Home
Marco Rubio’s secret (money) legacy
The senator’s allies found a way for donors to spend millions to support his presidential campaign while remaining anonymous — forever.
By Shane Goldmacher
03/28/16 05:19 AM EDT
Marco Rubio’s campaign is dead. His secret-money legacy lives on.
Nobody knows who funded the nonprofit group that spent more than $10 million on TV ads boosting Rubio, and untold more on mailers and research. And, unless those donors out themselves, nobody ever will.
No presidential candidate fighting for their party’s nomination has ever benefited from as much undisclosed cash, and watchdogs worry the pro-Rubio group’s unchecked activity serves as a dangerous precedent that will soon become common practice.
“It is now the model for a how a candidate can inject unlimited, secret, corrupting money into their campaigns to benefit their election,” said Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21, a campaign watchdog group. “That is precisely the kind of model that we do not need in America.”
The pro-Rubio nonprofit, known as the Conservative Solutions Project, was created in early 2014 and run by some of the same political operatives who would later lead his super PAC, including South Carolina strategist Warren Tompkins. Both groups can accept unlimited donations from donors, but unlike the super PAC, the nonprofit can keep its contributors hidden from the public — permanently.
The Conservative Solutions Project operates under the “social welfare” 501(c)4 section of the tax code, which requires that such groups not be primarily involved in political matters.
The pro-Rubio nonprofit has claimed not to be directly involved in electoral politics. Yet the group paid for a raft of polling and research in the early primary states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, as well as in Rubio’s home state of Florida. It bought millions in TV ads that aired in those early states, and it filled the mailboxes of Republican voters there with pro-Rubio literature. In fact, the Conservative Solutions Project was the second biggest TV advertiser of the 2016 campaign last year — trailing behind only Jeb Bush’s super PAC, according to a media tracker.
Loose nonprofit tax laws, and an unusual filing schedule set up by its creators, ensure the pro-Rubio nonprofit will file little paperwork covering the primary period until April 2017 — months after the next president is sworn in. And even then, no donors will be named.
“If you are trying to obscure your activities, they’re perfect,” Robert Maguire, a nonprofit investigator for the Center for Responsive Politics, said of 501(c)4s.
While super PACs are barred from coordinating with the candidates they support, the pro-Rubio super PAC and nonprofit legally worked hand-in-glove. They shared an address, staff and even a name (the super PAC went by the name the Conservative Solutions PAC). The treasurer of the nonprofit was Robert Watkins; the treasurer of the super PAC was his wife, Nancy Watkins.
Jeff Sadosky, who served as a spokesman for both, called them “two independent organizations, with wholly different missions and focuses.”
The Conservative Solutions Project’s first public splash came last June, when it released a television ad on national cable castigating the Iranian nuclear deal and casting Rubio as its chief opponent in Congress. “Marco Rubio is leading the fight,” the narrator said. The ad was just the beginning of a barrage that would last through November, all while the official Rubio campaign and super PAC conserved their cash.
Sadosky said the ads, all of which featured Rubio prominently, were unrelated to the election. “It was focused on highlighting conservative solutions to issues Americans were facing every day and focused on how conservatives spoke to the broader electorate,” Sadosky said.
The ads aired on broadcast in only three states: Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina — the first three states of the presidential primary campaign.
The nonprofit’s broadcast ads ran through Nov. 22 in Iowa and New Hampshire. About a week later, the Rubio super PAC picked up where it left off. The same ad-buying firm, Target Enterprises, executed the ad reservations for both the Rubio super PAC and nonprofit.
“They could not have been more blatant with the way this took place,” Wertheimer said.
At some television stations, such as WMUR in Manchester and KCCI in Des Moines, the forms the television stations filed with the Federal Communications Commission listed the nonprofit as spending on behalf of “Marco Rubio 2016.” When that became public, the nonprofit’s attorney sent letters to some stations asking to correct those records, arguing their ads starring Rubio were not actually about Rubio.
“CSP does not make candidate-related, political expenditures,” wrote Cleta Mitchell, the group’s lawyer and a prominent GOP attorney, of the Conservative Solutions Project. “All public communications are centered around important policy debates and concerns.”
Months before any of the TV ads aired, the group had paid for research that could later prove beneficial to Rubio’s presidential run. In 2014, it commissioned a 271-page, deep-dive report into the electorate in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada — the four states that voted first in February 2016 — along with Rubio’s home state of Florida. It analyzed voters’ opinions on immigration (Rubio’s signature issue, as well as a big vulnerability), job creation and gay marriage, and it studied their television watching habits.
It was published on the website of Optimus, the GOP analytics firm that produced it, including numerous tables of data, ensuring the Rubio campaign could later access the findings. Optimus would later sign on as consultants for Rubio’s campaign, getting paid nearly $1 million for its work.
Meanwhile, the timing of the Conservative Solutions Project’s tax filings and ad buys appears calculated to limit disclosure ahead of 2016.
The group was formed on Jan. 29, 2014, but declared its first fiscal year over only five months later, at the end of May 2014. It had raised $100,000 and spent only $63 in that time. The fact that the group aired its first ads in June 2015, just after the start of a new fiscal year, ensured that tax filings covering the period when TV ads aired would be delayed until April 2017.
“As long as you have enough money to spend millions on politics, you have enough money to hire the best lawyers to cover your tracks,” Maguire said.
So far, the group has made one non-required disclosure: Last summer, it announced it had raised $15.8 million, a sum that was promptly included in many media reports as part of the pro-Rubio war chest.
The Conservative Solutions Project is part of an ongoing evolution of the ways in which operatives pull so-called “dark money” into the political system. Millions in secretive spending seeped into the 2012 election through 501(c)4s, the biggest sums through Crossroads GPS, the group co-founded by Karl Rove. A pro-Obama nonprofit, Priorities USA, linked to the similarly named super PAC, also emerged that fall.
Some single-candidate nonprofits sprouted up in the 2014 congressional midterms, the most prominent one supporting Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell’s reelection in Kentucky. And other 2016 candidates benefited from political nonprofits, including John Kasich, Jeb Bush, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum and Bobby Jindal. Jindal’s spent the most — airing positive ads on his behalf in Iowa. But none of them spent nearly as much as Rubio’s.
“His campaign didn’t create this as an issue,” Maguire said. “They took it to the next level.”
Rubio himself stopped short of calling on his supportive nonprofit to unmask its donors.
“Obviously I can't interact or coordinate anything with them,” Rubio told POLITICO’s Mike Allen last summer at a summit for contributors to the Koch brothers political network, much of whose spending occurs through nonprofits. “And I just ask every group out there to comply with the law.”
When asked whether the group planned to make public its contributors, Sadosky said, “We look forward to complying with each rule and regulation from the IRS regarding 501(c)4s.” The law does not require donor disclosure for nonprofits.
Last November, Wertheimer’s group and the Campaign Legal Center asked the Department of Justice to investigate the pro-Rubio nonprofit for violating the tax code by claiming “social welfare” status. They got a letter back a few weeks later punting on the request, saying the question was the jurisdiction of the Internal Revenue Service, which has shown little inclination for such probes.
“The DOJ is refusing to do enforcement of the tax law. The [Federal Election Commission] is not enforcing the campaign finance laws. The result is the wild west of money in politics,” said Paul S. Ryan, senior counsel for the Campaign Legal Center.
On the campaign trail, Rubio's benefit from a nonprofit flashed as an occasional issue. Some believed Rubio’s allies were so reliant on secret money in part because Jeb Bush had frozen so much of the Florida Republican political class in place. "The fact that Bush was in the race meant a lot of donors wouldn’t help him out in the open,” a former senior Bush strategist said of Rubio.
Bush’s team, in particular, tried to highlight Rubio’s use of the nonprofit as they battled over fundraising totals. “Haven't seen the Rubio press release on frugality did it include the $6 million in secret money TV ads they saved money on?” as Bush communications director Tim Miller tweeted last October.
The issue, however, never really broke through.
“You’re talking about two of the most boring and convoluted fields of law: campaign finance and nonprofit tax law,” said Maguire, the nonprofit investigator. “Trying to explain that in an election where you have someone as outrageous as Donald Trump — it’s hard to do.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/marco-rubio-secret-money-legacy-221218#ixzz44WDWwktC
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
The senator’s allies found a way for donors to spend millions to support his presidential campaign while remaining anonymous — forever.
By Shane Goldmacher
03/28/16 05:19 AM EDT
Politico Magazine
Marco Rubio’s campaign is dead. His secret-money legacy lives on.
Nobody knows who funded the nonprofit group that spent more than $10 million on TV ads boosting Rubio, and untold more on mailers and research. And, unless those donors out themselves, nobody ever will.
No presidential candidate fighting for their party’s nomination has ever benefited from as much undisclosed cash, and watchdogs worry the pro-Rubio group’s unchecked activity serves as a dangerous precedent that will soon become common practice.
“It is now the model for a how a candidate can inject unlimited, secret, corrupting money into their campaigns to benefit their election,” said Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21, a campaign watchdog group. “That is precisely the kind of model that we do not need in America.”
The pro-Rubio nonprofit, known as the Conservative Solutions Project, was created in early 2014 and run by some of the same political operatives who would later lead his super PAC, including South Carolina strategist Warren Tompkins. Both groups can accept unlimited donations from donors, but unlike the super PAC, the nonprofit can keep its contributors hidden from the public — permanently.
The Conservative Solutions Project operates under the “social welfare” 501(c)4 section of the tax code, which requires that such groups not be primarily involved in political matters.
The pro-Rubio nonprofit has claimed not to be directly involved in electoral politics. Yet the group paid for a raft of polling and research in the early primary states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, as well as in Rubio’s home state of Florida. It bought millions in TV ads that aired in those early states, and it filled the mailboxes of Republican voters there with pro-Rubio literature. In fact, the Conservative Solutions Project was the second biggest TV advertiser of the 2016 campaign last year — trailing behind only Jeb Bush’s super PAC, according to a media tracker.
Loose nonprofit tax laws, and an unusual filing schedule set up by its creators, ensure the pro-Rubio nonprofit will file little paperwork covering the primary period until April 2017 — months after the next president is sworn in. And even then, no donors will be named.
“If you are trying to obscure your activities, they’re perfect,” Robert Maguire, a nonprofit investigator for the Center for Responsive Politics, said of 501(c)4s.
While super PACs are barred from coordinating with the candidates they support, the pro-Rubio super PAC and nonprofit legally worked hand-in-glove. They shared an address, staff and even a name (the super PAC went by the name the Conservative Solutions PAC). The treasurer of the nonprofit was Robert Watkins; the treasurer of the super PAC was his wife, Nancy Watkins.
Jeff Sadosky, who served as a spokesman for both, called them “two independent organizations, with wholly different missions and focuses.”
The Conservative Solutions Project’s first public splash came last June, when it released a television ad on national cable castigating the Iranian nuclear deal and casting Rubio as its chief opponent in Congress. “Marco Rubio is leading the fight,” the narrator said. The ad was just the beginning of a barrage that would last through November, all while the official Rubio campaign and super PAC conserved their cash.
Sadosky said the ads, all of which featured Rubio prominently, were unrelated to the election. “It was focused on highlighting conservative solutions to issues Americans were facing every day and focused on how conservatives spoke to the broader electorate,” Sadosky said.
The ads aired on broadcast in only three states: Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina — the first three states of the presidential primary campaign.
The nonprofit’s broadcast ads ran through Nov. 22 in Iowa and New Hampshire. About a week later, the Rubio super PAC picked up where it left off. The same ad-buying firm, Target Enterprises, executed the ad reservations for both the Rubio super PAC and nonprofit.
“They could not have been more blatant with the way this took place,” Wertheimer said.
At some television stations, such as WMUR in Manchester and KCCI in Des Moines, the forms the television stations filed with the Federal Communications Commission listed the nonprofit as spending on behalf of “Marco Rubio 2016.” When that became public, the nonprofit’s attorney sent letters to some stations asking to correct those records, arguing their ads starring Rubio were not actually about Rubio.
“CSP does not make candidate-related, political expenditures,” wrote Cleta Mitchell, the group’s lawyer and a prominent GOP attorney, of the Conservative Solutions Project. “All public communications are centered around important policy debates and concerns.”
Months before any of the TV ads aired, the group had paid for research that could later prove beneficial to Rubio’s presidential run. In 2014, it commissioned a 271-page, deep-dive report into the electorate in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada — the four states that voted first in February 2016 — along with Rubio’s home state of Florida. It analyzed voters’ opinions on immigration (Rubio’s signature issue, as well as a big vulnerability), job creation and gay marriage, and it studied their television watching habits.
It was published on the website of Optimus, the GOP analytics firm that produced it, including numerous tables of data, ensuring the Rubio campaign could later access the findings. Optimus would later sign on as consultants for Rubio’s campaign, getting paid nearly $1 million for its work.
Meanwhile, the timing of the Conservative Solutions Project’s tax filings and ad buys appears calculated to limit disclosure ahead of 2016.
The group was formed on Jan. 29, 2014, but declared its first fiscal year over only five months later, at the end of May 2014. It had raised $100,000 and spent only $63 in that time. The fact that the group aired its first ads in June 2015, just after the start of a new fiscal year, ensured that tax filings covering the period when TV ads aired would be delayed until April 2017.
“As long as you have enough money to spend millions on politics, you have enough money to hire the best lawyers to cover your tracks,” Maguire said.
So far, the group has made one non-required disclosure: Last summer, it announced it had raised $15.8 million, a sum that was promptly included in many media reports as part of the pro-Rubio war chest.
The Conservative Solutions Project is part of an ongoing evolution of the ways in which operatives pull so-called “dark money” into the political system. Millions in secretive spending seeped into the 2012 election through 501(c)4s, the biggest sums through Crossroads GPS, the group co-founded by Karl Rove. A pro-Obama nonprofit, Priorities USA, linked to the similarly named super PAC, also emerged that fall.
Some single-candidate nonprofits sprouted up in the 2014 congressional midterms, the most prominent one supporting Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell’s reelection in Kentucky. And other 2016 candidates benefited from political nonprofits, including John Kasich, Jeb Bush, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum and Bobby Jindal. Jindal’s spent the most — airing positive ads on his behalf in Iowa. But none of them spent nearly as much as Rubio’s.
“His campaign didn’t create this as an issue,” Maguire said. “They took it to the next level.”
Rubio himself stopped short of calling on his supportive nonprofit to unmask its donors.
“Obviously I can't interact or coordinate anything with them,” Rubio told POLITICO’s Mike Allen last summer at a summit for contributors to the Koch brothers political network, much of whose spending occurs through nonprofits. “And I just ask every group out there to comply with the law.”
When asked whether the group planned to make public its contributors, Sadosky said, “We look forward to complying with each rule and regulation from the IRS regarding 501(c)4s.” The law does not require donor disclosure for nonprofits.
Last November, Wertheimer’s group and the Campaign Legal Center asked the Department of Justice to investigate the pro-Rubio nonprofit for violating the tax code by claiming “social welfare” status. They got a letter back a few weeks later punting on the request, saying the question was the jurisdiction of the Internal Revenue Service, which has shown little inclination for such probes.
“The DOJ is refusing to do enforcement of the tax law. The [Federal Election Commission] is not enforcing the campaign finance laws. The result is the wild west of money in politics,” said Paul S. Ryan, senior counsel for the Campaign Legal Center.
On the campaign trail, Rubio's benefit from a nonprofit flashed as an occasional issue. Some believed Rubio’s allies were so reliant on secret money in part because Jeb Bush had frozen so much of the Florida Republican political class in place. "The fact that Bush was in the race meant a lot of donors wouldn’t help him out in the open,” a former senior Bush strategist said of Rubio.
Bush’s team, in particular, tried to highlight Rubio’s use of the nonprofit as they battled over fundraising totals. “Haven't seen the Rubio press release on frugality did it include the $6 million in secret money TV ads they saved money on?” as Bush communications director Tim Miller tweeted last October.
The issue, however, never really broke through.
“You’re talking about two of the most boring and convoluted fields of law: campaign finance and nonprofit tax law,” said Maguire, the nonprofit investigator. “Trying to explain that in an election where you have someone as outrageous as Donald Trump — it’s hard to do.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/marco-rubio-secret-money-legacy-221218#ixzz44WDWwktC
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
» utube MM&C 4/16/24 IQD Update - Iraq Dinar - America - Activate - Massive Economic Deals -
» Al-Sudani urges the US corporation Honeywell to help finish the Basra refinery
» Al-Sudani Meets with Representatives of Western Media Outlets in Washington
» Chairman of the Investment Authority signs the United Nations Convention on International Mediation
» PM: We will sign a contract to establish the Al-Faw refinery with a Chinese company
» PM arrives in Houston as part of his visit to USA
» Militia Man & Crew 4/18/24 Bush signed it and all presidents implemented it. Iraq’s funds have been
» Association of Iraqi Private Banks: The suspension of some electronic payment services yesterday was
» Iraq is close to launching the electronic signature
» The Basra government discusses with an international oil company the implementation of social benefi
» The Prime Minister confirms to an American company: Gas projects in Iraq are a priority for the gove
» The Minister of Planning discusses with the World Bank mechanisms for scheduling external loans
» Oil sets the twenty-seventh of this month as the date for opening contracts for the fifth complement
» “Electronic begging”...professionalism and fabrication of stories” generates millions of dinars dail
» Al-Sudani calls on the American company Hanwell to contribute to the completion of the Basra refiner
» An American company expresses its willingness to establish LED lighting production lines in Iraq
» Including Iraq.. Iran announces the possibility of exporting 300 megawatts of “renewable electricity
» Political forces present two options to find an alternative to Al-Halbousi
» Parliament is awaiting the arrival of the budget schedules and the government is studying higher spe
» The International Monetary Fund adjusts its expectations for the development of the world’s economie
» A representative talks about the difficulty of finalizing the file of “electing the Speaker of Parli
» Work on preparing a law for diplomatic passports
» A female representative accuses the Ministry of Immigration of corruption
» Minister: Solving the Kurdistan salaries problem is the beginning of addressing other disputes betwe
» About 270 million dollars were sold by the Central Bank of Iraq in the currency auction
» The volume of trade exchange between Jordan and Iraq will exceed 800 million dinars in 2023
» Iraq signs memorandums of understanding with American companies in the fields of electricity, oil an
» The American company that manufactures the F16 expresses its readiness to implement the terms of con
» The volume of expected Qatari investments for the Iraq Fund for Development exceeds $3.5 billion
» Decrease in dollar prices in Baghdad and Erbil
» The President of the Region brings together the Kurdish parties to resolve the election file
» Al-Sudani receives in Washington the Chairman of JPMorgan
» Transport is starting to transform its ports into smart ones
» Sudanese reveals the volume of exchange with America
» "Al-Eqtisad News" publishes the memorandums of understanding signed between the Iraqi delegation and
» Al-Sudani urges an American company to contribute to establishing a chemical materials factory
» Iraq stresses the importance of Lockheed Martin's commitment to opening military aircraft maintenanc
» Iraq is on the verge of a “water disaster” by 2035
» Great satisfaction and optimism with the results of Sudanese’s visit to Washington
» Transport is beginning to adopt a plan to transform its ports into smart ones
» Completed 8,000 loan transactions at the Housing Bank
» Prime Minister: We plan to invest production capacities for export
» Transformation and partnership...a new horizon in Iraqi-American relations
» What is new in the economic dimension of the Washington visit?
» Two letters to the future
» National interests first
» Iraqi-American rapprochement...a national necessity
» Al-Sudani’s visit to Washington and the course of Iraqi-American relations
» Sudanese carries security, economic and development files to Washington
» Armament and military development... features of a sustainable partnership
» Analysts: Sudanese's visit to Washington will achieve excellent results in the future
» Iraqi-American relations...the legacy of the past and the aspirations of partnership
» Sudanese and external necessities
» The Strategic Framework Agreement... 7 important provisions
» Joint statement of the Iraqi-American discussions
» Supreme Coordinating Committee: Iraq's role is vital to the security and prosperity of the region
» Towards an effective bilateral economic relationship between Baghdad and Washington
» She saw it as a new, different chapter in Iraqi-American relations... Al-Sudani’s visit to Washingto
» Al-Sudani’s visit to Washington.. Implications and results
» Advisor to the Prime Minister: The relationship with America has moved to the stage of cooperation
» Sudanese sponsors the signing ceremony of memorandums of understanding in America
» Al-Sudani: The volume of exchange between Iraq and the United States does not exceed 10 billion doll
» During Erdogan's visit on Monday, Iraq seeks to sign the "Water Protocol" with Türkiye
» With the escalation of tension between Tehran and Tel Aviv...an expert reveals the secrets of Sudane
» There are 150 draft laws on the parliament table waiting to be voted on... and the debates require c
» Al-Sudani stresses the necessity of continuing the dialogue with the US Treasury, the Federal Reserv
» Deputy: We reject the term sanctions, and Iraq is financially independent
» Warnings of a “political impasse” after Barzani’s boycott of the elections... Al-Sadr raises questio
» The head of the Kurdistan Regional Government’s representative office in Baghdad visits the external
» Al-Sudani: There are no combat forces in Iraq to withdraw.. The Iraqi Prime Minister confirmed in Wa
» Do the Iraqi political blocs really intend to hold the second early elections?
» Baghdad is not aware of the factions’ participation in the attack on Israel, and Washington is revie
» Progress: Al-Halbousi may return to the presidency of Parliament
» Al-Sudani: Iraq has distinguished relations with Iran and America
» Minister of Industry: Iraq is not a rich country and the electricity problem will not be solved even
» A prospective law to employ prisoners and detainees... job and retirement opportunities similar to E
» Sako in Baghdad.. Three possible scenarios for his return after the “withdrawal of the decree” crisi
» Parliamentary Integrity reveals a move with the judiciary to recover TBI Bank’s funds
» Iraq signs 18 memorandums of understanding with Washington
» An Iraqi judicial delegation arrives in Syria to discuss terrorism files and document ISIS crimes
» A plan to exploit new lands...the latest developments in the wheat, barley and rice season in Iraq
» Al-Abadi accuses oil companies of causing 70% of the cancer rate in Basra
» Justice announces the formation of a higher committee to resolve the state’s real estate file
» Deputy: Iraq seeks to sign the “Water Protocol” with Türkiye
» Al-Sudani stresses the importance of the American company Lockheed’s commitment to opening military
» The team accompanying Sudanese in Washington: America will hand over to Iraq the antiquities that we
» Al-Sudani sponsors the signing ceremony of memorandums of understanding with American companies
» MM&C 4/17/24 Saleh: The budget tables are almost complete and will take into account urgent circu
» Saleh: Private banks in Iraq are considering reorganizing themselves with another government structu
» Al-Sudani: It is not possible to work in any development sector without reforming the banking sector
» Minister of Oil: Kurdistan’s exports will soon resume, and the region must hand over its oil to SOMO
» An economic expert identifies ways for Iraq to get out of oil rents... starting with $350 million
» Parliamentary Oil: A proposal to establish Iraqi refineries in neighboring countries... and these ar
» Al-Ardawi: The Sudanese government seeks to liberalize the Iraqi dinar and stabilize the economy
» MM&C 4/17/24 Al-Sudani receives in Washington the Chairman of JPMorgan
» MM&C 4/17/24 US Supports Iraq in joining WTO
» US Supports Iraq in joining WTO
» utube 4/14/24 MM&C Iraqi Dinar - Iraq Prime Minister in Washington - Coming to