The separatists support the American military presence... openly trading in the country's security a

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]The separatists support the American military presence... openly trading in the country's security and supporting the occupation[/size]

[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
01-10-2024
The politics of the Kurdistan Regional Government continue to exploit key positions affiliated with it by imposing its whims on the political, popular, and governmental streets through meetings with American figures, including positions that support the presence of American combat forces on Iraqi territory, turning a blind eye to the violations and continuous bombing of the security forces, military leaders, and civilians. .[/size]
[size=45]According to politicians, the President of the Republic’s statements regarding the necessity of the continued presence of foreign forces in Iraq will not affect the government’s position rejecting the presence, and seeking to set time periods for removing these forces in accordance with the previous parliament’s decision.[/size]
[size=45]*Many criticisms[/size]
[size=45]Speaking about this file, Al-Fatah Alliance member Khaled Al-Saray confirms that the Presidency of the Republic is not concerned with the issue of the presence of American combat forces inside Iraq, while he confirmed that Prime Minister Muhammad Shiaa Al-Sudani is primarily responsible for removing foreign forces.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Saray said in an interview with the Maalouma Agency, “The government is obligated to implement the previous parliament’s decision to remove combat forces from the country,” noting that “American combat forces were and are still in the position of attacking security forces and civilians in Iraq.”[/size]
[size=45]He continues, “The continued presence of American forces inside Iraq is tantamount to a continuation of the barbaric bombing of military leaders who emerged prominent in the war against the terrorist ISIS gangs,” pointing out that “the lack of need for these forces is one of the main reasons for their expulsion from the country, in addition to the numerous violations they are carrying out.” “.[/size]
[size=45]He added, “The talk is outside the framework of what the government announced via Sudanese to proceed with the withdrawal of forces within unofficial periods of time and has no effect,” indicating that “the Presidency of the Republic is not concerned with the file of the American combat presence in Iraq.”
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
*Interventions that have no effect[/size]
[size=45]In addition, political affairs researcher, Sabah Al-Ukaili, believes that the position of the Presidency of the Republic is ceremonial, not executive, and will not affect the government’s position in removing American combat forces from the country, while he stressed that the government is obligated to implement the previous decision of the legislative authority.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Ugaili said in an interview, “The government will adopt the shortest way to remove these forces by implementing the combat forces exit agreement,” pointing out that “activating the bilateral committee to complete the removal of American forces includes the official request for the exit of all foreign forces.”[/size]
[size=45]He continues, “The statements of the President of the Kurdistan Region that support the continued presence of foreign forces do not represent the opinion of the Iraqi people as much as they represent his personal opinion,” noting that “the objection of the Sunni and Kurdish forces will not affect the Shiite majority in the government and the House of Representatives.”[/size]
[size=45]Al-Ugaili concludes his speech: “The previous parliament’s decision resolved the position of all Iraqis regarding ending the presence of combat forces from Iraq,” adding that “the position of the Presidency of the Republic is ceremonial, not executive, and will not affect the government’s position in removing American combat forces from the country.”[/size]
[size=45]Kurdish agendas continue to impose their discourse that is contrary to the orientations of the people, the central government, and the political blocs by controlling the position of the Presidency of the Republic and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs by trying to support the continuation of foreign combat forces after the government announced the formation of a joint committee to prepare a timetable for removing these forces from the country. Will the Sudanese move to unify the government’s discourse? The Kurdish parties will continue to support the United States of America. Ended 25/day[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]