Soon, the freeze on the "millionaires" and the "framework" fear the formation of a government-in-exi

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]Soon, the freeze on the "millionaires" and the "framework" fear the formation of a government-in-exile[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad / Tamim Al-Hassan[/size]
[size=45]With the passage of more than 48 hours since the end of what has become known as the deadline for the leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, to dissolve parliament, the hypotheses returned to talk about an upcoming "decisive" escalation.[/size]
[size=45]It is expected that the Federal Court will soon issue its opinion on the lawsuits filed by the Sadrist movement's supporters last week, against the three presidencies for exceeding the constitutional deadlines in forming a government.[/size]
[size=45]The leader of the movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, had given the judicial authorities 10 days (which ended last Thursday) to dissolve parliament and call on the President of the Republic to set new early elections.[/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, the options of Sadr's opponents go in several directions, especially with the refusal of the leader of the Sadrist movement to attend a political summit at the government palace last week, and his criticism of the final statement.[/size]
[size=45]With Al-Sadr continuing to reject all calls for negotiation and the end of the deadline for dissolving Parliament, information obtained by Al-Mada indicates that the next options will be in re-escalation.[/size]
[size=45]The leader of the movement said in a speech calling for the dissolution of parliament more than a week ago, that the revolutionaries "will have another position, if the people fail again," referring to whether the legal cases were dismissed.[/size]
[size=45]And at the end of last week, the Federal Court postponed a lawsuit similar to what al-Sadr's supporters are requesting, which was filed by a deputy against the three presidencies because of exceeding the constitutional deadlines.[/size]
[size=45]The leader of the current had reduced his positions in the middle of last week after announcing the postponement of demonstrations he described as "the last chance" that were supposed to take place yesterday, Saturday, in Baghdad.[/size]
[size=45]Observers explained the "temporary calm" that the leader of the Sadrist movement might have been waiting for a new position from the judiciary and political forces in the wake of the "government palace" meeting.[/size]
[size=45]But the final statement of the last meeting, which was considered "disappointing", according to information from sources close to the Sadrists: "returned the possibility of calling for a million instead of those that were postponed."[/size]
[size=45]The leader of the Sadrist movement had postponed Saturday's demonstrations (yesterday) until further notice, due to fears of fueling a "civil war".[/size]
[size=45]And the reason for the Sadrists' criticism of the "government palace" meeting, according to information from the circles of the current that "Al-Sadr no longer trusts any positions or statements or even papers signed by the parties to the framework."[/size]
[size=45]Those circles indicated that "the repeated evasion of previous commitments and Iran's refusal so far to guarantee the coordination framework team renders these meetings useless."[/size]
[size=45]And the representative of "Al-Sadr", with his Friday prayer sermon in the Green Zone, said that the goal of those gathered at the national dialogue table sponsored by Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi, "is personal interests and staying in power."[/size]
[size=45]And Friday preacher Muhannad al-Moussawi, in the prayer held by the Sadrists in front of the parliament gate in the Green Zone, added that the attacks against the leader of the movement aimed to achieve "partisan interests and stay in power."[/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, the "minister of the leader", Salih Muhammad al-Iraqi, commented on the atmosphere of the session, saying that: "It only resulted in some points that do not make people fat or suffice from hunger. They do not concern the people ... nor do they concern their service, their dignity, nor their aspirations."[/size]
[size=45]He added, "Yes, most of the attendees are only interested in remaining in the chair.. Therefore, they tried to minimize the revolution and stay away from its demands. Yes, the revolution does not want people like you to do anything but to step down from a chair on which you unjustly imposed your presence."[/size]
[size=45]The meeting, which was attended by all the political forces boycotting the Sadrist movement, came out with five recommendations, most notably the re-election according to constitutional contexts, and Sadr's call for dialogue.[/size]
[size=45]Shortly before the start of the meeting, al-Sadr's office said in a statement that "the Sadrist movement, with all its subsidiaries and political figures, did not participate in the political dialogue that the Prime Minister called for today (yesterday), neither directly nor indirectly."[/size]
[size=45]Shortly after Al-Sadr announced the postponement of Saturday's demonstrations, Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi called the political forces to a meeting last Wednesday at the Government Palace.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sadr had earlier rejected what he described as "weak dialogues" in response to calls to sit at the negotiating table.[/size]
[size=45]The leader of the movement said in a televised speech at the beginning of August, while calling for the rerun of the elections and the amendment of the constitution, that: "There is no benefit to be gained from dialogue with them," referring to the coordinating framework.[/size]
[size=45]What does al-Hakim want from Saudi Arabia?[/size]
[size=45]After the meeting ended in the government palace, Ammar al-Hakim, the leader of the Wisdom Movement, left for Saudi Arabia after he had rejected “six previous invitations,” according to leaks published by Iranian newspapers in 2019.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Hakim, whom he considered the "minister of the leader" as one of the sides of the "ominous trio" within the coordinating framework, met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Hakim had said in the summer of 2017, that he would not visit Saudi Arabia until “after its forces leave Bahrain and stop killing the oppressed Yemeni people.”[/size]
[size=45]According to informed political sources, "Al-Hakim's visit is related to the latter's attempt at a request from Riyadh to intervene to put pressure on the Sunni forces and Al-Sadr to hold a parliamentary session."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sadr visited Saudi Arabia for the first time in 2017, when he also met Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.[/size]
[size=45]According to well-informed political sources, "the coordinating framework had received a refusal to hold a parliament session in Sulaymaniyah and Erbil, after the matter was presented to the Kurdish forces."[/size]
[size=45]Hadi al-Amiri visited Kurdistan last week and met with Kurdish leaders, but he returned "without results" from that tour.[/size]
[size=45]The sources indicated that "some of the parties to the framework are not interested in the venue of the session, but the most important thing is to obtain political support to hold it."[/size]
[size=45]So far, according to information received by (Al-Mada), "half of those whom Hadi al-Amiri met refused to hold a session of Parliament in the midst of this tense atmosphere."[/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, informed sources say that “other parties in the framework see the danger in holding a session of Parliament and forming a new government away from the original location of the House of Representatives, for fear that the resulting government will turn into a government in exile and without popular legitimacy.”[/size]
[size=45]The sources had confirmed that Al-Amiri was ready if the leader of the Sadrist movement agreed to receive him, he might propose changing the name of Prime Minister Muhammad Al-Sudani's candidate with another that "does not provoke Al-Sadr."[/size]
[size=45]A few days ago, "framework" circles put forward the name of Basra Governor Asaad Al-Eidani, amid the resurgence of differences within the coordination framework due to the leader of Al-Fateh's recent tour.[/size]
[size=45]So far, there has been no official comment from the "Coordination Council" on the possibility of changing Al-Sudani, and the latter did not issue any statement about Al-Amiri's last tour and its results.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]