The Clinton Foundation’s 3 Strategies Designed to Steal the Election
The Clinton campaign thugs have been reduced to a very narrow range of strategies to defeat Donald Trump and it is not working.
Strategy #1: Smear Donald Trump with Fake Sexual Allegations
There is no proof, there is not one verified witness. Not one of these women filed a police report when the alleged event happened, Not one of these women was angry enough, or greedy enough, to file a civil suit. If their case would have had any merit, whatsoever, they would have had at minimum an opportunity to obtain a lucrative out of court settlement. Now, we are supposed to believe the fiction that their only concern is for the welfare of the country?
This strategy, like the piling on strategy employed by the elite GOP during the primary elections backfired, and this is backfiring. as well
Strategy #2: Discourage Trump Supporters from Voting With Rigged Polls
Cliff Zukin, a polling expert at Rutgers University stated that “Polls can no longer make fine distinctions. People can trust polls on broad issues — like what voters are most concerned about — but not so much on the political horse race.”“In 2012, his own campaign’s polls, among others, predicted Mitt Romney, the Republicans’ nominee, would defeat President Barack Obama for the presidency, but just barely. Two years later, surveys in Kentucky strongly suggested then-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, perhaps the shrewdest, most powerful Republican in Washington, could lose have lost his seat to an upstart rookie Democrat”. Obviously, neither event ever came close to happening.
Celinda Lake, a pollster, political consultant and president of Lake Research Partners, a Washington, D.C.-based polling firm, says polling has seen “kind of a steady decline. It’s getting harder to reach people. It’s also harder to get them to cooperate.”
Michael Traugott is a University of Michigan political science professor who specializes in polling and opinion surveys and he has stated that polls cannot be trusted for a variety of reasons and that he is in agreement with Gallup when they say the industry is in need of a “major overhaul”.
What many of these experts are referring to is the death of the legitimacy of public opinion polls due to insufficient sample size. When polls do not have enough participants, the results cannot be considered to be valid. The way that polls cover up this deficiency is to report an official sounding statistic that gives fake legitimacy to the results (e.g. the poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3%). In actuality, the legitimate poll would state something like “the statistical confidence level with regard to the accuracy of this poll is 95% or higher”. The representation of this notion is usually expressed as a level of confidence and it looks like this: P=<.05. If you don’t see this statistic, the poll, on its face, is unreliable.
The Tavistock Institute and the Use of Public Opinion PollsDating back to 1913, the Tavistock Institute used polls to shape public opinion into accepting Britain’s entry into World War I.
The plan to ‘create’ public opinion through the fake reporting of bogus polling date began as a propaganda factory centered at Wellington House in London. Sir Edward Grey, the British Foreign Secretary at the time, installed Lord Northcliffe (Britain’s most influential newspaper magnate) as its director. Lord Northcliffe’s position was supervised by Lord Rothmere on behalf of the British Crown. The operational staff of Wellington House consisted of Lord Northcliffe, and Arnold Toynbee, according to John Coleman.
John Coleman, the author of the classic book Conspirators Hierarchy, The Committee of 300, was one of the the first writers to call attention to the existence of Tavistock, in 1969, and the rest as they say is history. Subsequently, we learn from Coleman’s work that polls were designed to not really measure public opinion, they were designed to shape public opinion.
One of the chief methods that unscrupulous polls use to report fake results is to select a biased sample. For example, if one is using phone samplings to gather voting preferences, one merely needs to target neighborhoods which historically favor one party over the other in order to get the predetermined results that one is looking for. This violates the principle of random selection of subjects to poll and this completely invalidates any survey results.
Americans must be careful to not put any stock into public opinion polls. If America is survive any length of time, Hillary Clinton cannot be allowed to occupy the White House. Whether you like him or not, Trump will slow down the process of the globalist takeover of America. He is the only option to the immediate and complete tyrannical takeover of America. We must be careful to not let phony polling results influence our perceptions and efforts in supporting Donald Trump. Most of all, Trump supporters must allow themselves to be discouraged from voting. turn the MSM off, it is only filled with propaganda and intellectual posion.
Strategy #3: Bribe the Electoral College Voters
I was told by this person that Trump, right now, has the support of 65% of the voters who are mostly likely to vote. However, one of the biggest challenges to a Trump victory are corrupt electoral voters who have been bought off with Clinton Foundation under-the-table-bribe money.
I asked this person what could be done? He reminded me of how the Stamp Act tax collectors were chased down the street and tarred and feathered in pre-revolutionary war America. I told him I could not advocate for violence and he said you don’t have to. He said that these people will have business interests, or close family relatives will. He said make it known that the Independent Media will publish these interests should these electors vote against the will of the people.
As I have found out, there is a concerted effort by an unknown force that is reaching out to electors and telling them exactly what is going to happen should they vote against the will of the people. How do I know? I was speaking to a former Republican political figure in Arizona this weekend and they told me that they personally knew of electors who have already been threatened along these lines and they are having second thoughts about their role in their upcoming vote. This revelation speaks to the fact that there is distinct collusion between the Clinton Foundation and the electoral college voters. Are we surprised? My message to these would be criminals, there will nowhere that your assets can run and hide after the election. Corrupt electors will become the economic Brown Shirts of the Clinton Foundation. Although I cannot advocate for violent action, I have no compunction in recommending economic consequences to electors who accept bribes in any fashion.