Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    War: There's a difference between a vote on impeachment and the vote on the decision to cancel the d

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 269032
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    War: There's a difference between a vote on impeachment and the vote on the decision to cancel the d Empty War: There's a difference between a vote on impeachment and the vote on the decision to cancel the d

    Post by Rocky Wed 20 Apr 2016, 8:48 am

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]War: There's a difference between a vote on impeachment and the vote on the decision to cancel the dismissal
    By: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] on: Wednesday 4/20/2016 7:27[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    [rtl]
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    Follow - up / Iraq today , the 
    legal expert Tareq Harb pointed out that thecrisis is still ongoing, although the initiative of the President of the Republic Fuad Masum, and based on the powers contained in Article 58 of the Constitution when he said the war that " the right not to rely on this article because these Article shall apply during theparliamentary recess and not during working hours of the parliament is 
    not permissible to rely on the provisions ofthis article because the parliament now in itssecond Council is in session and in thesecond legislative term ends this Council is insession and the end of the legislative term this day 04/30/2016, where theparliamentary recess begins on 5 / 1/2016, it means that there are (11) days on the season finishes circulation, including the parliament in session and theseparation can the President of the Republic demand from parliament study this crisis , there is no need to use the authority established under Article 58 and that do not may be exercised during the session and chapter . " 
    He said the war" and if the President of the Republic took practice during theparliamentary recess on 05.01.2016 and will last until 07.31.2016, and this isevidenced by the authority of the President of the Republic received the Article 58 and Article her previous article (57) identified a session legislative chapter, ie that the authority be after the end of what is stated in Article 57, that is the end of the session and the separation so the article (58) authorized some quarters to call parliament to convene during the parliamentary recess and therefore, based on the statement of the presidency to the Article 58 of the Constitution away for the correct application of the provisions of theConstitution , as President of the Republic does not need during theparliament time to the validity of that, but his demand in all times - time study any subject or issue a decision on it , and Article 58 speaks of extending thelegislative term during the parliamentary recess and invite parliament to cut their vacation and to hold a hearing them to study the subject or take aparticular decision and that the meeting , which get constantly not called aspecial session because the special meeting is to invite members ofparliament to hold a session during their holiday. " 
    concluded his talk of war by saying" important topic remains is whether the parliament will vote on the dismissal of Salim al? Or to vote on the decision to cancel the former Special Balaqalh? .. So that the parliamentary vote on the dismissal means that Dr. Salim al - Jubouri , was still president of theparliament , given that the previous decision was unconstitutional and illegal but if the parliamentary vote on the abolition of the dismissal decision of theformer, it means that the constitutional and legal , especially as the constitution , parliament is granted the authority to issue dismissal new decision to cancel its previous decision and see that the second hypothesis is the subject of a study to cancel the previous decision more acceptable between the parties of the proposal for a decision Balaqalh     

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.][/rtl]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sat 27 Apr 2024, 9:48 am