image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/07/water.png

Feds sued over massive water-rule power grab
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99
A massive new power grab by bureaucrats in Washington that would give them control of “practically every pond, stream and ditch in the country” and the lands where they are is being challenged in court by a legal team that already has taken on – and defeated – federal efforts to run roughshod over Americans with water rules.
The newest fight is against the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and others for their announcement, at the end of June, to vastly expand the jurisdictional term “waters of the United States” under the clean Water Act.
A lawsuit was filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation because, as its principal attorney, M. Reed Hopper, explained, “This new regulation is an open-ended license for federal bureaucrats to assert control over nearly all of the nation’s water, and much of the property, from coast to coast.”
Have a retention pond in a park? Could be subject the new regulation. A low area where rain runoff from your neighborhood drains? Same thing. Isolated puddles in a cow pasture? Look out.
In fact, Hopper said, “Under its vague and limitless terms, the only waters that are clearly not subject to federal regulatory power are a few that are expressly excluded in the Clean Water Act, including artificial reflective pools, ornamental waters, some ground water, and gullies.”
Plaintiffs include the Washington Cattlemen’s Association, California Cattlemen’s Association, New Mexico Cattle Growers Association, New Mexico Wool Growers Inc., New Mexico Federal Lands Council, Duarte Nursery Inc., Pierce Investment Co.’ LPF Properties and Hawks Co.
Judge Andrew Napolitano is issuing his warning, in “It Is Dangerous To Be Right When The Government Is Wrong.”
The case was filed in U.S. District Court in Minnesota.
The Sacramento-based legal team said the Washington rule “could bring virtually all the nation’s water and much of the land under direct federal regulatory control” because “it sets no limit on the CWA’s reach.”
It explicitly expands federal control to waters that the U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled “off-limits,” the team said.
The Clean Water Act, originally designated to protect “navigable” waters such as rivers, lakes and oceans, would now include “tributaries” no matter how small or remote, “neighboring” water without any connections, and “even isolated waters that the Supreme Court has held to be beyond CWA coverage.”
“In short, the administration is engaged in a sweeping power grab,” Hopper said. “Property owners around the country will be faced with the prospect of being micro-managed by federal bureaucrats. This turns our federal system on its head. Under our constitutional framework, the states and localities are charged with the primary role in land use regulation and local water-quality protection.
“The Obama administration’s sweeping new rule usurps the authority and responsibility of the states, and empowers bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., to act as zoning and land use czars for the entire nation.”
Billy Gatlin, of the California Cattlemen’s Association, said the rule is vague and creates confusion over what ranching activities might, or might now, now be allowed.
Jose Varela of the new Mexico Cattle Growers Association noted his family has been on his land for 14 generations.
“I believe we have the history to prove that we are caretakers of the water and the land without the help of the Environmental Protection Agency,” he said.
The complaint seeks declaratory judgments that the EPA’s expansive claims to control of all tributaries, adjacent waters, interstate waters, isolated waters and more is contrary to law and invalid.
It explains that the Supreme Court already has ruled that the agencies can regulate some wetlands adjacent to navigable waters, but they cannot take control of isolated water bodies or certain tributaries.
The EPA proposed the rule change in 2014, and made it final on June 29, 2015.
If the rule change stands, the complaint explains, “landowners” will be required to seek a federal permit, at a significant cost perhaps of tens of thousands of dollars, to use their own property.
Lawsuits also have been filed over the past few days by 27 states challenging the EPA plan because it violates the Clean Water Act, Supreme Court precedent and state rules in its action.
“The results of this rule will carry a tremendous cost to our state, our economy, and our families,” South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said in a statement.
“The EPA’s proposed expansion would bring many roadside ditches, small ponds on family farms, water features on golf courses, and storm water systems under extremely burdensome federal regulation.”
States involved include South Carolina, West Virginia, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Utah, Wisconsin, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Ohio, Michigan, Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana.
The Pacific Legal Foundation has taken on Washington’s bureaucrats directly in the past, most notably in the Sackett case from Priest Lake, Idaho. There a couple bought some land and, with building permissions, started work on their dream home.
Along came the Environmental Protection Agency with a determination that the parcel contained “wetlands” and gave the couple the options to abandon their land, seek a prohibitively expensive permit or face millions of dollars in fines.
The federal agency also contended the couple was not allowed to seek a judicial review of its decision.
But in a case assembled by the foundation, the Supreme Court ruled the EPA cannot issue a “drive-by” decision regarding wetlands and then prohibit the owner from using the property or challenging the decision.
The Supreme Court said the EPA must provide a process through which a challenge to its decision can be addressed in a meaningful way. The case was called a “precedent-setting victory for the rights of all property owners.”
A legal team spokesman said at the time: “The justices have made it clear that EPA bureaucrats are answerable to the law and the courts just like the rest of us. EPA can’t try to micromanage people and their property – it can’t order property owners to dance like marionettes – while denying them any meaningful right to appeal to the courts. It can’t threaten property owners with financial ruin and not have to justify its threats to a judge. And it can’t issue lazy, drive-by ‘wetlands’ edicts about private property.”
WND reported earlier on the looming rule change, when the PLF submitted comments to Washington warning of the dangers.
“On its face, the proposed rule covers virtually every water in the nation,” the team told the government in a comment procedure in advance of any final decision on the plan. “Under this rule, a prudent legal practitioner would have to advise his client that the only waters not covered are those few that are expressly exempt.”
The legal team warned, “If a water body isn’t a ‘traditional navigable water,’ it is a ‘tributary.’ If it isn’t a ‘tributary,’ it is an ‘adjacent water.’ If it isn’t an ‘adjacent water,’ it is an ‘other water.’ All of which are subject to onerous federal regulation.
“If it isn’t a water at all, it is still covered by the fine print in Footnote 3 of the proposed rule that states the terms ‘waters’ and ‘water bodies’ ‘do not refer solely to the water contained in these aquatic systems, but to the system as a whole including associated chemical, physical and biological features.’”
Pacific Legal said the “seemingly innocuous language is troubling because it can be interpreted to include runoff, dry land, man-made structures, and flora and fauna.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99

Feds sued over massive water-rule power grab
Claiming control over 'every pond, stream and ditch' in country
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99
A massive new power grab by bureaucrats in Washington that would give them control of “practically every pond, stream and ditch in the country” and the lands where they are is being challenged in court by a legal team that already has taken on – and defeated – federal efforts to run roughshod over Americans with water rules.
The newest fight is against the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and others for their announcement, at the end of June, to vastly expand the jurisdictional term “waters of the United States” under the clean Water Act.
A lawsuit was filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation because, as its principal attorney, M. Reed Hopper, explained, “This new regulation is an open-ended license for federal bureaucrats to assert control over nearly all of the nation’s water, and much of the property, from coast to coast.”
Have a retention pond in a park? Could be subject the new regulation. A low area where rain runoff from your neighborhood drains? Same thing. Isolated puddles in a cow pasture? Look out.
In fact, Hopper said, “Under its vague and limitless terms, the only waters that are clearly not subject to federal regulatory power are a few that are expressly excluded in the Clean Water Act, including artificial reflective pools, ornamental waters, some ground water, and gullies.”
Plaintiffs include the Washington Cattlemen’s Association, California Cattlemen’s Association, New Mexico Cattle Growers Association, New Mexico Wool Growers Inc., New Mexico Federal Lands Council, Duarte Nursery Inc., Pierce Investment Co.’ LPF Properties and Hawks Co.
Judge Andrew Napolitano is issuing his warning, in “It Is Dangerous To Be Right When The Government Is Wrong.”
The case was filed in U.S. District Court in Minnesota.
The Sacramento-based legal team said the Washington rule “could bring virtually all the nation’s water and much of the land under direct federal regulatory control” because “it sets no limit on the CWA’s reach.”
It explicitly expands federal control to waters that the U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled “off-limits,” the team said.
The Clean Water Act, originally designated to protect “navigable” waters such as rivers, lakes and oceans, would now include “tributaries” no matter how small or remote, “neighboring” water without any connections, and “even isolated waters that the Supreme Court has held to be beyond CWA coverage.”
“In short, the administration is engaged in a sweeping power grab,” Hopper said. “Property owners around the country will be faced with the prospect of being micro-managed by federal bureaucrats. This turns our federal system on its head. Under our constitutional framework, the states and localities are charged with the primary role in land use regulation and local water-quality protection.
“The Obama administration’s sweeping new rule usurps the authority and responsibility of the states, and empowers bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., to act as zoning and land use czars for the entire nation.”
Billy Gatlin, of the California Cattlemen’s Association, said the rule is vague and creates confusion over what ranching activities might, or might now, now be allowed.
Jose Varela of the new Mexico Cattle Growers Association noted his family has been on his land for 14 generations.
“I believe we have the history to prove that we are caretakers of the water and the land without the help of the Environmental Protection Agency,” he said.
The complaint seeks declaratory judgments that the EPA’s expansive claims to control of all tributaries, adjacent waters, interstate waters, isolated waters and more is contrary to law and invalid.
It explains that the Supreme Court already has ruled that the agencies can regulate some wetlands adjacent to navigable waters, but they cannot take control of isolated water bodies or certain tributaries.
The EPA proposed the rule change in 2014, and made it final on June 29, 2015.
If the rule change stands, the complaint explains, “landowners” will be required to seek a federal permit, at a significant cost perhaps of tens of thousands of dollars, to use their own property.
Lawsuits also have been filed over the past few days by 27 states challenging the EPA plan because it violates the Clean Water Act, Supreme Court precedent and state rules in its action.
“The results of this rule will carry a tremendous cost to our state, our economy, and our families,” South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said in a statement.
“The EPA’s proposed expansion would bring many roadside ditches, small ponds on family farms, water features on golf courses, and storm water systems under extremely burdensome federal regulation.”
States involved include South Carolina, West Virginia, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Utah, Wisconsin, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Ohio, Michigan, Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana.
The Pacific Legal Foundation has taken on Washington’s bureaucrats directly in the past, most notably in the Sackett case from Priest Lake, Idaho. There a couple bought some land and, with building permissions, started work on their dream home.
Along came the Environmental Protection Agency with a determination that the parcel contained “wetlands” and gave the couple the options to abandon their land, seek a prohibitively expensive permit or face millions of dollars in fines.
The federal agency also contended the couple was not allowed to seek a judicial review of its decision.
But in a case assembled by the foundation, the Supreme Court ruled the EPA cannot issue a “drive-by” decision regarding wetlands and then prohibit the owner from using the property or challenging the decision.
The Supreme Court said the EPA must provide a process through which a challenge to its decision can be addressed in a meaningful way. The case was called a “precedent-setting victory for the rights of all property owners.”
A legal team spokesman said at the time: “The justices have made it clear that EPA bureaucrats are answerable to the law and the courts just like the rest of us. EPA can’t try to micromanage people and their property – it can’t order property owners to dance like marionettes – while denying them any meaningful right to appeal to the courts. It can’t threaten property owners with financial ruin and not have to justify its threats to a judge. And it can’t issue lazy, drive-by ‘wetlands’ edicts about private property.”
WND reported earlier on the looming rule change, when the PLF submitted comments to Washington warning of the dangers.
“On its face, the proposed rule covers virtually every water in the nation,” the team told the government in a comment procedure in advance of any final decision on the plan. “Under this rule, a prudent legal practitioner would have to advise his client that the only waters not covered are those few that are expressly exempt.”
The legal team warned, “If a water body isn’t a ‘traditional navigable water,’ it is a ‘tributary.’ If it isn’t a ‘tributary,’ it is an ‘adjacent water.’ If it isn’t an ‘adjacent water,’ it is an ‘other water.’ All of which are subject to onerous federal regulation.
“If it isn’t a water at all, it is still covered by the fine print in Footnote 3 of the proposed rule that states the terms ‘waters’ and ‘water bodies’ ‘do not refer solely to the water contained in these aquatic systems, but to the system as a whole including associated chemical, physical and biological features.’”
Pacific Legal said the “seemingly innocuous language is troubling because it can be interpreted to include runoff, dry land, man-made structures, and flora and fauna.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99
» Water Resources implements a "major" campaign to address water scarcity and completes the 300-well p
» Rumaila oil field and associated gas at the discussion tables in London and Paris
» Government Adviser: Counts the benefits of rising Iraq's reserves of the dollar
» Al-Kazemi: Iraq has become one of the most important countries in the Middle East in terms of econom
» The Minister of Finance acknowledges the "difficulty" of building industrial cities in Iraq: the exi
» A slight decrease in gold prices in the Iraqi markets
» Foreign remittances from the dollar in the bank auction increased by 90%
» Labor sets the national employment policy
» The federal government threatens to take measures towards the region
» Al-Maliki and his allies acknowledge the failure of the Al-Sadr containment strategy and agree to en
» "Frameworkers" are trying to convince the opponents within the bloc to stay Al-Kazemi for a longer t
» 120 deputies sign to withdraw the hand of the Minister of Industry: 24 corruption files and trillion
» Alia Nassif renews her demand for the dismissal of the Minister of Transport.. She asserts: His rema
» The resignation of the Minister of Natural Resources in the Kurdistan government
» A member of Parliamentary Finance talks about appointments, salary scale, and taxes
» Azem clarifies its position on the law rejecting normalization with the Zionist entity
» The judiciary is discussing with the Ministry of Electricity the legal solutions to the problems fac
» Al-Kazemi: The government has performed its duties, and we have succeeded in overcoming many challen
» Al-Zamili: The failure to obtain a political agreement between the blocs does not mean disrupting th
» Al-Rasheed Bank launches a new meal of advances for three categories
» Oil prices continue to rise cautiously
» Dollar exchange rates against the dinar
» Oil: discussions to raise the production of the Rumaila field to one million and 700 thousand barrel
» The Parliamentary Oil and Gas Committee decides to host the Minister of Oil and his agents next week
» To expedite the implementation of gas investment contracts... The Minister of Oil meets the CEO of T
» The Ministry of Labor decides to grant a gift of 100,000 dinars to insured retirees
» Iran: We made progress in recent talks with Saudi Arabia in Baghdad
» Dollar exchange rates in Iraq
» The UN Security Council between Baghdad and Erbil to resolve the oil dispute
» I warned of a new "October" .. Bloc: Rerunning the elections is in the interest of the people on con
» Baghdad awaits "white smoke" from Erbil.. Kurdish understandings are a Trojan horse to end the polit
» 120 deputies sign to withdraw the hand of the Minister of Industry: 24 corruption files and trillion
» Al-Kazemi: Iraq has become one of the most important countries in the Middle East in terms of econom
» Al-Zamili: The absence of a political agreement does not mean that the work of Parliament will be di
» "Severe penalties"... Disclosure of the most prominent contents of the "Prohibition of Normalization
» The Ministry of Oil announces the final statistics of oil exports for the month of April
» Iraq.. is subject to this condition.. Parliamentary Finance denies knowing the most important featur
» Washington's new ambassador to Baghdad sets out the first tasks she will perform in Iraq ,
» In The Document.. Al-Zamili Calls For Allocating An Amount In The “Food Security” Law To Convert Lec
» Parliament Will Host The Minister Of Education Next Week
» The Central Bank: The banking sector has withstood great challenges and witnessed positive growth
» Central Bank Governor: We will continue to support the banking sector to develop the Iraqi economy
» In The Presence Of Blackshart.. The Start Of The National And Democratic Meeting At The Headquarters
» The Housing Fund confirms the continuation of granting loans and warns against commentators
» Mulla Bakhtiar: President Nechirvan Barzani's initiative is important, and whoever reduces concerns
» He denounced the threats against Kurdistan .. the Iraqi Ummah Party: Its goal is to prevent the regi
» The framework talks about “surprises” and studies the renewal of Al-Kazemi in exchange for “guarante
» Al-Kazemi and his Bulgarian counterpart exchange invitations to visit Baghdad and Sofia
» The Council of Ministers issues “electrical” decisions and “water” recommendations and conducts an i
» Document.. The Iraqi parliament allocates its next session to vote on a law banning normalization wi
» Al-Kifah and Al-Harithiya close at a decrease in the exchange rate of the dollar
» Al-Rasheed Bank launches a new meal from an advance of 5 and 10 million dinars
» Davos leaders: Food crisis could lead to trade war
» For the second day.. gold prices stabilize in the Iraqi markets
» With revenues amounting to 10 billion dollars .. Oil announces its final exports for the month of la
» 24,000 random housing units: the deputy governor holds the Minister of Interior responsible for hous
» Education for the World Bank: Evaluating education is not your business
» Oil Minister: We signed contracts to produce 2,500 megawatts
» Experts call for an increase in marine fishing operations in territorial waters
» Erbil is “threatened” in conjunction with a Kurdish-Kurdish agreement, and the security of Kurdistan
» Al-Sadr is preparing to lead a resounding demonstration similar to the October uprising
» An oil official: Most of the southern fields produce associated gas
» Ali Allawi: Cash reserves will reach more than 90 billion dollars by the end of this year
» The rise in oil prices is supported by a lack of supplies and the possibility of increasing demand
» The rise in the price of the dollar in the local markets
» Rising food prices... Sanctions against these traders
» Oil prices are rising again
» The vote on “banning normalization” includes the agenda of Thursday's session
» Expectations to resolve the presidential file soon!
» Al-Sadr's deadline is in a countdown... and there are no signs of a consensual government
» After rejecting its governmental version, the Food Security Law returns to the front of the parliame
» The Agriculture Committee holds a meeting to discuss the summer plan for this season
» The Parliamentary Regions and Governorates Committee discusses the emergency support law proposal
» Parliamentary meeting to discuss mechanisms for implementing the instructions of the Teacher Protect
» Within a day.. the Central Bank of Iraq sells more than 220 million dollars in a currency auction
» Deputy: 80% of Iraq's factories have turned into "scrap iron".. 3 reasons behind the disaster - Urge
» PARLIAMENTARY LEGAL INCLUSION OF LECTURERS AND ADMINISTRATORS TO RESOLUTION 315 WITHIN THE 2022 BUDG
» Iraq Promises Iran To Pay Gas Debts Soon, And Tehran Offers Its Services To Solve The Problem Of Des
» The Council of Ministers holds its session headed by Al-Kazemi
» The Finance Committee sends an invitation to members of the House of Representatives regarding the p
» Parliamentary law sets the date for voting on the law criminalizing normalization with the Zionist e
» KTFA Members "News and Views" Monday Afternoon 5-23-2022
» Monday Night KTFA CC with Frank26 "Bird of Paradise: 5-23-2022
» Al-Bayati: The Kurdish House Will Join Any Coalition That Guarantees Its Interests... The Breakthrou
» A Deputy Calls For An Emergency Meeting After The “Al-Islah” Massacre.. 3 Big Question Points
» Al-Bolani Talks About “Agreement Week” To Produce A New Political Plan
» Calls To Open The File Of The Al-Halbousi Party’s Wealth: Its Headquarters In Baquba Is Worth One Bi
» Frustration Hits The Trio After 7 Months Of Failing To Achieve His Ambitions
» Al-Halbousi's Competitors Sneak Through The Parliament's Back Door And Signals Of Dismissal Are Eman
» Political Activist: Al-Halbousi Acquired Nineveh's Money And Transferred It To Anbar
» Al-Zobaie: Al-Halbousi's Behavior Will Lead Him To Dismissal Soon
» Deputy: Unemployment Reaches A Critical Point, The Most Dangerous After 2003
» Deputy: Unemployment Reaches A Critical Point, The Most Dangerous After 2003
» Economist: Oil Prices Will Continue To Rise, And Iraq Faces An Opportunity For Urban Development
» Al-Zanki: The Government Has Abandoned Its Role In Curbing Price Hikes
» With the participation of more than 200 companies .. Erbil hosts an international exhibition for bui
» Lebanese banks in Baghdad withdraw voluntarily
» Kurdistan Islamic Union of Maliki: The problems between Baghdad and Erbil require a quick solution