Home
EXCLUSIVE
From Tel Aviv to Turtle Bay
The White House hoped a new Israeli prime minister would resume peace talks with the Palestinians. With Netanyahu holding on, the administration is weighing a turn to the U.N. to help force a deal.
After years of blocking U.N. efforts to pressure Israelis and Palestinians into accepting a lasting two-state solution, the United States is edging closer toward supporting a U.N.
Security Council resolution that would call for the resumption of political talks to conclude a final peace settlement, according to Western diplomats.
The move follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decisive re-election Tuesday after the incumbent publicly abandoned his commitment to negotiate a Palestinian state — the basis of more than 20 years of U.S. diplomatic efforts — and promised to continue the construction of settlements on occupied territory. The development also reflects deepening pessimism over the prospect of U.S.-brokered negotiations delivering peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Shortly before this week’s election, the United States informed its diplomatic partners that it would hold off any moves in the U.N. Security Council designed to put Israel on the spot at the United Nations in the event that Netanyahu’s challenger, Isaac Herzog, won the election. But U.S. officials signaled a willingness to consider a U.N. resolution in the event that Netanyahu was re-elected and formed a coalition government opposed to peace talks. The United States has not yet circulated a draft, but diplomats say Washington has set some red lines and is unwilling to agree to set a fixed deadline for political talks to conclude.
“The more the new government veers to the right the more likely you will see something in New York,” said a Western diplomat.
Netanyahu’s government will likely be made up of right-wing and Orthodox parties adamantly opposed to making concessions to Palestinians. According to a statement from Netanyahu’s office, the Israeli leader has already consulted with party leaders he plans to add to his coalition, including Naftali Bennett of the pro-settlement Jewish Home party, Avigdor Lieberman of the far-right nationalist Yisrael Beitenu party, and leaders of the ultra-Orthodox Shas and United Torah Judaism parties.
On Wednesday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki did not rule out the possibility of the United States supporting a U.N. resolution on Israel-Palestine.
“We’re currently evaluating our approach. We’re not going to prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action,” she told reporters.
For decades, Democratic and Republican administrations have resisted a role for the U.N. Security Council in dealing with the Middle East crisis. They have argued consistently that an enduring peace can only be achieved through direct negotiations between the parties. Israeli leaders have also strongly opposed giving the world body a greater role in bringing about a deal.
However, the prospect of direct negotiations appeared to evaporate with Netanyahu’s pre-election declaration that he would never allow the creation of a Palestinian state. The comment completely reversed the Israeli leader’s previous support for an independent Palestine as part of a permanent peace deal between the two sides.
The deliberations over the future of the U.S. diplomatic efforts are playing out just weeks before the Palestinians are scheduled to join the International Criminal Court, a move that is certain to heighten diplomatic tensions between Israel and the Palestinians. On Wednesday, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s top diplomat in the United States told Foreign Policy the Palestinians would move forward with plans to use the ICC to try to hold Israel accountable for alleged war crimes during last summer’s war in Gaza. (Israel says it worked hard to avoid civilian casualties, of which there were many, and blames Hamas militants for taking shelter in populated areas.)
“The fact that we have a government in Israel publicly opposing a two-state solution just reinforces our position that this conflict must be handled by the international community,” Maen Rashid Areikat said.
Ilan Goldenberg, a former member of the Obama administration’s Mideast peace team, told FP that Washington might be inclined to support a Security Council resolution backing a two-state solution as an alternative to the Palestinian effort to hold Israel accountable at the ICC.
“If it was done, it could protect Israel from a worse outcome,” he said.
Under this scenario, the United States would seek guarantees from the international community to hold off on ICC activity in exchange for a Security Council resolution outlining international standards for a final peace agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians.
“The Israelis will probably resist and say this is a bad idea, but they could also be convinced that this is better than the alternative,” said Goldenberg.
The window for this type of U.N. initiative is small. U.S. officials are unlikely to act during the contentious Iran negotiations, which are set to end in late June, Goldenberg said. But the administration will not want to wait until the 2016 presidential race kicks into high gear, as any Democratic nominee would likely advise the White House against upsetting the party’s influential pro-Israel supporters.
“Don’t expect anything to move until the summer,” said Goldenberg.
European and Arab governments, including France and the Palestinians, will likely want to move more quickly at the United Nations.
The Palestinians had been pressing the U.N. Security Council for months last year to adopt a resolution demanding that Israel end its occupation of Palestinian lands within three years. But the United States vetoed the Palestinian initiative.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power called it “unbalanced” because it failed to take into consideration Israel’s security concerns.
But France, which is seeking a broader diplomatic role in the Middle East, had also been pushing for a separate resolution, which calls for the resumption of political talks between Israelis and Palestinians in order to conclude a comprehensive peace settlement. In December, U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry warned Paris and other European governments that the United States would block the resolution if it were put to a vote before the Israeli election.
But one European diplomat said that there was “a broad understanding” at the time “that this was something that could be revisited post-election.” So far, U.S. talks with European allies have taken place in Washington and other capitals. There have been no substantive talks in New York among Security Council members.
France, however, recently renewed its appeal to the United States to consider taking up the issue before the council, according to diplomats familiar with the matter.
The United States, according to the diplomats, gave no firm commitment. But the administration indicated that it was willing to consider action in the council once a coalition government is put into place.
“I think they probably just want to see how it pans out,” said one U.N.-based diplomat. “But certainly the message we got back in December was that they might be able to show more flexibility after the election.”
Security Council diplomats say there remain significant differences between the U.S. approach and that of France. “There are discrepancies between the U.S. and European positions but I think they will bridge them soon,” said an Arab diplomat. “The key elements are the same: a framework for a peaceful solution that leads to the establishment of a Palestinian state … plus guarantees for Israel’s long-term security.” The United States is unlikely to hit Israel or the Palestinians with punitive measures if they fail to comply.
During a recent meeting of U.S. and European officials in Washington, a senior State Department official said the United States was considering a draft resolution at the Security Council but that no decision had been made.
Of course, two other options lie before the Obama administration with regard to the Israel-Palestine issue: continuing to reflexively back Israel at the United Nations, and simply enduring the widespread criticism of the international community, or raising the pressure on Jerusalem by abstaining from a U.N. resolution condemning Israeli settlements.
In 2011, the United States vetoed a resolution demanding that Israel’s settlement activity cease immediately — even though it was in line with U.S. policy. The measure was sponsored by nearly two-thirds of the U.N.’s membership and received a 14-1 vote on the Security Council.
“If there was a settlement resolution, would the U.S. abstain? I could see that as a possibility,” said Goldenberg.
In the wake of Israel’s election, U.N. and Israeli officials exchanged sharp words after U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq called on the new Israeli government to halt “illegal settlement-building in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
In response to the statement, Ron Prosor, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., snapped back: “If the U.N. is so concerned about the future of the Palestinian people, it should be asking … why Hamas uses the Palestinian people as human shields.”
http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/18/from-tel-aviv-to-turtle-bay-israel-palestinians-un-resolution/
From Tel Aviv to Turtle Bay
The White House hoped a new Israeli prime minister would resume peace talks with the Palestinians. With Netanyahu holding on, the administration is weighing a turn to the U.N. to help force a deal.
- MARCH 18, 2015
After years of blocking U.N. efforts to pressure Israelis and Palestinians into accepting a lasting two-state solution, the United States is edging closer toward supporting a U.N.
Security Council resolution that would call for the resumption of political talks to conclude a final peace settlement, according to Western diplomats.
The move follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decisive re-election Tuesday after the incumbent publicly abandoned his commitment to negotiate a Palestinian state — the basis of more than 20 years of U.S. diplomatic efforts — and promised to continue the construction of settlements on occupied territory. The development also reflects deepening pessimism over the prospect of U.S.-brokered negotiations delivering peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Shortly before this week’s election, the United States informed its diplomatic partners that it would hold off any moves in the U.N. Security Council designed to put Israel on the spot at the United Nations in the event that Netanyahu’s challenger, Isaac Herzog, won the election. But U.S. officials signaled a willingness to consider a U.N. resolution in the event that Netanyahu was re-elected and formed a coalition government opposed to peace talks. The United States has not yet circulated a draft, but diplomats say Washington has set some red lines and is unwilling to agree to set a fixed deadline for political talks to conclude.
“The more the new government veers to the right the more likely you will see something in New York,” said a Western diplomat.
Netanyahu’s government will likely be made up of right-wing and Orthodox parties adamantly opposed to making concessions to Palestinians. According to a statement from Netanyahu’s office, the Israeli leader has already consulted with party leaders he plans to add to his coalition, including Naftali Bennett of the pro-settlement Jewish Home party, Avigdor Lieberman of the far-right nationalist Yisrael Beitenu party, and leaders of the ultra-Orthodox Shas and United Torah Judaism parties.
On Wednesday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki did not rule out the possibility of the United States supporting a U.N. resolution on Israel-Palestine.
“We’re currently evaluating our approach. We’re not going to prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action,” she told reporters.
For decades, Democratic and Republican administrations have resisted a role for the U.N. Security Council in dealing with the Middle East crisis. They have argued consistently that an enduring peace can only be achieved through direct negotiations between the parties. Israeli leaders have also strongly opposed giving the world body a greater role in bringing about a deal.
However, the prospect of direct negotiations appeared to evaporate with Netanyahu’s pre-election declaration that he would never allow the creation of a Palestinian state. The comment completely reversed the Israeli leader’s previous support for an independent Palestine as part of a permanent peace deal between the two sides.
The deliberations over the future of the U.S. diplomatic efforts are playing out just weeks before the Palestinians are scheduled to join the International Criminal Court, a move that is certain to heighten diplomatic tensions between Israel and the Palestinians. On Wednesday, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s top diplomat in the United States told Foreign Policy the Palestinians would move forward with plans to use the ICC to try to hold Israel accountable for alleged war crimes during last summer’s war in Gaza. (Israel says it worked hard to avoid civilian casualties, of which there were many, and blames Hamas militants for taking shelter in populated areas.)
“The fact that we have a government in Israel publicly opposing a two-state solution just reinforces our position that this conflict must be handled by the international community,” Maen Rashid Areikat said.
Ilan Goldenberg, a former member of the Obama administration’s Mideast peace team, told FP that Washington might be inclined to support a Security Council resolution backing a two-state solution as an alternative to the Palestinian effort to hold Israel accountable at the ICC.
“If it was done, it could protect Israel from a worse outcome,” he said.
Under this scenario, the United States would seek guarantees from the international community to hold off on ICC activity in exchange for a Security Council resolution outlining international standards for a final peace agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians.
“The Israelis will probably resist and say this is a bad idea, but they could also be convinced that this is better than the alternative,” said Goldenberg.
The window for this type of U.N. initiative is small. U.S. officials are unlikely to act during the contentious Iran negotiations, which are set to end in late June, Goldenberg said. But the administration will not want to wait until the 2016 presidential race kicks into high gear, as any Democratic nominee would likely advise the White House against upsetting the party’s influential pro-Israel supporters.
“Don’t expect anything to move until the summer,” said Goldenberg.
European and Arab governments, including France and the Palestinians, will likely want to move more quickly at the United Nations.
The Palestinians had been pressing the U.N. Security Council for months last year to adopt a resolution demanding that Israel end its occupation of Palestinian lands within three years. But the United States vetoed the Palestinian initiative.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power called it “unbalanced” because it failed to take into consideration Israel’s security concerns.
But France, which is seeking a broader diplomatic role in the Middle East, had also been pushing for a separate resolution, which calls for the resumption of political talks between Israelis and Palestinians in order to conclude a comprehensive peace settlement. In December, U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry warned Paris and other European governments that the United States would block the resolution if it were put to a vote before the Israeli election.
But one European diplomat said that there was “a broad understanding” at the time “that this was something that could be revisited post-election.” So far, U.S. talks with European allies have taken place in Washington and other capitals. There have been no substantive talks in New York among Security Council members.
France, however, recently renewed its appeal to the United States to consider taking up the issue before the council, according to diplomats familiar with the matter.
The United States, according to the diplomats, gave no firm commitment. But the administration indicated that it was willing to consider action in the council once a coalition government is put into place.
“I think they probably just want to see how it pans out,” said one U.N.-based diplomat. “But certainly the message we got back in December was that they might be able to show more flexibility after the election.”
Security Council diplomats say there remain significant differences between the U.S. approach and that of France. “There are discrepancies between the U.S. and European positions but I think they will bridge them soon,” said an Arab diplomat. “The key elements are the same: a framework for a peaceful solution that leads to the establishment of a Palestinian state … plus guarantees for Israel’s long-term security.” The United States is unlikely to hit Israel or the Palestinians with punitive measures if they fail to comply.
During a recent meeting of U.S. and European officials in Washington, a senior State Department official said the United States was considering a draft resolution at the Security Council but that no decision had been made.
Of course, two other options lie before the Obama administration with regard to the Israel-Palestine issue: continuing to reflexively back Israel at the United Nations, and simply enduring the widespread criticism of the international community, or raising the pressure on Jerusalem by abstaining from a U.N. resolution condemning Israeli settlements.
In 2011, the United States vetoed a resolution demanding that Israel’s settlement activity cease immediately — even though it was in line with U.S. policy. The measure was sponsored by nearly two-thirds of the U.N.’s membership and received a 14-1 vote on the Security Council.
“If there was a settlement resolution, would the U.S. abstain? I could see that as a possibility,” said Goldenberg.
In the wake of Israel’s election, U.N. and Israeli officials exchanged sharp words after U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq called on the new Israeli government to halt “illegal settlement-building in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
In response to the statement, Ron Prosor, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., snapped back: “If the U.N. is so concerned about the future of the Palestinian people, it should be asking … why Hamas uses the Palestinian people as human shields.”
http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/18/from-tel-aviv-to-turtle-bay-israel-palestinians-un-resolution/
» Oil: government interest in investing in "free" gas in the Akkas and Mansouriya fields
» Al-Fateh: The dollar rose as a result of “hidden” agreements that Al-Kazemi concluded with Washingto
» Al-Bandawi is likely to reach the budget to the Council of Ministers in the next seven days
» Al-Bawi: Al-Halbousi transgressed the interest of the people by obstructing the holding of the "doll
» Economist: All oil revenues reach the Federal Bank before they are sent to Iraq
» Al-Nasr: Reviewing the coordination framework agreement will be a priority for Al-Sudani's visit to
» An expected problem with the salaries of employees.. The state does not own the dinar, and the bet i
» As part of the "battle" being waged by Al-Sudanese... the secrets of an ambush that overthrew a mill
» Victory: One reason behind the dollar's rise... and Iraq is still in the seventh item
» An American monitoring alerts Al-Sudanese: The dollar crisis predicts bankruptcy and protests
» Demonstrations begin in central Baghdad to protest against the rise of the dollar
» Environment is in the process of circulating an international report on climate change to all govern
» The Judicial Council enters the crisis line of market turmoil
» Multiple efforts to end the dollar's domination of the global market.. You know it
» Direction to the Iraqi courts regarding the dollar
» The conclusion of a commercial memorandum between Iraq and Jordan
» "Beware of the Revolution of the Hungry"... Demonstrations in Karbala and Najaf against the rise of
» Zidane directs to take legal measures against those causing damage to the national economy
» National Security overthrows merchants and owners of companies who smuggle currency
» The arrest of a currency smuggler in possession of a large sum in Salah al-Din
» The counterfeit Iraqi dinar.. Organized gangs penetrate the markets and exacerbate the wounds of the
» The most prominent of which is the "tax holiday".. 5 positive outcomes of the Sudanese meeting with
» An expert talks about fears of printing a cash block of more than 80 trillion dinars without cover
» The dollar crisis in Iraq.. daily exacerbation and warnings of its long continuation
» Federation of Chambers of Commerce: We are committed to the official exchange rate, and there is no
» A demonstration in central Baghdad to demand a reduction in the price of the dollar against the dina
» The conclusion of a commercial memorandum between Iraq and Jordan
» Deputy: Forming a specialized committee to control exchange rates and restore them to their previous
» Its employees from Iraq after a dispute over energy projects
» Sudanese issues strict directives to deal with currency smuggling
» The most prominent of what came in the meeting of the Kurdistan Democratic Party with the Change Mov
» Petroleum Products Distribution Company: The fuel card will be applied in all governorates except Ku
» Jenin Blaskhart: The federal government confirmed its commitment to settling outstanding issues with
» Environment discloses the outcomes of its meetings with the World Bank on climate change
» Sudanese advisor: Iraq's economy will not be determined by shop brokers
» The start of the second meeting between the Iraqi delegation and the US federal government regarding
» Deputy: The budget is still in the corridors of the Ministry of Finance and has not been discussed i
» Iraq .. Disclosure of the ratio of government spending to GDP within 10 years
» KTFA Members "News and Views" Thursday 2-2-2023
» Parliamentary services: Traders stopped exchanging dollars exacerbated the crisis even more
» The Chamber of Commerce submits a request to solve the dollar crisis in internal transactions
» THE PRIME MINISTER CHAIRS A MEETING ON THE EXCHANGE RATE: “SOME BANKS DO NOT MAKE THE DESIRED CONTRI
» Al-Sudani issues directives to tackle currency smuggling and arrest smugglers and speculators
» Video: The head of the Karbala Chamber of Industry criticizes the industrial reality in Iraq and rev
» Religious authority and drugs: a prohibition of their trade, money, and abuse...and a mandate to com
» Baghdad and Washington "agree on, among other things" on the status of the dollar in Iraq
» Biden assures Al-Sudani of his welcome to the Iraqi delegation's visit to Washington next weekpropos
» Solutions are exhausted.. A specialist identifies the last option to solve the dollar crisis in Iraq
» Despite Al-Sudani's visit... Parliamentary assurances that there are "problems" with the French Tota
» International report: The solution to the dollar crisis in Iraq is imminent and its signs will appea
» The most prominent of which is the "tax holiday".. 5 positive outcomes of the Sudanese meeting with
» Amidst the apparent 'chaos'.. New directives from Al-Sudani to control the dollar
» French 'Total' withdraws its employees from Iraq in light of disagreements with Baghdad
» America's envoy to the Security Council: We urge the Sudanese to fulfill his obligations to "confine
» The White House: Telephone discussions between Biden and the Sudanese dealt with several files
» Instead of Iranian... Parliamentary oil: Iraq will suffice with domestic gas to operate electric sta
» Iraq's share in the projects impede the agreement with the French oil giant
» Al-Sudani directs banking facilities and indicates reluctance
» The dollar is facing a difficult test.. What is the expected scenario?
» Foreign Ministry: An Iraqi delegation to Washington to discuss basic issues related to financial and
» National Security announces the arrest of company owners on charges of smuggling currency abroad
» Exchange rates of the dollar against the dinar
» What is the rank of Iraq in the Arab economies competitiveness index?
» Associated Press on the dollar crisis and federal restrictions: The Iraqi regime is threatened
» “They have 72 hours.” Al-Sudani asks for clarification about the video “The Lady of Gold”
» After warning her of the “division in Kurdistan.” Talabani meets Blaskhart
» Baghdad and Washington “agree on, among other things” about the status of the dollar in Iraq
» Politics, economy and security are at the heart of bin Farhan's visit to Baghdad
» Deputy: Unknown reasons behind the failure to hold an emergency parliamentary session regarding the
» The Prime Minister, Mr. Muhammad Shia'a Al-Sudani, meets with the former Prime Minister, Mr. Adel Ab
» Iraq ranks 15th in the Arab economies competitiveness index
» Al Janoob Islamic Bank provides good news to merchants and business owners regarding saving the doll
» A huge deficit.. Parliamentary finance reveals the details of the budget
» The Minister of Justice directs to overcome the obstacles facing the work of the Investment Authorit
» Deputy: Everyone is pushing for a population census in Iraq
» Al-Sudani directs to simplify the procedures for dealings with merchants in state departments
» Government directives to deal with currency smuggling
» They renewed their commitment to Iraq's security and stability.. Al-Sudani and Biden discuss regiona
» Dollar exchange rates in the Iraqi market
» Minister of Health: We are determined to develop and improve the health system in Iraq
» The Prime Minister chairs a meeting on the exchange rate: "Some banks do not make the desired contri
» Expert: Fears that the government will resort to printing a monetary block at an amount of 82-87 tri
» Al-Sudanese directs to simplify the procedures for merchants' dealings in the concerned / expanded s
» Pavel Talabani is discussing with the German ambassador ways to overcome the differences between the
» with the video. . The National Security Agency announces the arrest of a group of owners of large co
» A call for major demonstrations tomorrow in Tahrir Square to reduce the exchange rate of the dollar
» The Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces issues directives to tackle currency smuggling and arrest
» Sanad ... a meeting in Turkey between the Iraqi delegation and a delegation representing the US Fede
» The dollar crisis will not be resolved soon... a "disappointed" statement from the parliamentary fin
» A good opportunity before prices rise.. Iraq is racing against time to buy wheat immediatelyproposal
» A bank releases good news for merchants: dollars at the official rate and “no commission” transfersp
» Iraq's chambers of commerce and economic elites in the Sudanese office: 10 urgent points to reduce t
» The Ministry of Education denies that "the illiteracy rate in Iraq has reached 47 percent."proposals
» Iraq market: trading of shares worth 5 billion dinars within a week
» Blaskhart calls for expediting the approval of the budget and giving priority to diversifying the ec
» Petroleum products: The fuel card will be applied in all governorates
» Foreign Ministry: The Iraqi delegation will discuss in Washington the rise of the dollar and financi
» Al-Halbousi: Parliament supports the Iraqi government and the bilateral cooperation agreement with S