Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    U.S. military presence in Iraq and Iran's influence his budget

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 280906
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    U.S. military presence in Iraq and Iran's influence his budget Empty U.S. military presence in Iraq and Iran's influence his budget

    Post by Rocky Fri 18 Jul 2014, 2:31 pm

    U.S. military presence in Iraq and Iran's influence his budget



    07/18/20140 
    Washington has dealt with the election of a new president of the Iraqi Council of Representatives, as «an encouraging first step» in the political process. Hopes to achieve the next step: choosing the head of government is the current Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. At least that's what you say. But she knows that the latter intimidating Tehran, which it will not give up easily. Especially since the nuclear negotiations are moving toward an extension.
    And therefore it is expected that Tehran maintains all its leaves, including paper Maalikis Iraq. So, it remains unlikely to facilitate the installation of a new Iraqi coalition government be able to pull the rug out from under the «Daash» to stop the march and to reverse.
    In light of these facts is going debate in Washington about the merits of the policy of sending military advisers and experts Americans to Iraq. The number is increasing.

    Wondering

    The rationale provided by the administration blurry. A step before the plan was compelling symbolism. I sent three successive waves, up to 800 expert, before that define them errands. After their arrival in Iraq, commissioned by the Ministry of Defence «Pentagon» committee to study the Iraqi military reality on the ground, to get to know the capabilities and needs. They said the collapse of Mosul battle raises eyebrows.

    But what is surprising is that it actually How can a regular military force Ashraf «Pentagon» on trained and armed for years and at a cost of 25 billion dollars, and that Tnfrt rush fugitive in front of the power of the militias, no matter how organized and trained? Did not get such a thing even in Afghanistan breached its military forces different loyalties.

    Committee Talaat interpretation, the reported leaked details about its secret, that Iraqi forces infiltrated by «Sunni militants as elements supported by Iran». As if Washington were ignorant of this. Especially Iranian penetration.

    Accordingly, U.S. officials believe that «unless provided for America's efforts to build Iraqi forces, it can not hope to reduce reliance on the Iraqi government militias backed by Iran». But America already has the process of building this and the result was tragic and therefore what ensures that the result will be different this time? And how they are to avoid such a breach as long as loyalties remained the same, as well as the political divide?

    Security risk

    Provide expertise and advice to Iraqi forces, the U.S., the paper resorted to by the Obama administration because they do not have an alternative. Is not in the process of military Aloizna Back to Iraq is not able to dismiss the rise of «Daash» who says their midst, and most recently the Minister of Justice in a speech a few days ago, that this development poses a security threat to the United States.

    The option of special advisers and experts, to fill the void. It links the activation of their mission to dissolve the political node. And flirting with Tehran from the angle welcome any role they can play to unlock this node. Washington does not hide its recognition of the interests of Iran in Iraq.

    But the political crisis is now beyond treatment, according to most American readings. Gap Sunni - Shiite enormous.

    Especially with the presence of al-Maliki. The situation of the Kurdish walking rapidly progressing toward independence. Or at least some foundation for not undo it. Came the dismissal of Minister Zebari to cut the fine line between Maliki and the rest are Kurds. The scene is clearly not ignorant of Washington.

    And talk about the need to address the «Daash» still ink on paper, even in Syria. Allocation of $ 500 million dollars to support the Syrian opposition in order to enable them to face «Daash», was from the U.S. Congress for further study, and is not expected to be completed before the project operational in late summer or early autumn.

    Socket

    Since the time of the outlet and this administration it's always late in dealing with external affairs. Especially in the Middle East. Iraq is not an anomaly. Perhaps even a deliberate case.

    There is a famous phrase once uttered by Vice President Biden, that «is not required to push the Iraqis toward the partition, but leave them to demand they themselves do». The fear that this is what is happening on the grou 

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sun 17 Nov 2024, 8:10 am