Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Will Iraq cancel the security agreement with Washington?

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 269035
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Will Iraq cancel the security agreement with Washington? Empty Will Iraq cancel the security agreement with Washington?

    Post by Rocky Wed 04 Sep 2019, 3:15 am

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    Will Iraq cancel the security agreement with Washington?
    s / Baghdad
    The Iraqi Council of Representatives is seeking to amend or cancel the security agreement it signed with the US side in 2008, following the violation of Iraqi airspace and targeting the Popular Mobilization camps by drones that Israel held responsible.
    This comes amid a split within the political blocs in parliament between supporters and opponents of the survival of the Convention as a guarantor of the Kurds and some other components of Iraq, while adopting an alliance of "conquest" led by Hadi al-Amiri and "walking" under the auspices of Muqtada al-Sadr and other deputies from different blocs headed to cancel it.
    According to the Fatah alliance, most of the blocs within the parliament intend to amend or cancel the agreement with the United States, and hold it responsible for security breaches and targeting the headquarters of the crowd by drones as they control the Iraqi airspace.
    In this context, the head of the Center for Political Thinking Dr. Ihsan al-Shammari said that "Parliament has the powers to conclude agreements under the Constitution, but the abolition of the Convention is more political than a constitutional measure," considering that the political climate now is not conducive to move in this direction, despite the presence of voices Voices echoed with each escalation between Iran and America, and "these voices put the abolition of the Convention as part of its electoral program and its performance at the level of the legislature."
    Al-Shammari told Al-Jazeera Net that “if these votes succeed, it is more pressure paper than convinced to cancel the agreement, especially as Iraq recognizes at the level of the official decision that the cancellation of the agreement will put it in front of open scenarios, as well as the loss of the United States as a successful partner in the fight against terrorism, and related to logistical assistance. Supporting the political process and supporting the Iraqi economy. ”
    However, the escalation in this issue will continue, according to Shammari, amid political divisions within the parliament, especially since the geography of the positions likely not to be abolished because the Kurds see the United States as a guarantor and a successful partner for them both internally and externally, as well as the Sunni component is afraid of being swallowed by Iran. They see America as a guarantor of their rights, as well as Shiite blocs that recognize that the continuation of the agreement is part of Iraq's policy of balance and neutrality, and that there are still areas in which to support its position internally and even externally.
    In November 2008, Iraq and the United States signed the Strategic Defense Framework Agreement on Joint Defense, the third part of which affirmed "the deterrence of all threats against the sovereignty, security and territorial integrity of Iraq through the development of defense and security arrangements." His sovereignty over his land, water and airspace. ”
    According to a member of the House of Representatives for the conquest of the Alliance MP Abdul Amir al-Dabi for the island Net that "the draft has not been formally presented so far, and may be put during the coming days with the convening of legislative sessions, and will be subject to discussions and talks between the political blocs."
    According to political analyst Ibrahim al-Sarraj, the Iraqi Council of Representatives can cancel the agreement if the approval of half of the members of parliament, and this requires half plus one, considering that the failure to amend or cancel it will strengthen the foreign presence and increase US pressure on Baghdad, and this means the failure of Iraq to obtain a system Advanced anti-aircraft aircraft from Washington, and may have to conclude arms and defense agreements with Russia or Iran.
    It is noteworthy that the depots of weapons and bases belonging to the Popular Mobilization were recently targeted by aircraft believed to be Israeli in western and central Iraq. Israel has hinted it was involved in the attacks, but has not explicitly claimed responsibility.
    In fact, PMU factions accuse the United States of helping Israel attack its positions, and has threatened retaliation. The Pentagon denies involvement.


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sat 27 Apr 2024, 8:59 pm