Al-Maliki did it and nothing happened.. No one wants America to leave with hostility, even Tehran..

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]Al-Maliki did it and nothing happened.. No one wants America to leave with hostility, even Tehran.. Experts predict the form of withdrawal from Iraq[/size]

[size=45]Situations in Iraq are fraying to achieve a rapid withdrawal of American forces, under pressure from factions that have been launching armed attacks on “International Coalition” bases for about three months.[/size]
[size=45]The government finally decided to form a committee to negotiate the withdrawal and schedule it, according to what Foreign Minister Fouad Hussein said during statements to reporters early this month.[/size]
[size=45]The pressure on the government has increased since American forces attacked the headquarters of the “Al-Nujaba” movement at the beginning of this month, and reached its peak on Wednesday after an attack on two sites of the “Hezbollah Brigades” in Al-Qaim and Jurf Al-Sakhar.[/size]
[size=45]Western diplomats told the Washington Post and CBS newspapers a week ago that a sudden decision to withdraw from Iraq in a humiliating manner would not be in the interest of President Joe Biden, who is running an election campaign to win a second term in the White House.[/size]
[size=45]Three experts with whom the 964 Network spoke said that the withdrawal will cost Iraq “significant economic and political taxes.”[/size]
[size=45]Even the analysts closest to the “Coordination Framework” forces put their call for a rapid withdrawal of American forces under the constraints of “economic relations between Washington and Baghdad,” and held the government responsible for “minimizing the potential damage” from the withdrawal.[/size]
[size=45]Two experts believe that “Iran itself does not want a hostile exit for Washington from Iraq,” because, despite its great influence in Iraq, it wants to let it breathe through a profitable relationship with the Americans.[/size]
[size=45]Abbas Al-Ardawi, political analyst, 964 Network:[/size]
[size=45]The Americans previously withdrew in 2012 during the time of the Maliki government, under political, popular and security pressure, but things proceeded normally between the two countries.[/size]
[size=45]The United States is keen to secure its position and is trying to reflect its presence in the Iraqi political situation, but the pressure escalated after they targeted Iraqi security headquarters.[/size]
[size=45]There is no doubt that the government wants to maintain economic relations and extensions with Washington, and this will lessen the impact of the withdrawal, or at the very least reduce its damage.[/size]
[size=45]There is no doubt that the presence of American forces constitutes the greatest harm to Iraq, due to the direct targeting operations aimed at imposing complete control over the political and security decision-making in Iraq.[/size]
[size=45]Basil Hussein, political affairs researcher, for the 964 Network:[/size]
[size=45]The withdrawal of American forces has several consequences, the most important of which is the end of the mission of the international coalition, the main nucleus of which is American forces.[/size]
[size=45]The withdrawal of American forces from Iraq will raise the cost of achieving security and increase the costs of the intelligence effort, with the accompanying many risks related to the return of the activity of extremist groups.[/size]
[size=45]The withdrawal will be met with a policy of filling the vacuum by Iran, as it did in the previous withdrawal, which may result in sharp fluctuations in the Iraqi scene that remove fragile stability.[/size]
[size=45]The American withdrawal is not determined according to the purely Iraqi vision, the government’s desire, or the pressure of the militias, but is primarily due to the priorities of American policy in Iraq, Syria, and the region.[/size]
[size=45]Presidential elections prevent the American administration from making crucial decisions, but rather leave them to the next administration, whether Democratic or Republican.[/size]
[size=45]The issue of withdrawal at this time is new for Iraqi local consumption without actual implementation on the ground, at least in the foreseeable future.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Nasser Duraid, political analyst for the 964 Network:[/size]
[size=45]The scenario of a hostile withdrawal is expected since Iranian control over post-ISIS Iraq has become completely clear.[/size]
[size=45]Before ISIS, there was a relative balance between Washington and Tehran in Iraq. After ISIS, Iran's control became completely clear, but it has no interest in the Americans leaving Iraq with hostility.[/size]
[size=45]Tehran wants Iraq to be under its control and to maintain good relations with Washington to secure many benefits and benefits, because otherwise this country will be turned into a splinter regime from the world and will be treated like Bashar al-Assad’s Syria.[/size]
[size=45]Iraq does not have a strongly centralized state that can withstand international sanctions or isolation; The system will collapse quickly.[/size]
[size=45]For this reason, Iran always plays two cards inside Iraq: a state of opposition or resistance, and a state friendly to the United States.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]