Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Iraq's ambassador in Washington, accuses the Obama administration of failing to support Iraq

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 269566
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Iraq's ambassador in Washington, accuses the Obama administration of failing to support Iraq Empty Iraq's ambassador in Washington, accuses the Obama administration of failing to support Iraq

    Post by Rocky Sun 12 Jan 2014, 3:44 am

    Iraq's ambassador in Washington, accuses the Obama administration of failing to support Iraq





    11-01-2014 01:05 PM



    Free -

    Accused the Iraqi ambassador in Washington, Luqman Philly, the administration of President Barack Obama that they were not 'impulsive' in its strategy to support Iraq and the 'curb' the threat of Al Qaeda as much as it was the previous one headed by George W. Bush, but the White House reiterated its commitment to partnership with the Iraqi government to build its possibilities in the fight against 'terrorism', stressing that the solution to this problem 'must' to be an Iraqi.
    said Philly during a meeting conducted by the Ambassador with The Washington Times, The Washington Times American, seen by (range Press) that 'the administration should have been understood adverse effects of any delay in providing support and assistance to Iraq ', pointing to the lack of' possibility to imagine that transformed the province of the whole into a safe haven for the base, because this in itself is against the strategic interests of the United States, and this act against U.S. national security. '
    In response to a question about If can the White House, to provide 'the most to build a relationship more solid' with Iraq, Ambassador Philly, that 'Americans can to some extent provide the most to build a more solid with Iraq', indicating 'but we are no longer at the time when the administration was Bush holds the building this relationship. "
    and urged the Iraqi ambassador, American leaders, the Republican and Democratic parties, the 'not to exploit the current Iraqi situation to be material to outbidding local politics of the United States' denying' reports that indicate the likelihood of Iraq at risk of a new civil war between Shiites and Sunnis. "
    He Philly it 'is tragic to turn the issue of the American project in Iraq to the ball represent the relations between the two political parties in Washington', returned to it 'will not benefit the United States, and does not constitute certainly no benefit for Iraq to become a tool to scramble Democrats against Republicans, because that is not a good thing for American security, and does not involve any interest of Iraq or the region. "
    For its part, received a spokeswoman for the National Security Council the U.S. Bernadette Meehan on the words of the Iraqi ambassador in Ashtun through, a letter sent to The Washington Times , confirmed that where there are 'connections and continue at a high level between officials in the United States and Iraq', stating that 'the United States is through the Washington Foreign Military Sales to provide attribution of a heavy military for Iraq' afterthought 'but that would require the Iraqi government to take the initiative in the face of terrorists. "
    added Meehan that 'Washington was committed to its partnership with the Iraqi government to build its capabilities in the fight against terrorism', stressing that 'the solution to that problem is bound to be an Iraqi and Icodoh themselves'.
    reported The Washington Times, that 'increase the influence of al-Qaeda in Anbar may pour oil on the fire burning between the two rivals in Washington as to whether should return the U.S. military presence in Iraq ', indicating that' a number of Republicans have expressed criticism of accelerate the Obama administration to withdraw troops from Iraq two years ago, but not achieved enough in the training of the Iraqi army to be able to maintain security. '
    The paper, to Philly, was' trying hard to avoid direct criticism, but said the Obama administration were not impulsive in its strategy to support Iraq as much as it was the Bush administration, which made     ​​the United States in position Ignored for the interests of strategic major in the country, especially with regard to Iraq's ability to maintain oil prices in the international market. '
    quoted the Washington Times, for Philly, saying also, that 'the Obama administration withdrew the army at a time when Iraq did not possess the air force, and it is directed the blame for Iraq on transit of weapons to Syria through Iraqi airspace at the time had no air force forced the plane to land ', pointing out that' Baghdad demanding Washington currently providing them with aircraft F-16, but she says why do you want this aircraft '.


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Mon 06 May 2024, 9:25 pm