Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Iraq Dinar/News is a popular topic among many topics this board offers. You must log in to see and participate in our Dinar sections.

Position yourself for free after watching the video on eCommerce at www.nenosplace.ipronetwork.com

Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 7am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2017


Interesting How People Define Labor as Communistic

Share
avatar
Lobo
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 21834
Thanked : 1017
Join date : 2013-01-12

Interesting How People Define Labor as Communistic

Post by Lobo on Mon 07 Sep 2015, 6:46 pm

Interesting How People Define Labor as Communistic


It is fascinating that some people interpret “total productive capacity” as only brute labor and thus communistic and how this becomes their argument for precious metals. True, Marx focused on labor as wealth. He was partially correct. The total productive capacity includes those who create innovations, such as Henry Ford, Steve Jobs, or Bill Gates. What they tend to create with innovation is scores of jobs for others that expand the total productivity. You cannot limit the wealth of a nation to just people digging trenches to plant crops or turning some machine to punch out widgets. The term as I define it is everyone acting FREELY within their personal capacity. That is Smith’s Invisible Hand. Marx saw everything as a battle between poor and rich crediting nothing to the jobs created by people with ideas. Government is incapable of innovation, which is why communism failed for it cannot create innovation. This is the very same reason big companies die. They kick-out the creative people, fill the board with lawyers and accountants, then they have to pay huge money to buy startups because they lack the capacity to create innovation.
There must be FREEDOM to reach your capacity without bribing government to prevent innovation. England saw the early development of the automobile. The horse & buggy crowd bribed government to put in regulations to stop innovation. They passed a low where if you drove a car, you had to hire someone to walk before your car with a horn and flag yelling – WARNING – car approaching. The automobile innovation took hold in USA and Germany reducing England to a second rate country incapable of taking the lead during the Industrial Era. Government can be the worst enemy of everyone.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Martin Armstrong. Bookmark the permalink.

    Current date/time is Mon 27 Mar 2017, 7:25 pm