Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Iraq Dinar/News is a popular topic among many topics this board offers. You must log in to see and participate in our Dinar sections.

Position yourself for free after watching the video on eCommerce at www.nenosplace.ipronetwork.com

Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 7am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2017


Money vs. Fiat

Share
avatar
Lobo
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 21834
Thanked : 1018
Join date : 2013-01-12

Money vs. Fiat

Post by Lobo on Tue 08 Dec 2015, 10:52 am

Money vs. Fiat

Posted on December 8, 2015 by Martin Armstrong

QUESTION: Why do you do not see that money must be backed by something tangible?
ANSWER: That is an antiquated barter perspective; you are blind to reality. Your proposition is that only gold has value and you yourself are worthless. This idea of fiat money is just out of line with reality. The traditional definition of fiat currency, such as a paper currency, has no worth unless it is backed by something with a defined tangible commodity value, which is preposterous. That is still a derivative of barter. Paper currency that is not backed by something of tangible value is by no means worthless. China invented paper money during the 13th century and never issued gold coins. You are confusing money with politicians.
This traditional definition of a fiat currency is primitive. A currency is backed by the productive capacity of its people like a share in a corporation. If this were not true then Germany, Japan, and China would never have been able to rise from the ashes without gold. Obviously, it was the productive ability of their people. Under Socialism, currency is also backed by the taxpayers who are shaken down to pay the interest on the debt. That is very tangible for you go to prison if you do not obey their commands.

The wealth of a nation is not its gold, land, or natural resources, for it still takes labor to bring any commodity to market. The wealth of a nation is its people. Look at Germany. Its productive capacity was the highest in Europe and it rightly rose to the top. In Africa and places in South America, the people are not educated as a whole or productive from an international trade perspective, and consequently those countries have been unable to rise to the top at any point in their history.
This idea of fiat is a primitive distortion of reality for it also degrades humanity. Gold is a hedge against government as are all things to varying degrees on the opposite side of money. During a boom, money declines in purchasing power and tangible assets rise. During a recession or depression, money rises in purchasing power and assets decline. Is that so hard to understand?
You are confusing fiscal mismanagement by politicians and equating the problem to the existence of paper money. Not every system has collapsed. It is always dependent upon the integrity of government. That is the distinguishing factor.
This entry was posted in Basic Concepts and tagged fiat money, Gold, Tangible Assets, What is Money? by Martin Armstrong. Bookmark the permalink.
avatar
gmc
Understood Investor
Understood Investor

Posts : 96
Thanked : 25
Join date : 2012-12-19

Re: Money vs. Fiat

Post by gmc on Tue 08 Dec 2015, 11:13 am

You are confusing fiscal mismanagement by politicians and equating the problem to the existence of paper money. Not every system has collapsed. It is always dependent upon the integrity of government. That is the distinguishing factor.
 
Oh no dependent upon the integrity of the government oh no Sleep

    Current date/time is Tue 28 Mar 2017, 12:50 pm