It has taken almost 10 years for the ECB’s controversial government bond purchases to finally reach the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to be reviewed as to their constitutionality. There have always been serious questions whether the PSPP (Public Sector Purchase Program) was compatible with the ban on monetary budgetary funding that has been imposed upon member states. Italy, for example, asked for an exemption from the budgetary constraints to take care of the refugees, The EU Commission said absolutely no!
The German high court has been hearing a case that proposes it rule that financing government budgets would not be covered by the mandate of the European Central Bank (ECB). That has long been a thorn in the side of Draghi that he was acting unconstitutional at the end of the day. The ECJ has been requested to expedite the procedure, because “the case requires a quick settlement” after almost 10 years?
The background of the case is three constitutional arguments are fairly straight forward against the PSPP. The ECJ has not answered these issues which has been preventing the German court from finally decide the constitutional complaints.
The argument claims that the European System of Central Banks, with the program for the purchase of securities of the public sector which it has set up, is contrary to the prohibition of monetary government financing (Article 123 TFEU) and the principle of limited individual authorization (Article 5 1 TEU in conjunction with Art. 119, 127 et seq. TFEU).Therefore, the Deutsche Bundesbank should not participate in this program and the German Bundestag and the Federal Government are obliged to take appropriate measures against the program.
The plaintiffs in Germany wanted the Bundesverfassungsgericht to stop the Bundesbank’s participation in the ECB program. Germany, they argued, would suffer a complete loss if the bonds failed. The risk to the German national budget is disproportionate was their main point.
The ECJ has a political mandate which is strangely different from the Supreme Court of Germany or the United States for that matter.The ECJ has a mandate to promote integration within the EU, which is clearly a political element. If we add this political element, that one can see that the ECJ can view the purchase of government bonds as a permissible means of integration.
The ECB has clearly altered the bond market destroying liquidity. Banks are rushing to sell their bonds to the ECB in anticipation of rising rates which will cause their bond holdings to decline. Hence, the ECB has actually functioned as a place to dump financial toxic-waste.
The Germany Federal Constitutional Court has thus suspended further litigation pending the ECJ ruling.
The Federal Constitutional Court announced in a Press Release No. 70/2017 of 15 August 2017
Decision of 18 July 2017
2 BvR 859/15, 2 BvR 980/16, 2 BvR 2006/15, 2 BvR 1651/15
With the decision published today, the Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court has suspended the procedure concerning the question whether the Public Sector Purchase Program (PSPP) of the European Central Bank is compatible with the Basic Law for the purchase of public sector securities and asks the Court of Justice of the European Union several questions For a preliminary ruling. According to the Senate, there are important reasons for the fact that the decisions underlying the bond purchase program are in breach of the ban on monetary budgetary financing and go beyond the mandate of the European Central Bank for monetary policy and thus fall within the competence of the Member States. The Senate seeks the implementation of the accelerated procedure in accordance with Article 105 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Union, since the nature of the case requires its speedy completion.
Facts:
The PSPP is part of the Expanded Asset Purchase Program (EAPP), a framework program of the European Central Bank (ECB) for the purchase of assets. The PSPP accounts for the largest share of the total volume of the EAPP. On 12 May 2017, the EAPP achieved a total volume of EUR 1 862.1 billion; Of this total, EUR 1,534.8 billion accounted for the PSPP.
The complainants, by their constitutional complaints, claim that the European System of Central Banks, with the program for the purchase of securities of the public sector which it has set up, is contrary to the prohibition of monetary government financing (Article 123 TFEU) and the principle of limited individual authorization (Article 5 1 TEU in conjunction with Art. 119, 127 et seq. TFEU). Therefore, the Deutsche Bundesbank should not participate in this program and the German Bundestag and the Federal Government are obliged to take appropriate measures against the program.
Important considerations of the Senate:
1. Article 38 (1), first sentence, of the Basic Law guarantees to German nationals the right to democratic self-determination, which is enforceable with the constitutional complaint, in the scope protected by Article 79 (3) of the Basic Law. On the basis of the responsibility of integration, the German constitutional authorities have the duty, within the limits of their competences, to work towards compliance with the integration program. It is the task of the Federal Constitutional Court to examine whether measures taken by bodies, bodies and other bodies of the European Union are based on apparent excesses of competence or affect the non-transferable area of the constitutional identity, with the result that German state institutions are not allowed to participate in their condition or implementation ,
2. There are doubts as to whether the PSPP decision is compatible with the ban on monetary budgetary financing.
(A) Article 123 (1) TFEU prohibits the ECB and the central banks of the Member States from purchasing debt securities directly from the institutions of the European Union and the Member States. Purchases on the secondary market may not be used to circumvent the objective pursued by Article 123 TFEU. A program dealing with the purchase of government bonds on the secondary market must therefore be provided with sufficient guarantees to ensure effective compliance with the prohibition of monetary government financing. The Senate is of the opinion that the Court of Justice of the European Union considers the terms which it sets out to limit the scope of the OMT program of 6 September 2012 within its scope as a legally binding criterion The purchase of government bonds.
(B) The PSPP covers bonds issued by States, state enterprises and other government bodies, as well as by European institutions. These bonds are purchased exclusively on the secondary market. However, for an infringement of the PSPP decision against Article 123 TFEU, it is argued that details of purchases are announced in a manner which could give rise to factual certainty on the markets that the Eurosystem will also purchase issued government bonds, The time limits between issuance of a debt instrument on the primary market and its acquisition on the secondary market is not verifiable, that acquired bonds are held to maturity until now, and that bonds with a negative return are obtained from the outset.
3. The PSPP decision could not be covered by the mandate of the ECB.
(A) monetary policy should be distinguished, in particular, from the economic policy which is primarily the responsibility of the Member States, in accordance with the wording, system and objective of the Treaties; The objective of a measure to be determined objectively, the means chosen to achieve this objective, and its link with other arrangements.
(B) From the Senate’s point of view, the PSPP decision could not be seen as a monetary policy measure, but rather as a predominantly economic policy measure, on the basis of an overall view of the relevant delineation criteria. While the PSPP has a stated monetary policy objective and is committed to the pursuit of this objective of monetary policy, But the economic policy implications arising from the volume of the PSPP and the associated predictability of the purchase of government bonds are already directly reflected in the program itself. This would render the PSPP disproportionate in relation to the underlying monetary policy objective. Moreover, the decisions constituting the basis of the program do not provide a comprehensible explanation which would allow the continuous continuity of the program to be reviewed on an ongoing basis during the several years of implementation of the decisions.
4. On the basis of the risk allocation between the ECB and the Bundesbank, the budgetary right of the German Bundestag, protected by Article 20 (1) and (2) in conjunction with Article 79 (3) of the Basic Law, and its overall budgetary responsibility by the PSPP decision Or its implementation in view of possible losses of the Bundesbank, can not be foreseen at present.
(A) An unlimited risk allocation within the Eurosystem and the resulting risks to the national central banks’ profit and loss account would constitute a violation of constitutional identity within the meaning of Article 79 (3) of the Basic Law if it were to recapitalize the national central banks with budgetary resources Which the Senate has committed to the approval of the German Bundestag in its jurisprudence to the EFSF and the ESM. For the success of the constitutional complaints, it is therefore important whether such a risk allocation can be excluded under the primary law.
(B) the decision-making by the Governing Council on the nature and extent of the risk-sharing between members of the European System of Central Banks is hardly determined by primary law. This could allow the ECB Council to amend the rules on risk-sharing within the Eurosystem, which could lead to risks to the national central banks’ profit and loss account and, moreover, to the overall budgetary responsibility of the national parliaments. Against this background, the question arises whether an unlimited risk allocation in the event of default of bonds of central governments and equivalent issuers between the national central banks of the Eurosystem against Article 123 and Article 125 TFEU and Article 4 (2) TEU With Article 79 (3) of the Basic Law).
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/the-legal-challenge-to-quantitative-easing/
The German high court has been hearing a case that proposes it rule that financing government budgets would not be covered by the mandate of the European Central Bank (ECB). That has long been a thorn in the side of Draghi that he was acting unconstitutional at the end of the day. The ECJ has been requested to expedite the procedure, because “the case requires a quick settlement” after almost 10 years?
The background of the case is three constitutional arguments are fairly straight forward against the PSPP. The ECJ has not answered these issues which has been preventing the German court from finally decide the constitutional complaints.
The argument claims that the European System of Central Banks, with the program for the purchase of securities of the public sector which it has set up, is contrary to the prohibition of monetary government financing (Article 123 TFEU) and the principle of limited individual authorization (Article 5 1 TEU in conjunction with Art. 119, 127 et seq. TFEU).Therefore, the Deutsche Bundesbank should not participate in this program and the German Bundestag and the Federal Government are obliged to take appropriate measures against the program.
The plaintiffs in Germany wanted the Bundesverfassungsgericht to stop the Bundesbank’s participation in the ECB program. Germany, they argued, would suffer a complete loss if the bonds failed. The risk to the German national budget is disproportionate was their main point.
The ECJ has a political mandate which is strangely different from the Supreme Court of Germany or the United States for that matter.The ECJ has a mandate to promote integration within the EU, which is clearly a political element. If we add this political element, that one can see that the ECJ can view the purchase of government bonds as a permissible means of integration.
The ECB has clearly altered the bond market destroying liquidity. Banks are rushing to sell their bonds to the ECB in anticipation of rising rates which will cause their bond holdings to decline. Hence, the ECB has actually functioned as a place to dump financial toxic-waste.
The Germany Federal Constitutional Court has thus suspended further litigation pending the ECJ ruling.
The Federal Constitutional Court announced in a Press Release No. 70/2017 of 15 August 2017
Decision of 18 July 2017
2 BvR 859/15, 2 BvR 980/16, 2 BvR 2006/15, 2 BvR 1651/15
With the decision published today, the Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court has suspended the procedure concerning the question whether the Public Sector Purchase Program (PSPP) of the European Central Bank is compatible with the Basic Law for the purchase of public sector securities and asks the Court of Justice of the European Union several questions For a preliminary ruling. According to the Senate, there are important reasons for the fact that the decisions underlying the bond purchase program are in breach of the ban on monetary budgetary financing and go beyond the mandate of the European Central Bank for monetary policy and thus fall within the competence of the Member States. The Senate seeks the implementation of the accelerated procedure in accordance with Article 105 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Union, since the nature of the case requires its speedy completion.
Facts:
The PSPP is part of the Expanded Asset Purchase Program (EAPP), a framework program of the European Central Bank (ECB) for the purchase of assets. The PSPP accounts for the largest share of the total volume of the EAPP. On 12 May 2017, the EAPP achieved a total volume of EUR 1 862.1 billion; Of this total, EUR 1,534.8 billion accounted for the PSPP.
The complainants, by their constitutional complaints, claim that the European System of Central Banks, with the program for the purchase of securities of the public sector which it has set up, is contrary to the prohibition of monetary government financing (Article 123 TFEU) and the principle of limited individual authorization (Article 5 1 TEU in conjunction with Art. 119, 127 et seq. TFEU). Therefore, the Deutsche Bundesbank should not participate in this program and the German Bundestag and the Federal Government are obliged to take appropriate measures against the program.
Important considerations of the Senate:
1. Article 38 (1), first sentence, of the Basic Law guarantees to German nationals the right to democratic self-determination, which is enforceable with the constitutional complaint, in the scope protected by Article 79 (3) of the Basic Law. On the basis of the responsibility of integration, the German constitutional authorities have the duty, within the limits of their competences, to work towards compliance with the integration program. It is the task of the Federal Constitutional Court to examine whether measures taken by bodies, bodies and other bodies of the European Union are based on apparent excesses of competence or affect the non-transferable area of the constitutional identity, with the result that German state institutions are not allowed to participate in their condition or implementation ,
2. There are doubts as to whether the PSPP decision is compatible with the ban on monetary budgetary financing.
(A) Article 123 (1) TFEU prohibits the ECB and the central banks of the Member States from purchasing debt securities directly from the institutions of the European Union and the Member States. Purchases on the secondary market may not be used to circumvent the objective pursued by Article 123 TFEU. A program dealing with the purchase of government bonds on the secondary market must therefore be provided with sufficient guarantees to ensure effective compliance with the prohibition of monetary government financing. The Senate is of the opinion that the Court of Justice of the European Union considers the terms which it sets out to limit the scope of the OMT program of 6 September 2012 within its scope as a legally binding criterion The purchase of government bonds.
(B) The PSPP covers bonds issued by States, state enterprises and other government bodies, as well as by European institutions. These bonds are purchased exclusively on the secondary market. However, for an infringement of the PSPP decision against Article 123 TFEU, it is argued that details of purchases are announced in a manner which could give rise to factual certainty on the markets that the Eurosystem will also purchase issued government bonds, The time limits between issuance of a debt instrument on the primary market and its acquisition on the secondary market is not verifiable, that acquired bonds are held to maturity until now, and that bonds with a negative return are obtained from the outset.
3. The PSPP decision could not be covered by the mandate of the ECB.
(A) monetary policy should be distinguished, in particular, from the economic policy which is primarily the responsibility of the Member States, in accordance with the wording, system and objective of the Treaties; The objective of a measure to be determined objectively, the means chosen to achieve this objective, and its link with other arrangements.
(B) From the Senate’s point of view, the PSPP decision could not be seen as a monetary policy measure, but rather as a predominantly economic policy measure, on the basis of an overall view of the relevant delineation criteria. While the PSPP has a stated monetary policy objective and is committed to the pursuit of this objective of monetary policy, But the economic policy implications arising from the volume of the PSPP and the associated predictability of the purchase of government bonds are already directly reflected in the program itself. This would render the PSPP disproportionate in relation to the underlying monetary policy objective. Moreover, the decisions constituting the basis of the program do not provide a comprehensible explanation which would allow the continuous continuity of the program to be reviewed on an ongoing basis during the several years of implementation of the decisions.
4. On the basis of the risk allocation between the ECB and the Bundesbank, the budgetary right of the German Bundestag, protected by Article 20 (1) and (2) in conjunction with Article 79 (3) of the Basic Law, and its overall budgetary responsibility by the PSPP decision Or its implementation in view of possible losses of the Bundesbank, can not be foreseen at present.
(A) An unlimited risk allocation within the Eurosystem and the resulting risks to the national central banks’ profit and loss account would constitute a violation of constitutional identity within the meaning of Article 79 (3) of the Basic Law if it were to recapitalize the national central banks with budgetary resources Which the Senate has committed to the approval of the German Bundestag in its jurisprudence to the EFSF and the ESM. For the success of the constitutional complaints, it is therefore important whether such a risk allocation can be excluded under the primary law.
(B) the decision-making by the Governing Council on the nature and extent of the risk-sharing between members of the European System of Central Banks is hardly determined by primary law. This could allow the ECB Council to amend the rules on risk-sharing within the Eurosystem, which could lead to risks to the national central banks’ profit and loss account and, moreover, to the overall budgetary responsibility of the national parliaments. Against this background, the question arises whether an unlimited risk allocation in the event of default of bonds of central governments and equivalent issuers between the national central banks of the Eurosystem against Article 123 and Article 125 TFEU and Article 4 (2) TEU With Article 79 (3) of the Basic Law).
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/the-legal-challenge-to-quantitative-easing/
Today at 5:52 pm by Bama Diva
» Iraq-China trade cooperation reaches $50 billion in 11 months
Today at 5:45 pm by Bama Diva
» Salih: Iraq ranks first in the world in the concentration of natural resources
Yesterday at 10:51 am by Bama Diva
» PM Advisor: The monetary enhancement mechanism will safeguard financial stability in the country
Yesterday at 10:45 am by Bama Diva
» Government Adviser: Non-Oil GDP Growth in 2024 Reaches Unprecedented Levels
Yesterday at 10:42 am by Bama Diva
» Parliament conforms to World Bank on the importance of government infrastructure in development
Yesterday at 10:37 am by Bama Diva
» PM: Restructuring government banks to ensure the availability of capabilities and openness with glob
Yesterday at 10:33 am by Bama Diva
» entral Bank: There is no financial problem threatening employees’ salaries and we have great capabil
Yesterday at 10:25 am by Bama Diva
» Basra crude achieves weekly gains amid rising oil markets
Yesterday at 10:10 am by Bama Diva
» The dollar falls against the dinar in Baghdad and Erbil with the closing at the beginning of the wee
Yesterday at 10:06 am by Bama Diva
» PM Al-Sudani eyes tourism as a cornerstone of Iraq’s non-oil economy
Yesterday at 9:57 am by Bama Diva
» PMF Chief: Iraq's armed forces at their strongest
Yesterday at 9:43 am by Bama Diva
» I regret to inform you after 20 yrs of postings
Fri 10 Jan 2025, 6:34 pm by Bama Diva
» INA discusses exchange rates files, foreign transfers, and housing initiatives with the CBI governor
Fri 10 Jan 2025, 6:29 pm by Bama Diva
» Government Adviser: Non-Oil GDP Growth in 2024 Reaches Unprecedented Levels
Fri 10 Jan 2025, 6:25 pm by Bama Diva
» Parliament conforms to World Bank on the importance of government infrastructure in development
Fri 10 Jan 2025, 6:20 pm by Bama Diva
» Iraq exports oil worth over $5 billion to US in 11 months
Fri 10 Jan 2025, 5:30 pm by Bama Diva
» Iraq’s Ministry of Oil announces 2024 petroleum product sales
Fri 10 Jan 2025, 5:25 pm by Bama Diva
» US dollar exchange rate continues to decline in Iraq
Fri 10 Jan 2025, 5:20 pm by Bama Diva
» Iraq completes 400-kilometer security border wall with Syria
Fri 10 Jan 2025, 5:15 pm by Bama Diva
» Iraq collaborates with Ernst & Young on state-owned bank reforms
Fri 10 Jan 2025, 5:07 pm by Bama Diva
» Kurdistan records a significant increase in the number of imported cars during 2024
Thu 02 Jan 2025, 4:01 am by Rocky
» The Ministry of Justice announces the implementation of the electronic payment system in all notary
Thu 02 Jan 2025, 3:59 am by Rocky
» The Ministry of Justice counts the achievements and activities achieved during the past year accordi
Thu 02 Jan 2025, 3:58 am by Rocky
» Central Bank: We have started working with the correspondent banking system
Thu 02 Jan 2025, 3:55 am by Rocky
» Is the Ministry of Finance hiding the facts?.. An expert reveals the main reason for the shortage of
Thu 02 Jan 2025, 3:53 am by Rocky
» Reconstruction: 2025 plan includes 70 external road projects
Thu 02 Jan 2025, 3:49 am by Rocky
» Economist: The government is obligated to pay salaries as it is a matter of fate
Thu 02 Jan 2025, 3:47 am by Rocky
» The Central Bank of Iraq opens new horizons in foreign transfers and enhances international financia
Thu 02 Jan 2025, 3:45 am by Rocky
» Judge Zidane and Al-Sudani are the first to disclose their financial assets in 2025
Thu 02 Jan 2025, 3:42 am by Rocky
» Oil Price: Trump's Team Considers 'Direct Sanctions' on Iraq That Will Hit Oil
Thu 02 Jan 2025, 3:40 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Integrity: The amounts recovered from the “theft of the century” do not exceed 5%, and
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:04 pm by Bama Diva
» Dinars entering the Ministry of Finance are 20% less than the amount it needs.. Iraqis start their n
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 2:50 pm by Bama Diva
» Mazhar Saleh: No salary crisis and financial reserves cover liquidity completely
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 4:04 am by Rocky
» Central Bank announces major achievement in foreign transfers
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 4:02 am by Rocky
» Confirmation that America is putting pressure on Al-Sudani to transform the Iraqi regime into "secul
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:59 am by Rocky
» Warnings of the dangers of the Turkish-Zionist-American plan to destabilize Iraq
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:57 am by Rocky
» Expert: Iraqi economy is stable despite changes in the dollar market
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:56 am by Rocky
» Economist praises ASYCUDA automation system: A step towards achieving important resources
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:55 am by Rocky
» More than $60 billion in Iraqi currency auction sales in 2024
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:53 am by Rocky
» Is there a salary crisis in Iraq? Al-Sudani’s advisor explains
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:50 am by Rocky
» The Central Bank decides to suspend withdrawals and deposits for four days
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:46 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani Office announces the implementation of the global ASYCUDA system to automate customs opera
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:42 am by Rocky
» The leaders “reconciled” and the amendment of the electoral law is “a done deal”.. What does this da
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:41 am by Rocky
» With the document .. MP Sand files a complaint against the Ministry of Finance .. for this reason
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:39 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Finance: The government is working to enhance non-oil revenues
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:37 am by Rocky
» The 10 most indebted Arab countries in 2024.. This is Iraq's rank
Wed 01 Jan 2025, 3:35 am by Rocky
» utube 12/27/24 MM&C MM&C Iraq Dinar News-Iraqs Wealth Fund-National Currency-Arab World Volume Tra
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:42 am by Rocky
» utube 12/28/24 Iraq - CBI Governor Makes an Announcement, Digital Banking Expansion
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:41 am by Rocky
» utube 12/29/24 MM&C MM&C Iraq Dinar News-Digital Transformation-Global Economic Power-USA-Imminent
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:40 am by Rocky
» utube 12/31/24 MM&C MM&C Iraq Dinar News-Commemorative Coin?-Investment Attractive-Dollar Auction
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:40 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani chairs expanded meeting to review Oil Ministry projects
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:35 am by Rocky
» Prime Minister stresses importance of investing best opportunities to maximize state revenues
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:27 am by Rocky
» Prime Minister's Office announces implementation of ASYCUDA global system for automating customs ope
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:24 am by Rocky
» Judiciary: Recovering 12 billion dinars for financial fraud crime
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:20 am by Rocky
» US-Iranian Tension: Iraq Between Competition and Mediation Role After Trump’s Return
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:14 am by Rocky
» MP confirms settlement of controversy over ministerial amendments
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:07 am by Rocky
» National Union: Time is no longer sufficient for the dialogue on the oil and gas law to mature
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:05 am by Rocky
» Economist: Relying on oil as a source of revenue will have serious consequences
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:03 am by Rocky
» Al-Maliki: Repeated amendments to the election law weaken voter confidence in the political process
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 7:01 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Legal: Interrogating ministers and officials is still subject to political agreements
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 6:58 am by Rocky
» Due to the American veto, Iraq suffers from a weak armament in the face of regional developments
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 6:52 am by Rocky
» What is holding up the passage of the oil and gas law so far?
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 6:49 am by Rocky
» New Cabinet Resolutions Package
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 6:45 am by Rocky
» Experts speak to {Sabah} about the most important economic events in 2024
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 6:36 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani stresses the importance of review and investing the best opportunities to maximize state r
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 6:30 am by Rocky
» With more than 30 billion dollars... a leap in the projects market in Iraq
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 5:15 am by Rocky
» Central Bank of Iraq sells about $290 million in currency auction
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 5:12 am by Rocky
» Customs: Our revenues increased by 128% during the current year
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 5:08 am by Rocky
» Our Economic and Financial Vision for 2025 in Iraq
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 5:05 am by Rocky
» How much of Iraq's electrical system has been lost due to the halt of Iranian gas?
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 5:02 am by Rocky
» $31.7 billion is the increase in the value of its market projects in Iraq
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 5:00 am by Rocky
» Turkmen gas will cover 50% of Iraq's stations' needs.. New details about the agreement
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:57 am by Rocky
» Basra-Haditha oil pipeline.. will go to 5 countries and this is its value
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:55 am by Rocky
» Early talk about postponing the elections is “evidence” of Iraq’s entry into the map of change in th
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:52 am by Rocky
» New details on the incident of the "death of a US National Guard soldier" in Iraq - Urgent
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:48 am by Rocky
» Economist: Iraq-Jordan oil pipeline enters implementation phase
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:45 am by Rocky
» International Report: 2025 will be the largest year for projects inside Iraq
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:42 am by Rocky
» Monetary policy collapses in Iraq.. Investment in banks is almost non-existent and the Central Bank
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:40 am by Rocky
» We have started preparing for next summer.. Electricity: The agreement to supply Turkmen gas will co
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:37 am by Rocky
» Former MP: Wrong timing hinders the passage of laws
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:35 am by Rocky
» The Prime Minister's Media Office said in a statement: "Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani chair
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:33 am by Rocky
» Al-Hakim calls for benefiting from the Japanese experience in combating corruption
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:31 am by Rocky
» Türkiye is considering establishing an oil pipeline with Syria and linking it to the Iraqi Kirkuk-Ce
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:30 am by Rocky
» 2024, the year of crises, bids farewell to Iraq without answers: What is the fate of the Popular Mob
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:29 am by Rocky
» Agriculture Committee: Strict measures to protect the agricultural calendar and support local produc
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:27 am by Rocky
» MP: Delay in employees’ salaries is unjustified and we demand that the Ministry of Finance clarify t
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:23 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani chairs a special meeting on the integrated South Basra project, which includes several ene
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:18 am by Rocky
» The Iraqi government approves the contract to establish the oil pipeline (Basra-Haditha)
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:16 am by Rocky
» The government agrees to increase the fees for examining and marking gold jewellery
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:13 am by Rocky
» MP: There is no longer any intention by the government to make a ministerial reshuffle
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:10 am by Rocky
» Transparency: Sulaymaniyah and Halabja imports in 2024 amounted to more than 897 billion dinars
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:06 am by Rocky
» Despite the denial of the Ministry of Finance, MPs talk about a shortage of liquidity
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 4:00 am by Rocky
» 'Secret' documents reveal Britain's anger at France's rejection of 2003 Iraq war
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 3:58 am by Rocky
» The leaders have "reconciled" and the amendment of the electoral law is "a done deal".. What does th
Tue 31 Dec 2024, 3:54 am by Rocky
» Observers: The Central Bank claims the success of its monetary policy without any effect on reality
Mon 30 Dec 2024, 9:38 am by Rocky
» Sudanese advisor reveals government's philosophy for future of national economy
Mon 30 Dec 2024, 9:22 am by Rocky
» Al-Sayhoud calls for activating the investment sector to diversify resources and achieve self-suffic
Mon 30 Dec 2024, 9:14 am by Rocky
» Private Banks Association to Nina: Government support will enhance the success of the Kafalat Compan
Mon 30 Dec 2024, 9:13 am by Rocky