Victory: The claim to cancel the elections does not express the position of all the framework forces

[size=52]Victory: The claim to cancel the elections does not express the position of all the framework forces[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad/ Firas Adnan[/size]
[size=45]Forces in the coordination framework announced, yesterday, Monday, that they are not responsible for the lawsuit to cancel the election results before the Federal Supreme Court, stressing that the Al-Fateh coalition was the one who adopted it and expressed its point of view, refusing to resort to escalation and threats to civil peace, stressing the need to respect judicial decisions in any way. she was.[/size]
[size=45]This comes at a time when the Al-Fateh Alliance spoke of presenting evidence that it said could sabotage the electoral process, pointing out that a large number of boxes had been subjected to various violations, including not complying with the closing and opening times on the day of voting, as well as technical problems related to polling.[/size]
[size=45]The Federal Supreme Court had postponed consideration of Al-Amiri's lawsuit to cancel the election results to the thirteenth of this month.[/size]
[size=45]A member of the Victory Alliance, Saad al-Lami, said, in a statement to (Al-Mada), that "resorting to the judiciary and legal contexts is the best way to express objection to the election results."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Lami continued, "Going to legal and constitutional means is the best option, perhaps it is better than demonstrating, although it is a constitutional right, but we are facing a better way to deal with objections."[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out, "The lawsuit submitted to the Federal Supreme Court to cancel the election results is by the Al-Fateh Alliance, and not in the name of the coordination framework."[/size]
[size=45]And Al-Lami stated, "What the lawsuit included expresses the viewpoint of the Al-Fateh Alliance, as it believes that it has evidence, proofs and reports that support the validity of what they went to and ensure that a decision is issued in their favour."[/size]
[size=45]He stated, "The Victory Alliance took the option of sending a memorandum containing questions to the Presidency of the Republic, the United Nations Mission to the United Nations and the Electoral Commission, and we have not received an answer until the present time."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Lami pointed out that “the judiciary is the only way to solve these problems. As for threats to escalate or resort to violence, it is rejected by the Victory Alliance, which does not have an armed faction or an economic body, and its vision is clear to be with the state.”[/size]
[size=45]He noted, "Our objections to the elections are related to technical and programmatic problems that we were waiting to get answers about, but this did not happen, including closing polls outside the specified time, not counting valid papers, as well as stations that were shut down for various reasons."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Lami went on to say, "Our presence in the coordination framework is correct, but we are with the constitution and stand against any escalation and prejudice to civil peace, and we refuse to display the power of the state, and we will respect the approval of the election results issued by the Federal Supreme Court, and we will be with the national assembly and will not tweet." out of the flock.”[/size]
[size=45]For his part, Jawad Al-Moussawi, a member of the Al-Fateh Alliance, said in an interview with Al-Mada that "the lawsuit filed by the leader of the coalition, Hadi Al-Amiri, to challenge the elections was on the twentieth of last month, backed by evidence that shows the reality of fraud."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Moussawi added, "Some of the evidence was previously submitted to the Independent High Electoral Commission, as well as the Electoral Judicial Authority, and it was not taken into account."[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out, "The postponement is a natural matter in order to complete the procedures for settlement, and the court will consider the case on the thirteenth of this month."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Moussawi indicated, "The decisive decision may be issued by the Federal Supreme Court on the specified date, and you may consider postponing it to a later date," stressing that "the evidence presented by Al-Amiri is sufficient to correct the course and cancel the elections, especially with regard to the papers that were considered invalid and their number was close to about." million ballot papers.[/size]
[size=45]And he stated, "Previous objections bore fruit in changing seven seats that did not include only the Al-Fateh Alliance, but in favor of the Azm Alliance and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, and this indicates the existence of violations, some of which were corrected, and today we are looking for restoring rights to their owners."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Moussawi warned, "The documents we obtained show that more than 6,200 boxes were not closed on time, and this matter would topple the electoral process as a whole."[/size]
[size=45]He talked about "other boxes that were opened the day after the polling, and the issue of fingerprints that did not appear for many citizens, which led to their inability to vote."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Moussawi concluded, "The body examining the ballot boxes and papers presented reports that speak of violations and major technical problems in the electoral process, all of which are evidence capable of changing the political scene completely."[/size]
[size=45]It is noteworthy that the electoral judiciary has completed the consideration of the appeals on the results and announced sending them to the Federal Supreme Court for approval.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]