image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/07/water.png

Feds sued over massive water-rule power grab
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99
A massive new power grab by bureaucrats in Washington that would give them control of “practically every pond, stream and ditch in the country” and the lands where they are is being challenged in court by a legal team that already has taken on – and defeated – federal efforts to run roughshod over Americans with water rules.
The newest fight is against the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and others for their announcement, at the end of June, to vastly expand the jurisdictional term “waters of the United States” under the clean Water Act.
A lawsuit was filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation because, as its principal attorney, M. Reed Hopper, explained, “This new regulation is an open-ended license for federal bureaucrats to assert control over nearly all of the nation’s water, and much of the property, from coast to coast.”
Have a retention pond in a park? Could be subject the new regulation. A low area where rain runoff from your neighborhood drains? Same thing. Isolated puddles in a cow pasture? Look out.
In fact, Hopper said, “Under its vague and limitless terms, the only waters that are clearly not subject to federal regulatory power are a few that are expressly excluded in the Clean Water Act, including artificial reflective pools, ornamental waters, some ground water, and gullies.”
Plaintiffs include the Washington Cattlemen’s Association, California Cattlemen’s Association, New Mexico Cattle Growers Association, New Mexico Wool Growers Inc., New Mexico Federal Lands Council, Duarte Nursery Inc., Pierce Investment Co.’ LPF Properties and Hawks Co.
Judge Andrew Napolitano is issuing his warning, in “It Is Dangerous To Be Right When The Government Is Wrong.”
The case was filed in U.S. District Court in Minnesota.
The Sacramento-based legal team said the Washington rule “could bring virtually all the nation’s water and much of the land under direct federal regulatory control” because “it sets no limit on the CWA’s reach.”
It explicitly expands federal control to waters that the U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled “off-limits,” the team said.
The Clean Water Act, originally designated to protect “navigable” waters such as rivers, lakes and oceans, would now include “tributaries” no matter how small or remote, “neighboring” water without any connections, and “even isolated waters that the Supreme Court has held to be beyond CWA coverage.”
“In short, the administration is engaged in a sweeping power grab,” Hopper said. “Property owners around the country will be faced with the prospect of being micro-managed by federal bureaucrats. This turns our federal system on its head. Under our constitutional framework, the states and localities are charged with the primary role in land use regulation and local water-quality protection.
“The Obama administration’s sweeping new rule usurps the authority and responsibility of the states, and empowers bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., to act as zoning and land use czars for the entire nation.”
Billy Gatlin, of the California Cattlemen’s Association, said the rule is vague and creates confusion over what ranching activities might, or might now, now be allowed.
Jose Varela of the new Mexico Cattle Growers Association noted his family has been on his land for 14 generations.
“I believe we have the history to prove that we are caretakers of the water and the land without the help of the Environmental Protection Agency,” he said.
The complaint seeks declaratory judgments that the EPA’s expansive claims to control of all tributaries, adjacent waters, interstate waters, isolated waters and more is contrary to law and invalid.
It explains that the Supreme Court already has ruled that the agencies can regulate some wetlands adjacent to navigable waters, but they cannot take control of isolated water bodies or certain tributaries.
The EPA proposed the rule change in 2014, and made it final on June 29, 2015.
If the rule change stands, the complaint explains, “landowners” will be required to seek a federal permit, at a significant cost perhaps of tens of thousands of dollars, to use their own property.
Lawsuits also have been filed over the past few days by 27 states challenging the EPA plan because it violates the Clean Water Act, Supreme Court precedent and state rules in its action.
“The results of this rule will carry a tremendous cost to our state, our economy, and our families,” South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said in a statement.
“The EPA’s proposed expansion would bring many roadside ditches, small ponds on family farms, water features on golf courses, and storm water systems under extremely burdensome federal regulation.”
States involved include South Carolina, West Virginia, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Utah, Wisconsin, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Ohio, Michigan, Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana.
The Pacific Legal Foundation has taken on Washington’s bureaucrats directly in the past, most notably in the Sackett case from Priest Lake, Idaho. There a couple bought some land and, with building permissions, started work on their dream home.
Along came the Environmental Protection Agency with a determination that the parcel contained “wetlands” and gave the couple the options to abandon their land, seek a prohibitively expensive permit or face millions of dollars in fines.
The federal agency also contended the couple was not allowed to seek a judicial review of its decision.
But in a case assembled by the foundation, the Supreme Court ruled the EPA cannot issue a “drive-by” decision regarding wetlands and then prohibit the owner from using the property or challenging the decision.
The Supreme Court said the EPA must provide a process through which a challenge to its decision can be addressed in a meaningful way. The case was called a “precedent-setting victory for the rights of all property owners.”
A legal team spokesman said at the time: “The justices have made it clear that EPA bureaucrats are answerable to the law and the courts just like the rest of us. EPA can’t try to micromanage people and their property – it can’t order property owners to dance like marionettes – while denying them any meaningful right to appeal to the courts. It can’t threaten property owners with financial ruin and not have to justify its threats to a judge. And it can’t issue lazy, drive-by ‘wetlands’ edicts about private property.”
WND reported earlier on the looming rule change, when the PLF submitted comments to Washington warning of the dangers.
“On its face, the proposed rule covers virtually every water in the nation,” the team told the government in a comment procedure in advance of any final decision on the plan. “Under this rule, a prudent legal practitioner would have to advise his client that the only waters not covered are those few that are expressly exempt.”
The legal team warned, “If a water body isn’t a ‘traditional navigable water,’ it is a ‘tributary.’ If it isn’t a ‘tributary,’ it is an ‘adjacent water.’ If it isn’t an ‘adjacent water,’ it is an ‘other water.’ All of which are subject to onerous federal regulation.
“If it isn’t a water at all, it is still covered by the fine print in Footnote 3 of the proposed rule that states the terms ‘waters’ and ‘water bodies’ ‘do not refer solely to the water contained in these aquatic systems, but to the system as a whole including associated chemical, physical and biological features.’”
Pacific Legal said the “seemingly innocuous language is troubling because it can be interpreted to include runoff, dry land, man-made structures, and flora and fauna.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99

Feds sued over massive water-rule power grab
Claiming control over 'every pond, stream and ditch' in country
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99
A massive new power grab by bureaucrats in Washington that would give them control of “practically every pond, stream and ditch in the country” and the lands where they are is being challenged in court by a legal team that already has taken on – and defeated – federal efforts to run roughshod over Americans with water rules.
The newest fight is against the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and others for their announcement, at the end of June, to vastly expand the jurisdictional term “waters of the United States” under the clean Water Act.
A lawsuit was filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation because, as its principal attorney, M. Reed Hopper, explained, “This new regulation is an open-ended license for federal bureaucrats to assert control over nearly all of the nation’s water, and much of the property, from coast to coast.”
Have a retention pond in a park? Could be subject the new regulation. A low area where rain runoff from your neighborhood drains? Same thing. Isolated puddles in a cow pasture? Look out.
In fact, Hopper said, “Under its vague and limitless terms, the only waters that are clearly not subject to federal regulatory power are a few that are expressly excluded in the Clean Water Act, including artificial reflective pools, ornamental waters, some ground water, and gullies.”
Plaintiffs include the Washington Cattlemen’s Association, California Cattlemen’s Association, New Mexico Cattle Growers Association, New Mexico Wool Growers Inc., New Mexico Federal Lands Council, Duarte Nursery Inc., Pierce Investment Co.’ LPF Properties and Hawks Co.
Judge Andrew Napolitano is issuing his warning, in “It Is Dangerous To Be Right When The Government Is Wrong.”
The case was filed in U.S. District Court in Minnesota.
The Sacramento-based legal team said the Washington rule “could bring virtually all the nation’s water and much of the land under direct federal regulatory control” because “it sets no limit on the CWA’s reach.”
It explicitly expands federal control to waters that the U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled “off-limits,” the team said.
The Clean Water Act, originally designated to protect “navigable” waters such as rivers, lakes and oceans, would now include “tributaries” no matter how small or remote, “neighboring” water without any connections, and “even isolated waters that the Supreme Court has held to be beyond CWA coverage.”
“In short, the administration is engaged in a sweeping power grab,” Hopper said. “Property owners around the country will be faced with the prospect of being micro-managed by federal bureaucrats. This turns our federal system on its head. Under our constitutional framework, the states and localities are charged with the primary role in land use regulation and local water-quality protection.
“The Obama administration’s sweeping new rule usurps the authority and responsibility of the states, and empowers bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., to act as zoning and land use czars for the entire nation.”
Billy Gatlin, of the California Cattlemen’s Association, said the rule is vague and creates confusion over what ranching activities might, or might now, now be allowed.
Jose Varela of the new Mexico Cattle Growers Association noted his family has been on his land for 14 generations.
“I believe we have the history to prove that we are caretakers of the water and the land without the help of the Environmental Protection Agency,” he said.
The complaint seeks declaratory judgments that the EPA’s expansive claims to control of all tributaries, adjacent waters, interstate waters, isolated waters and more is contrary to law and invalid.
It explains that the Supreme Court already has ruled that the agencies can regulate some wetlands adjacent to navigable waters, but they cannot take control of isolated water bodies or certain tributaries.
The EPA proposed the rule change in 2014, and made it final on June 29, 2015.
If the rule change stands, the complaint explains, “landowners” will be required to seek a federal permit, at a significant cost perhaps of tens of thousands of dollars, to use their own property.
Lawsuits also have been filed over the past few days by 27 states challenging the EPA plan because it violates the Clean Water Act, Supreme Court precedent and state rules in its action.
“The results of this rule will carry a tremendous cost to our state, our economy, and our families,” South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said in a statement.
“The EPA’s proposed expansion would bring many roadside ditches, small ponds on family farms, water features on golf courses, and storm water systems under extremely burdensome federal regulation.”
States involved include South Carolina, West Virginia, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Utah, Wisconsin, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Ohio, Michigan, Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana.
The Pacific Legal Foundation has taken on Washington’s bureaucrats directly in the past, most notably in the Sackett case from Priest Lake, Idaho. There a couple bought some land and, with building permissions, started work on their dream home.
Along came the Environmental Protection Agency with a determination that the parcel contained “wetlands” and gave the couple the options to abandon their land, seek a prohibitively expensive permit or face millions of dollars in fines.
The federal agency also contended the couple was not allowed to seek a judicial review of its decision.
But in a case assembled by the foundation, the Supreme Court ruled the EPA cannot issue a “drive-by” decision regarding wetlands and then prohibit the owner from using the property or challenging the decision.
The Supreme Court said the EPA must provide a process through which a challenge to its decision can be addressed in a meaningful way. The case was called a “precedent-setting victory for the rights of all property owners.”
A legal team spokesman said at the time: “The justices have made it clear that EPA bureaucrats are answerable to the law and the courts just like the rest of us. EPA can’t try to micromanage people and their property – it can’t order property owners to dance like marionettes – while denying them any meaningful right to appeal to the courts. It can’t threaten property owners with financial ruin and not have to justify its threats to a judge. And it can’t issue lazy, drive-by ‘wetlands’ edicts about private property.”
WND reported earlier on the looming rule change, when the PLF submitted comments to Washington warning of the dangers.
“On its face, the proposed rule covers virtually every water in the nation,” the team told the government in a comment procedure in advance of any final decision on the plan. “Under this rule, a prudent legal practitioner would have to advise his client that the only waters not covered are those few that are expressly exempt.”
The legal team warned, “If a water body isn’t a ‘traditional navigable water,’ it is a ‘tributary.’ If it isn’t a ‘tributary,’ it is an ‘adjacent water.’ If it isn’t an ‘adjacent water,’ it is an ‘other water.’ All of which are subject to onerous federal regulation.
“If it isn’t a water at all, it is still covered by the fine print in Footnote 3 of the proposed rule that states the terms ‘waters’ and ‘water bodies’ ‘do not refer solely to the water contained in these aquatic systems, but to the system as a whole including associated chemical, physical and biological features.’”
Pacific Legal said the “seemingly innocuous language is troubling because it can be interpreted to include runoff, dry land, man-made structures, and flora and fauna.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/feds-sued-over-massive-water-rule-power-grab/#Zwzd8Xl6hp4gdydG.99
» utube 11/28/23 From Iraq Today 2023 / Iraqi Dinar RV / Iraqi Dinar News Today
» Militia Man & Crew IMF ARTICLE VIII - The Department of Investments and Foreign Transfers OF IRAQ
» utube 11/27/23 Militia Man & Crew WTO - International Monetary Fund - AYSCUDA
» The American Ambassador: The guide to financial investigation procedures will support Iraq in reduci
» The Iraqi judiciary adopts the “video conferencing” mechanism to record the statements of witnesses
» The Federal Court rejects a lawsuit against Al-Sudani regarding the salaries of Kurdistan employees
» Planning: The Development Road and Al-Faw Port projects will provide a high contribution to state re
» The Ministry of Transport confirms its readiness for the task of managing Iraqi airports
» The Iraqi government issues new decisions
» The Commission comments on the possibility of “exploiting” unreceived voter cards by fraud
» Asala instead of agency.. The Council of Ministers votes on a number of special grades and sends the
» “It does not export all quantities.” Parliament comments on Iraq’s oil exports for the month of Octo
» Dealing with Chinese is a funny game.. Iraq’s expectations for 2024: The dollar is above 190.. How m
» Central Bank: There is no shortage of dinar stocks and the financial situation is good
» Al-Rasheed announces the opening of the platform for travelers wishing to buy dollars
» Sudanese Advisor: Reforming the economy begins with the government banking sector
» Adviser to the Prime Minister: Economic policy in Iraq is moving towards implementing the principle
» Audit Bureau: Completing the audit of the final accounts for the 2016 budget and obliging government
» In cooperation with the World Health Organization, the launch of a project for electronic organizati
» The continuation of “insults to the dollar” will force us to undertake a mass migration. Representat
» Regional Chambers of Commerce: Thursday is the election date, and this is the number of merchants wh
» The Sudanese is between the hammer and the anvil of the Americans and the resistance missiles
» Overthrowing a network that manipulates dollar exchange rates in Baghdad
» Violations and violations in two projects costing them “41” billion dinars in Dhi Qar
» State Forces candidate Ahmed Al-Hassani: Agriculture on the Euphrates River is annihilated, and inve
» State Forces candidate Sarah Al-Khazali: The housing crisis is at the forefront of service problems
» State Forces candidate Hassan Al-Kinani: Mr. Al-Hakim’s contribution was significant in approving th
» Erbil...the opening of the largest iron production factory in Iraq
» Al-Barti identifies the “point of contention” regarding not exporting Kurdistan’s oil to Türkiye
» Al-Fateh: America is misleading about its combat presence in Iraq
» External remittances increased by 94% in the Central Bank of Iraq auction
» The Financial Supervision Authority announces the completion of the audit of the final accounts for
» The Iraqi Stock Exchange closed up by 0.01%
» Iraq loses half of its cultivated areas due to drought
» Baghdad does not recognize.. Revealing the reason for preventing Iraq from entering the “Gaza truce”
» Al-Parti is pressing to implement a “law that ends the Kurdistan employee salaries crisis” and direc
» Costs, agreements, and diversity.. Iraq increases its trade exchange with Iran, and the obstacles ar
» “It does not export all quantities.” Parliament comments on Iraq’s oil exports for the month of Octo
» An invitation to an extraordinary session to choose the Speaker of Parliament
» Prime Minister: Forming a team to follow up on reforms in Rafidain Bank
» The Council of Ministers holds its regular session headed by Al-Sudani
» The Security Committee for Securing the Elections announces the formation of the Cybersecurity Commi
» Oil is heading to end a series of losses amid anticipation of the OPEC+ decision
» Finance funds the Ministry of Education’s account to disburse student and student grants
» Adopting the electronic payment system at gas stations early next year
» Al-Maliki's coalition advises Al-Halbousi to "stay away" from the political process
» Finance launches the second issuance of reconstruction bonds worth one trillion dinars
» Accusations against Al-Halbousi’s party of stealing the revenues of Al-Qaim and Trebil outlets
» The framework expects an increase in the number of competitors for the position of Speaker of Parlia
» Al-Rasheed directs its branches to stop credit activities
» Kurdish leader: The employee salaries crisis includes all governorates of the region
» The Iraqi Central Bank diagnoses the “basic” problem with the crisis of the dollar’s rise
» The Patriotic Council of Kurdistan sets a “condition” for choosing the Speaker of Parliament.. What
» Masrour Barzani: The regional government delegation is holding discussions in Baghdad to resolve the
» Last month... Chinese companies acquired the largest share of Iraq's oil
» American report: Iraq is among the 10 countries most exposed to floods
» Agriculture demands the activation of “food industries” and the production of modern mechanization
» 24 foreigners who intended to destabilize the security of the oil fields in Basra were arrested
» Jassim Al-Falahi: 90 billion dinars have been allocated to confront climate change and address pollu
» The Council of Ministers issues a special decision to import gold and precious metals
» "SOMO": Chinese companies are the most numerous to buy Iraqi oil
» Oil: Total projects will close the file of flared gas in 5 fields
» Electricity delivers sites for the construction of solar power plants
» Planning reveals the goals of the five-year national development plan
» 30% growth in Iranian goods exports to Iraq
» With the document.. Integrity summons the Assistant Secretary of Security and Intelligence, Ali Sabr
» Al-Sudani reviews the latest preparations for holding the elections
» Contracting with an international company to repair government banks
» An invitation to an extraordinary session to choose the Speaker of Parliament
» Iraq presents its demographic urban document to the Arab League
» Parliamentarians: Iraq’s position on Gaza is consistent and ahead of international positions
» Zidane: We are committed to anti-money laundering requirements
» The Ministry of Interior begins automating police stations in Karkh and Rusafa
» Efforts to employ geologists in oil companies
» Iraq raises hot issues at the World Climate Conference sessions
» Al-Alaq: There is no scarcity of dinars and the monetary supply exceeds 100 trillion
» 9 billion dollars in Iraqi oil imports in a month
» Gas export
» Baghdad does not recognize.. Revealing the reason for preventing Iraq from entering the “Gaza truce”
» Baghdad dollar stabilizes high.. Money exchangers sell for more than 158 thousand
» Al-Sudani will present the demands of the regional delegation to the Iraqi Council of Ministers
» Prime Minister, Mr. Muhammad Shiaa Al-Sudani, receives the head of the Victory Alliance, Mr. Haider
» 4 “Sunni” figures.. Learn about the names nominated to assume the position of Speaker of the House o
» The work releases the salary of a full-time employee to more than 311 thousand beneficiaries
» The Prime Minister and the Turkish Ambassador agree on the importance of resuming the export of Kurd
» Fears of the outbreak of a devastating regional conflict: Iraq warns against extending the Gaza truc
» President Barzani meets with the Turkish Ambassador to Iraq
» Al-Sudani reviews the latest preparations for holding the elections
» Petroleum products: Electronic payment at gas stations will not impose additional fees
» Peasants demonstrate in Diwaniyah: The agricultural plan did not include our lands
» The Commission responds to the demands to postpone the Kirkuk elections and confirms the integrity o
» An international survey summarizes the suffering of Iraqi farmers due to drought
» A network manipulating dollar exchange rates was arrested in Baghdad
» Kurdistan gives pharmacies two months to comply with “drug pricing”
» Nechirvan Barzani: Erbil and Baghdad are holding technical discussions to resume Kurdistan oil expor
» Finance announces the launch of the second issuance of reconstruction bonds worth more than one tril
» The coordination framework discusses during its meeting developments in the political situation in I
» Coinciding with the end of the year... a government bank extends an invitation to its branches