image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/07/water.png

Feds sued over massive water-rule power grab
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99
A massive new power grab by bureaucrats in Washington that would give them control of “practically every pond, stream and ditch in the country” and the lands where they are is being challenged in court by a legal team that already has taken on – and defeated – federal efforts to run roughshod over Americans with water rules.
The newest fight is against the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and others for their announcement, at the end of June, to vastly expand the jurisdictional term “waters of the United States” under the clean Water Act.
A lawsuit was filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation because, as its principal attorney, M. Reed Hopper, explained, “This new regulation is an open-ended license for federal bureaucrats to assert control over nearly all of the nation’s water, and much of the property, from coast to coast.”
Have a retention pond in a park? Could be subject the new regulation. A low area where rain runoff from your neighborhood drains? Same thing. Isolated puddles in a cow pasture? Look out.
In fact, Hopper said, “Under its vague and limitless terms, the only waters that are clearly not subject to federal regulatory power are a few that are expressly excluded in the Clean Water Act, including artificial reflective pools, ornamental waters, some ground water, and gullies.”
Plaintiffs include the Washington Cattlemen’s Association, California Cattlemen’s Association, New Mexico Cattle Growers Association, New Mexico Wool Growers Inc., New Mexico Federal Lands Council, Duarte Nursery Inc., Pierce Investment Co.’ LPF Properties and Hawks Co.
Judge Andrew Napolitano is issuing his warning, in “It Is Dangerous To Be Right When The Government Is Wrong.”
The case was filed in U.S. District Court in Minnesota.
The Sacramento-based legal team said the Washington rule “could bring virtually all the nation’s water and much of the land under direct federal regulatory control” because “it sets no limit on the CWA’s reach.”
It explicitly expands federal control to waters that the U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled “off-limits,” the team said.
The Clean Water Act, originally designated to protect “navigable” waters such as rivers, lakes and oceans, would now include “tributaries” no matter how small or remote, “neighboring” water without any connections, and “even isolated waters that the Supreme Court has held to be beyond CWA coverage.”
“In short, the administration is engaged in a sweeping power grab,” Hopper said. “Property owners around the country will be faced with the prospect of being micro-managed by federal bureaucrats. This turns our federal system on its head. Under our constitutional framework, the states and localities are charged with the primary role in land use regulation and local water-quality protection.
“The Obama administration’s sweeping new rule usurps the authority and responsibility of the states, and empowers bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., to act as zoning and land use czars for the entire nation.”
Billy Gatlin, of the California Cattlemen’s Association, said the rule is vague and creates confusion over what ranching activities might, or might now, now be allowed.
Jose Varela of the new Mexico Cattle Growers Association noted his family has been on his land for 14 generations.
“I believe we have the history to prove that we are caretakers of the water and the land without the help of the Environmental Protection Agency,” he said.
The complaint seeks declaratory judgments that the EPA’s expansive claims to control of all tributaries, adjacent waters, interstate waters, isolated waters and more is contrary to law and invalid.
It explains that the Supreme Court already has ruled that the agencies can regulate some wetlands adjacent to navigable waters, but they cannot take control of isolated water bodies or certain tributaries.
The EPA proposed the rule change in 2014, and made it final on June 29, 2015.
If the rule change stands, the complaint explains, “landowners” will be required to seek a federal permit, at a significant cost perhaps of tens of thousands of dollars, to use their own property.
Lawsuits also have been filed over the past few days by 27 states challenging the EPA plan because it violates the Clean Water Act, Supreme Court precedent and state rules in its action.
“The results of this rule will carry a tremendous cost to our state, our economy, and our families,” South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said in a statement.
“The EPA’s proposed expansion would bring many roadside ditches, small ponds on family farms, water features on golf courses, and storm water systems under extremely burdensome federal regulation.”
States involved include South Carolina, West Virginia, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Utah, Wisconsin, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Ohio, Michigan, Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana.
The Pacific Legal Foundation has taken on Washington’s bureaucrats directly in the past, most notably in the Sackett case from Priest Lake, Idaho. There a couple bought some land and, with building permissions, started work on their dream home.
Along came the Environmental Protection Agency with a determination that the parcel contained “wetlands” and gave the couple the options to abandon their land, seek a prohibitively expensive permit or face millions of dollars in fines.
The federal agency also contended the couple was not allowed to seek a judicial review of its decision.
But in a case assembled by the foundation, the Supreme Court ruled the EPA cannot issue a “drive-by” decision regarding wetlands and then prohibit the owner from using the property or challenging the decision.
The Supreme Court said the EPA must provide a process through which a challenge to its decision can be addressed in a meaningful way. The case was called a “precedent-setting victory for the rights of all property owners.”
A legal team spokesman said at the time: “The justices have made it clear that EPA bureaucrats are answerable to the law and the courts just like the rest of us. EPA can’t try to micromanage people and their property – it can’t order property owners to dance like marionettes – while denying them any meaningful right to appeal to the courts. It can’t threaten property owners with financial ruin and not have to justify its threats to a judge. And it can’t issue lazy, drive-by ‘wetlands’ edicts about private property.”
WND reported earlier on the looming rule change, when the PLF submitted comments to Washington warning of the dangers.
“On its face, the proposed rule covers virtually every water in the nation,” the team told the government in a comment procedure in advance of any final decision on the plan. “Under this rule, a prudent legal practitioner would have to advise his client that the only waters not covered are those few that are expressly exempt.”
The legal team warned, “If a water body isn’t a ‘traditional navigable water,’ it is a ‘tributary.’ If it isn’t a ‘tributary,’ it is an ‘adjacent water.’ If it isn’t an ‘adjacent water,’ it is an ‘other water.’ All of which are subject to onerous federal regulation.
“If it isn’t a water at all, it is still covered by the fine print in Footnote 3 of the proposed rule that states the terms ‘waters’ and ‘water bodies’ ‘do not refer solely to the water contained in these aquatic systems, but to the system as a whole including associated chemical, physical and biological features.’”
Pacific Legal said the “seemingly innocuous language is troubling because it can be interpreted to include runoff, dry land, man-made structures, and flora and fauna.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99

Feds sued over massive water-rule power grab
Claiming control over 'every pond, stream and ditch' in country
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99
A massive new power grab by bureaucrats in Washington that would give them control of “practically every pond, stream and ditch in the country” and the lands where they are is being challenged in court by a legal team that already has taken on – and defeated – federal efforts to run roughshod over Americans with water rules.
The newest fight is against the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and others for their announcement, at the end of June, to vastly expand the jurisdictional term “waters of the United States” under the clean Water Act.
A lawsuit was filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation because, as its principal attorney, M. Reed Hopper, explained, “This new regulation is an open-ended license for federal bureaucrats to assert control over nearly all of the nation’s water, and much of the property, from coast to coast.”
Have a retention pond in a park? Could be subject the new regulation. A low area where rain runoff from your neighborhood drains? Same thing. Isolated puddles in a cow pasture? Look out.
In fact, Hopper said, “Under its vague and limitless terms, the only waters that are clearly not subject to federal regulatory power are a few that are expressly excluded in the Clean Water Act, including artificial reflective pools, ornamental waters, some ground water, and gullies.”
Plaintiffs include the Washington Cattlemen’s Association, California Cattlemen’s Association, New Mexico Cattle Growers Association, New Mexico Wool Growers Inc., New Mexico Federal Lands Council, Duarte Nursery Inc., Pierce Investment Co.’ LPF Properties and Hawks Co.
Judge Andrew Napolitano is issuing his warning, in “It Is Dangerous To Be Right When The Government Is Wrong.”
The case was filed in U.S. District Court in Minnesota.
The Sacramento-based legal team said the Washington rule “could bring virtually all the nation’s water and much of the land under direct federal regulatory control” because “it sets no limit on the CWA’s reach.”
It explicitly expands federal control to waters that the U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled “off-limits,” the team said.
The Clean Water Act, originally designated to protect “navigable” waters such as rivers, lakes and oceans, would now include “tributaries” no matter how small or remote, “neighboring” water without any connections, and “even isolated waters that the Supreme Court has held to be beyond CWA coverage.”
“In short, the administration is engaged in a sweeping power grab,” Hopper said. “Property owners around the country will be faced with the prospect of being micro-managed by federal bureaucrats. This turns our federal system on its head. Under our constitutional framework, the states and localities are charged with the primary role in land use regulation and local water-quality protection.
“The Obama administration’s sweeping new rule usurps the authority and responsibility of the states, and empowers bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., to act as zoning and land use czars for the entire nation.”
Billy Gatlin, of the California Cattlemen’s Association, said the rule is vague and creates confusion over what ranching activities might, or might now, now be allowed.
Jose Varela of the new Mexico Cattle Growers Association noted his family has been on his land for 14 generations.
“I believe we have the history to prove that we are caretakers of the water and the land without the help of the Environmental Protection Agency,” he said.
The complaint seeks declaratory judgments that the EPA’s expansive claims to control of all tributaries, adjacent waters, interstate waters, isolated waters and more is contrary to law and invalid.
It explains that the Supreme Court already has ruled that the agencies can regulate some wetlands adjacent to navigable waters, but they cannot take control of isolated water bodies or certain tributaries.
The EPA proposed the rule change in 2014, and made it final on June 29, 2015.
If the rule change stands, the complaint explains, “landowners” will be required to seek a federal permit, at a significant cost perhaps of tens of thousands of dollars, to use their own property.
Lawsuits also have been filed over the past few days by 27 states challenging the EPA plan because it violates the Clean Water Act, Supreme Court precedent and state rules in its action.
“The results of this rule will carry a tremendous cost to our state, our economy, and our families,” South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said in a statement.
“The EPA’s proposed expansion would bring many roadside ditches, small ponds on family farms, water features on golf courses, and storm water systems under extremely burdensome federal regulation.”
States involved include South Carolina, West Virginia, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Utah, Wisconsin, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Ohio, Michigan, Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana.
The Pacific Legal Foundation has taken on Washington’s bureaucrats directly in the past, most notably in the Sackett case from Priest Lake, Idaho. There a couple bought some land and, with building permissions, started work on their dream home.
Along came the Environmental Protection Agency with a determination that the parcel contained “wetlands” and gave the couple the options to abandon their land, seek a prohibitively expensive permit or face millions of dollars in fines.
The federal agency also contended the couple was not allowed to seek a judicial review of its decision.
But in a case assembled by the foundation, the Supreme Court ruled the EPA cannot issue a “drive-by” decision regarding wetlands and then prohibit the owner from using the property or challenging the decision.
The Supreme Court said the EPA must provide a process through which a challenge to its decision can be addressed in a meaningful way. The case was called a “precedent-setting victory for the rights of all property owners.”
A legal team spokesman said at the time: “The justices have made it clear that EPA bureaucrats are answerable to the law and the courts just like the rest of us. EPA can’t try to micromanage people and their property – it can’t order property owners to dance like marionettes – while denying them any meaningful right to appeal to the courts. It can’t threaten property owners with financial ruin and not have to justify its threats to a judge. And it can’t issue lazy, drive-by ‘wetlands’ edicts about private property.”
WND reported earlier on the looming rule change, when the PLF submitted comments to Washington warning of the dangers.
“On its face, the proposed rule covers virtually every water in the nation,” the team told the government in a comment procedure in advance of any final decision on the plan. “Under this rule, a prudent legal practitioner would have to advise his client that the only waters not covered are those few that are expressly exempt.”
The legal team warned, “If a water body isn’t a ‘traditional navigable water,’ it is a ‘tributary.’ If it isn’t a ‘tributary,’ it is an ‘adjacent water.’ If it isn’t an ‘adjacent water,’ it is an ‘other water.’ All of which are subject to onerous federal regulation.
“If it isn’t a water at all, it is still covered by the fine print in Footnote 3 of the proposed rule that states the terms ‘waters’ and ‘water bodies’ ‘do not refer solely to the water contained in these aquatic systems, but to the system as a whole including associated chemical, physical and biological features.’”
Pacific Legal said the “seemingly innocuous language is troubling because it can be interpreted to include runoff, dry land, man-made structures, and flora and fauna.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99
» Al-Amiri and Khazali affirm support for the measures to reduce the price of the dollar
» Economist: The rise of the dollar lost the value of the dinar and raised prices by 50%2023/01/30
» The dollar... Iraqi power is threatened and an American grip
» 1350 or 1640? Parliamentary Finance talks about news of changing the exchange rate in the budget
» Minister of Oil: We will invite international companies to rebuild the North Refinery
» Iraq.. 100 days since the Sudanese government assumed power
» Dollar prices ignore government decisions and continue to rise in Iraq
» The Governor of Diwaniyah announces the approval of the Minister of Labor to increase the number of
» Talabani On The Crisis In Baghdad And The Region: It Is No Longer In The Interest Of Any Party To De
» The House of Representatives completes the election of heads and deputies of parliamentary committee
» A leader in Al-Fateh: Internal hands want to thwart the Sudanese and the dollar crisis to "bring the
» Next Thursday.. 3 files related to Iraq will be presented to the UN Security Councilproposals from
» The Minister of Finance addresses Al-Sudani regarding the launch of real estate loans for citizens (
» The judiciary summons the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives for bypassing the Federal S
» Basem Khashan: The number of Sudanese advisors will reach 100 times soon..!
» Mazhar Muhammad Salih denies accusing a Kurdish politician of smuggling dollars
» A close associate of the coordination framework reveals a financial loan to Kurdistan instead of the
» Mandalawi and Alaq put the dollar on the table in Parliamen
» Parliamentary Finance resolves the controversy: The Sudanese government has no intention of reducing
» Tomorrow, Tuesday: an important meeting of the Central Bank of Iraq and expected decisions regarding
» Governor of Baghdad: He directed to establish new industrial cities in the capital
» Integrity: the overthrow of the former director of the Tax Authority, his wife, and two accused of c
» Election of Ahmed Al-Kinani and Ali Al-Hamidawi as chairpersons of the Economics and Services Commit
» The World Economic Forum appreciates the participation of the President of the Republic
» Iraq and Egypt are discussing expanding the scope of the Memorandum of Understanding signed between
» Deputy: The distribution of committees is according to the political agreement
» Deputy on the budget: its subject needs a lot of details
» Integrity reveals a “qualitative process”: it toppled heads and seized large sums of money
» Parliamentary source: Today...the presidencies of the committees in the House of Representatives are
» A deputy talks about the possibility of repeating the scenario of the Lebanese economic crisis in Ir
» Al-Karbouli calls on Japan to enhance its role in developing the infrastructure of the liberated cit
» Planning discusses with a UN program the results of a survey of institutions in Iraq
» Creating an integrated electronic service to change the names of beneficiaries of water and electric
» At the inauguration of the Judicial Complex in Ghamas... .. Minister of Justice: We will open more c
» Will you succeed in dealing with the rise of the dollar? An economist suggests adding a cash currenc
» Infographic: Learn the security signs to discover counterfeit Iraqi currency
» Expert: Solving the dollar problem requires breaking the link between it and commodity prices in the
» Al-Mandalawi to Al-Alaq: Financial stability must return to the markets soon
» Health: The 2023 budget will include standard allocations for the health sector
» Parliamentary Finance calls for expediting sending the budget law
» Finance: creating 24,933 job degrees to confirm contracts in 3 places
» With a capacity of 100,000 tons.. Announcing the construction of a new silo in Wasit
» corruption
» The new generation holds the Kurdistan government responsible for 4 crises in the region
» The Iraqi Central Bank's sales increased to more than 91 million dollarsproposals from
» Alekti: The Association of Banks has not done its part to solve the dollar crisis..and the governmen
» A new rise in the exchange rates of the dollar in Baghdad..and a raid on the Al-Kifah and Al-Harithi
» Parliamentary Finance invites the government regarding the 2023 budget
» Iraq and UNESCO are discussing the development of the education, culture and science sectors
» High prices of “foreign and Iraqi” gold in the local markets in the capital, Baghdad, and in the mar
» Iyad Allawi receives the President of the Republic, Abdul Latif Rashid, to discuss the situation in
» Iraq and the Netherlands are discussing the human rights file within the jurisdiction
» The central bank governor presents plans to control the dollar's rise
» Rashid and Allawi stress the necessity of holding a Kurdish dialogue under the supervision of Masoud
» It was preceded by American negotiation.. An Iraqi tendency to adopt the price of the dollar at 1,64
» KDP: The parties did not abide by the document that contributed to the formation of the government
» Al-Alaq briefs the Iraqi parliament on a "financial plan" to control the exchange rate and prevent s
» The bank’s dollar sales increased by 44% in the currency auction
» It imports 16 million liters per day.. Iraq is among the cheapest in the world with gasoline prices
» The crisis of the rise in the dollar exchange rate between the weak establishment of a fixed exchang
» Hamza El-Gawahry: The agreements with Siemens are a good step for investing in gas
» It costs 9 billion dollars.. Oil expert: The oil pipeline between Iraq and Jordan is useless
» Transport The project to link the port of Faw with Turkey is included in the 2023 budget
» Iraqis have spent more than 700 million dollars on treatment in India over the past 3 years
» Central Bank sales jump 40% and exceed $90 million
» The Governor of the Central Bank briefs the Presidency of Parliament on a “financial plan” to contro
» Labor is considering including the economic inclusion project in the 2023 budget
» Oil ignores the Iran bombings...waiting for OPEC's word
» Politicians: Investment laws deprive the state of huge sums
» Adding 1,000 megawatts to the national grid by 2023
» Preventing the transfer of funds to the region confuses the papers of the Party and the administrati
» Investigative committees of breaches of foreign investors
» Integrity reveals manipulation of 9 real estate and tax evasion in Fallujah
» Parliamentary Finance urges accelerating the approval of the 2023 draft budget
» Federal decision on the territory restores political tension
» Good news from the Central Bank, the Iraqi dinar has become equivalent to a dinar and a half. Video
» Kurdistan Regional Government: There is no compromise on our constitutional rights... There is no al
» After the complaint of the Federal Court.. issuance of a summons order against the second deputy spe
» Al-Zamili and Al-Janabi are the heads of the Parliamentary Security and Integrity Committees
» Election of Alia Nassif as First Vice-Chairman of the Integrity Committee and Karim Shakour as Secon
» Praising the efforts of the Minister of Construction.. Representative Kazem Al-Shammari expresses hi
» An American-British welcome to the Sulaymaniyah meeting: By working together, a more developed Kurdi
» Parliament elects the heads of parliamentary committees, three of which are for the Kurdistan Democr
» President Barzani receives the Kuwaiti Consul in Erbil
» Pumping food items at reduced prices next week
» State administration takes over the important parliamentary committee chairmen
» A leader in Al-Asa'ib sparks a dispute between Al-Sudani and Al-Maliki
» Formation of a committee to discuss constitutional amendments in Iraq
» "Money transfer" ignites disputes between Baghdad and Erbil
» Iraq renews its refusal to use its lands to encroach on neighboring countries
» Morocco reopens its embassy in the Iraqi capital
» Expectations of a delay in approving the budget until May: its amounts reach 220 trillion dinars
» The “frame” traces Al-Kazemi’s steps in the Basra-Aqaba pipeline, and a faction in the crowd threate
» Inclusion of the project to link the port of Fao with Turkey in the 2023 budget
» Economic center: Iraqis spent 700 million dollars on treatment in India in 3 years
» Parliament issues a clarification regarding the elections for parliamentary committee chairs
» Exchange rates in the Iraqi markets.. 166 thousand per 100 dollars
» The Presidents of the Republic and the National Coalition are discussing the Kurdish differences