Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


Coordination framework lawyer reveals "surprise and dangerous evidence" in the next session of the F

rocky
rocky
NNP TEAM
NNP TEAM


Posts : 217425
Join date : 2012-12-21

session - Coordination framework lawyer reveals "surprise and dangerous evidence" in the next session of the F Empty Coordination framework lawyer reveals "surprise and dangerous evidence" in the next session of the F

Post by rocky Tue 21 Dec 2021, 6:23 am

Coordination framework lawyer reveals "surprise and dangerous evidence" in the next session of the Federal Court

  •  Time: 12/20/2021 23:30:51
     
  •  Reading: 4,862 times

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
  
{Politics: Al-Furat News} The lawyer for the coordination framework regarding appeals to the election results, Muhammad Al-Saadi, revealed a "surprise and dangerous evidence" in the next session of the Federal Court to be held on the 22nd of this month.
The useful summary.. In important news, you can find it on Al-Furat News Channel on Telegram.. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Al-Saadi said; For the “State Dialogue” program, broadcast by Al-Furat satellite channel, tonight: “We presented evidence except for the report of the examining company that is not known to everyone and that it is new defenses to the Federal Court of documents and documents. at the next session."
He added, "We did not ask to postpone the case, and we submitted a list, and the two parties (the coordination framework and the Electoral Commission) were allowed to respond to the questions. We presented evidence that was not presented, and during the session there was a dialogue with the court."
Al-Saadi explained, "It is within the jurisdiction of the Federal Court to cancel the results and it is able, and it is the only competent authority according to the constitutional texts 93 / III, which states that the court decides on laws, instructions, controls and procedures issued by the federal authority (the Electoral Commission)."
He continued, "We based it on the constitutional text, and there is no alternative court to decide on appeals, and canceling the results leads to the cancellation of the elections, and we have a report from the committee formed by the Commission and supposed to be presented to the House of Representatives, which indicated that there is a danger of using the [CI] device." The 
court's decision will resolve the controversy and it must be A judicial decision is issued deciding that the institution bears the legal consequences arising from it, and the subject of the decisions is a word intended as far as the appeal relates to its appeal, and it is the jurisdiction of the Federal Court to consider the separation of judicial bodies.
Al-Saadi went on to say, "The disclosing company requested the update 6 weeks before the elections, and it turned out that the device entered the electronic and manual data, opened the code and merged it, then sent it, and this revealed a very big flaw that proved a fraud." 
And he stated, "The examining company confirmed the danger of its use and the possibility of cyber penetration, and we have very strong evidence that proves the existence of a hidden electronic fraud, so we called for software experts to investigate and investigate these mechanisms."
Al-Saadi pointed out that "the Federal Court can postpone the decision or ratify the results, and no one can discuss its decision and it is not within its competence to form a committee to resolve the dispute, but it has the right to request experts to consider the appeals submitted." 
The Coordinating Framework's lawyer concluded, "The court will rely on the report completely if it covers all aspects, and it rejected four cases two days ago from some deputies regarding the women's quota, even without pleading because it considered them to be formally unqualified."

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    Current date/time is Sun 22 May 2022, 8:55 am