Sadrist leader: Parliament can be judicially dissolved without amending the election law

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]Sadrist leader: Parliament can be judicially dissolved without amending the election law[/size]

[size=45]A prominent leader in the Sadrist movement revealed the content of the lawsuit to dissolve parliament, stressing the possibility of issuing a judicial decision to dissolve without the need to hold a session and make an amendment to the electoral law.[/size]
[size=45]The former deputy from the Sairoon Alliance, Sabah Al-Saadi, said, in a television interview that Al-Mada followed, that “if the Sadrist movement had sat at a dialogue table with the blocs and agreed to dissolve parliament, public opinion would have said that this is not a correction of the political process, but rather a distribution of shares and spoils.” .[/size]
[size=45]Al-Saadi added that «the Federal Supreme Court, when it issues a decision to invalidate a certain legislation, requests an amendment in it, the implementation of which is carried out by the House of Representatives».[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out that «the case brought by the Sadrist movement before the Federal Supreme Court includes two parts, the first criminalizing Parliament by perjury and breach of constitutional deadlines in accordance with Article 50 of the Constitution, and the second dissolving Parliament».[/size]
[size=45]Al-Saadi stressed, that the court, in its decision No. (23/25) of 2022, gave the House of Representatives a short period to elect the President of the Republic, and he also violated it, noting that “the short period can be estimated from two weeks to a month, but what is happening is a suspension of six months.” ».[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out that "the judicial decision that we are waiting for is to condemn Parliament of perjury and issue a decision to the concerned authorities to dissolve it, and then the Prime Minister sends a letter to the President of the Republic in accordance with the provisions of Article 64 of the Constitution to dissolve Parliament without the need for its approval."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Saadi stated, “This article sets two ways to dissolve the council, either by requesting a third of the members of the council for the solution and the absolute majority of the members agreeing to it, and the second way is to be satisfied with the request of the Prime Minister and the approval of the President of the Republic.”[/size]
[size=45]He noted that "talking about the necessity of submitting the request of the Prime Minister and the President of the Republic to the House of Representatives contradicts the correct reading of the constitutional text."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Saadi continued, "The problem of the coordination framework of the early elections lies in two things, the first is the electronic counting and sorting, and the second is the multiple districts."[/size]
[size=45]He believed, "Resorting to multiple constituencies has proven a resounding success," inferring that "this method contributed to the delivery of 79 independent deputies from all provinces and components and gave a change from within the political process, and they (the coordination framework) want to destroy this freedom."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Saadi added, "The court, with regard to electronic counting and sorting, decided to refer to manual counting and sorting, and this does not need a legislative amendment."[/size]
[size=45]He continues, "The Independent High Electoral Commission are judges, and the coordinating framework constantly calls for not criticizing the judiciary, and therefore the demand to change the members of the commission is a criticism of the judiciary as well."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Saadi pointed out that "these data lead us to a conclusion that the House of Representatives can be dissolved by a judicial decision without the need to hold a session or make amendments to the electoral law."[/size]
[size=45]He went on to state that "the government, whether current or previous, does not have the right to supervise the elections, and the issue of providing protection and other logistical measures is part of its daily tasks for running public utilities in the state."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Saadi went on to say that «the Sadrist movement is waiting for the thirtieth of this month, which is the date to consider the case for dissolving Parliament, in the hope that the Federal Supreme Court will issue its decision and be on the side of the street».[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]