Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Iraq and the China-Iran Agreement

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 268964
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Iraq and the China-Iran Agreement Empty Iraq and the China-Iran Agreement

    Post by Rocky Fri 02 Apr 2021, 8:32 am





    China recently concluded an important agreement with Iran that extends for 25 years and includes various sectors between them. This agreement is expected to lead to important geopolitical transformations in the region, and Iraq will not be isolated from the repercussions of this. The important point in this context lies in the absence of critical dialogues about the terms of that agreement, not to mention the lack of highlighting the Iranian opposition among some intellectuals about this agreement, as some marches went out - and in a limited way - in some Iranian cities to denounce this, saying that "Iran is not For sale, which is a part that is completely absent from the Iraqi public opinion, as nothing is known about its details due to the failure of the local media to address this matter, as no (real) strategic expert from the Iranian interior has met to talk about what their concerns are about this step. Note that such voices are not subject to treason and labor, as is the case in the Iraqi case . 
    Immediately after that, many voices rose in the Iraqi media that called for the need for Iraq to activate the agreement that it allegedly signed with China during the era of former Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi, and some even began promoting in the media that the Iranian-Chinese agreement is primarily inspired. From the vision put forward by Adel Abdul Mahdi at the time. Some of them have gone so far as to say that the Chinese government has asked Abdul Mahdi to become an advisor for its affairs in the Middle East. It is an opinion that many Iraqi circles received - and also fell into a trap of - and turned into a propaganda discourse in the media and social networking sites . 
    The strange thing is that the current Prime Minister, Mustafa Al-Kazemi, has directed the necessity to start implementing the terms of the agreement with China. It is as if he tried to identify it with what appeared in the media in terms of reactions, and thus he gave the impression that the decision-maker was hasty in formulating his strategic positions without taking into account how others viewed this step, at a time when many local media platforms are still attacking him. It classifies him as an ally and sometimes accuses him of being an agent of the United States of America, and stresses that his recent decision will not intercede for him in creating an important shift in the perception of these parties of his role in the Iraqi scene .
    So far, there is no logical answer in government and knowledge circles (sober) to the nature of the expected reactions of the US administration regarding what is happening, specifically regarding the Iraqi position in which some parties push towards joining the Chinese-Iranian agreement. Nevertheless, there is now an urgent need to monitor and monitor what is coming from important parties and personalities in the United States of America towards these major changes. Recently, many opinions and articles began to be published that warn the Badin administration of the danger of the Chinese dragon spreading across the Iranian geography to the region that the United States of America classifies as an important destiny area for its interests and influence .
    It is expected that such figures will consider the new weight that Iran has begun to characterize with the presence of an international sponsor standing behind it in the region. Consequently, such a matter will greatly affect the possibility of increasing the Iranian presence on the Iraqi scene, contrary to Washington's desires. As indicators of the possibility of an escalation of the Chinese-Iranian presence in the Iraqi economy will increase in an important stage of what some believe is the beginning of a major setback in the American strategy .
    It is also expected that China will exploit this economic penetration to contribute to the production of internal settlements in Iraq and perhaps also work to contribute to the production of Iraqi-Arab settlements that allow it to work to compete with the American diplomatic model that has suffered greatly in order to persuade the Arab region to accept Iraq after 2003. .
    This will also be interpreted as an attempt to produce an important axis extending from Beijing to Tehran - Damascus via the important land connection bridge represented by Baghdad. It is an influential strategic axis that will work greatly to tighten the screws on the allies of the United States of America, especially in the Arab Gulf region. Fears are rising dramatically about the possibility of China entering the depth of geopolitical interactions in the region, and its way (may) allow it to produce stable military bases that will prepare for it, for the first time in contemporary history, that there will be an official presence of its forces in one of the most important countries of this axis .
    There is now a widespread belief in American circles that there are certain Shiite parties in Baghdad that are working to push for identification with the subject of the Sino-Iranian agreement. What implicitly means, in one way or another, that this side seeks to produce an alliance with China at the expense of losing any possible relationship with the American side, and this in itself is a major shift in the nature of the Shiite-American relations, which are mainly suffering from a major deterioration . 
    In light of the great enthusiasm that now exists in the media to talk about this agreement and its potential impact on the Iraqi situation, there is a kind of neglect of other important issues that may allow this project to be severely sabotaged, including the size of the large local polarizations inside Iraq. As a large number of Sunnis and Kurds are still clearly and overtly inclined to continue the partnership with the American side in various fields. This will largely lead to a kind of clash in the Iraqi vision regarding the mechanisms of work to implement the idea of ​​indulging with the Chinese-Iranian draft agreement. These polarizations will greatly affect the future of the fragile geopolitical situation in this country . 
    Also there is another opinion is important within the Shiite geography in Iraq , criticizing some of the parties of government practices, describing their attempts broke up the partnership with the American party as a sin geopolitical can not for Iraq to bear its consequences easily, and that China will not be a real Msadda can take refuge in him as a result of game competition Zero  Zero Game  The wide range that will take place on Iraqi soil in the coming months. This important voice will produce more support for his opinion, which tends towards rationalization and also to re-activate the terms of the relationship with the American side in a way that serves the interests of Iraq, as it will be a better alternative to the process of joining this agreement . 
    Anyone who followed Biden’s speech during his inauguration as President of the United States of America is well aware that his speech was clearly and explicitly referring to China and Russia as the most important opponents of the United States of America at this stage, and that any (not agreed upon) penetration by them into the important arenas of the American administration will be considered tantamount to A dangerous shift in the structure of the international system, which the US administration seeks to be present in drawing its features without dictations or conditions by others. All this proves that Iraq must be wise and cautious in producing decisions with a geopolitical dimension and thinking carefully about the lessons of history before committing a sin whose consequences are difficult to address in the long run .
    In an important article written by the American diplomat and expert on Iraq and the region, Robert Ford, on the relationship between the United States of America and China and the nature of the gains the latter achieved on various fronts and arenas, including the diplomatic front, he affirms that the international power triangle represented by Moscow - Beijing - Washington does not represent parties Angelic in any form, and each party has different advantages and disadvantages. As Iraqis, we have to mention here that there is a great illusion that some are trying now to market to the public opinion portraying China as the savior of the Iraqi situation. As some parties try to forget that China has not made any real step in order to pressure Saddam Hussein's regime to amend its internal policies, especially towards the Shiites, and that if China were to choose to choose, it would not hesitate to keep the Baath regime in control as long as this system gave it space. Great in the field of oil investments .
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sat 27 Apr 2024, 3:40 am