The coordination promotes British intervention in the formation of the government and is waiting for

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]The coordination promotes British intervention in the formation of the government and is waiting for Tehran to convince al-Sadr[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad / Tamim Al-Hassan[/size]
[size=45]The solutions of the Shiite coordination framework to participate in the government ended with the decision of the leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, to close the door of negotiations for the second time in two months.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sadr's opponents are waiting for a "miracle" to trigger the crisis again, including the return of "Al-Attar" to the game, which is the description used by the leader of the movement in reference to Iranian interference.[/size]
[size=45]And if the supposed last attempt fails, the “frameworkers” have to swallow one of two things: either accept the victory of the majority project, or the continuation of Mustafa Al-Kazemi’s government.[/size]
[size=45]The leader of the Sadrist movement, a day after his "retreat" to the government formation negotiations, issued strict orders to the bloc's members not to declare.[/size]
[size=45]The movement's media stated, in a statement last Saturday, that based on al-Sadr's tweet, it was decided that the month of Ramadan would be a "media silence" for the Sadrist movement's spokesmen.[/size]
[size=45]Yesterday, the “Al-Sadr deadline” entered its first day, which was set at about 40 days, starting from the first of Ramadan, until the end of the Eid holiday.[/size]
[size=45]And give the leader of the Sadrist movement, his opponents the green light to proceed with the formation of the government, with the commitment of his current "neutrality" full and non-interference "neither positive or negative."[/size]
[size=45]Last February, al-Sadr closed the door to negotiations with Shiite forces for the first time, before breaking the ban with his famous call with "Al-Maliki" last month.[/size]
[size=45]Leaks from the scenes indicate that the withdrawal of the "temporary" leader of the Sadrist movement from forming the government came to block the way for the "coordinating framework."[/size]
[size=45]And the leaks reported to (Al-Mada) that "Al-Sadr knew that there was an attempt by his opponents to appear as the victor after the last Wednesday session."[/size]
[size=45]The "Save the Homeland" coalition, which includes the Sadrists, part of the Sunnis, and the Kurdistan Democratic Party, failed in the last parliament session to achieve a quorum for choosing the president of the republic.[/size]
[size=45]After announcing early that the session had failed, hours before it began, the "Coordination Council" hinted that he was preparing to present a new initiative.[/size]
[size=45]The initiative was disappointing, according to observers, as it did not carry any new solutions, and the return of the same previous conditions in the formation of a large Shiite bloc in alliance with "Al-Sadr".[/size]
[size=45]According to sources close to the "frameworkers", the opponents of the tripartite alliance "have become handcuffed," especially after Sadr's partners announced their commitment to the alliance with the latter.[/size]
[size=45]The sources confirm to (Al-Mada), which preferred not to reveal their names, that the coordination framework "has become certain that the Sadrist movement will use the same method even after the expiry of the 40-day period."[/size]
[size=45]Britain participates in the government![/size]
[size=45]The Coordination Council promotes that the Sadrist movement’s “hardened” stances toward the Shiite forces are brought about by an “external push,” especially from Britain.[/size]
[size=45]In explaining this, the "frameworkers" rely on pushing Jaafar al-Sadr, al-Sadr's cousin and the Iraqi ambassador in London, to head the government.[/size]
[size=45]On Saturday, Hadi al-Amiri, head of the "Al-Fateh" coalition, Secretary-General of the Badr Organization, accused Britain of interfering in Iraqi political affairs, according to information he said he obtained from foreign intelligence.[/size]
[size=45]This came during a meeting with the British Ambassador to Iraq, "Marc Barison Richardson" at Al-Amiri's office in Baghdad.[/size]
[size=45]During the meeting, the media office quoted Al-Amiri as saying that the latter informed the British ambassador that he had "information from foreign intelligence agencies confirming your continued interference in the political situation."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Amiri explained, according to what his office reported: “We are seeking a Shiite-Shiite understanding, and this will certainly lead to a Kurdish-Kurdish understanding and end the division in the Kurdish house.”[/size]
[size=45]The leader of Al-Fateh stressed that "the framework will not give up on forming the largest bloc that preserves the right of the Shiite component in the government and agree on the candidate for prime minister."[/size]
[size=45]Although the "Coordination" rejects British intervention, but in return it is waiting for a new Iranian intervention to convince the leader of the Sadrist movement to "preserve Shiite unity," according to his claim.[/size]
[size=45]At least 3 previous attempts by high-ranking Iranian figures had failed during the past months to dissuade Sadr from the majority project.[/size]
[size=45]Sources close to the "Coordination Committee" confirm that the latter "has no more solutions but to wait for the success of the nuclear agreement with Iran."[/size]
[size=45]The "frameworkers" believe that the end of the agreement in favor of Tehran "will fail the British plan in Iraq," according to them.[/size]
[size=45]Until then, the coordinating framework is trying to give an image to the street that it is continuing to negotiate with "Al-Sadr," said Abbas Al-Zamili, a representative of Badr.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Zamili added in a televised interview that "the coordination framework continues in the negotiations, and it is important to determine the most numerous Shiite bloc."[/size]
[size=45]Nuri al-Maliki, the leader of the State of Law coalition, had visited the Christian bloc (Babylon), which participated in last Saturday's session, and has 4 seats.[/size]
[size=45]The sources considered that these moves are "useless", and that the coordinating framework has no choice but to continue to disrupt the upcoming sessions.[/size]
[size=45]And the sources added: “If al-Sadr persists, the other option other than the blocking third is to accept the continuation of the Al-Kazemi government, which is rejected by some parties to the framework.”[/size]
[size=45]And the coordinating framework claimed in the last Wednesday's session that the boycotters had reached about 135 seats, while neither side in the litigation specified the numbers of its supporters in particular.[/size]
[size=45]Ahmed al-Yasiri, a researcher in political affairs, considers that despite the political blockage, the "boycott" and the behavior of the coordination framework, came with "positives."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Yasiri tells (Al-Mada) that it is "the first time that Parliament separates two parties, supporters and opponents, and for the first time we clearly know the size of the largest bloc."[/size]
[size=45]The researcher added: "It is also the first time that the accusations were dropped against the Sunni and Kurdish forces allied with al-Sadr, which have always been accused of supporting ISIS and of separatism."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Yasiri indicated that "what appeared is the opposite, that these forces are more patriotic and allied quickly and got support from the street."[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]