To postpone the vote on the «amnesty» for tomorrow Monday
[rtl] BAGHDAD morning
the House of Representatives decided to postpone the vote on the amnesty law to thesession on Monday as a result of the presence of additional points on the law by theNational Alliance and the Liberal bloc, was brought to the parliament speaker Salim al -Jubouri , during the day Saturday session, the distribution of the final version of the bill between the House of Representatives in preparation for a vote.
parliamentary legal Committee attributed the postponement of the vote to the existence of a controversial points and additions to the law, said committee member Salim Shawki: the «on Monday will be the deadline to vote on the amnesty law after it was postponed yesterday (Saturday) , the presence of additions by some blocks it », said Shawki« morning », that« National Alliance requested the study added and postpone the vote on the Act, and there was a vote to postpone the vote on it during the two days that themeeting on Monday will be the last date for the vote ».
he added Shawqi, that« there are points additional law asked the National Alliance studied in relation to the substance of terrorism, as it has been added to these points is most important is that (there is a definition of terrorism that every action leads to thekilling of a person or persons or the loss of their fate or diagnosed permanent disability or abuse of state funds or state institutions or the security forces) any otherwise be covered by the amnesty, noting that the Liberal bloc said the issue of «resisting theoccupation» in the sense that «all the work built to resist the occupation extends amnesty». controversial paragraph , for its part, pointed out the legal committee member Ibtisam al- Hilali to no objection of the National Alliance on the eighth paragraph of thelaw and own a retrial, said Hilali «morning»: «Astgrbena raise law agenda of the meeting (on Saturday) , despite of the collected signatures of 40 deputies inclusion on theagenda», indicating that «State of law bloc want to be a retrial once », she said, that« everyone agrees on what the rest of the points, and the legal Committee had completed much of this law », noting that the Iraqi street is eager to pass this law. the MP front unique Brahimi reform , he stressed for« Sabah »that there is disagreement on this law, especially in regard to paragraph eighth of it, and said:« this article talking about the re -trial, and that this matter if they are allowed it, thousands of terrorists will demand aretrial again, and it will delay the topics of terrorism and a victory for the oppressor to theoppressed », and between that« the political blocs want to raise a portion of these paragraphs, because part of it is in the criminal Court Rules retrial, or to apply from now on, and not for fixed - terrorism crimes evidence ». loopholes and amendments to it , MP for the rule of law Ali Sobhi al - Maliki noted that the general amnesty law «contain gaps», noting in a statement »Sabah» that « the substance of the law dealing remove innocent people, but the law is the name means whitening prisons , which comes on themartyrs account, as well as the paragraph VIII of the Act , a re - courts of prisoners is one of the problems in the law », he said deputy al - Maliki said the inclusion of the law to vote in yesterday 's session (Saturday) were not the wishes of the House ofRepresentatives because the law was similar to the one basket which was added with the law« attended the Baath Party ». for his part, the MP for the Liberal bloc Majid Ghraoui that there are remarks by the Liberal bloc in order to include a general amnesty law which is not new, saying «morning»: The «Liberal bloc demanded full amnesty for detainees from the Sadrists and others who resisted the occupation US and sentenced to orders because of political pressure by the government , »he continued, that« there are many people who have been to extract confessions in ways that are illegal and unconstitutional, and therefore we demand their release », noting the existence of aparagraph important in the law which« retrial », as the there are legal materials unrealistic - not in the issue of terrorism only- but other issues, which is calling for a re - trial of a lot of the oppressed, according to the MP from the block free expression.[/rtl]
[rtl][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.][/rtl]