a move that is certain to heighten diplomatic tensions between Israel and the Palestinians. On Wednesday, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s top diplomat in the United States told Foreign Policy the Palestinians would move forward with plans to use the ICC to try to hold Israel accountable for alleged war crimes during last summer’s war in Gaza. (Israel says it worked hard to avoid civilian casualties, of which there were many, and blames Hamas militants for taking shelter in populated areas.)
“The fact that we have a government in Israel publicly opposing a two-state solution just reinforces our position that this conflict must be handled by the international community,” Maen Rashid Areikat said.
Ilan Goldenberg, a former member of the Obama administration’s Mideast peace team, told FP that Washington might be inclined to support a Security Council resolution backing a two-state solution as an alternative to the Palestinian effort to hold Israel accountable at the ICC.
“If it was done, it could protect Israel from a worse outcome,” he said.
Under this scenario, the United States would seek guarantees from the international community to hold off on ICC activity in exchange for a Security Council resolution outlining international standards for a final peace agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians.
“The Israelis will probably resist and say this is a bad idea, but they could also be convinced that this is better than the alternative,” said Goldenberg.
The window for this type of U.N. initiative is small. U.S. officials are unlikely to act during the contentious Iran negotiations, which are set to end in late June, Goldenberg said. But the administration will not want to wait until the 2016 presidential race kicks into high gear, as any Democratic nominee would likely advise the White House against upsetting the party’s influential pro-Israel supporters.
“Don’t expect anything to move until the summer,” said Goldenberg.
European and Arab governments, including France and the Palestinians, will likely want to move more quickly at the United Nations.
The Palestinians had been pressing the U.N. Security Council for months last year to adopt a resolution demanding that Israel end its occupation of Palestinian lands within three years. But the United States vetoed the Palestinian initiative.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power called it “unbalanced” because it failed to take into consideration Israel’s security concerns.
But France, which is seeking a broader diplomatic role in the Middle East, had also been pushing for a separate resolution, which calls for the resumption of political talks between Israelis and Palestinians in order to conclude a comprehensive peace settlement. In December, U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry warned Paris and other European governments that the United States would block the resolution if it were put to a vote before the Israeli election.
But one European diplomat said that there was “a broad understanding” at the time “that this was something that could be revisited post-election.” So far, U.S. talks with European allies have taken place in Washington and other capitals. There have been no substantive talks in New York among Security Council members.
France, however, recently renewed its appeal to the United States to consider taking up the issue before the council, according to diplomats familiar with the matter.
The United States, according to the diplomats, gave no firm commitment. But the administration indicated that it was willing to consider action in the council once a coalition government is put into place.
“I think they probably just want to see how it pans out,” said one U.N.-based diplomat. “But certainly the message we got back in December was that they might be able to show more flexibility after the election.”
Security Council diplomats say there remain significant differences between the U.S. approach and that of France. “There are discrepancies between the U.S. and European positions but I think they will bridge them soon,” said an Arab diplomat. “The key elements are the same: a framework for a peaceful solution that leads to the establishment of a Palestinian state … plus guarantees for Israel’s long-term security.” The United States is unlikely to hit Israel or the Palestinians with punitive measures if they fail to comply.
During a recent meeting of U.S. and European officials in Washington, a senior State Department official said the United States was considering a draft resolution at the Security Council but that no decision had been made.
Of course, two other options lie before the Obama administration with regard to the Israel-Palestine issue: continuing to reflexively back Israel at the United Nations, and simply enduring the widespread criticism of the international community, or raising the pressure on Jerusalem by abstaining from a U.N. resolution condemning Israeli settlements.
In 2011, the United States vetoed a resolution demanding that Israel’s settlement activity cease immediately — even though it was in line with U.S. policy. The measure was sponsored by nearly two-thirds of the U.N.’s membership and received a 14-1 vote on the Security Council.
“If there was a settlement resolution, would the U.S. abstain? I could see that as a possibility,” said Goldenberg.
In the wake of Israel’s election, U.N. and Israeli officials exchanged sharp words after U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq called on the new Israeli government to halt “illegal settlement-building in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
In response to the statement, Ron Prosor, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., snapped back: “If the U.N. is so concerned about the future of the Palestinian people, it should be asking … why Hamas uses the Palestinian people as human shields.”
http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/18/from-tel-aviv-to-turtle-bay-israel-palestinians-un-resolution/
From Tel Aviv to Turtle Bay
The White House hoped a new Israeli prime minister would resume peace talks with the Palestinians. With Netanyahu holding on, the administration is weighing a turn to the U.N. to help force a deal.
- MARCH 18, 2015
After years of blocking U.N. efforts to pressure Israelis and Palestinians into accepting a lasting two-state solution, the United States is edging closer toward supporting a U.N.
Security Council resolution that would call for the resumption of political talks to conclude a final peace settlement, according to Western diplomats.
The move follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decisive re-election Tuesday after the incumbent publicly abandoned his commitment to negotiate a Palestinian state — the basis of more than 20 years of U.S. diplomatic efforts — and promised to continue the construction of settlements on occupied territory. The development also reflects deepening pessimism over the prospect of U.S.-brokered negotiations delivering peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Shortly before this week’s election, the United States informed its diplomatic partners that it would hold off any moves in the U.N. Security Council designed to put Israel on the spot at the United Nations in the event that Netanyahu’s challenger, Isaac Herzog, won the election. But U.S. officials signaled a willingness to consider a U.N. resolution in the event that Netanyahu was re-elected and formed a coalition government opposed to peace talks. The United States has not yet circulated a draft, but diplomats say Washington has set some red lines and is unwilling to agree to set a fixed deadline for political talks to conclude.
“The more the new government veers to the right the more likely you will see something in New York,” said a Western diplomat.
Netanyahu’s government will likely be made up of right-wing and Orthodox parties adamantly opposed to making concessions to Palestinians. According to a statement from Netanyahu’s office, the Israeli leader has already consulted with party leaders he plans to add to his coalition, including Naftali Bennett of the pro-settlement Jewish Home party, Avigdor Lieberman of the far-right nationalist Yisrael Beitenu party, and leaders of the ultra-Orthodox Shas and United Torah Judaism parties.
On Wednesday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki did not rule out the possibility of the United States supporting a U.N. resolution on Israel-Palestine.
“We’re currently evaluating our approach. We’re not going to prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action,” she told reporters.
For decades, Democratic and Republican administrations have resisted a role for the U.N. Security Council in dealing with the Middle East crisis. They have argued consistently that an enduring peace can only be achieved through direct negotiations between the parties. Israeli leaders have also strongly opposed giving the world body a greater role in bringing about a deal.
However, the prospect of direct negotiations appeared to evaporate with Netanyahu’s pre-election declaration that he would never allow the creation of a Palestinian state. The comment completely reversed the Israeli leader’s previous support for an independent Palestine as part of a permanent peace deal between the two sides.
The deliberations over the future of the U.S. diplomatic efforts are playing out just weeks before the Palestinians are scheduled to join the International Criminal Court, a move that is certain to heighten diplomatic tensions between Israel and the Palestinians. On Wednesday, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s top diplomat in the United States told Foreign Policy the Palestinians would move forward with plans to use the ICC to try to hold Israel accountable for alleged war crimes during last summer’s war in Gaza. (Israel says it worked hard to avoid civilian casualties, of which there were many, and blames Hamas militants for taking shelter in populated areas.)
“The fact that we have a government in Israel publicly opposing a two-state solution just reinforces our position that this conflict must be handled by the international community,” Maen Rashid Areikat said.
Ilan Goldenberg, a former member of the Obama administration’s Mideast peace team, told FP that Washington might be inclined to support a Security Council resolution backing a two-state solution as an alternative to the Palestinian effort to hold Israel accountable at the ICC.
“If it was done, it could protect Israel from a worse outcome,” he said.
Under this scenario, the United States would seek guarantees from the international community to hold off on ICC activity in exchange for a Security Council resolution outlining international standards for a final peace agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians.
“The Israelis will probably resist and say this is a bad idea, but they could also be convinced that this is better than the alternative,” said Goldenberg.
The window for this type of U.N. initiative is small. U.S. officials are unlikely to act during the contentious Iran negotiations, which are set to end in late June, Goldenberg said. But the administration will not want to wait until the 2016 presidential race kicks into high gear, as any Democratic nominee would likely advise the White House against upsetting the party’s influential pro-Israel supporters.
“Don’t expect anything to move until the summer,” said Goldenberg.
European and Arab governments, including France and the Palestinians, will likely want to move more quickly at the United Nations.
The Palestinians had been pressing the U.N. Security Council for months last year to adopt a resolution demanding that Israel end its occupation of Palestinian lands within three years. But the United States vetoed the Palestinian initiative.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power called it “unbalanced” because it failed to take into consideration Israel’s security concerns.
But France, which is seeking a broader diplomatic role in the Middle East, had also been pushing for a separate resolution, which calls for the resumption of political talks between Israelis and Palestinians in order to conclude a comprehensive peace settlement. In December, U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry warned Paris and other European governments that the United States would block the resolution if it were put to a vote before the Israeli election.
But one European diplomat said that there was “a broad understanding” at the time “that this was something that could be revisited post-election.” So far, U.S. talks with European allies have taken place in Washington and other capitals. There have been no substantive talks in New York among Security Council members.
France, however, recently renewed its appeal to the United States to consider taking up the issue before the council, according to diplomats familiar with the matter.
The United States, according to the diplomats, gave no firm commitment. But the administration indicated that it was willing to consider action in the council once a coalition government is put into place.
“I think they probably just want to see how it pans out,” said one U.N.-based diplomat. “But certainly the message we got back in December was that they might be able to show more flexibility after the election.”
Security Council diplomats say there remain significant differences between the U.S. approach and that of France. “There are discrepancies between the U.S. and European positions but I think they will bridge them soon,” said an Arab diplomat. “The key elements are the same: a framework for a peaceful solution that leads to the establishment of a Palestinian state … plus guarantees for Israel’s long-term security.” The United States is unlikely to hit Israel or the Palestinians with punitive measures if they fail to comply.
During a recent meeting of U.S. and European officials in Washington, a senior State Department official said the United States was considering a draft resolution at the Security Council but that no decision had been made.
Of course, two other options lie before the Obama administration with regard to the Israel-Palestine issue: continuing to reflexively back Israel at the United Nations, and simply enduring the widespread criticism of the international community, or raising the pressure on Jerusalem by abstaining from a U.N. resolution condemning Israeli settlements.
In 2011, the United States vetoed a resolution demanding that Israel’s settlement activity cease immediately — even though it was in line with U.S. policy. The measure was sponsored by nearly two-thirds of the U.N.’s membership and received a 14-1 vote on the Security Council.
“If there was a settlement resolution, would the U.S. abstain? I could see that as a possibility,” said Goldenberg.
In the wake of Israel’s election, U.N. and Israeli officials exchanged sharp words after U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq called on the new Israeli government to halt “illegal settlement-building in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
In response to the statement, Ron Prosor, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., snapped back: “If the U.N. is so concerned about the future of the Palestinian people, it should be asking … why Hamas uses the Palestinian people as human shields.”
http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/18/from-tel-aviv-to-turtle-bay-israel-palestinians-un-resolution/
» utube 12/08/23 Iraqi Dinar Today 2023 / Iraqi Dinar News Today / Iraqi Dinar
» utube 12/08/23 Militia Man & Crew Iraq Dinar International - Gateway - Local Currency - Sustainab
» The Prime Minister blesses the activation of the partnership between the Iraqi and Saudi private sec
» Planning: 11 axes to invest in the population increase and transform it into effective development e
» Advisor Mazhar Saleh: The economic geography of Iraq and Saudi Arabia constitutes an important found
» Al-Maliki: The best way to remove the corrupt is to go to the election ballots
» Al-Sudani: Parliament members have the final say in choosing the president
» The Kurdistan Region warns of a mass migration of Iraqis to other countries in the future
» "Embassy missiles" fall on the National Security headquarters, and the agency threatens the "bombers
» There are more obstacles than solutions.. The housing sector in Iraq: The need for more than 5 milli
» China reduces entry visa fees for Iraqis wishing to enter its territory (table)
» Al-Abadi on the bombing of the American embassy: Security and stability are not a commodity in the m
» Political conflicts and tension between Al-Halbousi and the governor.. What is happening in Anbar?
» Fatah leader: America created Al-Hawl camp to threaten the security of 7 Arab countries
» The Minister of Immigration instructs to solve the problems of returning families in Diyala
» Why was Iraq's "voluntary" reduction the largest in OPEC+?
» Regional Government: January 10th, official working hours in all Kurdistan districts
» Coinciding with International Anti-Corruption Day...the Ministry of Immigration holds a ceremony in
» The Federal Court rules that the instructions for conducting daily business in the Al-Kadhimi govern
» Head of the Kurdistan Council of Ministers: Our talks with the federal government will continue, and
» Three types of water violations were identified... Water Resources announces the introduction of gro
» Australian readiness to consolidate relations with the Kurdistan Region in the fields of investment
» There are more obstacles than solutions.. The housing sector in Iraq: The need for more than 5 milli
» The US Embassy in Baghdad urges the Iraqi government to protect diplomatic personnel
» Sudanese directs the prosecution of the perpetrators of the attack by launching projectiles towards
» Provincial council candidates are competing for two hundred and seventy-five seats
» With a new decision.. How will Iraq lose 6% of its oil exports?
» Georgetown Center for Studies: The killing of Americans in Iraq and the regional war is “a matter of
» Iraq.. Online food delivery will generate $845 million in 2023
» The US embassy in Baghdad confirms that it was hit by two missiles
» Directives from Sudanese regarding the bombing of the American embassy in Baghdad
» “No vacation until the end of the year.” The Minister of Finance issues a directive to the employees
» utube 12/5/23 Militia Man & Crew Iraq Dinar - Reality - Internationalism - Investors - Revaluatio
» The Ministry of Commerce decides to open sales outlets for those covered by social care in installme
» Minister of Oil: Iraq's decision to reduce OPEC Plus to achieve balance and stability in the markets
» Despite sending money from Baghdad.. Politician: The regional government refuses to release employee
» Baghdad is a cash cow...and the regional government steals the camel with what it carries
» Anbar Environment monitors violations of land conversion in Ramadi
» Federation of Arab Stock Exchanges: The Iraqi Stock Exchange accounted for 61% of November trading
» The Minister of Labor reveals a campaign to grant loans and plans to expand the employment process f
» Southern Gas: The agreement with the French company Total includes 4 main projects
» Sudanese directs to suspend working hours on Sunday
» Revealing the latest developments in choosing the new President of Parliament
» Media and Communications signs a contract with Azerbaijan to protect civil aviation radio navigation
» Al-Party accuses “sectarian” parties of delaying sending the $700 billion to the region
» The Kurdistan Oil Industry Association announces the joining of an American company
» A fine of 3 times the price.. Iraq reveals how to deal with goods that “violate specifications”
» Regional Government: Next Sunday, official working hours in all government departments
» A deputy reveals the loss of 35 trillion dinars and determines the extent of smuggling
» Al-Nouri: Most of the Central Bank’s decisions are political and do not have an economic content
» Representatives: The region’s failure to adhere to the decisions of the Baghdad government is causin
» 15 illegal outlets in Kurdistan cost the Iraqi treasury a billion dollars annually
» Naguib Sawiris: We are negotiating with government agencies to build an entire city outside Baghdad
» Commerce decides to open sales outlets for those covered by premium care at cost
» Directed to legislate a law that activates partnership between the public and private sectors
» The management of the North Refineries Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Project sets the date for o
» Problems between the region and foreign companies delay the export of oil through Ceyhan
» Parliamentarian: Baghdad has nothing to do with the salary crisis of the region’s employees
» Prime Minister: The Development Road Project will contribute to achieving economic development for t
» Iraq and 4 Arab countries possess more than one million tons of global gold reserves
» The stock market announces weekly trading indicators
» “Incompetent” figures are removed.. An expert indicates the influence of “tribal and partisan favori
» Al-Sudani: The path of development will contribute to achieving economic development for the region
» The current stability in Iraq is “temporary,” and this is what Al-Sudani succeeded in doing..An anal
» Shipments worth millions of dollars arrive in Iraq
» Government source: New shipments of dollar supplies arrive in Iraq
» In pictures: Iraqi Special Forces achieve first place in a global exercise in Pakistan
» Dismantling international drug networks in southern Iraq
» “Our soldiers are in a trap.” An American report calls for “courage” to withdraw from Iraq and Syria
» Labor launches electronic application to recruit foreign workers
» Audit Bureau: More than 5,000 financial reports will be issued in 2023
» Advisor to the Ministry of Oil: Iraq achieved 4% of its climate commitments this year
» Iraq is at the top of the 5 largest oil deals within a month
» A year later... where did Resolution 320 arrive at converting agricultural land to residential?
» The judiciary orders the Communications and Media Commission to adopt the Internet Services Licensin
» It does not include cuts or imposing a ban. The Commander-in-Chief approves the plan to secure local
» The discovery of about 50 archaeological sites and new heritage buildings in Kirkuk
» Iraq's exports of oil and its products to America exceed 70 million barrels within 7 months
» Salah al-Din Municipalities: A government move to refer cleaning work to the private sector
» The Sudanese government sends 700 billion to the region again
» Integrity: The Authority’s authority will extend to the private sector
» Preliminary designs for the construction of the Vanguard Bridge
» Maritime studies students prepare for the opening of the Grand Al-Faw Port
» Electricity signs a strategic contract with two companies
» Sudanese: We are serious about restoring the business environment and rehabilitating the institution
» The absence of programs and the presence of material temptations in {electoral propaganda}
» Experts: Integrity deals a strong blow to the corrupt
» Audit Bureau: More than 5,000 financial reports will be issued in 2023
» Dhi Qar adopts a plan to zero all requests for land plots and distributes more than 10,000 residenti
» The Kurdistan government demands Baghdad to achieve justice, pay salaries, and amend the budget
» Employees complain about their low salaries: The government does not appreciate our efforts
» OPEC production declined last month to control the oil market
» Al-Sudani and Talabani discuss “national issues and files” and the progress of implementing the gove
» America is pressing to save the normalization of Zionism.. Calls for Al-Halbousi to be tried on char
» Sudanese: $26 billion was not subject to customs duties and taxes
» 9 million Iraqis live in Baghdad
» "Sponsored ads" drained nearly a million dollars from the pockets of candidates in Iraq
» "Comprehensive discussions"... A Kurdish delegation will visit Baghdad soon, and Erbil announces the