What happens to FBI's Hillary probe after Obama nod?
Legal minds divided on whether independent counsel should take over investigation
Published: 19 hours ago
130903obamafinger
WASHINGTON – Conservative legal experts are sharply divided over whether it is time to demand an independent counsel to investigate Hillary Clinton’s email scandal, now that President Obama has officially endorsed her for president.
Many question whether the endorsement creates a huge conflict of interest for the administration because those investigating her, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey, both report to the president.
In an email to supporters on Thursday, Obama declared, “I can’t wait to get out there and campaign for her.” At the same time, White House press secretary Josh Earnest insisted that the president’s endorsement will not “sway” the FBI, which, the spokesman acknowledged, was conducting a “criminal” investigation.
That’s left Washington abuzz with talk of whether an independent counsel is needed to take over the federal investigation into Clinton’s emails, to prevent any possibility of Obama swaying the investigation.
Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano insists the answer is “yes.”
The ‘Stop Hillary’ campaign is on fire! Join the surging response to this theme: ‘Clinton for prosecution, not president’
But one of the nation’s top legal minds, former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, just as emphatically tells WND, “no.”
McCarthy made the case that an independent counsel would be both impractical and unconstitutional, and cited no less a legal authority than the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, for reasons outlined below.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/06/mccarthy-150x150.jpg
Andrew McCarthy
Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy
Napolitano’s case was outlined as the top story on “The Kelly File” Thursday evening, as legal experts asked how the administration could both support Clinton’s campaign and investigate her possible criminality at the same time.
Fox reported that a source approached the judge with concerns expressed by prosecutors and FBI agents on the case about a conflict an endorsement would create, and that Napolitano’s information came from “career FBI agents who work in the bureau’s most sophisticated divisions.”
Those concerns were based on the fact that the president is officially head of both the Justice Department and the FBI.
“If the decision is made based on the value of the evidence, as the president says it will be, she will be indicted,” flatly declared Napolitano. “But the FBI agents involved are finding it hard to believe that there will be no political interference when and if the president endorses her as his choice to replace him.”
In other words, some fear that even if the FBI recommends charges against Clinton, the Justice Department would still not indict her because of political pressure, especially if it came from the president. Some have speculated such a scenario might cause mass resignations at the FBI, putting pressure on the administration to charge Clinton, or maybe even force her to drop out of the presidential race if public opinion were to turn against a candidate under such a serious legal cloud.
But all of that uncertainty is why the Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst strongly argued for taking the investigation away from the administration.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/12/judge_napolitano-150x150.jpg
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Judge Andrew Napolitano
“An independent counsel would alleviate conflict because an independent counsel is not answerable to the director of the FBI, is not answerable to the attorney general and is not answerable to the White House,” said Napolitano. “An independent counsel would have his or her own budget, discretion as to what charges to bring, (choice of) FBI agents to work for him or her, and is not really answerable to anyone.”
He even suggested the president could be called as a witness in the case, if some of his own emails had been sent to Clinton’s private server, creating an even greater conflict.
Napolitano has said that he was “100 percent certain” the FBI had overwhelming evidence to indict and convict Clinton, and that the bureau was in the final stages of its investigation. However, that was back in April, and the FBI still has yet to interview Clinton. Current speculation among Washington insiders is that she will be interviewed in July.
McCarthy, who frequently appears as a guest legal analyst on the Kelly File, told WND he disagreed with Napolitano’s solution for a very simple but monumental reason: He contended the appointment of an independent prosecutor would be unconstitutional.
To back up his assertion, McCarthy cited the writings of Scalia, who argued that an independent counsel would be as impractical and ineffective as it would be unconstitutional.
“Scalia’s dissent was always right, proved prescient, and is now generally thought to be the definitive statement of the law. In our system, you cannot have an ‘independent counsel’ in the sense of independent from the executive branch because it is unconstitutional,” McCarthy told WND.
And this is why it would be impractical: “Prosecution is an executive power. All executive power in the federal system is expressly vested by the Constitution in the president. Consequently, you cannot have an official who exercises executive power ‘independent’ of the president. Any ‘independent’ or ‘special’ counsel would ultimately report to the president (and probably to the Attorney General).”
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/06/hillary_clinton_glare-150x150.jpg
Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
But even that, he insists, is not the real issue. “The problem is not the unconstitutionality of independent counsels,” said the former federal prosecutor. “It is that we get the government the public wants, and if the public is indifferent to ethics and morals, it will tend to be unethical and immoral.”
McCarthy suggested Americans are stuck with the process we’ve got, and the issue really isn’t whether Obama will meddle in the investigation, because it’s basically too late for that. If the public had a problem with a potential conflict of interest, it should have pushed for the remedy the Founders provided: impeachment.
That is why, McCarthy said, he wrote the book “Faithless Execution: Building the Political Case for Obama’s Impeachment.”
“Our system has a way for Congress and the public to deal with these problems: impeachment and the ballot box. Under Article I, Section 3, the punishment for impeachment includes ‘disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States’ – so it theoretically applies even to former government officials for purposes of disqualifying them,” McCarthy told WND in an email outlining his case against appointing an independent counsel, or special prosecutor.
“However, as I’ve said any number of times (and as the book centrally argues), impeachment is a political remedy, not a legal one.” McCarthy maintains that is a critical distinction, because, basically, an administration cannot effectively investigate itself. That is the job of Congress, and, by extension, the public.
“If the public does not want an official removed/disqualified, there will not be political support for impeachment no matter how many high crimes and misdemeanors have been committed and how serious they are.”
He pointed out a further impracticality: “In Mrs. Clinton’s case, there is no political support for her impeachment, and there was not when she was in office. It was never even seriously discussed. And I imagine at least 46 percent of the country (and maybe more than 50 percent) is poised to vote for her for president.”
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/02/Justice-Scalia-TW2-150x150.jpg
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, 1936-2016 (Photo: Twitter)
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, 1936-2016 (Photo: Twitter)
As for the president’s possible lack of impartiality, McCarthy mentioned he had already “noted that Obama has made public comments that minimize the violations involved in Hillary’s email caper. Anything more he says or does that is expressly or implicitly dismissive just adds to this already existing problem but is not anything new.”
And, as for what Judge Napolitano was hearing from his sources, McCarthy said he didn’t know whether Obama’s emails were among the top classified communications.
But, the former prosecutor then alluded to a potentially much more explosive issue.
McCarthy implied the reason Clinton hasn’t been charged yet may be because the president might be guilty, too.
That was because, as he’d previously noted, “Obama knowingly communicated with Clinton over a non-government, non-secure e-mail system.”
In his email to WND, McCarthy referred to an article he had written back in February in which he had observed, “Eighteen e-mails between Mrs. Clinton and President Obama have been identified, and the government is refusing to disclose them” and that they likely were “not about her recommendations for the best country clubs in Martha’s Vineyard, but about matters that the White House judges too sensitive to reveal.”
“[D]o you think those exchanges just might touch on foreign-government information, foreign relations, or foreign activities of the United States – deliberations on which are presumed classified?” he asked rhetorically, in the article.
He added the clincher, that the administration was fighting the release of those emails because they “might expose that Obama engaged in recklessness similar to Clinton’s, albeit on a far smaller scale.”
But, despite the gravity of that possibility, and the difficulty inherent in having a Justice Department investigate its own president, McCarthy contended that an independent counsel was still not a viable solution.
The bottom line, as McCarthy spelled it out, is “An ‘independent counsel’ – as in independent of the executive branch – is unconstitutional. I know my friend Judge Napolitano is an admirer of Justice Scalia. I’d suggest that he go back and read Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. Olson.”
The former prosecutor provided a link to that opinion.
McCarthy is a New York Times best-selling author, Fox News analyst, contributing editor at National Review and a former adviser to the deputy secretary of defense. As chief assistant U.S. attorney in New York, he successfully prosecuted the perpetrators of the first World Trade Center bombing.
http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/what-happens-to-hillary-investigation-after-obama-endorsement/
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/what-happens-to-hillary-investigation-after-obama-endorsement/#vtWE6yafjAhRmWTM.99
Legal minds divided on whether independent counsel should take over investigation
Published: 19 hours ago
130903obamafinger
WASHINGTON – Conservative legal experts are sharply divided over whether it is time to demand an independent counsel to investigate Hillary Clinton’s email scandal, now that President Obama has officially endorsed her for president.
Many question whether the endorsement creates a huge conflict of interest for the administration because those investigating her, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey, both report to the president.
In an email to supporters on Thursday, Obama declared, “I can’t wait to get out there and campaign for her.” At the same time, White House press secretary Josh Earnest insisted that the president’s endorsement will not “sway” the FBI, which, the spokesman acknowledged, was conducting a “criminal” investigation.
That’s left Washington abuzz with talk of whether an independent counsel is needed to take over the federal investigation into Clinton’s emails, to prevent any possibility of Obama swaying the investigation.
Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano insists the answer is “yes.”
The ‘Stop Hillary’ campaign is on fire! Join the surging response to this theme: ‘Clinton for prosecution, not president’
But one of the nation’s top legal minds, former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, just as emphatically tells WND, “no.”
McCarthy made the case that an independent counsel would be both impractical and unconstitutional, and cited no less a legal authority than the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, for reasons outlined below.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/06/mccarthy-150x150.jpg
Andrew McCarthy
Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy
Napolitano’s case was outlined as the top story on “The Kelly File” Thursday evening, as legal experts asked how the administration could both support Clinton’s campaign and investigate her possible criminality at the same time.
Fox reported that a source approached the judge with concerns expressed by prosecutors and FBI agents on the case about a conflict an endorsement would create, and that Napolitano’s information came from “career FBI agents who work in the bureau’s most sophisticated divisions.”
Those concerns were based on the fact that the president is officially head of both the Justice Department and the FBI.
“If the decision is made based on the value of the evidence, as the president says it will be, she will be indicted,” flatly declared Napolitano. “But the FBI agents involved are finding it hard to believe that there will be no political interference when and if the president endorses her as his choice to replace him.”
In other words, some fear that even if the FBI recommends charges against Clinton, the Justice Department would still not indict her because of political pressure, especially if it came from the president. Some have speculated such a scenario might cause mass resignations at the FBI, putting pressure on the administration to charge Clinton, or maybe even force her to drop out of the presidential race if public opinion were to turn against a candidate under such a serious legal cloud.
But all of that uncertainty is why the Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst strongly argued for taking the investigation away from the administration.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/12/judge_napolitano-150x150.jpg
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Judge Andrew Napolitano
“An independent counsel would alleviate conflict because an independent counsel is not answerable to the director of the FBI, is not answerable to the attorney general and is not answerable to the White House,” said Napolitano. “An independent counsel would have his or her own budget, discretion as to what charges to bring, (choice of) FBI agents to work for him or her, and is not really answerable to anyone.”
He even suggested the president could be called as a witness in the case, if some of his own emails had been sent to Clinton’s private server, creating an even greater conflict.
Napolitano has said that he was “100 percent certain” the FBI had overwhelming evidence to indict and convict Clinton, and that the bureau was in the final stages of its investigation. However, that was back in April, and the FBI still has yet to interview Clinton. Current speculation among Washington insiders is that she will be interviewed in July.
McCarthy, who frequently appears as a guest legal analyst on the Kelly File, told WND he disagreed with Napolitano’s solution for a very simple but monumental reason: He contended the appointment of an independent prosecutor would be unconstitutional.
To back up his assertion, McCarthy cited the writings of Scalia, who argued that an independent counsel would be as impractical and ineffective as it would be unconstitutional.
“Scalia’s dissent was always right, proved prescient, and is now generally thought to be the definitive statement of the law. In our system, you cannot have an ‘independent counsel’ in the sense of independent from the executive branch because it is unconstitutional,” McCarthy told WND.
And this is why it would be impractical: “Prosecution is an executive power. All executive power in the federal system is expressly vested by the Constitution in the president. Consequently, you cannot have an official who exercises executive power ‘independent’ of the president. Any ‘independent’ or ‘special’ counsel would ultimately report to the president (and probably to the Attorney General).”
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/06/hillary_clinton_glare-150x150.jpg
Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
But even that, he insists, is not the real issue. “The problem is not the unconstitutionality of independent counsels,” said the former federal prosecutor. “It is that we get the government the public wants, and if the public is indifferent to ethics and morals, it will tend to be unethical and immoral.”
McCarthy suggested Americans are stuck with the process we’ve got, and the issue really isn’t whether Obama will meddle in the investigation, because it’s basically too late for that. If the public had a problem with a potential conflict of interest, it should have pushed for the remedy the Founders provided: impeachment.
That is why, McCarthy said, he wrote the book “Faithless Execution: Building the Political Case for Obama’s Impeachment.”
“Our system has a way for Congress and the public to deal with these problems: impeachment and the ballot box. Under Article I, Section 3, the punishment for impeachment includes ‘disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States’ – so it theoretically applies even to former government officials for purposes of disqualifying them,” McCarthy told WND in an email outlining his case against appointing an independent counsel, or special prosecutor.
“However, as I’ve said any number of times (and as the book centrally argues), impeachment is a political remedy, not a legal one.” McCarthy maintains that is a critical distinction, because, basically, an administration cannot effectively investigate itself. That is the job of Congress, and, by extension, the public.
“If the public does not want an official removed/disqualified, there will not be political support for impeachment no matter how many high crimes and misdemeanors have been committed and how serious they are.”
He pointed out a further impracticality: “In Mrs. Clinton’s case, there is no political support for her impeachment, and there was not when she was in office. It was never even seriously discussed. And I imagine at least 46 percent of the country (and maybe more than 50 percent) is poised to vote for her for president.”
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/02/Justice-Scalia-TW2-150x150.jpg
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, 1936-2016 (Photo: Twitter)
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, 1936-2016 (Photo: Twitter)
As for the president’s possible lack of impartiality, McCarthy mentioned he had already “noted that Obama has made public comments that minimize the violations involved in Hillary’s email caper. Anything more he says or does that is expressly or implicitly dismissive just adds to this already existing problem but is not anything new.”
And, as for what Judge Napolitano was hearing from his sources, McCarthy said he didn’t know whether Obama’s emails were among the top classified communications.
But, the former prosecutor then alluded to a potentially much more explosive issue.
McCarthy implied the reason Clinton hasn’t been charged yet may be because the president might be guilty, too.
That was because, as he’d previously noted, “Obama knowingly communicated with Clinton over a non-government, non-secure e-mail system.”
In his email to WND, McCarthy referred to an article he had written back in February in which he had observed, “Eighteen e-mails between Mrs. Clinton and President Obama have been identified, and the government is refusing to disclose them” and that they likely were “not about her recommendations for the best country clubs in Martha’s Vineyard, but about matters that the White House judges too sensitive to reveal.”
“[D]o you think those exchanges just might touch on foreign-government information, foreign relations, or foreign activities of the United States – deliberations on which are presumed classified?” he asked rhetorically, in the article.
He added the clincher, that the administration was fighting the release of those emails because they “might expose that Obama engaged in recklessness similar to Clinton’s, albeit on a far smaller scale.”
But, despite the gravity of that possibility, and the difficulty inherent in having a Justice Department investigate its own president, McCarthy contended that an independent counsel was still not a viable solution.
The bottom line, as McCarthy spelled it out, is “An ‘independent counsel’ – as in independent of the executive branch – is unconstitutional. I know my friend Judge Napolitano is an admirer of Justice Scalia. I’d suggest that he go back and read Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. Olson.”
The former prosecutor provided a link to that opinion.
McCarthy is a New York Times best-selling author, Fox News analyst, contributing editor at National Review and a former adviser to the deputy secretary of defense. As chief assistant U.S. attorney in New York, he successfully prosecuted the perpetrators of the first World Trade Center bombing.
http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/what-happens-to-hillary-investigation-after-obama-endorsement/
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/what-happens-to-hillary-investigation-after-obama-endorsement/#vtWE6yafjAhRmWTM.99
Today at 7:30 am by Rocky
» utube 5/4/24 MM&C Iraq Dinar- IQD Update - No Float of Exchange Rate - Budget -2024 - Schedules -
Today at 7:29 am by Rocky
» “Services” asks the Central Bank about billions of foreign banks in Iraq
Today at 7:27 am by Rocky
» Central Bank: Iraqi banks still face challenges in complying with international laws and standards
Today at 7:24 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary bloc: The Central Bank offers hard currency to “mafias” on a golden platter.. The Suda
Today at 7:20 am by Rocky
» The Iraqi Central Auction witnesses a rise in foreign remittances to $267 million
Today at 7:19 am by Rocky
» Wednesday.. The session to elect the President of the Iraqi Parliament is heading towards “Al-Issawi
Today at 7:14 am by Rocky
» The Union of Arab Banks proposes 4 “important” points for Iraqi banks to meet compliance standards
Today at 7:12 am by Rocky
» In the document... the Central Bank decides to return the “Al-Mal” Bank to work... in this case
Today at 7:08 am by Rocky
» The Iraqi-American agreements and cooperation were the most prominent topics of Al-Araji and Romanow
Today at 7:06 am by Rocky
» Al-Hakim meets a joint delegation of resolve and sovereignty and renews the call to hold a session t
Today at 7:05 am by Rocky
» Nearly one billion dinars were recovered and 3 million liters of fuel intended for smuggling in Iraq
Today at 7:03 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani and the European Union ambassador discuss issues of economic partnerships, civil aviation,
Today at 6:59 am by Rocky
» More than 950 million dinars... petroleum products announced their recovery
Today at 6:57 am by Rocky
» Forming a committee to follow up on stopping the sale of the dollar to travelers
Today at 6:54 am by Rocky
» The Minister of Justice visits Al-Muthanna Governorate to discuss mechanisms for developing judicial
Today at 6:52 am by Rocky
» Agriculture: Farmers who were affected by the recent rains will be compensated
Today at 6:51 am by Rocky
» Al-Rasheed issues a warning regarding applying for advances and loans
Today at 6:49 am by Rocky
» Al-Rafidain announces the implementation of the comprehensive banking system in its main branch
Today at 5:24 am by Rocky
» Al-Rasheed warns of offices and pages claiming to promote the Salaf
Today at 5:22 am by Rocky
» Adviser to the Prime Minister: There are no conflicts in the route of the Baghdad Metro
Today at 5:19 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani: We are keen to develop the work of the TBI Bank and address the problems it faces
Today at 5:18 am by Rocky
» Agriculture explains the mechanism of implementing the calendar program and its economic gains
Today at 5:17 am by Rocky
» “The shocks have changed.” The Governor of the Central Bank explains the impact of the openness of I
Today at 5:16 am by Rocky
» The President of the Association of Private Banks sends an “important” invitation to the Central Ban
Today at 5:15 am by Rocky
» Al-Alaq: The Iraqi banking sector has witnessed significant qualitative developments in response to
Today at 5:12 am by Rocky
» On behalf of Al-Sudani, the Minister of Planning sponsors the signing ceremony of a memorandum of un
Today at 5:11 am by Rocky
» The Iraqi Travel Companies Association participates in the Arab Travel Market Exhibition
Today at 5:10 am by Rocky
» The start of the work of the Iraqi-Jordanian Economic Forum
Today at 5:07 am by Rocky
» Integrity Commission at the Arab Anti-Corruption Convention Conference
Today at 5:06 am by Rocky
» Election of the Speaker of Parliament between amendment and disruption
Today at 5:05 am by Rocky
» Plans to increase the real estate bank's capital
Today at 5:03 am by Rocky
» The Central Bank sells more than $276 million in the currency auction
Today at 5:02 am by Rocky
» Advisor to the Prime Minister: We are heading towards a complete transformation of the electronic pa
Today at 5:01 am by Rocky
» Savings and financial inclusion
Today at 5:00 am by Rocky
» Agriculture expects to market 6 million tons of wheat
Today at 4:58 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani chairs the first meeting of the Supreme Committee for Restructuring the Government Apparat
Today at 4:57 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani receives an official invitation to participate in the United Nations Climate Change Confer
Today at 4:55 am by Rocky
» "Baghdad Today" in the southern refineries: The Azmara unit will reduce imported gasoline and hard c
Today at 4:54 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani stresses the importance of supporting the pillars of food security
Today at 4:51 am by Rocky
» Kurdistan is an important oasis for investment. Security and economic stability eliminates the housi
Today at 4:50 am by Rocky
» Politician: Comparing Al-Halbousi to Al-Maliki is not up for discussion
Today at 4:46 am by Rocky
» The Kurdistan Democratic Party demands international supervision of the region's elections
Today at 4:45 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani heads to Italy next week on an official visit
Today at 4:44 am by Rocky
» Warnings of challenges delaying budget approval, most notably the deficit
Today at 4:43 am by Rocky
» The Ministry of Oil sets the launch date for the fifth and sixth licensing rounds
Today at 4:41 am by Rocky
» Rafidain Bank announces the implementation of the comprehensive banking system in its main branch
Today at 4:40 am by Rocky
» Central Bank Governor: The banking sector is witnessing major qualitative developments
Today at 4:39 am by Rocky
» Economic: Neighboring countries do not import from Iraq for fear of fraud
Yesterday at 10:43 am by Rocky
» The Central Bank of Iraq sells more than $276 million in currency auction
Yesterday at 9:16 am by Rocky
» Agreement on the presidency of Parliament: Did Al-Halbousi win?
Yesterday at 7:09 am by Rocky
» Because of his corruption... Al-Karawi calls for Al-Halbousi to be held accountable
Yesterday at 7:08 am by Rocky
» Al-Shammari: The American presence in Iraq has no legal cover
Yesterday at 7:06 am by Rocky
» A story titled: Al-Fartusi, the Iraqi ports, and the 160 Committee
Yesterday at 7:04 am by Rocky
» The Minister of Finance of the Kurdistan Region expects the date of Baghdad’s sending of salaries fo
Yesterday at 7:03 am by Rocky
» What is the importance of conducting a pilot population census in Iraq?
Yesterday at 7:01 am by Rocky
» The start of the meetings of the sixth session of the joint Iraqi-Iranian committee in Tehran
Yesterday at 6:58 am by Rocky
» The budget schedules did not reach the Council of Ministers
Yesterday at 6:54 am by Rocky
» The Minister of Planning directs the installation and operation of gold screening units at Iraqi air
Yesterday at 6:52 am by Rocky
» Government advisor: Collections will shift almost completely to electronic payment in the middle of
Yesterday at 6:51 am by Rocky
» A politician accuses the American embassy of attracting parties inside Iraq to confuse the situation
Yesterday at 5:07 am by Rocky
» Deputy: The anti-prostitution law blocks the way for destructive ideas
Yesterday at 5:06 am by Rocky
» State of Law: A political agreement to resolve the position of Speaker of Parliament...these are its
Yesterday at 5:05 am by Rocky
» Kurdistan Parliament elections.. The insistence of the two parties intensifies and an international
Yesterday at 5:04 am by Rocky
» Jordan considers Iraq one of its "most important" main partners in the investment field
Yesterday at 5:02 am by Rocky
» Advisor to the Prime Minister: Iraq is a fertile environment for projects, and there is an expansion
Yesterday at 5:01 am by Rocky
» Parliament is close to approving the renewable energy project law
Yesterday at 5:00 am by Rocky
» The delay surrounds five Iraqi ministries.. What is the relationship with the budget?
Yesterday at 4:58 am by Rocky
» Basra Council threatens: We will not accept unreliable companies to work in Qurna service projects
Yesterday at 4:57 am by Rocky
» Iraq intends to convert collections to electronic payment in mid-2024
Yesterday at 4:54 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Committee: 5 ministries whose completion rates are “low”
Yesterday at 4:53 am by Rocky
» Completion of the five-year national development plan 2024-2028
Yesterday at 4:51 am by Rocky
» Investment opportunities in the ancient city of Ur
Yesterday at 4:50 am by Rocky
» Today.. Baghdad hosts leading scientists and researchers in the field of artificial intelligence
Yesterday at 4:49 am by Rocky
» Conditions and horrors
Yesterday at 4:47 am by Rocky
» Democratic conditions threaten Kurdistan elections and embarrass the Commission
Yesterday at 4:46 am by Rocky
» “Consensus” disrupts laws in parliamentary culture
Yesterday at 4:44 am by Rocky
» Iraq celebrates “World Press Freedom Day”
Yesterday at 4:43 am by Rocky
» Including Iraq... five countries possess more than 1,000 tons of gold
Yesterday at 4:41 am by Rocky
» Davos is between two stations, is Iraq the third?
Yesterday at 4:40 am by Rocky
» Specialists: The food basket was a buffer to mitigate the blow of high prices
Yesterday at 4:39 am by Rocky
» Al-Rafidain Bank announces the implementation of the comprehensive banking system in its Hindi branc
Yesterday at 4:34 am by Rocky
» Learn about the proposed law replacing punishment with financial sums
Yesterday at 4:33 am by Rocky
» With the beginning of summer... poor services and a spiral of crises afflict the citizens of Kurdist
Yesterday at 4:30 am by Rocky
» A new scandal involving one of the “ten promising companies in Basra”... the Iraqi Plain strikes con
Yesterday at 4:29 am by Rocky
» With a package of files... Barzani to Tehran and Talabani to Washington next week
Yesterday at 4:28 am by Rocky
» An expert reveals the size of the "gas gap" in Iraq: Achieving sufficiency within 3 years is very di
Yesterday at 4:25 am by Rocky
» To reach an agreement on 10 memorandums...the start of the meetings of the sixth session of the Iraq
Yesterday at 4:24 am by Rocky
» The dollar is declining slightly against the Iraqi dinar in local markets
Yesterday at 4:22 am by Rocky
» Deputy: 4 factors hinder Iraqi development.. one of them is a 90% reduction - urgent
Yesterday at 4:21 am by Rocky
» Revealing the reason for its delay.. Elekti sets the date for sending the salaries of Kurdistan Regi
Yesterday at 4:19 am by Rocky
» The Iraqi development road project, ambitions and expected challenges
Yesterday at 4:18 am by Rocky
» Laws were enacted but did not find their way into implementation
Yesterday at 4:16 am by Rocky
» Iraq: Political withdrawals hamper the work of Parliament
Yesterday at 4:14 am by Rocky
» The continued fluctuation of the dollar exchange rates worries traders and citizens
Yesterday at 4:13 am by Rocky
» Vice: Nour Zuhair and his companions manage Iraqi ports
Yesterday at 4:10 am by Rocky
» The President of the Kurdistan Region visits Tehran today and meets with senior Iranian officials
Yesterday at 4:08 am by Rocky
» Al-Maliki confirms Iraq's openness to all countries of the world
Yesterday at 4:07 am by Rocky
» The World Bank is preparing to issue a human capital report in Iraq
Yesterday at 4:06 am by Rocky