Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Two deputies from the Change Bloc: Parliament's vote on amending the Federal Court is a "big mistake

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 268962
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Two deputies from the Change Bloc: Parliament's vote on amending the Federal Court is a "big mistake Empty Two deputies from the Change Bloc: Parliament's vote on amending the Federal Court is a "big mistake

    Post by Rocky Mon 22 Mar 2021, 6:53 am

    [size=35][size=35]Two deputies from the Change Bloc: Parliament's vote on amending the Federal Court is a "big mistake."[/size]
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    Policy

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    2021-03-22 | 03:47
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]



    [/size]


    1,925 Views


    Deputy Chairman of the Constitutional Amendments Committee in Parliament Yusef Muhammad and a member of the Legal Committee, Dr. Bahar Mahmoud, revealed today, Monday, that the vote on the amendment of the Federal Court Law was a "big mistake," while they warned against a repetition of the scenario of choosing judges for the Electoral Commission in the court, considering the arrest of activists due to An opinion on social media is a "dangerous precedent" occurring in the country.


    The two deputies said in a joint statement received by Alsumaria News, "The vote to amend Law No. 30 of 2005 for the Supreme Federal Court by a simple majority was a great mistake and a clear violation of the constitution, specifically Clause Two of Article 92 of it, which stipulates that voting on the Supreme Federal Court Law must be done." It is by a two-thirds majority of the members of the House of Representatives, and from the operative part of this article we understand that any legislation pertaining to the Supreme Federal Court must be by a two-thirds majority of its members, and this is what the Federal Supreme Court went to in its statement of opinion of No. 107 of 2012 upon the previous inquiry of the Parliamentary Legal Committee. And its Resolution No. (38) of 2019.







    And they added, "The Change bloc demanded more than once that the vote be by a two-thirds majority, but its opinion was not taken, and this made it refuse to participate in the voting session, expressing their wish to correct this grave mistake because" what is built on falsehood is invalid.

    "And they added," This error will cause. " With the occurrence of many problems in the future, especially upon approval of the results of the upcoming elections, which will be under suspicion and disagreement by the political blocs.
    The two deputies of the Change Parliamentary Bloc considered that the amendment to the Federal Court law voted by Parliament last week is "the lesser evil" compared to the more problematic legislation of a new court law.

    At the same time, they cautioned against the repetition of the scenario of selecting judges who are members of the Board of Commissioners of the Elections Commission, which was marred by a lot of flaws, problems and ambiguities in the process of selecting members of the Federal Court. Rather, the door for candidacy should be opened to those who wish to do so and possess the legal conditions, and to choose those who meet the specifications of competence, integrity and experience. And the scientific level, taking into account the representation of components being a constitutional issue and avoiding quotas.

    The two deputies considered the arrest of the academic and journalist Ibrahim al-Sumaida’i against the background of a conversation he had on one of the electronic communication sites regarding the legislation of the Federal Supreme Court law, as it is rumored, that it constitutes a "dangerous precedent", calling for his release, respect for freedom of opinion and expression, and no restrictions on freedom of opinion and other opinion, or excessive The implementation of some articles of the penal code subject to controversy.
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Fri 26 Apr 2024, 2:16 pm