Obama Steps Up U.S. Training of Communist Chinese Military
Posted on July 31, 2015 by Paul
The New American – by Alex Newman
Even as the Communist Chinese dictatorship ruthlessly oppresses the people of China while stepping up itsaggressive rhetoric, espionage, and military activities aimed beyond its borders, the Obama administration has been training Beijing’s troops in U.S. military tactics, techniques, and procedures. Critics have long opposed the high-level “mil-mil cooperation” between the U.S. Armed Forces and one of the most brutal autocracies on the planet. At least one U.S. lawmaker has been expressing concerns. But the Obama administration, which boasts of its actions and has called for even deeper military ties with Beijing, shows no signs of backing down from the highly controversial and potentially dangerous programs.
In 2013, the Obama administration shocked the world by inviting Communist Chinese troops to the United States to train with American forces for the first time in history. Ostensibly aimed at practicing “disaster management,” the U.S.-Communist China military exercises raised widespread alarm among national security experts. And while the Pentagon downplayed the risk and denied in comments to The New American that any weapons were involved, Chinese officials were boasting of “weapon demonstration, technique exchange, and cooperative action.” Earlier in 2013, a senior Chinese general, who in 2005 threatened to destroy hundreds of U.S. cities with nuclear weapons, led a “military exchange program” delegation to Washington, D.C. from Beijing.
The next year, again for the first time in history, Obama offered further opportunities for Chinese forces to gather sensitive intelligence on how the U.S. military works — this time by inviting Beijing’s Navy to participate in the “RIMPAC war games.” Hosted off the American coast by the U.S. Pacific Command, RIMPAC is the largest multinational maritime exercise in the world. And by allowing the Chinese regime’s ships to participate, Beijing was able to gather important insight into the U.S. military’s “tactics, techniques and procedures” (TTPs), according to analysts. Beijing was invited again this year, even as it steps up its aggressive actions against U.S. Navy ships in international waters.
Since Obama took office, U.S. forces have been training Chinese troops and sailors in “counter-piracy operations” in the Indian Ocean, too. The Obama administration also waived the ban on Chinese parts in U.S. weapons systems, with potentially catastrophic implications for national security. And in February of this year, the administration invited dozens of Chinese naval officers to tour the U.S. Naval Academy, the U.S. Surface Warfare Officers School, and the U.S. Naval War College. The dictatorship’s officers also “took part in seminars with trainees at the Surface Warfare Officers School,” the Chinese Navy headquarters boasted to the regime’s propaganda outlets.
In recent years, the administration has gone even further in terms of linking up the U.S. military to Beijing’s “People’s Liberation Army.” “The military-to-military ties between the United States and China have grown and strengthened in recent years and it is an area of cooperation that the United States values,” said Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice last year while in Beijing meeting with top Communist Chinese officials, including dictator Xi Jinping. “President Obama firmly believes that the U.S.-China relationship is one of the most consequential bilateral relationships in the world and that there is virtually no problem of global significance that can be better resolved when the United States and China are working together at the same table.”
The deepening bonds between U.S. and Chinese forces under the Obama administration, justified by the administration and the establishment as an effort to prevent “misunderstandings,” has now attracted some attention even from establishment media organs. In a Reuters column last week about how the United States is training China’s military even while inching toward conflict, columnist William Johnson noted that, despite tensions, “the two nations’ militaries train together at a very high level.” He noted that even though the two governments were coming closer to “armed confrontation,” the Obama administration was simultaneously “training Chinese forces in the American way of war.” The two militaries are also developing “increased interoperability,” Johnson observed.
Beijing is taking full advantage of the opportunities to learn about the U.S. military and how it operates, too. Various “cooperative” and “international” military efforts with U.S. forces are being used by China to, for example, “explore the anti-submarine warfare tactics of the U.S. forces stationed on Diego Garcia Island, south of India, as well as those of U.S. and allied forces in the Gulf of Aden,” according to Johnson. Meanwhile, with Beijing being allowed to use the European Union’s MERCURY communications network, China is able “to understand exactly how NATO allies coordinate efforts in every stage of sea battle, from planning to execution to assessment,” Johnson explained. Incredibly, the columnist goes on to argue for increased military cooperation.
Apparently, some military officials also support the administration’s ongoing support for the Chinese regime’s armed forces. “The PLA(N) [People’s Liberation Army-Navy] and PLAAF [People’s Liberation Army-Air Force] are now global brands and our desire is for them to increasingly contribute to security and stability operations,” wrote Vice Admiral Robert Thomas in a column published by Defense One. “What’s next? Our goal is clear: we want to work with the PLA(N) and PLAAF to ensure their efforts contribute to regional stability and that they act as a proponent of the rule of law in the international system. To this end, increased cooperation between the U.S. 7th Fleet and the PLA(N) will benefit all nations in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region.”
But more than a few high-profile voices have said the cooperation ought to end — and that it is putting U.S. national security in danger. In an analysis published by the Center for Security Policy, for example, U.S. Admiral James “Ace” Lyons (Ret.) started off by blasting the invitation extended to Communist China to participate in RIMPAC. That massive exercise “is for allies and friends, not nations planning to eventually wage war on the United States,” he said, quoting analyst Robert Sutter’s 2005 assertion that “China is the only large power in the world preparing to shoot Americans.” That assessment remains true today, Admiral Lyons noted: “Beijing is configuring its forces — especially its navy — to fight ours.”
“As Beijing’s behavior has become more troubling, the Pentagon has clung to the hope that military-to-military relations will somehow relieve tensions with the Chinese,” Lyons continued, rightly or wrongly assuming that the Obama administration’s training of Chinese forces is at least well-intentioned, if naïve. “Yet as Ronald Reagan taught us, the nature of regimes matter. We are now helping an incurably aggressive state develop its military — to our peril. There is something very wrong at the core of the Obama administration’s and the Pentagon’s China policies.” Of course, numerous other respected analysts and Western officials have offered similar warnings about Beijing’s intentions.
The Chinese regime’s increasingly aggressive confrontations with U.S. ships and aircraft in international waters and airspace have raised alarm, too. Meanwhile, Beijing’s generals have, even in recent years, threatened to annihilate hundreds of U.S. cities in a nuclear holocaust if the U.S. government were to stick by its treaty obligations and defend the free Republic of China (Taiwan) from the communist regime ruling the mainland. Obama responded by inviting the communist general to the United States on an official exchange mission. The regime has also been aggressively spying on the United States, most recently found culpable in a massive hacking attack. Plus, the fact that the Communist Chinese dictatorship has murdered more human beings than any other in historyshould, in and of itself, be cause for serious concern.
In Congress, some lawmakers have started questioning the Obama administration’s “mil-mil” actions, too. Late last year, Rep. Randy Forbes (R. Va.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee’s Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee, sent a letter to Obama’s defense chiefs asking for a “review” of the cooperation. “I believe that the Department currently lacks the thorough guidance and oversight mechanisms necessary to maintain a consistent mil-mil policy that best serves U.S. national security objectives over the ‘long-haul’ of the emerging U.S.-China peacetime competition,” the congressman wrote, citing “multiple examples” of senior U.S. officials “pursuing multiple, divergent mil-mil engagement objectives.” But even Forbes’ publicly expressed doubts hardly hit on the main problems.
Of course, Obama has not been alone in handing sensitive insight into the U.S. military to Beijing on a silver platter. Former U.S. President Bill Clinton, for example, helped the hostile communist government access some of the most sensitive American military technology, even while covering up various crimes for the regime and its agents, as documented in the February 15, 1999 “Chinagate: Treason in the White House” issue of The New American. “President Clinton promised to restrain those who ordered the Tiananmen Square massacre, but he has now allowed these men whose hands are stained with the blood of martyrs of freedom into the highest reaches of our military defenses, and made available to them significant portions of our advanced military technology,” wrote former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Thomas Moorer.
The Obama administration’s seemingly bizarre decision to cooperate so closely with the brutal Chinese regime is in line with advice offered by billionaire globalist financier George Soros. In recent months, the Rothschild dynasty protégée has become increasingly vocal in demanding an even broader “strategic partnership” with the dictatorship, allegedly to avoid another world war. Soros has also called regularly for Beijing to “own” what he touts as the “New World Order.” The broader globalist establishment, meanwhile, continues to build up the ruthless autocracy, even as Chinese Communists increasingly seize control of more and more of the architecture of “global governance.”
For the sake of U.S. national security and liberty, the U.S. government should end any and all programs that could benefit the brutal autocracy or its armed forces in any way — particularly in the event of conflict with the United States. The Obama administration, which has also invited Russian terror troops to U.S. soil for training with U.S. forces for the first time in history, clearly has no intention of reining in the potentially catastrophic assistance to hostile foreign regimes. But Congress, which controls the purse strings, can and should take action to protect America.
Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. Follow him on Twitter@ALEXNEWMAN_JOU. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/21351-obama-steps-up-u-s-training-of-communist-chinese-military
Posted on July 31, 2015 by Paul
The New American – by Alex Newman
Even as the Communist Chinese dictatorship ruthlessly oppresses the people of China while stepping up itsaggressive rhetoric, espionage, and military activities aimed beyond its borders, the Obama administration has been training Beijing’s troops in U.S. military tactics, techniques, and procedures. Critics have long opposed the high-level “mil-mil cooperation” between the U.S. Armed Forces and one of the most brutal autocracies on the planet. At least one U.S. lawmaker has been expressing concerns. But the Obama administration, which boasts of its actions and has called for even deeper military ties with Beijing, shows no signs of backing down from the highly controversial and potentially dangerous programs.
In 2013, the Obama administration shocked the world by inviting Communist Chinese troops to the United States to train with American forces for the first time in history. Ostensibly aimed at practicing “disaster management,” the U.S.-Communist China military exercises raised widespread alarm among national security experts. And while the Pentagon downplayed the risk and denied in comments to The New American that any weapons were involved, Chinese officials were boasting of “weapon demonstration, technique exchange, and cooperative action.” Earlier in 2013, a senior Chinese general, who in 2005 threatened to destroy hundreds of U.S. cities with nuclear weapons, led a “military exchange program” delegation to Washington, D.C. from Beijing.
The next year, again for the first time in history, Obama offered further opportunities for Chinese forces to gather sensitive intelligence on how the U.S. military works — this time by inviting Beijing’s Navy to participate in the “RIMPAC war games.” Hosted off the American coast by the U.S. Pacific Command, RIMPAC is the largest multinational maritime exercise in the world. And by allowing the Chinese regime’s ships to participate, Beijing was able to gather important insight into the U.S. military’s “tactics, techniques and procedures” (TTPs), according to analysts. Beijing was invited again this year, even as it steps up its aggressive actions against U.S. Navy ships in international waters.
Since Obama took office, U.S. forces have been training Chinese troops and sailors in “counter-piracy operations” in the Indian Ocean, too. The Obama administration also waived the ban on Chinese parts in U.S. weapons systems, with potentially catastrophic implications for national security. And in February of this year, the administration invited dozens of Chinese naval officers to tour the U.S. Naval Academy, the U.S. Surface Warfare Officers School, and the U.S. Naval War College. The dictatorship’s officers also “took part in seminars with trainees at the Surface Warfare Officers School,” the Chinese Navy headquarters boasted to the regime’s propaganda outlets.
In recent years, the administration has gone even further in terms of linking up the U.S. military to Beijing’s “People’s Liberation Army.” “The military-to-military ties between the United States and China have grown and strengthened in recent years and it is an area of cooperation that the United States values,” said Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice last year while in Beijing meeting with top Communist Chinese officials, including dictator Xi Jinping. “President Obama firmly believes that the U.S.-China relationship is one of the most consequential bilateral relationships in the world and that there is virtually no problem of global significance that can be better resolved when the United States and China are working together at the same table.”
The deepening bonds between U.S. and Chinese forces under the Obama administration, justified by the administration and the establishment as an effort to prevent “misunderstandings,” has now attracted some attention even from establishment media organs. In a Reuters column last week about how the United States is training China’s military even while inching toward conflict, columnist William Johnson noted that, despite tensions, “the two nations’ militaries train together at a very high level.” He noted that even though the two governments were coming closer to “armed confrontation,” the Obama administration was simultaneously “training Chinese forces in the American way of war.” The two militaries are also developing “increased interoperability,” Johnson observed.
Beijing is taking full advantage of the opportunities to learn about the U.S. military and how it operates, too. Various “cooperative” and “international” military efforts with U.S. forces are being used by China to, for example, “explore the anti-submarine warfare tactics of the U.S. forces stationed on Diego Garcia Island, south of India, as well as those of U.S. and allied forces in the Gulf of Aden,” according to Johnson. Meanwhile, with Beijing being allowed to use the European Union’s MERCURY communications network, China is able “to understand exactly how NATO allies coordinate efforts in every stage of sea battle, from planning to execution to assessment,” Johnson explained. Incredibly, the columnist goes on to argue for increased military cooperation.
Apparently, some military officials also support the administration’s ongoing support for the Chinese regime’s armed forces. “The PLA(N) [People’s Liberation Army-Navy] and PLAAF [People’s Liberation Army-Air Force] are now global brands and our desire is for them to increasingly contribute to security and stability operations,” wrote Vice Admiral Robert Thomas in a column published by Defense One. “What’s next? Our goal is clear: we want to work with the PLA(N) and PLAAF to ensure their efforts contribute to regional stability and that they act as a proponent of the rule of law in the international system. To this end, increased cooperation between the U.S. 7th Fleet and the PLA(N) will benefit all nations in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region.”
But more than a few high-profile voices have said the cooperation ought to end — and that it is putting U.S. national security in danger. In an analysis published by the Center for Security Policy, for example, U.S. Admiral James “Ace” Lyons (Ret.) started off by blasting the invitation extended to Communist China to participate in RIMPAC. That massive exercise “is for allies and friends, not nations planning to eventually wage war on the United States,” he said, quoting analyst Robert Sutter’s 2005 assertion that “China is the only large power in the world preparing to shoot Americans.” That assessment remains true today, Admiral Lyons noted: “Beijing is configuring its forces — especially its navy — to fight ours.”
“As Beijing’s behavior has become more troubling, the Pentagon has clung to the hope that military-to-military relations will somehow relieve tensions with the Chinese,” Lyons continued, rightly or wrongly assuming that the Obama administration’s training of Chinese forces is at least well-intentioned, if naïve. “Yet as Ronald Reagan taught us, the nature of regimes matter. We are now helping an incurably aggressive state develop its military — to our peril. There is something very wrong at the core of the Obama administration’s and the Pentagon’s China policies.” Of course, numerous other respected analysts and Western officials have offered similar warnings about Beijing’s intentions.
The Chinese regime’s increasingly aggressive confrontations with U.S. ships and aircraft in international waters and airspace have raised alarm, too. Meanwhile, Beijing’s generals have, even in recent years, threatened to annihilate hundreds of U.S. cities in a nuclear holocaust if the U.S. government were to stick by its treaty obligations and defend the free Republic of China (Taiwan) from the communist regime ruling the mainland. Obama responded by inviting the communist general to the United States on an official exchange mission. The regime has also been aggressively spying on the United States, most recently found culpable in a massive hacking attack. Plus, the fact that the Communist Chinese dictatorship has murdered more human beings than any other in historyshould, in and of itself, be cause for serious concern.
In Congress, some lawmakers have started questioning the Obama administration’s “mil-mil” actions, too. Late last year, Rep. Randy Forbes (R. Va.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee’s Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee, sent a letter to Obama’s defense chiefs asking for a “review” of the cooperation. “I believe that the Department currently lacks the thorough guidance and oversight mechanisms necessary to maintain a consistent mil-mil policy that best serves U.S. national security objectives over the ‘long-haul’ of the emerging U.S.-China peacetime competition,” the congressman wrote, citing “multiple examples” of senior U.S. officials “pursuing multiple, divergent mil-mil engagement objectives.” But even Forbes’ publicly expressed doubts hardly hit on the main problems.
Of course, Obama has not been alone in handing sensitive insight into the U.S. military to Beijing on a silver platter. Former U.S. President Bill Clinton, for example, helped the hostile communist government access some of the most sensitive American military technology, even while covering up various crimes for the regime and its agents, as documented in the February 15, 1999 “Chinagate: Treason in the White House” issue of The New American. “President Clinton promised to restrain those who ordered the Tiananmen Square massacre, but he has now allowed these men whose hands are stained with the blood of martyrs of freedom into the highest reaches of our military defenses, and made available to them significant portions of our advanced military technology,” wrote former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Thomas Moorer.
The Obama administration’s seemingly bizarre decision to cooperate so closely with the brutal Chinese regime is in line with advice offered by billionaire globalist financier George Soros. In recent months, the Rothschild dynasty protégée has become increasingly vocal in demanding an even broader “strategic partnership” with the dictatorship, allegedly to avoid another world war. Soros has also called regularly for Beijing to “own” what he touts as the “New World Order.” The broader globalist establishment, meanwhile, continues to build up the ruthless autocracy, even as Chinese Communists increasingly seize control of more and more of the architecture of “global governance.”
For the sake of U.S. national security and liberty, the U.S. government should end any and all programs that could benefit the brutal autocracy or its armed forces in any way — particularly in the event of conflict with the United States. The Obama administration, which has also invited Russian terror troops to U.S. soil for training with U.S. forces for the first time in history, clearly has no intention of reining in the potentially catastrophic assistance to hostile foreign regimes. But Congress, which controls the purse strings, can and should take action to protect America.
Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. Follow him on Twitter@ALEXNEWMAN_JOU. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/21351-obama-steps-up-u-s-training-of-communist-chinese-military
» The Minister of Finance talks about imbalance and corruption in the Iraqi financial system
» Al-Kazemi sends a message to the country's leaders: The government cannot live without a budget
» Al-Kazemi: The government cannot live without the budget ,
» Basra is suing the finances to obtain funds equivalent to one-fifth of Iraq's budget
» The departure of the “leader” of the white paper .. 3 possible reasons for the resignation of Financ
» With the increasing demand for residential complexes in Iraq, Iraqis' purchase of Turkish real estat
» Two months after its 57% rise, Iraq sells about one billion dollars in US bonds, instead of transfer
» Parliamentary move to open the "den of corruption" in the Rashid and Al-Rafidain banks, and to pros
» With more than 8 billion dollars annually... Iraq is the first importer from Iran
» Allawi: The Iraqi economy is a victim of a major corruption network that works to protect the politi
» Erbil .. Masrour Barzani inaugurates the third international exhibition for real estate and investme
» Food security and the white paper.. Expose the reasons for the resignation of the Minister of Financ
» Al-Kazemi links the Iraqi situation with the events of Singapore and Rwanda: Tomorrow I will call fo
» Praise for the government's achievements and anger at the political conflict.. Details revealed from
» Al-Sadr refuses to participate in the dialogue that Al-Kazemi called for
» Al-Abadi: The stage is critical and de-escalation is a necessity
» The Federal Service Council approves the appointment of those covered by the law on the grading of m
» Minister of Planning: Iraq seeks to achieve more economic integration with the countries of the regi
» Tomorrow... Al-Kazemi: I will call for an Iraqi national dialogue for all the country's leaders
» Al-Kazemi calls for an Iraqi national dialogue for all the country's leaders
» To stop the escalation, Al-Kazemi invites the political forces to a meeting at the government palace
» Al-Fateh expresses a position on the government palace dialogue tomorrow
» Al-Amiri Alliance: Using the street does not bring results..Negotiations are the solution
» The Kurdistan Union diagnoses a group of positive indicators of a breakthrough in the crisis
» Design: the current and the frame the cause of the current crisis
» Alsumaria News publishes the text of the resignation of the Minister of Finance
» The United States confirms its support for the independence of the Central Bank of Iraq
» An Iraqi move to establish economic free zones
» That is why “Al-Sadr went crazy”: A “leak” of a “framework plan” to overthrow Al-Sadr and isolate hi
» A foreign report reveals Iraqis' resentment over the continuation of the demonstrations and fear of
» Construction: The electronic collection automation project reduces water consumption
» The Order Committee (50) announces the recovery of 1,376 properties belonging to the state
» With the participation of 180 companies... the launch of the Erbil International Real Estate and Inv
» Learn about the map of the Iraqi political forces supporting and rejecting the dissolution of Parlia
» An informed source: The coordination framework will send a delegation to Saudi Arabia headed by Amma
» A close source: Ali Allawi requests to resign from his position and is awaiting official approval
» Al-Kazemi assigns the Minister of Oil the duties of the Ministry of Finance as an agency
» Al-Amri and Plasschaert discuss the most important political developments
» Decreased cash sales of the dollar in the bank auction
» Labor stresses the need to provide funds to cover the social protection program
» Integrity announces the recovery of nearly 1,400 properties belonging to the state
» In the presence of the Prime Minister .. the launch of the third Erbil International Real Estate and
» Will Iran repeat the nuclear mistake as it did with Iraq at the end of the eighties?
» In the presence of the Prime Minister .. the launch of the third Erbil International Real Estate and
» Al-Hakim: We look forward to overcoming the current suffocation and proceeding with the completion o
» Al-Sadr announces the postponement of Saturday's demonstration until further notice
» The political process is in a state of silence in light of the disagreement of the blocs.. Video
» “Satisfies the frame and the chest.” Al-Fateh talks about a “single solution” to the political crisi
» The Council of Ministers holds its regular session headed by Al-Kazemi
» Officially.. the Minister of Finance submits his resignation - Urgent
» The political blockage at the table of Al-Amiri and Plasschaert in Baghdad - urgent
» A legal sets the date for the expiry of the food security law and sets the reasons for
» The framework unanimously agrees on 4 conditions before going to the dissolution of Parliament - urg
» Al-Mulla To "Earth News": It Is Not Possible To Skip The Political Consensus Regarding The Dissoluti
» Two prominent senators call on Biden to provide more support to the Kurdistan Region
» A preliminary agreement on the location of the first sessions of Parliament, following the latest de
» The five boycotters reveal the reason for their disagreement with Darjal: We will not lead a coup
» A decision to form a Syrian-Iraqi Business Council
» Al-Kazemi’s Advisor Resolves The Controversy Over State Spending In The Absence Of The Budget
» Energy Police: Seizures And Cranes For Trading In Oil Derivatives In Baghdad And Basra
» Nassif Calls On The Judiciary To Put Its Hand On Iraqi Money In Light Of The Current Political Turmo
» Asa’ib responds to “Minister Al-Sadr”: We have tired you and hurt you
» The coordination framework meeting ends with four conditions to achieve Al-Sadr's demand
» Al-Sadr's Minister issues instructions on Saturday: The crowd and the judiciary are a red line
» Al-Alusi comments on the seizure of his money: a decision to blackmail me, and I will not stop confr
» The coordination framework is knocking on the doors of Saudi Arabia with a delegation led by Al-Haki
» An Iraqi bank decides to reduce the interest on loans to employees and cancels the sponsor's require
» Iraq records a decline of nearly a billion dollars in holding US bonds
» In compliance with Oak's decision, Iraq's exports will rise to 3 million and 800 thousand barrels pe
» Construction: The electronic collection automation project reduces water consumption
» With the support of the European Union...FAO holds a meeting in Chabayish to discuss the drying up o
» The environment reveals a national plan to remove radioactive pollution from Iraq
» The Embassy of Iraq in Abu Dhabi honors outstanding Iraqi students in the UAE
» Baghdad investment: the visit of the delegation of the Iraqi Media Network to the Commission and to
» Barzani's party offers a solution to end repeated Turkish violations in northern Iraq
» Trading volume decreased by 67% in the Iraqi Stock Exchange during the month of July
» Baghdad hosts the Third Interfaith Conference for Peace and International Cooperation in the presenc
» Emami said in a statement yesterday, "The conclusion of twinning agreements between Iranian border c
» The salt tongue invades the Shatt al-Arab and reaches unprecedented levels
» Observers: Saturday's demonstrations will determine the strength of the political parties in the str
» Al-Amiri in the longest tour before “Million Al-Sadr”: 400 km to reach Al-Hanana and no clear result
» An American message about the joint economic cooperation between it and Iraq, especially in the ener
» Hoshyar Zebari: The political tension between the framework and the current has reached its peak and
» Al-Sadr: Do not raise my pictures and do not chant my name during Saturday's "million" demonstration
» The conflict of the 'current' and the 'framework' is escalating.. Has the moment of al-Sistani come?
» Al-Fateh: It is possible to solve the political crisis in the country if President Barzani intervene
» A deputy in the Kurdistan Democratic Party explodes a surprise: restoring confidence in the Al-Kazem
» Zebari tweets about the tension between the current and the framework and reminds of the Kurdish civ
» Al-Sadr issues instructions regarding the millionth demonstration
» In conjunction with Al-Sadr's million, the Al-Attar Demonstrations Committee calls on its audience t
» Mishaan al-Jubouri: The judiciary is the last of the fortresses, and by threatening it, we read peac
» The National Union sends a message to the Democrat regarding heading to Baghdad
» Barzani: The Democrat did not and will not give up the rights of Kurdistan
» Minister al-Sadr: The tire plays with fire
» A leader in the Sadrist movement: Sadr's life is in danger
» Nassif calls for stopping the aviation authority's contract with a company dealing with the "Israeli
» The central bank denies granting sums of money to citizens
» Iraqi bank cuts interest on loans to employees