Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Hans Blix: the evidence was missing to announce Iraq did not possess weapons of mass destruction

    Hkp1
    Hkp1
    Hkp1
    Interacting Investor
    Interacting Investor


    Posts : 3118
    Join date : 2012-12-19
    • Post n°1

    Hans Blix: the evidence was missing to announce Iraq did not possess weapons of mass destruction Empty Hans Blix: the evidence was missing to announce Iraq did not possess weapons of mass destruction

    Post by Hkp1 Mon 27 May 2013, 8:34 pm

    2013/05/28


    Hans Blix: the evidence was missing to announce Iraq did not possess weapons of mass destruction



    Translate term

    A
    decade ago became a force for the war on Iraq, in the hands of Hans
    Blix, when the inspection body of the United Nations, to search for
    weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

    Blix, who is charged with
    the weapons of Saddam Hussein, this Swedish guy who studied law, thought
    some might recognize the key to metaphysical heart of Anglo-us plan for
    war against Iraq, if Hans Blix stated that toxic gases to Saddam
    Hussein and deadly germs, there at all, he will remove political and
    legal action by one stroke of the pen.

    Today speaks of Hans Blix,
    diplomat and former Foreign Minister of Sweden, (Daily Telegraph) about
    his experience in Iraq, being the only diplomat who came out of the
    crisis, and has gained a good reputation.

    In 2002, allowed the
    inspectors headed by Hans Blix to return to Iraq, with the cooperation
    of the Government of Saddam, but George Bush and Tony Blair certainly
    inspection function in March 2003, following the start of the attack on
    Iraq.

    However, during those crucial months, Blix three charges to
    the Security Council, although only one of them was used for statement
    to the world that Iraq is free of weapons of mass destruction, Blair's
    argument for war, will be gone and away from Britain from invasion.

    In
    that case, the only America would go to war, which would erupt in any
    circumstances, but Hans Blix was the only man who has a chance to
    prevent a war, which he regarded as disaster day.

    * Do you have an opportunity to declare your opinion about Iraq did not possess weapons of mass destruction, and failed to do?
    -(Yes), then added without hesitation, (I'd lose my veracity).
    * But you are correct?

    I'll
    be honest – I was, Yes, but without a solid base for my own, although I
    have said that Americans who lack a strong foundation as they say, they
    say, but not looking for that place. Not looking for here or there, how
    you say it! There is the problem of inherited always prove the opposite
    of what they say.

    According to Blix's view it was not the person who turns to the issue of the war
    Political action, the idea of going to war, was for him personally, is off-topic, Blix says:

    -Saddam
    as ever, doesn't help in command belongs to the Iraqis, they opened all
    the doors to international inspectors and on all the sites requested by
    us, nor does he care to explain the disappearance of weapons of mass
    destruction.

    Blix acknowledged that in the days preceding the
    war, agreed with the view of both Blair and Bush on Saddam poison gas
    and germ warfare, otherwise why spent on tasks of United Nations
    inspectors in Iraq in the 1990s?

    (As for the chemical and
    biological weapons, Yes, I too, like the others, asked: for they denied
    the inspectors, there must be a reason, I had some doubts, but
    disappeared gradually with more inspections).

    In February 2003,
    having completed hundreds of inspectors inspections without finding
    something, doubt has to push Blix to say Blair, (now is a war on Iraq
    with 250, 000 troops, contrary to the result that says, (there are no
    weapons of mass destruction).

    Yet declaring Iraq free of weapons
    of mass destruction-although, privately, he began to doubt its
    existence, and that no absolute indication that Iraq is clean, when Iraq
    began cooperating with international inspectors after the UN resolution
    (1441), issued by the Security Council, in November 2002, forcing Iraq
    to cooperate unconditionally with the resolution.

    According to
    Blix, that Iraq was allowing the inspectors into all facilities they
    want, including the Presidential Palace, but the documentation that
    supports the destruction of large quantities of such weapons remain
    missing, and the scientists who oversaw inspections insisted not to
    conduct interviews.

    Ironically, Saddam agreed to a Security
    Council resolution, but the Security Council remains a Blix none
    declared. When Britain wanted to get the resolution gives a green light
    for the invasion, it did not get the majority vote which asked for
    further inspection.

    The United States and Britain violated the
    UN Charter, and this is what they have done, Bush did not care about
    this, but the Blair was on the contrary, because of the standpoint of
    Britain.

    Blix says (his report on Saddam's alleged that Britain
    and America were granted an opportunity to get UN approval to invade
    Iraq. for I've asked, but Blair and Bush had to pay greater political
    reputation.

    Blair has lost the opportunity, which can prevent a
    war on Iraq, but the opportunity she sneaked out of his fingers, and all
    because of the lack of ads amrnarfah, know it's true.

    From: the Daily Telegraph

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sun 28 Apr 2024, 9:16 am