Comey Delivers Scathing Rebuke of Hillary But Says No Indictment

To indict someone, the criteria is supposed to be “intent” and Comey has used that to pretend there is no evidence that Hillary “intentionally” erased anything and says that her lawyers erased emails using a key word search program and they did not “read” the emails. He added that he would not recommend charges against Hillary or her aides. He added:
“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”
It was Comey who indicted Frank Quattrone for claiming he instructed his people to erase emails in his technology-industry banking group at Credit Suisse Group’s Credit Suisse First Boston based upon a single email that read “clean up those files” in December 2000. It was Comey who indicted Quattrone for a single email saying to erase emails. That was more than enough for his “intent” requirement to obstruct justice. This further illustrates the double standard of justice for them v us.
Comey has said that he could not find anyone else who had been prosecuted for such a thing, but then added after clearing her that this is not to say everyone in the government can do this or that they would not prosecute someone else for the same thing. Comey said in “[o]ur judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”
Comey presented a scathing rebuke of Hillary’s conduct that anyone else would have certainly been indicted. But it was clear for Obama to have announced in advance he would campaign for Hillary there is no question this is a cover-up and he knew the results before today. For Comey to say: “Although we did not find clear evidence” of any intentional misconduct, he added “there is evidence that they were extremely careless of very sensitive, highly classified information.” It is the jury’s role to determine if there is any evidence and the case should have been presented for a Grand Jury to decide if she should have been indicted. That of course is off limits as well.
Comey went on to al but acknowledge that Russia hacked Hillary’s emails:
“With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.”
For Comey to claim neither the Department of Justice nor the White House knew what he was going to announce seriously undermines this trustworthiness in this matter. Of course Obama knew or he would not have schedule to campaign for Hillary since if indicted she would have to be on bail to stay out of jail to even campaign. This is by no means credible. But nobody would have expected Hillary to be indicted when the Democrats control the Executive branch. Had Hillary been indicted, she could not have run for office for even that statute says such a person would be disqualified for such an office. The entire election would have been a fiasco and the Democratic Party would have collapsed. This is what Bernie was holding out for and why he had his talk with Obama who informed him forget it – there would be no indictment for Hillary. Comey said:
“From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.”
 Then, Comey contradicted Lynch in making it clear that the final decision was her’s: “As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.”

 James Comey was the chief prosecutor in the Southern District of New York between 2003 and 2005. He had no problem keeping me in Federal Prison on contempt of court without any charges, indictment, or a civil complaint describing any crime whatsoever that they even admitted openly in court. There was never any charges, complaint ever filed and they publicly stated “there is no as description of criminal liability.” Yet, Comey allowed someone to be held in prison with absolutely nothing whatsoever entirely arbitrarily and completely violating my civil rights, those of my family, and all 240 employees. So he is not someone who upholds the Constitution when it goes against government or the banks. As they say, the Department of Justice is really “Just Us” in reality. He has proven that once again.

Comey also allowed a LIFE-TIME GAG ORDER on me to prevent me from providing any assistance to my clients in Japan to sue the bankers. Now the State Department has asked for a two-year stay in turning over any of Hillary’s emails. Why if there is nothing criminal? This only proves that this is a cover-up as always, because the Democratic Party cannot allow Hillary to go down for they would lose everything. Sorry, but Comey has a track record of defending the banks even when they stole $1 billion and plead criminally guilty having to pay them back. He kept me in prison on contempt to turnover assets for a “possible” restitution but when I got into the Supreme Court, I was released and no such charges were ever filed nor did I ever have any restitution. They then tried to prevent the Forecaster Movie from being shown in the USA.
So much for any honesty from the Department of Justice. It is the Department of “Just Us” as they say.